Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

68 $9.99
49 2012
56 Adam
37 Amelia
50 Armored
53 Astro Boy
35 Babysitters, The
66 Bandslam
86 Beaches of Agnes, The
19 Bitch Slap
65 Black Dynamite
71 Bliss
24 Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
47 Box, The
51 Breakfast with Scot
44 Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
76 Broken Embraces
71 Bronson
61 Capitalism: A Love Story
57 Chelsea on the Rocks
43 Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
65 Coco Before Chanel
69 Cold Souls
23 Couples Retreat
75 Crude
81 Damned United, The
54 Dare
61 Dead Snow
27 Did You Hear About the Morgans?
68 End of the Line, The
55 Endgame
47 Everybody's Fine
64 Examined Life
xx Falling for Grace
31 Fix
74 Flame & Citron
xx From Mexico with Love
28 Gentlemen Broncos
64 Gigante
58 Gogol Bordello Non-Stop
72 Good Hair
73 House of the Devil, The
82 Hunger
17 I Hate Valentine's Day
66 Informant!, The
34 Law Abiding Citizen
33 Love Happens
59 More Than a Game
34 Motherhood
49 New York, I Love You
34 Ninja Assassin
19 Old Dogs
47 Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
68 Paris
44 Peter and Vandy
39 Planet 51
86 Ponyo
79 Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73 Princess & the Frog, The
49 Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
84 Revanche
69 September Issue, The
79 Serious Man, A
36 Serious Moonlight
70 Shall We Kiss?
24 Sorority Row
40 Spiral
41 Splinterheads
33 Stepfather, The
50 Stoning of Soraya M., The
47 Time Traveler's Wife
44 Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83 Up in the Air
65 Vicious Kind, The
69 We Live in Public
65 Wedding Song, The
71 Where the Wild Things Are
43 Women in Trouble
48 Wonderful World
73 Zombieland

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

EMAILPRINTWarner Bros.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets reviews
63
4.7 User Score:

Generally favorable reviews

Based on 35 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 146 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Fantasy

Written by: Steven Kloves
J.K. Rowling (novel)

Directed by: Chris Columbus

Release Date:
Theatrical: November 15, 2002
DVD: April 11, 2003

Running Time: 161 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG for scary moments, some creature violence and mild language

Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Richard Harris, Maggie Smith, Kenneth Branagh, Robbie Coltrane, and Alan Rickman

This second installment in the Harry Potter series finds young wizard Harry Potter (Radcliffe) and his friends Ron (Grint) and Hermione (Watson) facing new challenges during their second year at Hogwarts as they try to discover a dark force that is terrorizing the school.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Brimming with invention and new ideas, and its Hogwarts School seems to expand and deepen before our very eyes into a world large enough to conceal unguessable secrets -- What a glorious movie.

Read Full Review >
90

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

It's definitely an enchanting spectacular for Potter fans anxious to ride the Hogwarts Express toward a new year of magic and mischief.

Read Full Review >
83

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

Best of all, the second Potter movie reunites its adult cast: Harris, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, John Cleese, Alan Rickman, Julie Walters and others -- a veritable Who's Who of British actors that single-handedly elevates the proceedings out of the kid's movie genre into something special.

Read Full Review >
83

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

And among the things this ''HP'' does very well indeed is deepen the darker, more frightening atmosphere for audiences of all ages already familiar with the intricacies of the ''Potter'' landscape. (This is as it should be: Harry's story is supposed to get darker.)

Read Full Review >
80

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Has its flaws, but it's better, as well as darker, than the first. It's also longer, by nine minutes, but hold that protest to the Kidney Foundation; the time flies, albeit in fits and starts, like players on a Quidditch field.

80

Variety Todd McCarthy

Darker and more dramatic, this account of Harry's troubled second year at Hogwarts may be a bit overlong and unmodulated in pacing, but it possesses a confidence and intermittent flair that begin to give it a life of its own apart of the literary franchise, something the initial picture never achieved.

Read Full Review >
80

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

Columbus beautifully realizes many of Rowling's fantastic conceits -- but for the last hour I was searching for a spell to make the credits appear.

Read Full Review >
75

Boston Globe Ty Burr

Moves the franchise even closer to Indiana Jones territory, with bloodcurdling action scenes and a passel of climactic computer-generated slime beasties unparalleled in their potential ability to -- I'm quoting from both book and film here -- '' rip, tear, rend, kill. ''

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

The Chamber of Secrets -- darker, scarier and somewhat better than "Sorcerer's Stone."

Read Full Review >
75

ReelViews James Berardinelli

A fun, fantastic adventure, but, watching it, I had the sense that it could have been even better than it is. I was diverted and entertained, but never truly absorbed.

Read Full Review >
75

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

Plusses and minuses work out about evenly, if you compare the sequel to "Sorcerer's Stone." The three young leads act with more assurance; Radcliffe emerges as a leader, rather than one leg of a triangle. (Too bad he no longer expects to make all seven of the proposed pictures.)

Read Full Review >
75

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

There's a missing element whose absence, forgive me, I can't help but lament. This is a movie about magic that ultimately lacks the magic of movies."

Read Full Review >
70

Village Voice Ed Park

Chamber's charm lies in the sheer visualization of Rowling's weirder inventions: pots of shrivel-phizzed screaming treelets, Harry's arm gone boneless from a bungled spell, a scolding letter from home that leaps to life as a yapping paper mouth.

Read Full Review >
70

TV Guide Frank Lovece

While this is just as long as the first film, more convincing special effects help make time fly.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Nothing from the book is left to wither away. That should please the vast reading audience that'll watch the movie.

Read Full Review >
70

LA Weekly Ella Taylor

Columbus' sequel is faster, livelier and a good deal funnier than his original, due to the presence of some new characters.

Read Full Review >
67

Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones

Columbus never quite captures the depth, the rich complexities of Rowling's novels. She's written four Harry Potter books for kids that adults swoon for, too. Columbus has made two Harry Potter movies for kids … and we'll leave it at that. That isn't bad. But I suspect there's something better just around the bend.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Post Lou Lumenick

Screenwriter Steve Kloves still seems overly dedicated to cramming in every detail of J.K. Rowling's novel - while tacking on a schmaltzy Hollywood ending.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

Chamber is chockablock with action (including a far more exciting game of Quidditch) and crafty special effects.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Tribune Mark Caro

It remains an expertly assembled companion piece to its source material, with charms you can't overlook. But the great Harry Potter should be casting a more powerful spell.

Read Full Review >
63

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

Drags on and on and could frighten little kids. But Kenneth Branaugh is one bright light in Chamber of Secrets.

Read Full Review >
63

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Scenes that should have been cut are included, so as not to disappoint anyone. What could have been a small, sweet and genuinely scary film is instead a full hour too long and many millions too fat.

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

Doesn't feel quite so lengthy as its predecessor. And while it still falls short of becoming the classic fans so badly want it to be, the film is livelier and better overall than "The Sorcerer's Stone."

Read Full Review >
60

The New York Times Dana Stevens

By the end, instead of feeling stirred to a high pitch of anxiety and excitement, you may feel battered and worn down. But not, in the end, too terribly disappointed.

Read Full Review >
60

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

A well-chosen cast helps make the wild notions convincing, and director Chris Columbus presents it all in an attractive, thoroughly watchable package. But try imagining a universe in which the Harry Potter series existed only in film form.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

This time around, Harry Potter has more to worry about than the Dark Arts -- though parts of The Chamber of Secrets are spellbinding, he seems to be suffering from a bit of sequelitis.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

The film's scary moments are too monstrous and its happy times have too much idiotic beaming, making the film feel like the illegitimate offspring of "Alien" and "The Absent-Minded Professor."

Read Full Review >
60

Film Threat Rick Kisonak

May just be the most quintessential Steven Spielberg movie Steven Spielberg never made.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

Not much in the way of captivating magic, but all the expected notes are duly played. Hope springs eternal for the next film in the series, though: Columbus is handing the reins over to Alfonso Cuaron, an actual movie director.

50

Newsweek David Ansen

Before it degenerates into Indiana Potter and the Chamber of Doom, the movie holds promise -- it hints at why the Harry Potter movies aren’t half as wonderful as they ought to be, why they feel created from the outside in. Magic isn’t made by committee.

50

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

After its deceptively fleet opening 20 minutes or so, Chamber of Secrets settles into a plodding amble, a rickety framework in which many allegedly exciting things happen -- and are forgotten only minutes later.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

It's fun to see the regular gang on hand for new adventures, joined by fresh characters who add touches of novelty and spice. But the secrets in this chamber aren't all that amazing once you get a glimpse of them.

Read Full Review >
40

Slate David Edelstein

I can't think of a movie this long that has left me so starved for a movie.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat Eric Campos

With “Chamber of Secrets,” all we get is a f____ "Scooby Doo" episode. Boo on everyone involved...BOOOOOOOO!

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

Big, dull and empty -- nobody associated with this production appears to have thought hard about storytelling.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 4.7 (out of 10) based on 146 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

c k gave it a9:
Not a kids movie.

Matt D gave it an8:
Better than the novel.

Adnan A gave it a10:
Again this movie has also been criticized for following the book too much. Personally, I think staying true to the book is the strongest point of the movie. Staying with the book imparts the same magic of the book which has created the Harry Potter phenomena. The story... well I don't have to say anything about that because the success of this franchise has already proved it. Acting... couldn't be better. The trio, Daniel, Rupert and Emma were born for these roles. All the adults are perfect for their roles and create the same attitude and personality as their characters have in the books. Direction... Warner bros did a very smart thing by giving it to Chris. A person like him knows how to make a family movie which not only entertains but remains in your memory forever. Even though many have criticized Chris for making such a kiddish movie but I think that as this is the first year you have to stay with the kiddish atmosphere as the children are only 12. Visuals... for a 2002 movie it's visuals are excellent. Even today they look fantastic! Overall I'd rate this movie an A because the book created the world and the characters but the movie has created the true images of the Harry Potter world.

Dexter J. gave it an8:
A great movie full of excitement and fun.

Jon L gave it a7:
Columbus directed this? Really? A very good glimpse at the future of the series with the best visuals of it so far...would be great if it wasn't a half-hour too long. Some bits are put in just to please hardcore fans and they are really annoying and slow the pace down...but overall, solid, and in all aspects except editing, far superior to the first.

Tom K. gave it a7:
The second film is not much better than the first film, it's still childish and not matching the book's environment, but it's still enjoyable as a film.

Ruan H gave it a7:
A generally good film throughout, but unfortunately fell a little short of my expectations. Nonetheless, a good start to a promising series.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | March Madness | TV | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use