DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Recent DVD/Video Releases
65
Adoration
42
Aliens in the Attic
56
American Violet
44
Answer Man, The
82
Anvil! The Story of Anvil![]()
54
Bruno
55
Casi Divas
63
Cheri
83
Drag Me to Hell![]()
24
Eating Out 3: All You Can Eat
76
Every Little Step
70
Fados
49
Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80
Food, Inc.
74
Humpday
32
I Love You, Beth Cooper
50
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
81
Il Divo![]()
54
Is Anybody There?
32
Land of the Lost
74
Lemon Tree
40
Limits of Control, The
43
Love 'N Dancing
63
Medicine for Melancholy
34
My Life in Ruins
51
My Sister's Keeper
48
Not Forgotten
76
Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation!
50
Nothing Like the Holidays
26
Objective, The
42
Orphan
78
Pray the Devil Back to Hell
48
Proposal, The
39
Spread
83
Star Trek![]()
55
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The
72
Thirst
35
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
28
Ugly Truth, The
66
Unmistaken Child
88
Up![]()
45
Whatever Works
34
Year One
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Universal acclaim
Based on 40 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 358 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Adventure | Family/Kids | Fantasy
Written by:
Steven Kloves
J.K. Rowling (novel)
Directed by: Alfonso Cuarón
Release Date:
Theatrical: June 4, 2004
DVD: November 23, 2004
Running Time: 136 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: PG for frightening moments, creature violence and mild language
Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Gary Oldman, David Thewlis, Robbie Coltrane, Emma Thompson, and Julie Christie
In this third installment of the series, the infamous Sirius Black has escaped from the dreaded fortress of Azkaban and is headed straight to Harry Potter.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: A Little Princess Children of Men Great Expectations Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Solo Con Tu Pareja Y Tu Mamá También
GAMES: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (PS2)
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site Official Book Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
A different kind of Harry Potter movie, a better kind... It's where this fantasy series has wanted to go all along.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The Prisoner of Azkaban is to Harry Potter what that other No. 3, "Goldfinger," was to James Bond: the movie that takes the invention and gamesmanship of the series to a whole new giddy peak.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine Peter Rainer
The most powerfully entrancing children's film in years. Of course, a true kid's classic is just as magical for adults.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Potter 3 is, in its heart of hearts, a teenage angst movie...Cuaron has done a masterful job of bringing off this shift in the Potter paradigm without disrupting any disruption in the established style of the series and without any pandering concessions to the teen-movie genre.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Like the first two movies, this is loaded with computer-generated imagery, but for the first time there's a sense of dramatic proportion balancing the spectacle and the story line.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The right word for Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is wondersful -- as in full of wonders, great and small.
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
A deeper, darker, visually arresting and more emotionally satisfying adaptation of the J.K. Rowling literary phenomenon, achieving the neat trick of remaining faithful to the spirit of the book while at the same time being true to its cinematic self.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The best of the Harry Potter films so far, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is also hands down the scariest, and the deepest.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Mark Caro
With Cuaron leading the way, Harry has burst from the printed page to soar on-screen.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Not only is this dazzler by far the best and most thrilling of the three Harry Potter movies to date, it's a film that can stand on its own even if you never heard of author J.K. Rowling and her young wizard hero.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jami Bernard
An entrancing experience for Potter fans. It's a carefully crafted, dreamy immersion in a world that feels snugly familiar even when evil intrudes.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
In an era when most scripts are written by committees of monkeys, hearing one man's intelligent voice is an almost forgotten pleasure.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Wesley Morris
[Cuaron]'s a visionary and crafty storyteller who rewards your patience, not with twists in the plot, though the movie has its share, but with pure feeling. Deploying wit, grace, and artistry, he's whisked a kid flick into adolescence.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Is Prisoner of Azkaban as good as the first two films? Not quite. It doesn't have that sense of joyously leaping through a clockwork plot, and it needs to explain more than it should. But the world of Harry Potter remains delightful, amusing and sophisticated.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
Who would think Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban could be an art film? Thanks to director Alfonso Cuaron, a dazzling storyteller with a keen eye for whimsical detail, the third film in the Potter franchise is a visual delight.
Read Full Review >New York Post Lou Lumenick
This movie belongs to its young stars, who have grown immensely as actors since they were first ideally cast by Chris Columbus, the hack who directed the first two movies.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Karen Karbo
Much has been made about the fact that the world's most popular fictional children are growing up and straight into that horror-filled no man's land of the human life span, puberty.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Shot in spooky gradations of silver and shadow, The Prisoner of Azkaban is the first movie in the series with fear and wonder in its bones, and genuine fun, too.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
In the Harry Potter film series thus far, The Sorcerer's Stone remains the strongest, perhaps because the first look at any rich new world is almost always going to be more groundbreaking than its sequels. But Prisoner of Azkaban is a worthy and stylistically different follow-up, where Chamber of Secrets often felt like an unimaginative retread.
Read Full Review >Slate David Edelstein
In Cuarón's hands, the world of Harry Potter doesn't feel like a synthetic movie theme park anymore. It's almost real, Hogwarts and all.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Azkaban breaks free of all these shackles in its final hour. Working with the persuasive Thewlis and Oldman, able to focus his gifts on what's distinctive, dramatic and surprising about the story, Cuarón creates on screen the heartfelt magic that has enthralled so many on the page.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Dana Stevens
This film may disappoint some dogmatic Old Hogwartsians: a few plot points have been sacrificed, and Mr. Cuarón does not seem to care much for Quidditch. But it more than compensates for these lapses with its emotional force and visual panache.
Read Full Review >Time Richard Corliss
Enjoy the savory witches' brew that Cuaron has cooked up in his Harry pot. For on its own terms, this one is truly wizard.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marrit Ingman
It helps that J.K. Rowlings third book in the series is full of spooky stuff that translates beautifully to screen.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
From its restlessly moving camera work to its heartfelt acting by a splendid cast, "Azkaban" is a horror movie for mature kids.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
Although Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban stands well enough on its own, it has a "middle chapter" feeling. In other words, there's no real beginning or ending. Little is resolved and the film's climax is low-key.
Read Full Review >Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
In the end, Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban offers what neither of its predecessors, for all their wand-waving and witch-brooms, had: real magic.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Here, finally, is a Harry Potter picture that lives up to its potential -- that, plainly, LIVES.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Nicole Arthur
It's not perfect, or even close, but it delivers on the promise of J.K. Rowling's novels to a far greater extent.
Read Full Review >Variety Brian Lowry
Visually dazzling and considerably darker than the prior incarnations, the story suffers from a slightly disjointed feel that will prove less accessible to those not intimately familiar with every corner of author J.K. Rowling's world.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Michael Atkinson
A mild upkick in pacing and texture can be credited to director Alfonso Cuarón (more Little Princess than Y Tu Mamá), who avoids Chris Columbus's mastodon-like setups and knows a bit more about whipping up atmospherics.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
With shades of Carrie, Harry's magical powers and adolescent angst make a combustible fusion, taking on frightening, vengeful implications that Cuarón honors by refusing to airbrush the shadowy regions of fantasy.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
From my doddering perspective - rheumy with a view - Volume 3 puts plenty of cinema into the picture but leeches all the charm out of the tale.
Read Full Review >Empire Colin Kennedy
Azkaban contains both the longest denouement and the most rousing finish of any of the books, and Cuarón wisely whips through the 'ah-hahs' so that the clever climax, complete with the series' best SFX, can enjoy its moment in the moonlight.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Rick Kisonak
If my moviegoing experience was magical in any way, it was only in that I once or twice nodded off for a spell.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Put delicately, this is one long sit, made all the more so by a turgid story, a dour visual palette and uninspiring action.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 6.6 (out of 10) based on 358 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Help U gave it a9:
Man, this is like the last good movie and last good book in the Harry Potter series rolled into one. Mildly confusing if you didn't read the books though. It actually alludes to how lacking of logical emotion the series will become.
Miguel T. gave it a2:
By far the worst Harry Potter movie. The adaptation is horrible, and the story-telling is lousy. The director gives a lot of time to stupid details [the bus, the spider-book, the boggart class...] instead of telling important passages in the story. And, the worst of all: the ending. The ending SUCKS. Looks like they ran out of money. Fortunately this was the only movie directed by Cuaron.
Austin M. gave it a3:
This one just doesn't give me that feeling the first two gave me and it lacks the action of the 4th and 5th films. By far the worst so far.
derek b gave it an8:
I am a huge fan of the harr potter series, i have only read the first 2 books but i have watched all the movies and i was more impressed with the 2nd film more than the rest of them, but im reviewing the 3rd one, i thought it was good, sometimes during the film i lost interest but the fact that harry wanted to avenge his parents when he finds out the guy responsible is on the loose and looking for him, he wants to kill him and i love it when harry is doing anything to find this man....the darkness of the film kept me interested and some didn't but overall this film was just Ok...i give it an 8 because im a fan of the harry potter series and although it didn't impress me as much as the 2nd film, it's still good.
C C gave it an8:
Excellent film.as always the central trio undermine the fantastic story and characters with wooden performances and overall dislikability but theyre poor acting is not enough to overshadow awesome stints from Oldman,Rickman and Thewlis to name but a few. its hilarious to read the geeky fan-boys reviews stating how poorly the director adapted their beloved rowlings book to film when we all know theyre clearly in the wrong.cuaron did a masterful job with a difficult piece of childrens fiction and should have stayed on to direct the other films rather than allowing rank amateurs to toe the line as rowling had intended all along.
Adnan A gave it a9:
Now this movie has been praised for turning away from the book and creating something new and different. Personally, changing things is the weakest point of this movie. If you haven't read the book then you'll either find it very confusing or you'll love it, but if you've read the book then nothing will stop you from finding faults and flaws. The story... well If they just wouldn't have deleted some main plots, it would have been as good as its predecessors. Not including the plots from the book is understandable but introducing new things is unacceptable. Acting... the trio have matured very much and I'd still say they were born for these roles. All the adults are great as usual. The two new actors, David as Lupin was perfect but Michael Gambon as Dumbledore... oh boy! Erase what I said in the beginning about the alterations in the plot being its weakest point. No! Michael Gambon is the weakest point of the movie. He sucks big time!!! He has tarnished the Dumbledore portrayed by the versatile actor Richard Harris and the character created by the prolific writer J.K.Rowling. Michael Gambon - one of the major reasons why I disliked the movie, the other reason was the tiny whomping willow. Direction... I don't know why Warner bros removed Chris. It's not that Alfonso is not talented, but changing a director breaks a smooth flow which was found between movie 1 and 2. Sorceror's and chambers felt like it was from the same world but this movie feels like a whole new world, only the characters are same. Chris had improved upon chamber of secrets by making it dark and suspenseful and with prisoner he would have made a hell of a movie (mean it in a positive manner). Visuals... for a 2004 movie it's visuals are excellent. Even today they look fantastic! Overall I'd rate this movie a B+. I would have given it an A if the director hadn't changed the small details which makes it very different from the books and the predecessor movies.
[Anonymous] gave it a7:
The weakest of the films. I don't know why, it just doesn't give me the same feeling as I did with the first two. Don't get me wrong, this is a fun movie, good, but not great.
