Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Haunting in Connecticut, The

EMAILPRINTLionsgate

Haunting in Connecticut, The reviews
33
6.0 User Score:

Generally unfavorable reviews

Based on 23 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 26 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Horror  |  Suspense/Thriller

Written by: Adam Simon
Tim Metcalfe

Directed by: Peter Cornwell

Release Date:
Theatrical: March 27, 2009
DVD: July 14, 2009

Running Time: 92 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for some intense sequences of terror and disturbing images

Starring Virginia Madsen, Kyle Gallner, Martin Donovan, Elias Koteas, and Amanda Crew

The Haunting in Connecticut charts one family's terrifying, real-life encounter with the dark forces of the supernatural. When the Campbell family moves to upstate Connecticut, they soon learn that their charming Victorian home has a disturbing history: not only was the house a transformed funeral parlor where inconceivable acts occurred, but the owner's clairvoyant son Jonah served as a demonic messenger, providing a gateway for spiritual entities to crossover. Now, unspeakable terror awaits when Jonah, the boy who communicated with the dead, returns to unleash a new kind of horror on the innocent and unsuspecting family. (Lionsgate)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

63

Charlotte Observer Roger Moore

Sinks or swims with the actors. Gallner makes a very convincing boy-about-to-die; Madsen is his properly stricken mom; and Donovan, an under-used leading man, plays the stressed, guilt-ridden dad well.

Read Full Review >
60

The Hollywood Reporter John DeFore

Haunting tweaks familiar tropes enough to make them interesting. Just not so interesting as to inspire many nightmares after the credits roll.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman

Don't misunderstand: the proceedings are pretty silly, and the scares were a lot fresher back in 1979, when we first saw "The Amityville Horror." But Cornwell and his cast take things just seriously enough to keep us at least intermittently on edge.

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Claudia Puig

Although it's reasonably well-acted and offers a few certifiable jolts, feels awfully familiar.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Joe Leydon

Long on atmosphere yet short on dramatic tension.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

A technically proficient horror movie and well acted.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

The movie bumps along from low-grade scare to scare, and it's not lousy, mainly because Virginia Madsen prevents it from being so.

Read Full Review >
50

Philadelphia Inquirer Tirdad Derakhshani

A tepid PG-13 iteration of the already lame 1979 genre classic "The Amityville Horror."

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

You have to be willing to take a lot of punishment for a few good scares.

Read Full Review >
42

Entertainment Weekly Adam Markovitz

Smart enough to put much of its weight on Gallner, a lively presence with a terrifically sour mug that makes him look like a mutual cousin of Willem Dafoe and Peter Lorre.

Read Full Review >
40

Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall

It loses steam once the wraiths become fully visible: they're just not scary enough.

Read Full Review >
40

Los Angeles Times Mark Olsen

Part of what makes "Connecticut" oddly watchable even as it drags is the oil-and-water mix of acting styles of the leads. Virginia Madsen's refined naturalism is an awkward fit with the sharp mannerisms of Martin Donovan.

Read Full Review >
38

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Boring and uninspired, this movie gives ghost stories a bad name.

Read Full Review >
38

New York Post Kyle Smith

Not very haunty.

Read Full Review >
38

TV Guide Jason Buchanan

A film that pays lip service to some interesting ideas, but is far too concerned with pleasing a large crowd to be anything more than another instantly forgettable fright flick.

Read Full Review >
33

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

As a piece of storytelling, The Haunting In Connecticut is pretty lazy. As a horror movie, it’s lazier still, bringing out every annoying shock-cut and disorienting sound-design trick of the last decade.

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice Scott Foundas

In the realm of domestic horror, The Haunting in Connecticut is about as scary as a shower that suddenly changes temperature when someone flushes the toilet.

Read Full Review >
30

The New York Times Jeannette Catsoulis

Gives you the creeps, the giggles and the groans in almost equal measure.

Read Full Review >
25

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

C'mon, in matters of haunted-house inhabitation, settling into an ex-mortuary is like renting above a dentist's office -- ashen faces and ghastly screams come with the territory.

Read Full Review >
25

Premiere Rob Calvert

When the hits finally do come, they are really only capable of scaring 13-year-olds making their first trip into the horror genre.

Read Full Review >
25

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

There is still a great horror movie about foreclosure to be made. In the meantime, this movie plays games. (How many rounds of hide-and-seek should an audience tolerate?)

Read Full Review >
25

San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub

Contains so many insults to the audience's intelligence.

Read Full Review >
11

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Koteas' overearnest performance almost makes The Haunting in Connecticut worth a look, but ultimately even the star of Cronenberg's "Crash" can't salvage what is essentially a substandard rip-off of "The Amityville Horror."

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.0 (out of 10) based on 26 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ryan S gave it a6:
Oooohhhh scary. They sure like to use the same tricks over, though. At least it kept me watching. Not bad.

Carole S. gave it a2:
OH MY GOD. I give this rag 2 stars. Very disappointing, and I'll tell you why. First they tell you that this movie is based on a true story. By telling me that it is based on a true story it set my expectations very high. For a true story I expected the realism to be REAL. You know, something I could believe. Well this movie was anything but realistic. It was typical Hollywood.We found ourselves laughing through 95% of this movie. Watching this and trying to believe that it really happened to someone was hysterical. We couldn't stop giggling. Nice try Hollywood, but this was a NO GO!! Scary??? NOT!!! hilarious?? ABSOLUTELY! Rent this one if you want a good laugh fest.

Frankie H gave it a5:
Overall, the movie is okay, but not so a 'horror' movie. The story doesn't really make sense, if they knew the house has problem, and it is only rented, they could have just move back , or find elsewhere, don't really have to deal with it.

David D gave it a9:
I went into this expecting The Exorcism of Emily Rose part 2, in other words just utter crap, but this was a really good horror movie. As far as horror movies that make it to theatres in North America this was one of the scarier ones. It's creepy as hell and the acting and plot is good enough to make you buy in to the whole mess. If you like horror movies first off you know to ignore what critics say, and just look past the crappy title and cover art and watch it. definitely worth it.

Jimbo H. gave it a7:
Does it's creep-outs very well, this movie gets the award for making my fiancee scream/jump the loudest I've seen her while in front of a movie. I thought this one was up there with Amityville, if not creepier, so I'm not sure where the negative comparisons come from. Amityville's plot line is quite a bit different than this one (actually to be honest they aren't even remotely similar), which makes me wonder how many critics even watched the damned movie. Apparently if it is in a house, and people died, and its scary, then it must be an Amityville rip-off, right?

Jay H gave it a5:
Unconvincing horror flick. It is well produced, the cast is capable but the story just simply isn't very good. Nuff' said.

John S gave it a0:
Movies with cheap scares should not be classified as horror but trash rather. Anyone can surprise an audience, horror movies requires good plot and storyline.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use