Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

High Crimes

EMAILPRINT20th Century Fox Film Corporation

High Crimes reviews
48
5.4 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 33 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 7 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller

Written by: Joseph Finder (novel)
Yuri Zeltser
Grace Cary Bickley

Directed by: Carl Franklin

Release Date:
Theatrical: April 5, 2002
DVD: August 27, 2002

Running Time: 115 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for violence, sexual content and language

Starring Ashley Judd, Morgan Freeman, James Caviezel, Adam Scott, Amanda Peet, Michael Gaston, Tom Bower, and Jesse Beaton

A young San Francisco attorney (Judd) gets help from a former military attorney (Freeman) when she defends her husband in a top-secret military court.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Stylish and effective, if slightly overlong, thriller.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Has some faults, but it manages to keep its audience either angry or jumpy from start to finish.

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

Comes across as gratifying, not grating: the same way the familiarity of a well-crafted whodunit is part of the book's pleasures.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

This is the second movie Judd and Freeman have made together (after "Kiss the Girls" in 1997). They're both good at projecting a kind of Southern intelligence that knows its way around the frailties of human nature.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan

Satisfies a hunger for the basics: a decent mystery to chew on, a bit of juicy suspense, maybe a plot twist as garnish. The fare is all on the standard menu, but it goes down well just the same.

Read Full Review >
67

Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones

Franklin injects life into a flat format and has in the process done something nearly unheard of in Hollywood as of late: He's brought class back to the genre film.

Read Full Review >
67

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

Even if it lacks the finesse of Franklin's earlier work, High Crimes moves like a bullet.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

It's still a disappointment: a well-mounted and well-acted suspense movie that, thanks to its illogical script, falls off a cliff midway through.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

The problem with High Crimes, acceptable though it is, is that it's not close to anyone's best work.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Franklin directs smoothly, but except for Freeman, the theatrics are pretty pro forma.

Read Full Review >
60

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Ms. Judd commands the screen with consistent authority, and Mr. Freeman brings expansive humor to the role of a self-styled wildcard who's still dangerous in court.

50

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

The biggest offense in the somewhat unimaginative but serviceable legal thriller High Crimes is that the venerable Morgan Freeman simply does not get enough screen time, and when he's up there, he doesn't have enough to do.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Dana Stevens

For his part. Mr. Freeman shows himself, once again, incapable of giving a bad performance.

Read Full Review >
50

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

This is very much a ''woman's picture,'' driven by a twin rudder of anxiety and empowerment.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

Every minute of the film is trash, and director Carl Franklin seems to know it.

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

It's hard to see Franklin's fingerprints on the material. It's as if he directed with his gloves on.

Read Full Review >
50

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

This thing's got more plot than an Alliance convention. Unfortunately (to extend the comparison), not a whole lot of it makes a lick of common sense.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Post Lou Lumenick

It's terribly predictable and often risible stuff.

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Mike Clark

It's no crime the movie has one or two endings too many, given that many thrillers of the past quarter-century have had the same. But Judd's latest is too harmless to be anything but a misdemeanor.

Read Full Review >
50

LA Weekly Manohla Dargis

While its blowout finale is telegraphed long before the first act ends, and too much else is just as obvious and bland, Judd, Freeman and Franklin never stop adding filigree. The big picture isn't much to look at, but the detailing isn't bad.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

The story has possibilities, but you'll spot the big plot twists long before they happen, and the acting by Judd and Cavaziel is strictly by the numbers.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

Judd has genuine movie star magnetism -- beauty, intelligence, presence and talent to spare. In the old studio days, she'd be Ingrid Bergman by now.

50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The chief pleasure of High Crimes (and it's a limited one) comes from watching Morgan Freeman, who can bring a sense of integrity to even the silliest thriller.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Undermined by contrived suspense sequences, a pointless subplot involving Claire's flaky, trashy sister, and a formulaic thriller ending.

Read Full Review >
40

Salon.com Charles Taylor

High Crimes does offer good, often sharp and funny work from its two stars. But you can't fake excitement, and it's a lousy feeling to know that the best commercial movie I can point you to right now is this shallow, self-erasing nonsense.

Read Full Review >
40

Slate David Edelstein

The strands in High Crimes don't coalesce. Those red herrings somehow take over the picture; the thing itself turns into a giant red herring.

Read Full Review >
40

Variety Robert Koehler

Judd now is top-billed, but her performance is so resolutely humorless and businesslike that Freeman's gruffly affectionate warmth becomes doubly valuable, though not nearly enough to lend this generic project any special character.

Read Full Review >
40

New Times (L.A.) Luke Y. Thompson

Film falls into the same trap as the book: a moderately interesting setup ultimately undone by an ending that makes the audience feel like fools for investing any sympathy with the characters.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat Michael Dequina

Washes away whatever unique filmmaking personality Franklin has.

Read Full Review >
38

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

Once, for no reason, Franklin whirled the camera around 360 degrees while two people were having an ordinary conversation. I suspect he must have been as bored by then as I was.

Read Full Review >
30

The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias

A major disappointment that lacks the courage to follow through on its premise's themes.

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice Nick Rutigliano

Secret trials and buried atrocities are no match for a plucky (and rich, and svelte) young heroine, least of all Ms. Ashley Judd, who eyebrow-cocks her way through Carl Franklin's witless High Crimes.

Read Full Review >
20

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

All in all, High Crimes isn't worth the crayons it took to write the script.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 5.4 (out of 10) based on 7 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Pat C. gave it a 3:
Almost a decent thriller. Ideal for the small screen, the smaller the better. Can't resist cheap shots at the military.

Jack D. gave it a 5:
Not bad, but don't think too hard.

H. Strickland gave it an 8:
Fast moving action & adventure withnew twists every scene - Ashley Judd & M Freeman are great - prof. movie critics should give this more than 46 !

Jeff M. gave it a 6:
Competent, but unoriginal. The ending is obvious not because of flaws in the storytelling, but because by now we know that this genre needs something qualifiying as a "twist" ending these days. So we simply wait (for nearly 2 hours) before it comes -- which it finally does. Yawn. satisfying.

Eric S. gave it a 6:
"High Crimes" may not be high budget, but that doesn't mean it's not done well in most parts. I found many elements of the story to be perfectly satisfactory. But the climactic conclusion is so manipulative, so convenient, so ridiculous, that I'm forced to award it only two-and-a-half stars. Is this a positive or a negative review? You decide.

Jake M. gave it a 2:
What a piece of crap, i hate movies about the law because obviously they don't do their homework. Just find basicly anyone in the military and bring them to watch this movie, and ask them to point out everything that is wrong in the court scenes. The list will go about 1/3 of the movie. Also there ain't no nail bitting involved with this movie, i figured out that ..............about 40 minutes into the movie. There is no real thrill involved with this movie.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use