GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Hollow Man
Sony Pictures Entertainment

Hollow Man reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 24 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.1 out of 10
based on 35 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 28 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence, nudity, vulgarity, animal abuse

Starring Steve Altes, Kevin Bacon, Josh Brolin, William Devane, and Elizabeth Shue

A government scientist (Bacon) discovers how to make people invisible. After a freak accident that makes him slowly disappear, he begins to go insane and seeks revenge on the other scientists on the project.


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Gary Scott Thompson (story)
Andrew W. Marlowe (also story)
 
DIRECTED BY: Paul Verhoeven  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: January 2, 2001 
Video: January 2, 2001 
Theatrical: August 4, 2000 
RUNNING TIME: 112 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

70
Mr. Showbiz Michael Atkinson
Filthy fun, if not much more.
67
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
An eminently watchable B-movie nightmare.
Read Full Review
60
TNT RoughCut J. Rentilly
The film becomes so much urgent nonsense, its killing spree neither cheaply thrilling nor even more cheaply cathartic. It's only gory.
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Might have worked as a sex comedy, certainly as porn. But as a suspense thriller, it's creepy for all the wrong reasons.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Hollow Man can think of nothing more interesting to do than spy on his girlfriend and assault his neighbor.Too bad. Really too bad, because the movie is supported by some of the most intriguing special effects I've seen.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Boasts special effects that are really spectacular - too bad it lacks flesh-and-blood characters.
50
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Gleefully confrontational in its ludicrous, pulpy tawdriness.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Robert Koehler
Pic's future as a cult item is a sure bet.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Turns resoundingly dumb in its last 40 minutes.
42
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
A special-effects-and-chase-to-the-death movie, with little special about it.
42
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It is relatively suspenseless and often distastefully crude.
Read Full Review
40
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Verhoeven, who inflicted "Showgirls" on us, skips the provacative questions raised by invisibility and goes straight to rape and murder.
38
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Verhoeven's most deeply disturbing film yet.
38
Chicago Tribune Marc Caro
The folks who made this movie apparently had nothing inside their heads, either.
30
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
This mean-spirited invisible man movie tries to hide its poverty of fresh ideas behind a load of state-of-the-art special effects.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
A boisterous, gooey miscue.
Read Full Review
30
LA Weekly F. X. Feeney
If only the rest of the movie were as good as its cast.
Read Full Review
25
USA Today Susan Wloszczyna
Ultimately the title is most revealing. It's hollow, man.
25
San Francisco Chronicle Edward Guthmann
Might be a blast of ridiculous fun -- the way truly bad movies tend to be -- if it weren't so noxious and reprehensible.
Read Full Review
25
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
A painful bore.
Read Full Review
25
Baltimore Sun Ann Hornaday
How can we make the entire movie disappear?
25
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
This is fatuous twaddle with a nasty, misogynistic edge.
Read Full Review
25
Boston Globe Jay Carr
Should have been an inaudible man movie. Every time the characters open their mouths, they hammer it deeper into the ground.
20
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
It's not terribly interesting on the subject.
Read Full Review
20
Film.com Robert Horton
One wonders if the only original directors left are the obsessives and the freaks. This guy qualifies on both counts.
Read Full Review
12
San Francisco Examiner G. Allen Johnson
A terribly bad movie, one of the worst of its kind in recent years.
10
The New York Times Dana Stevens
Endure the long, slow, unraveling of this movie, which can't even muster the intelligence to be pretentious or the bravado to be amusingly bad.
Read Full Review
10
Time Richard Corliss
Too many special effects, many of them stomach churning; too much pornographically arranged death.
10
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
Ultimately it's an ugly, insipid rape fantasy, nothing more.
Read Full Review
10
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Definitely stuck in the fourth grade.
Read Full Review
10
Film.com Tom Keogh
We don't even have Joe Eszterhas to blame for this one.
Read Full Review
10
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Despite a wealth of special effects...this movie is surprisingly inert, more dull than anything else, with little to recommend it on any level.
Read Full Review
10
Film.com John Hartl
Maybe Kevin Bacon can use the Twinkie defense to explain Hollow Man.
Read Full Review
10
Slate David Edelstein
Turns into a moronic, psycho-on-the-loose picture pretty quickly.
Read Full Review
0
Salon.com Charles Taylor
I haven't had a worse time at the movies this summer.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.1 (out of 10) based on 28 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

R. Lopez gave it a7:
This movie got a seven from me for what is and what it means to me as a science geek. This is not a great movie, don't get me wrong; but is a exceptionally well executed one at that. Hollow man follows the story of Dr. Sebastian Cane, an egotistical and arrogant scientist working on a way to make living matter invisible. He has already succeeded on animal trials and is ready to go to the next step, human testing, Cane volunteers to be the first human subject. The experiment seems like a major success, until something goes terrible goes wrong. Now Sebastian is becoming increasingly paranoid and out of control, doomed to be without flesh for all his life. Now his team wants to shut the project down and bring in the government to catch Sebastian, But Sebastian traps them in the lab with him. With time running out can the team really out smart a maniac invisible man? Hollow man is not a great movie in the sense of what it is, it is a great achievement in visual effects and putting a whole new story to the invisible man tale. It also makes you wonder if that feeling you get when your alone is really just a feeling, or if it's just your imagination playing tricks on you.

Dizzle Fizzle gave it a10:
The funniest comedy of the year, if not the decade. Everything including the story, acting, and sheer genius by the director just makes me want to pee my pants. Obviously this movie was not meant to be serious, and most of the critics did not realize this. There is no way that anyone could be stupid enough to make a movie like this and have it actually be a suspenseful thriller. That's just crazy. Keep up the good work Paul Verhoeven, I look forward to other comedies coming out directed by you.

James T. gave it a2:
This movie has all the bad elements of a B rated horror flick. However it's not snakes on a plane bad, more like snakes in a pit of boringness. It doesn't even have the guilty sense of bad movie watching pleasure. Neophytes who like bad movies would really have to dig deep to enjoy this one.

Big K. gave it a4:
I've seen better and worse films with Mr Bacon. This film is simply another cliched foray into the sci/fi/horror type flick. Truly ordinary in the way it ends with the lacklustre defeat of the (by that stage) poorly computer generated Bacon. (in fact he looks like he might actually have been made out of bacon).

[Anonymous] gave it a5:
Invisibility effects were cool, but after Sebastian's transformation, there's nothing but dawdling around until he finally goes insane.

[Anonymous] gave it a10:
This movie is da bomb.

raVen gave it a 1:
Most people seem to agree that this movie's most fatal flaw was its assumption about human nature - but I disagree. Actually, its most towering failure is that it sabotaged the one element that SHOULD have been its saving grace: science. Science was reponsible for the special effects, and for the story itself, really. The hang-up is that the movie makers didn't have to earn this idea - it was already out there, and so they apparently felt no need to think about it much. And so, once Kevin Bacon is made invisible, any sense of reality is abandoned. Enter: THE PLOT ELEMENT THAT DESTROYED THIS MOVIE.... Sunglasses. There is much made about the fact that Bacon's eyelids are invisible and thus transparent. The big black sunglasses are brought out to prevent our Kevin from being blinded. What??? Using this (invisible = transparent) formula, would he not be blinded anyway - his corneas, retinas, and such being similarly transparent? They couldn't function if light passes right through them. Period. Not to mention what might be happening to the rest of Bacon's bacon, internal organs exposed to light and whatever other rays that wish to pass through transparent human flesh. A better idea would have been to say that invisibility could be achieved through an ultra-chameleon-like biology, not through pane-of-glass transparency. Because in a funny way, Harry Potter's invisibility cape makes a lot more sense. Better Scifi flicks like Jurassic Park have succeeded as great cinema despite being MOSTLY fiction, because once they ask the big "what if," they leave it alone and don't screw it up with sunglasses. It's like showing the monster's zipper on purpose. Doy.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use