Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

In My Country

EMAILPRINTSony Pictures Classics

In My Country reviews
44
7.7 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 27 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 4 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama

Written by: Ann Peacock
Antjie Krog (book Country of My Skull)

Directed by: John Boorman

Release Date:
Theatrical: March 11, 2005
DVD: July 5, 2005

Running Time: 104 minutes, Color

Origin: UK

Language(s): English / Afrikaans

Summary

RATING: R for language, including descriptions of atrocities, and for a scene of violence

Starring Samuel L. Jackson, Juliette Binoche, Brendan Gleeson, Menzi Ngubane, Sam Ngakane, Aletta Bezuidenhout, Lionel Newton, and Langley Kirkwood

A drama set against the backdrop of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings, In My Country charts the lowest depths of pain and suffering and reveals the redeeming power of forgiveness and love. (Sony Pictures Classics)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88

New York Post Kyle Smith

Sobering and important.

Read Full Review >
88

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

A stirring, large-souled movie.

Read Full Review >
75

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Boorman treats this moving, important subject with restraint, tact, and candid views of horrors suffered by the nation.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

A potent, moving, liberal-minded docudrama.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

There is something not quite right about the film itself.

Read Full Review >
63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Stephen Cole

Although In My Country is charged with moments of grace and feeling, the film is ultimately betrayed by the clunky Jackson-Binoche romance.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Mike Clark

Boorman's troubles usually come from going over the top (atop Exorcist II, there's always Zardoz). But this is one of his few misfires that almost anyone would call tepid.

Read Full Review >
60

TV Guide Ken Fox

It's essential viewing for anyone interested in the state of post-Apartheid South Africa.

Read Full Review >
58

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

In My Country doesn't so much explore as use the tragedy of black South Africa to give its heroine a righteous slap of nobility.

Read Full Review >
50

LA Weekly Ella Taylor

In My Country stands closest to "Hotel Rwanda," a similarly clumsy yet inescapably moving effort to confront the brutal consequences of colonial oppression.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Stephen Holden

High-minded but hopelessly wooden film.

Read Full Review >
50

Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas

Boorman's stars Juliette Binoche and Samuel L. Jackson are valiant - even impressive - but they cannot rescue this grueling film or its mechanical plot.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

The charisma and hard work by his two leads allows Boorman to succeed beyond all expectations.

Read Full Review >
50

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

A disappointingly blunt, monochrome work.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein

Lacks compelling narrative.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Ty Burr

At its best when Anna confronts her tangled Afrikaaner legacy and when it brings the heretical notion of forgiveness up front, where a non-African audience can come to grips with it.

Read Full Review >
50

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

Ends badly, with a clumsy, nihilistic coda that leaves one uncertain how to feel about the story, confused as to what point has been made and not at all convinced that the new South Africa will be that much different from the old one.

Read Full Review >
50

Dallas Observer Melissa Levine

A clunky, obvious film, it makes the mistake of asking drama to do what documentary should.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jami Bernard

Would be better if it weren't so preachy.

Read Full Review >
40

Austin Chronicle Marrit Ingman

There is great material here and ample food for thought, but the presentation is lacking.

Read Full Review >
40

Variety Derek Elley

An unquestionably sincere but dramatically stillborn outing by veteran John Boorman.

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice Jessica Winter

Boorman's bathetic tourism is unconscionable for a subject of this magnitude; for an infinitely superior account of this chapter of South African history, seek out the documentary "Long Night's Journey Into Day."

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

In their desire to humanize the big story, director John Boorman and screenwriter Ann Peacock ... have resorted to groan-inducing cliches and clunky narrative.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

This romantic melodrama ... doesn't even get to first base.

Read Full Review >
25

Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell

Social justice is never an excuse for bad art. In fact, one could argue that a really bad movie about a really important subject is twice the artistic crime -- because, however well-intentioned, it trivializes human suffering while squandering a teaching opportunity.

Read Full Review >
20

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

Any social good the film might do gets lost in a soupy morass of histrionics, clumsy storytelling, overripe dialogue, and rampant didacticism.

Read Full Review >
10

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

It's a bad idea done disastrously.

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.7 (out of 10) based on 4 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Mark B. gave it a9:
Combine two absolutely world-class actors (Samuel L. Jackson, who simply never disappoints, and Juliette Binoche, whose exquisite delicacy and vulnerability made her THE indispensible component in both The English Patient and Chocolat) with an incredibly compelling, fascinating historical moment (the tribunals called for by Nelson Mandela and conducted in post-apartheid South Africa in 1995) and you're halfway home. Director John Boorman (Deliverance, The General) and screenwriter Ann Peacock finish the journey by fashioning a work that asks scores of questions worthy of a week's worth of post-film discussions, such as: If the point of the tribunals was to forgive the White Afrikaaner minority for its torture of and other crimes against alleged Black majority dissidents, what offenses, if any, qualify as being absolutely unforgivable? How much weight should be placed on whether the alleged criminals truly are remorseful or just playing the part in order to get a wrist-slap...and how many of them truly WERE sorry? (According to the film, at least one...and he figures prominently in the most heartbreaking scene in a movie that's packed with them.) How much of a valid defense is the old "just following orders" line? (And if you're automatically thinking Nazi Germany, fine...but I think this movie correlates this excuse with human nature in all times and places. Certainly ANY example of mob violence ranging in history from the Crucifixion to My Lai would definitely prove that we're dealing with the herd mentality, a flaw in human nature that isn't limited to any time or geographic area.) Why do tragedies in predominantly White countries make the front page but, if they occur in Africa, get relegated to page 7 or further back? And finally, whose country IS the title referring to: Anna's (Binoche) because she claims it as her homeland and has lived there all her life, or American correspondent Langston's (Jackson) because his skin color links him to the original residents? I absolutely disagree with the standard criticism of this film that the affair that Anna and Langston fall into is contrived, distracting and out of tone with the powerful material. On the contrary, I believe that their actions fit in perfectly with it, because Anna's and Langston's relatively comfortable, Westernized minds, as well as those of other reporters covering the hearings, aren't equipped to handle the extreme examples of man's inhumanity to man that they hear described day after day; consequently, nonsmokers start smoking and everybody starts guzzling beer out of quart bottles...so it seems totally natural (if not right) for the happily married Anna to seek solace from the pain she's been witness to with a fellow observer who's also trying desperately to cope with it all. The last 8 months have seen 3 major motion pictures dealing with 20th century mass slaughter in the oldest and, arguably, most tragic continent: Sydney Pollack's superficial, self-important The Interpreter, Terry George's effective Hotel Rwanda, which boasts a magnificent performance by Don Cheadle but still pulls a couple punches too many...and this, which is not only the most heartwrenching, intellectually challenging and emotionally overwhelming of the lot, but is John Boorman's best film since his 20-year-old The Emerald Forest.

John R. gave it a2:
Simply a disaster, embarrassing.

Mark G. gave it a10:
Excellent. In micro and macrocosim reflects what are the complex and conflicted emotions of what are So Africa, interracial society, revenge and forgivness, humanity, cruelty, and love and death. Not bad for less than two hours!

Michael D. gave it a10:
Best movie ever; can anyone say the contrary.

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use