DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Recent DVD/Video Releases
60
9
xx
Across the Hall
56
Adam
37
Amelia
73
Amreeka
35
Babysitters, The
70
Big Fan
57
Boys Are Back, The
81
Bright Star![]()
71
Bronson
60
Brothers at War
55
Brothers Bloom, The
45
Burning Plain, The
xx
Carriers
64
Che
57
Chelsea on the Rocks
66
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
23
Couples Retreat
54
Dare
68
Departures
19
Downloading Nancy
55
Endgame
39
Fame
30
Final Destination, The
27
Gamer
50
Give Me Your Hand
46
Halloween II
73
House of the Devil, The
94
Hurt Locker, The![]()
55
I Can Do Bad All By Myself
17
I Hate Valentine's Day
26
I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
83
In the Loop![]()
58
Invention of Lying, The
47
Jennifer's Body
41
Little Ashes
80
Lorna's Silence
33
Love Happens
67
Michael Jackson's This Is It
xx
Ministers, The
67
Moon
59
More Than a Game
49
New York, I Love You
66
No Impact Man
47
Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
28
Pandorum
68
Paranormal Activity
85
Passing Strange![]()
63
Perfect Getaway, A
44
Peter and Vandy
54
Pontypool
35
Post Grad
30
Saw VI
79
Serious Man, A
36
Serious Moonlight
76
Soul Power
40
Spiral
39
St. Trinian's
33
Stepfather, The
45
Surrogates
47
Time Traveler's Wife
43
Tru Loved
61
Trucker
47
Weather Girl
67
Whip It
28
Whiteout
73
Zombieland
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
In My Country
EMAILPRINTSony Pictures Classics

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 27 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 4 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Drama
Written by:
Ann Peacock
Antjie Krog (book Country of My Skull)
Directed by: John Boorman
Release Date:
Theatrical: March 11, 2005
DVD: July 5, 2005
Running Time: 104 minutes, Color
Origin: UK
Language(s): English / Afrikaans
Summary
RATING: R for language, including descriptions of atrocities, and for a scene of violence
Starring Samuel L. Jackson, Juliette Binoche, Brendan Gleeson, Menzi Ngubane, Sam Ngakane, Aletta Bezuidenhout, Lionel Newton, and Langley Kirkwood
A drama set against the backdrop of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings, In My Country charts the lowest depths of pain and suffering and reveals the redeeming power of forgiveness and love. (Sony Pictures Classics)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: The Tailor of Panama
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Boorman treats this moving, important subject with restraint, tact, and candid views of horrors suffered by the nation.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is something not quite right about the film itself.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Stephen Cole
Although In My Country is charged with moments of grace and feeling, the film is ultimately betrayed by the clunky Jackson-Binoche romance.
Read Full Review >USA Today Mike Clark
Boorman's troubles usually come from going over the top (atop Exorcist II, there's always Zardoz). But this is one of his few misfires that almost anyone would call tepid.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Ken Fox
It's essential viewing for anyone interested in the state of post-Apartheid South Africa.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
In My Country doesn't so much explore as use the tragedy of black South Africa to give its heroine a righteous slap of nobility.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Ella Taylor
In My Country stands closest to "Hotel Rwanda," a similarly clumsy yet inescapably moving effort to confront the brutal consequences of colonial oppression.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas
Boorman's stars Juliette Binoche and Samuel L. Jackson are valiant - even impressive - but they cannot rescue this grueling film or its mechanical plot.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
The charisma and hard work by his two leads allows Boorman to succeed beyond all expectations.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Ty Burr
At its best when Anna confronts her tangled Afrikaaner legacy and when it brings the heretical notion of forgiveness up front, where a non-African audience can come to grips with it.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Ends badly, with a clumsy, nihilistic coda that leaves one uncertain how to feel about the story, confused as to what point has been made and not at all convinced that the new South Africa will be that much different from the old one.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Melissa Levine
A clunky, obvious film, it makes the mistake of asking drama to do what documentary should.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marrit Ingman
There is great material here and ample food for thought, but the presentation is lacking.
Read Full Review >Variety Derek Elley
An unquestionably sincere but dramatically stillborn outing by veteran John Boorman.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Jessica Winter
Boorman's bathetic tourism is unconscionable for a subject of this magnitude; for an infinitely superior account of this chapter of South African history, seek out the documentary "Long Night's Journey Into Day."
Read Full Review >Washington Post Desson Thomson
In their desire to humanize the big story, director John Boorman and screenwriter Ann Peacock ... have resorted to groan-inducing cliches and clunky narrative.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Ann Hornaday
This romantic melodrama ... doesn't even get to first base.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
Social justice is never an excuse for bad art. In fact, one could argue that a really bad movie about a really important subject is twice the artistic crime -- because, however well-intentioned, it trivializes human suffering while squandering a teaching opportunity.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Any social good the film might do gets lost in a soupy morass of histrionics, clumsy storytelling, overripe dialogue, and rampant didacticism.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
It's a bad idea done disastrously.
What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 7.7 (out of 10) based on 4 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Mark B. gave it a9:
Combine two absolutely world-class actors (Samuel L. Jackson, who simply never disappoints, and Juliette Binoche, whose exquisite delicacy and vulnerability made her THE indispensible component in both The English Patient and Chocolat) with an incredibly compelling, fascinating historical moment (the tribunals called for by Nelson Mandela and conducted in post-apartheid South Africa in 1995) and you're halfway home. Director John Boorman (Deliverance, The General) and screenwriter Ann Peacock finish the journey by fashioning a work that asks scores of questions worthy of a week's worth of post-film discussions, such as: If the point of the tribunals was to forgive the White Afrikaaner minority for its torture of and other crimes against alleged Black majority dissidents, what offenses, if any, qualify as being absolutely unforgivable? How much weight should be placed on whether the alleged criminals truly are remorseful or just playing the part in order to get a wrist-slap...and how many of them truly WERE sorry? (According to the film, at least one...and he figures prominently in the most heartbreaking scene in a movie that's packed with them.) How much of a valid defense is the old "just following orders" line? (And if you're automatically thinking Nazi Germany, fine...but I think this movie correlates this excuse with human nature in all times and places. Certainly ANY example of mob violence ranging in history from the Crucifixion to My Lai would definitely prove that we're dealing with the herd mentality, a flaw in human nature that isn't limited to any time or geographic area.) Why do tragedies in predominantly White countries make the front page but, if they occur in Africa, get relegated to page 7 or further back? And finally, whose country IS the title referring to: Anna's (Binoche) because she claims it as her homeland and has lived there all her life, or American correspondent Langston's (Jackson) because his skin color links him to the original residents? I absolutely disagree with the standard criticism of this film that the affair that Anna and Langston fall into is contrived, distracting and out of tone with the powerful material. On the contrary, I believe that their actions fit in perfectly with it, because Anna's and Langston's relatively comfortable, Westernized minds, as well as those of other reporters covering the hearings, aren't equipped to handle the extreme examples of man's inhumanity to man that they hear described day after day; consequently, nonsmokers start smoking and everybody starts guzzling beer out of quart bottles...so it seems totally natural (if not right) for the happily married Anna to seek solace from the pain she's been witness to with a fellow observer who's also trying desperately to cope with it all. The last 8 months have seen 3 major motion pictures dealing with 20th century mass slaughter in the oldest and, arguably, most tragic continent: Sydney Pollack's superficial, self-important The Interpreter, Terry George's effective Hotel Rwanda, which boasts a magnificent performance by Don Cheadle but still pulls a couple punches too many...and this, which is not only the most heartwrenching, intellectually challenging and emotionally overwhelming of the lot, but is John Boorman's best film since his 20-year-old The Emerald Forest.
John R. gave it a2:
Simply a disaster, embarrassing.
Mark G. gave it a10:
Excellent. In micro and macrocosim reflects what are the complex and conflicted emotions of what are So Africa, interracial society, revenge and forgivness, humanity, cruelty, and love and death. Not bad for less than two hours!
Michael D. gave it a10:
Best movie ever; can anyone say the contrary.
