|
New This Week
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Interview with the Vampire
Warner Bros.
FILM:
MPAA RATING: R
Starring
Tom Cruise,
Brad Pitt,
Kirsten Dunst,
Stephen Rea,
Antonio Banderas,
Christian Slater,
Virginia McCollam,
and
Thandie Newton
The undead are among us and livelier than ever when Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt and a talented group of young-bloods star in Interview with the Vampire, the spellbinding screen adaptation of Anne Rice's best seller. (Warner Bros.)
| GENRE(S): |
Drama
|
Fantasy
|
Horror
|
| WRITTEN BY: |
Anne Rice (also novel)
|
| DIRECTED BY: |
Neil Jordan
|
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: June 6, 2000
Video: August 26, 1997
Theatrical: November 11, 1994
|
| RUNNING TIME: |
123 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: |
USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
100
Empire
Adam Smith
Bold, gruesome and melancholic, this Gothic horrorfest offers us much to sink our teeth into: Cruise - who effectively disappears from the screen for half the film's duration - is terrific, Dunst eerily compelling, Banderas hypnotic.
100
USA Today
Mike Clark
The generally faithful script is by Anne Rice herself, the director is "The Crying Game"'s Neil Jordan, and both seem true to themselves and as true as they can be to artistic and visceral expectations. [11Nov1994 Pg. 01.D]
90
The New York Times
Elvis Mitchell
His sumptuous film is as strange and mesmerizing as it is imaginatively ghastly. It's a sophisticated, spookily intense rendering of Ms. Rice's story.
80
Chicago Reader
Jonathan Rosenbaum
But if you can get swept up in the story, the movie is imaginative and compelling.
75
Chicago Sun-Times
Roger Ebert
A stronger plot engine might have drawn us more quickly to the end, but on a scene by scene basis, Interview with the Vampire is a skillful exercise in macabre imagination.
75
ReelViews
James Berardinelli
When Interview with the Vampire works, it's as compelling and engrossing a piece of entertainment as is available on film today. When it falters, the weaknesses seem magnified.
75
Rolling Stone
Peter Travers
But for all its visionary brilliance, the movie version of Interview never lets us close enough to see ourselves in Louis. We're dazzled but unmoved.
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Rick Groen
The look is fine, the effects are special, the cast is solid, and Jordan (in company with Rice) makes a commendable effort to add a cerebral dimension to a visceral genre.
75
TV Guide
Staff(not credited)
This darkly effective horror drama holds plenty of interest, even for those who find Anne Rice's gothic cult novels unreadable.
67
Austin Chronicle
Marc Savlov
It is, however, a very satisfying film, and surely the first in a long franchise (it does, after all, bear the subtitle The Vampire Chronicles).
60
Variety
Todd McCarthy
But the film also has its turgid, dialogue-heavy stretches, and the leading performances, if acceptable, are not everything they needed to be to fully flesh out these elegant immortals.
60
Washington Post
Desson Thomson
Unfortunately, the story, adapted by Anne Rice from her best-selling novel, sucks at the neck a little too long. A 23-minute snipping from this 123-minute movie would have done wonders.
50
Los Angeles Times
Kenneth Turan
Although he works his hardest at the part and doesn't embarrass himself, even with the help of Stan Winston's vampire makeup Tom Cruise is plainly miscast as Lestat. [11Nov1994 Pg. F1]
50
The New Yorker
Terrence Rafferty
The director, Neil Jordan, and his cinematographer, the great Philippe Rousselot, have given the movie an extraordinary seductive look, but Rice (who wrote the screenplay) doesn't provide enough narrative to keep the audience satisfied.
42
Entertainment Weekly
Owen Gleiberman
Dramatically, though, the film is torpid.
40
Dallas Observer
Matt Zoller Seitz
Lestat, like all vampires, is a bad boy frozen in time; because the role is emotionally static and one-note, it can't hold our attention unless it's played by an actor with deep reserves of mystery, elegance, and sexual power. Cruise has no such qualities.
40
Time
Richard Corliss
A vampire story needs vampires, sure, but it also needs a human victim to lead the audience into the vortex and help them escape it. Otherwise, the fear factor evaporates, and you get this mishmash: an interview in a void, a vampire movie with underbite.
40
The New Republic
Stanley Kauffmann
Literal-minded to the last, I felt nothing but pity for Tom Cruise, fanged, wigged and costumed, trying hard with his considerable talent to make his sanguinary appetite real. [12Dec1994 Pg. 24]
30
Washington Post
Rita Kempley
Passionately anticipated and much ballyhooed, the film, alas, is little more than a foppish, fang de siecle costume drama. Its pulse barely registers.
 The average user rating for this movie is 8.0 (out of 10) based on 3 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Discuss this movie in our forums |
|
