Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

In the Company of Men

EMAILPRINTSony Pictures Classics

In the Company of Men reviews
81
8.5 User Score:

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama

Written by: Neil LaBute

Directed by: Neil LaBute

Release Date:
Theatrical: August 1, 1997
DVD: March 17, 1998

Running Time: 97 minutes, Color

Origin: Canada / USA

Summary

RATING: R for language and emotional abuse

Starring Aaron Eckhart, Stacy Edwards, Matt Malloy, and Emily Cline

A psychological love triangle set within 90's corporate culture. (Sony Picture Classics)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

Stunning, unsettling, beautifully written drama.

Read Full Review >
100

Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten

As disturbing as it is well-made, this low-budget indie is a thoroughly original piece of work.

Read Full Review >
100

The Onion (A.V. Club) John Krewson

Writer/director Neil LaBute has taken the gender-issues film into uncharted, almost inhuman territory with this malevolently perfect exploration of male cruelty.

Read Full Review >
100

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

What is remarkable is how realistic the story is.

Read Full Review >
100

ReelViews James Berardinelli

In the Company of Men is anything but entertaining. It's virtually impossible to sit through this film without suffering bouts of intense discomfort, and therein lies its power.

Read Full Review >
90

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

It's virtually guaranteed to make us squirm.

Read Full Review >
90

Washington Post Desson Thomson

This is a fully realized movie, whose intelligence -- despite its grim findings -- dwarfs any Hollywood production.

Read Full Review >
90

Film.com Robert Horton

One of the best films of the year, a polished, contained piece of provocation.

90

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

An unusually fine screenplay, then, yet LaBute's accomplishment goes further. He has envisioned a cinematic style for his film that harmonizes exactly with its theme and mood. [Sept 1, 1997]

88

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

In the end, like any satire worth the name, In the Company of Men spins around to fire its biggest salvo at its ultimate target -- the audience.

Read Full Review >
80

Slate David Edelstein

A dazzling, repellent exercise in which the case against men is closed before it's opened.

Read Full Review >
80

Newsweek Jeff Giles

A brutal black comedy. It asks real questions and takes real chances.

Read Full Review >
80

LA Weekly Ernest Hardy

A provocative, timely script full of gasp-inducing lines and scenes.

Read Full Review >
80

Time Richard Corliss

Cool, shiny, handsomely made and, in its compelling-repelling way, mordantly funny.

Read Full Review >
80

Variety Dennis Harvey

Pics greatest achievement is its sharply poignant dialogue which, despite the horrible consequences of the contest it describes, is also darkly amusing.

Read Full Review >
80

Film.com John Hartl

As a writer, LaBute is capable of creating long dialogue scenes that never seem stagey or artificial. As a director, he has the confidence to stay with those words.

75

USA Today Mike Clark

A provocative dissection of human dynamics.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein

Tersely written and compellingly acted. But its controversial subject matter may make a lot of viewers so angry that the film's strong points will be disregarded.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Mark Caro

The movie sticks with you, thanks to LaBute's observational powers and the three impressive lead performances. [15 August 1997, Friday, p.C]

70

The New York Times Elvis Mitchell

It exaggerates real, recognizable attitudes in a manner that intends to be disturbing.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

A one-trick pony, a movie that has a gift only for making audiences squirm.

Read Full Review >
60

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

This is a film worth seeing, and LaBute is a filmmaker well worth watching.

Read Full Review >
60

Salon.com Charles Taylor

A singularly unpleasant movie.

Read Full Review >
60

New Times (L.A.) Peter Rainer

It's Mamet without the rich slanginess and heat of which he's capable at his best.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Examiner G. Allen Johnson

An independent film so enamored of itself it refuses to have any fun.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 8.5 (out of 10) based on 8 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Clyde gave it a4:
An excellent storyline with a sophmoric script and poor execution by the director. Poorly cast as well, younger protagonists would have been more believable. Not recommeded.

Yoon Min C. gave it a 9:
It's like a whit stillman movie made in hell. a nietzschean yuppie exploits his 'friend' and a deaf woman to get what he wants. he's one real sumfabitch, but in a perverse way, the only TRUE person in the movie. he knows what he wants and ruthlessly goes after it. his spineless associate betrays his own conscience for acceptance into jockdom, and the deaf woman, though conventionally a sympathetic figure, wants to give herself to the alpha male of the tribe rather than mate with a dorky and contrite twerp, a symbol of crippled manhood. of course, even the twerp's apology isn't entirely honest since he's attracted to her handicap for it props up his sense of power; bestowing sympathy--as a form of condescension--is also an exercise of power and superiority. the movie says you're damned if you do, damned if you don't. whther winner or loser, hardheaded or sappy, we're all wolves of a tribe. animals.

D. Rock gave it a 10:
The best movie of the 1990's. Overrated? Please.

T. K. gave it a 5:
This movie is extremely overrated. To get to where this movie really gets interesting, one must get through the first 75 minutes. Yes, it is an original story. Yes, it is compelling, but only really in the final act. It's also very low budget, which is NOT bad, but they shot it in only 11 days, so when you're watching it and want more coverage, or to see another actor's reaction and they don't cut back to this other actor....this is why. They didn't have time to get all they really needed in 11 shooting days. I don't begrudge the director the success this movie brought him -- good for him! It's just that this movie could have been SO MUCH better.

Gilbert gave it a 10:
What's most disturbing is the ending. Look away now if you don't want it spoiled... [Ed: sorry G.M., you're giving away too much, but nice observations....] A great, great movie.

Blanco A. gave it a 10:
One of the all-time best. Aaron Eckhart's performance is one for the ages. Legendary.

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use