|
Upcoming Release Calendar
34
10,000 B.C. Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
King Kong
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: PG-13 for frightening adventure violence and some disturbing images
Starring Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody, Andy Serkis, Jamie Bell, Kyle Chandler, Lobo Chan, and Thomas Kretschmann
Director Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings trilogy) helms the dramatic adventure King Kong, bringing his sweeping cinematic vision to the iconic story of the gigantic ape captured in the wild and brought to civilization where he meets his tragic fate. (Universal Studios)
| GENRE(S): | Action | Adventure | Drama | Fantasy | Sci-fi | Suspense/Thriller |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Peter Jackson
Fran Walsh Philippa Boyens Merian C. Cooper and Edgar Wallace (story) |
| DIRECTED BY: | Peter Jackson |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: March 28, 2006 Theatrical: December 14, 2005 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 187 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | New Zealand / USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 7.0 (out of 10) based on 958 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Shane B. gave it an8:
This is my review of King Kong. Pretty much, it's about Ann Darrow, a woman who, after losing her job in 1933, is offered to be in a movie by a rebellious filmmaker, named Carl Denham, who trying to make a movie. They go on a ship and end up at skull island, where Ann is sacrificed to the ape Kong. Now the only reason i wanted to see this movie was because it was directed by Peter Jackson. So, all in all, it was one of the best movies of 2005. the acting was okay, the action was spectacular. Yet the special effects was mixed. Some effects were awesome, like Kong. Yet others were no good at all. So this is a good film to see. I give Kong 2005 an 8/10.
Nick A. gave it a9:
I’ll start by saying the Peter Jackson’s 'King Kong' is one of the greatest movie epics to hit the screen in recent and distant memory. Its larger-than-life story is woven impeccably with the mythic legend of the film’s title character and the modern century’s absolute best in visual technology to create a movie that invigorates the mind and the heart, while also feeding the eyes a mighty dose of wondrous images. Thanks in part to a handsomely larger budget (a then-record-breaking $207 million), Peter Jackson has revitalized Cooper’s 1933 classic in a way that no other remake has ever done; he’s simply pasted the bigger and the better on top of Hollywood’s most treasured tale, while reminding us of its ageless delights. Jackson’s 'Kong' includes a renovated screenplay – which is done by Jackson and two of his 'LOTR' collaborators, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens – that elaborates on the known characters and offers us a few new ones as well (including the Venture’s gruff cook named Lumpy, played by Andy Serkis – who also performs as Kong). However, as big and hugely conceived (at a lengthy 188 min.) as this movie was, it glided from sequence to sequence fluidly and quickly, while managing to evenly weigh action and sentiment. In fact, 'Kong'’s in-film transitions are as clear and clean as its succulent special effects, which rank among the best ever seen on film. One nervous question mark concerning 'King Kong' was the casting of Jack Black to play the eccentric and obsessive film director, Carl Denham, who’s lust for fame and wealth doom his crew, the soon-to-be ravaged New York City, and the most magnificent beast to have ever been conjured. For me, Black came out a revelation – a previously unveiled gem of the screen. He delivers a performance that is as stirring as it is enthusiastic and further adds to the film’s likability. Along with Black, Jackson’s all-star cast (which also includes Naomi Watts, Adrien Brody, Jamie Bell, and Colin Hanks, to name a few) compliments his vision spotlessly and provides viewers with a refreshing, authentic feel. Everything about Peter Jackson’s 'King Kong' is alluring. The extravagant sets (especially the recreation of Great-Depression-era New York) are meticulously constructed and virtually unrecognizable as being false, and they offer amazement as to how Jackson and his team pulled them off. Equally astonishing is the music, composed by James Newton Howard (whose multitude of Oscar-nominated works include 'The Fugitive', 'My Best Friend’s Wedding', and, most recently, 'The Village'), which is gorgeous and tragic, making it perfect for the story’s famed conclusion. Easily the year’s most monstrously entertaining motion picture, 'King Kong' is also one of the best; and, seeing how it was undertaken by the brilliant Peter Jackson, it comes as no surprise.
Franco N. gave it a3:
Like the big ape himself, this movie was bloated and flabby. They could have at least cut 45 minutes out of it.
Balzac gave it a6:
Like the Big Ape himself, this movie is bloated with too much flab. Kong himself looks like Mighty Joe Young. They made him too small. The scene where Kong wipes the jungle floor with 3 T-Rexes is overkill an not believable. But hey, it's a picture about a giant ape and his blond girlfriend.
Greg A. gave it a9:
Just watched this on DVD last night and thought it was fantastic - only wished I had seen it on the big screen. Previous to that I was a bit wary of this film due to the length of it, but I was wrong, I didn't feel it was drawn out at all - you may question the slow bits with Naomi and Kong but without it the purpose to the movie would be lost. It is a couple years old now, but if you haven't seen it and want to see some great special effects coupled with a solid storyline I highly recommend it.
Austin M. gave it a10:
Kong's one the greatest movies ever, excellent special effects, I love every action scene in this movie. After those three hours, it felt like the movie was short, I know most people saw it's long, but I didn't, I wanted at least another half hour.
Mark D gave it a9:
I see views and ratings vary wildly for this movie. Some criticisms are just; it was a teeny bit too long and some of the action scenes were poorly done and unnecessary. I get the impression, though, that some people are carping and nit picking while choosing to ignore (or perhaps just not getting) the emotional and moral core at the heart of this movie. The key is in the very last line - and it's heartbreaking. If you don't get it I'm not going to explain it to you but to sum it up, this movie is both exciting and beautiful. This movie is Hollywood at it's very best.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G
About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use