DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Recent DVD/Video Releases
65
Adoration
42
Aliens in the Attic
56
American Violet
44
Answer Man, The
82
Anvil! The Story of Anvil![]()
54
Bruno
55
Casi Divas
63
Cheri
83
Drag Me to Hell![]()
24
Eating Out 3: All You Can Eat
76
Every Little Step
70
Fados
49
Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80
Food, Inc.
74
Humpday
32
I Love You, Beth Cooper
50
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
81
Il Divo![]()
54
Is Anybody There?
32
Land of the Lost
74
Lemon Tree
40
Limits of Control, The
43
Love 'N Dancing
63
Medicine for Melancholy
34
My Life in Ruins
51
My Sister's Keeper
48
Not Forgotten
76
Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation!
50
Nothing Like the Holidays
26
Objective, The
42
Orphan
78
Pray the Devil Back to Hell
48
Proposal, The
39
Spread
83
Star Trek![]()
55
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The
72
Thirst
35
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
28
Ugly Truth, The
66
Unmistaken Child
88
Up![]()
45
Whatever Works
34
Year One
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Lions for Lambs
EMAILPRINTUnited Artists (MGM)

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 36 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 74 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Drama
Written by: Matthew Michael Carnahan
Directed by: Robert Redford
Release Date:
Theatrical: November 9, 2007
DVD: April 8, 2008
Running Time: 88 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R for some war violence and language
Starring Tom Cruise, Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, Michael Pena, Derek Luke, and Andrew Garfield
The story begins after Arian and Ernest, two determined students at a West Coast university, follow the inspiration of their idealistic professor Dr. Malley and attempt to do something important with their lives. But when the two make the bold decision to join the battle in Afghanistan, Malley is both moved and distraught. Now, as Arian and Ernest fight for survival in the field, they become the string that binds together two disparate stories on opposite sides of America. In California, an anguished Dr. Malley attempts to reach a privileged but disaffected student who is the very opposite of Arian and Ernest. Meanwhile, in Washington DC, charismatic presidential hopeful Senator Jasper Irving is about to give a bombshell story to a probing TV journalist that may affect Arian and Ernest's fates. As arguments, memories, and bullets fly, the three stories are woven even more tightly together, revealing how each of these Americans has a profound impact on one another and the world. (United Artists)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: A River Runs Through It Quiz Show The Horse Whisperer The Legend of Bagger Vance
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Empire Helen O'Hara
A smart, accessible, surprisingly balanced look at our dysfunctional world. Compelling stuff.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Steve Davis
Despite its flaws, which become more evident as time elapses, Lions for Lambs is worth seeing for no other reason that you’ve never seen anything like it before.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
The tiny scale and armchair talkiness mark the movie as a bit of a folly, an act of idealistic hubris in today's commercial marketplace, yet that's its (minor) fascination too.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
This is responsive, engaged filmmaking, the kind of movie they say Americans don't make.
Read Full Review >Newsweek David Ansen
Intelligent, deadly serious, made in a spirit of patriotism and protest, Redford's movie is more civics lesson than drama and doesn't pretend otherwise. It is what it is: a call to action.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
This is a weird movie hybrid, both a tasteful picture and an angry one.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
All the good intentions in the world and solid performances from three of the biggest and most respected movie stars of our time cannot disguise the fact that Lions for Lambs is resting on a talky, disjointed and not-very-well-thought-out script.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
Though characters make some strong points, the film feels preachy and falls flat as entertainment.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
And unlike other recent dramas such as "Rendition," the film never feels like it's preaching. Instead, it just urges: Whatever you believe, do something.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
All true, but not new -- and not especially compelling.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is a long stretch toward the beginning of the film when we're interested, under the delusion that it's going somewhere. When we begin to suspect it's going in circles, our interest flags, and at the end, while rousing music plays, I would have preferred the Peggy Lee version of "Is That All There Is?"
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
Like many a Hollywood political drama, Lions for Lambs carries a full head of steam that is indistinguishable from a lot of hot air.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Ella Taylor
The movie is awful--and also oddly touching, even adorable in its dogged sense of responsibility, its stubborn refusal of style.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Ray Bennett
Politicians, the media, educators, military commanders and a docile public all come under fire in a well-made movie that offers no answers but raises many important questions.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
The movie is compelling now but unlikely to survive its moment.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
Lions for Lambs appears to have taken its inspiration from Al Gore's stolid "An Inconvenient Truth," using the stage lecture and Power Point presentation in lieu of dramatic momentum.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Ken Fox
In the end, it all remains a dramatically inert set of talking points, and not even the high-caliber cast can make much more out of it.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
This is the sort of film where a character says “Here we are, having a high-minded debate ...” and you wonder if countless moviegoers will be rolling their eyes in unison.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Manohla Dargis
It tells us everything most of us know already, including the fact that politicians lie, journalists fail and youth flounders. Mostly it tells us that Mr. Redford feels really bad about the state of things. Welcome to the club.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
One of those movies in which the principals talk a lot but don't say much.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
Fortunately for Redford, Lions for Lambs is a less ham-handed effort than Sayles’ “Silver City,” but it’s a near thing.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
This tactic, and the film's valid but familiar arguments, might have been fleshed out with better results onstage.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The problem with Lions for Lambs isn't its political engagement but its cinematic disengagement. Robert Redford directs and stars in this ambitious talkathon, which would have been more effective as a radio play.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Wesley Morris
It does not feel good to report that a movie with Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise makes the eyelids droop. But that's what Lions for Lambs does.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Marc Mohan
Talky, didactic and essentially free of any real narrative, it views Iraq through the lens of Vietnam, which is fair enough, but ends up making the whole polemic seem like a condescending effort from aging baby boomers to get the younger generation to step up to the plate.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano
Redford and Carnahan would like us to ponder our role in their fate. And maybe we would, if the lecture weren't so dull and self-satisfied.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine David Edelstein
Robert Redford’s Lions for Lambs is the clunkiest, windiest, and roughest of the lot. Most of it is dead on the screen. But its earnestness is so naked that it exerts a strange pull. You have to admire a director who works so diligently to help us rise above all the bad karma.
Read Full Review >Variety Derek Elley
Amounts to a giant cry of "Americans, get engaged!" wrapped in a star-heavy discourse that uses a lot of words to say nothing new.
Read Full Review >The New Yorker Anthony Lane
It winces with liberal self-chastisement: Redford is surely smart enough to realize, as the professor turns his ire on those who merely chatter while Rome burns, that his movie is itself no better, or more morally effective, than high-concept Hollywood fiddling.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Ann Hornaday
But for all its passion and topical currency, the movie plays too often like a college colloquium. And it ends on an unsatisfying note, with each character's choice, whether fateful or fatal, hanging in a confounding limbo of indeterminacy.
Read Full Review >New York Post Kyle Smith
I went to a wartime thriller, but then a Poli Sci 101 seminar broke out.
Read Full Review >Slate Dana Stevens
Ought to have been called "Slugs for Snails," so leisurely does it creep toward its predictably bombastic conclusion.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
All talk and zero characterization, it doesn't even feel like a real movie.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
You could make a case for this as a feature-film version of the FCC's fairness doctrine, but it feels more like a blandness doctrine, a pulling and hauling of the tone-deaf script, which is credited to Matthew Michael Carnahan, to the point of perfect vacuousness.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 4.9 (out of 10) based on 74 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Paul gave it a10:
A truly intelligent film, will have you thinking long after the film has finished.
Bill H. gave it a10:
Much better than the reviews I had seen, I don't think it's for everyone, though, which is particularly funny in an ironic way after having seen the movie.
Chris R. gave it a7:
I'm surprised by how many people think that this movie is bad. You have to realize that except for the flashback all of the events were supposed to be happening in the time of the actual movie length, jumping between storylines. These stories are supposed to be happening at the same time. The "politically savvy" like to say this movie is contrived and the politically apathetic like to say this movie was a lecture. I think it was a good bit of politics movie put together in a fairly captivating dramatic fashion. Not the best political movie I've ever seen but worth at least a single viewing.
Abubrad gave it an8:
This movie accomplished just what it set out to accomplish despite all the criticism from mindless critics who just want to be entertained. I showed it to my 18-year old who is as apathetic as they come and like his peers look to be entertained by movies. He was riveted to it and his response at the end? - "It was thought-provoking".
Rich R. gave it a0:
Are you kidding me? Seeing Meryl Streep struggling, and I mean STRUGGLING to act like she is taking Tom Cruise seriously is most painful. She is one of our greatest actors; he is one of the worst. Why are they in the same movie??? And Robert Redford? Poor guy looks like an old woman. This is pure bilge.
Linda W. gave it an8:
This is an analysis of life's decisions and how they affect you forever. And in a political format, makes you realize what apathy = just not caring one way or another - can do to our society. Well played, directed and written. I thought it was a breath of fresh air in the movie industry, without trying to put mud on either political party. Truly thought-provoking.
Andrew P. gave it an8:
Although the message of this movie, to take action, isn't original, it is important enough that hearing it more than once is just fine in my opinion. So many of us still aren't doing enough to help fix things that we all realize are wrong, so it's clear to me that this type of film still has its place.
