Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Lost in Translation

EMAILPRINTFocus Features

Lost in Translation reviews
89
6.3 User Score:

Movie Info

Genre(s): Comedy  |  Drama  |  Romance

Written by: Sofia Coppola

Directed by: Sofia Coppola

Release Date:
Theatrical: September 12, 2003
DVD: February 3, 2004

Running Time: 105 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: R for some sexual content

Starring Scarlett Johansson, Bill Murray, Giovanni Ribisi, and Anna Faris

Unable to sleep, Bob (Murray) and Charlotte (Johansson), two Americans in Tokyo, cross paths one night in the luxury hotel bar. This chance meeting soon becomes a surprising friendship. Charlotte and Bob venture through Tokyo, having often hilarious encounters with its citizens, and ultimately discover a new belief in life's possibilities. (Focus Features)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

What's astonishing about Sofia Coppola's enthralling new movie is the precision, maturity, and originality with which the confident young writer-director communicates so clearly in a cinematic language all her own.

Read Full Review >
100

LA Weekly Scott Foundas

Fraught with a deep sadness and sense of yearning. Yet, it is also an enormously -- at times, even uproariously -- comedic film, not because it feels any obligation to be "funny" in some contrived, screenwriterly sort of way, but because Coppola has set out to make a movie set to the rhythms of real (rather than reel) life.

Read Full Review >
100

LA Weekly Ella Taylor

Fraught with a deep sadness and sense of yearning. Yet, it is also an enormously -- at times, even uproariously -- comedic film, not because it feels any obligation to be "funny" in some contrived, screenwriterly sort of way, but because Coppola has set out to make a movie set to the rhythms of real (rather than reel) life.

Read Full Review >
100

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

The fact that this kind of serious material ends up playing puckishly funny as well as poignant is a tribute both to Coppola and to her do-or-die decision to cast Murray in the lead role.

Read Full Review >
100

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Simply put, Sofia Copolla's Lost in Translation is an amazing motion picture.

Read Full Review >
100

Premiere Glenn Kenny

This is one of the year's most subtly moving films, and a strong affirmation of Coppola's substantial talent.

Read Full Review >
100

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker

Isn't about a May-December romance or a brief encounter in a faraway place. It's about being alone in a crowd and the power of unexpected friendships.

Read Full Review >
100

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

I loved this movie. I loved the way Coppola and her actors negotiated the hazards of romance and comedy, taking what little they needed and depending for the rest on the truth of the characters.

Read Full Review >
100

New York Post Lou Lumenick

It's impossible to conceive of this ruefully funny entertainment without Bill Murray, who is nothing less than brilliant.

Read Full Review >
100

The New York Times A.O. Scott

Here he (Murray) supplies the kind of performance that seems so fully realized and effortless that it can easily be mistaken for not acting at all.

Read Full Review >
100

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

The connection between Bob and Charlotte, as Coppola shows it to us at the end of Lost in Translation, is a moment of intimate magnificence. I have never seen anything quite like it, in any movie.

Read Full Review >
100

Boston Globe Ty Burr

Longer on atmosphere and observation than on story, but you don't mind: Coppola maintains her quietly charged tone with a certainty that would be unbelievable in a second film if you didn't suspect genetics had a hand.

Read Full Review >
100

San Francisco Chronicle Edward Guthmann

A delicate, beautifully observed study of impossible romance, Lost in Translation is one of the best films this year.

Read Full Review >
100

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Giddily funny in a singularly American idiom, and shot, by Lance Acord, with an eagle eye for cultural absurdities, Ms. Coppola's film is also a meditation on love and longing, shot through with a sensibility that's all the more surprising for being so unfashionably tender.

100

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

This year's must-see film.

Read Full Review >
100

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

It's a bento box of shifts, feints, hints and small, sharp insights, built around a surprisingly deep core of feeling. And it confirms Coppola as an artist to watch and relish.

Read Full Review >
100

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Smart, funny, and splendidly acted.

Read Full Review >
100

Empire Rob Fraser

With cinemas dominated by underwhelming blockbusters and formulaic rom-coms, it’s easy to become disillusioned with the state of the movies. Thank the almighty, then, for Lost In Translation, which in 102 wondrous minutes will restore your faith in the power of the medium.

Read Full Review >
90

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

Coppola handles her film with very pleasant economy, with a kind of warm precision. Her father, who was one of this picture's producers, can be as proud of her as we are grateful.

Read Full Review >
90

Slate David Edelstein

This is the Bill Murray performance we've been waiting for: Saturday Night Live meets Chekhov.

Read Full Review >
90

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

It gets at something exquisitely human, so human that even movie stars feel it.

Read Full Review >
90

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

The movie contains priceless slapstick from Bill Murray, finely tuned performances by Murray and the beautiful Scarlett Johansson and a visual and aural design that cultivates a romantic though melancholy mood.

Read Full Review >
90

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

Gorgeously shot by Lance Acord, who makes Toyko a gaudy dreamscape that's both seductive and frightening, Lost In Translation washes away memories of "Godfather III," establishing Coppola as a major filmmaker in her own right, and reconfirming Johansson and Murray as actors of startling depth and power.

Read Full Review >
90

Village Voice J. Hoberman

As bittersweet a brief encounter as any in American movies since Richard Linklater's equally romantic "Before Sunrise."

Read Full Review >
90

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Coppola both wrote and directed, and there’s a pleasing shapelessness to her scenes. She accomplishes the difficult feat of showing people being bored out of their skulls in such a way that we are never bored watching them.

Read Full Review >
90

Time Richard Corliss

Watch Murray's eyes in the climactic scene in the hotel lobby: while hardly moving, they express the collapsing of all hopes, the return to a sleepwalking status quo. You won't find a subtler, funnier or more poignant performance this year than this quietly astonishing turn.

Read Full Review >
90

Newsweek David Ansen

Their (Murray/Johansson) brief, wondrous encounter is the soul of this subtle, funny, melancholy film.

Read Full Review >
89

Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones

A lovely, quietly thrilling thing.

Read Full Review >
88

USA Today Mike Clark

Romantic comedies with two low-key leads can be asking for trouble, but one senses that the actors must have clicked on some fundamental level.

Read Full Review >
88

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Don't stall about seeing Sofia Coppola's altogether remarkable Lost in Translation. It's a class-act liftoff for the fall movie season. Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson give performances that will be talked about for years.

Read Full Review >
88

Chicago Tribune Mark Caro

Dislocated from their native country and former lives, Bob and Charlotte come to establish a language of their own. Coppola has done the same, proving she boasts one of today's truly distinct filmmaking voices.

Read Full Review >
88

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

A smartly written, confidently directed film that delivers big laughs while developing two of the year's most earnest characters and some of its most rewarding sentiments.

Read Full Review >
88

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

It's a sign of just how much Coppola respects her characters that she doesn't make us privy to that final line: It is only meant for them to share. But like the rest of the ethereal Lost in Translation, you don't need to have it spelled out in order to feel it.

Read Full Review >
80

Film Threat Rick Kisonak

There isn't another American screen actor who could have given this performance, not one who so deftly could have navigated the razor's edge separating the wiseacre and the wise.

Read Full Review >
80

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Thanks to two delightful performers, you're drawn powerfully to the outcome.

Read Full Review >
80

Variety David Rooney

The film's unhurried pace will target it for discerning audiences only, but its wry humor and coolly amused observation of contemporary Japan should score with smart urbanites.

Read Full Review >
80

The New Yorker David Denby

Not much happens, but Coppola is so gentle and witty an observer that the movie casts a spell. [15 September 2003, p. 100]

80

Film Threat Stina Chyn

By the time the film was half over, I was ready to catch the next flight to Japan. Until travel arrangements can be made, though, I'll just watch Lost in Translation again.

Read Full Review >
75

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

Arguably, Lost in Translation is the American answer to Wong Kar-wai's masterpiece, "In the Mood for Love," though less about history, more about infatuation.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Coppola does a fair job of capturing the fish-tank ambience of nocturnal, upscale Tokyo and showing how it feels to be a stranger in that world, and an excellent job of getting the most from her lead actors. Unfortunately, I'm not sure she accomplishes anything else.

Read Full Review >
63

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

Coppola lacks a firm grip on this material, and it starts to get away from her midway through.

Read Full Review >
63

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

This movie registers like a pop song that enters the mind only in fragments because, as a whole, it lacks the style or substance to be memorable.

Read Full Review >
60

TV Guide Ken Fox

It can be funny, but the humor is too often based in stereotypical perceptions of Asians (they're short, they're laughably polite, they eat weird food), and Coppola shamelessly invites us to laugh along with Murray's character, who, believe it or not, thinks it's hilarious when his hosts get their "r"s and "l"s switched.

Read Full Review >
40

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

Coppola hasn't delivered a turkey--it's a cute little movie, if not as rich as her brother Roman's similarly themed "CQ"--but when work this potentially satisfying remains flatly obvious, it's almost worse than being flat-out bad.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.3 (out of 10) based on 466 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

apostolos a gave it a10:
A movie-trip across your heart! A sound deep into your soul! Yes, we are awake listening to Bob and Charlotte's whispers, taking us far away, above the cityscape of Tokyo! Sofia created a masterpiece! Just for the soul-listeners.

Michael H. gave it a10:
Pure perfection. Moving and touching everytime. The ending brings tears every watch.

Kieran J gave it a10:
A lot of these reviews give this movie a 1 or a zero, usually citing reasons such as ' it was actionless' ' boring' ' where was the plot? i didn't get a climax, something which I've been socially conditioned to look forward to!' This movie is subtle, maybe it lacks action, but not everything's about action. The exploration into ideas about isolation and loneliness and poignant romance shared between the two characters is something special.

Nigel M gave it a0:
Don't listen to the pretentious reviews here, this is a bad film plain and simple. Boring, meandering tosh.

J.C. V gave it a10:
I think that the message this film give us is very important. There's some comments under mine that says this movie is boring, without climax, drama or something else, but that's the typical kind of comment that an average person would say. The movie is not so direct as "Requiem for a dream" (for example) is, may be kinda slow for some people but I think that the main topics are wonderfully expressed. [I'm sorry because my english is not so good but that's what I have to say. I loved that movie, and I think is one of the best I've ever seen...].

John A gave it a6:
lost in translation is one of those movies that makes a person feel good for watching it. most of its viewers love its small "Anti Hollywood" feel, but BELIEVE me, aside from being a respectable piece of art (at best), lost in translation really doesnt offer much more to its viewers then that nice little indie feel. the problem with the movie is that there isnt enough character development involved. at no point did i as a viewer have a specific feeling for anyone in the movie because theres really not enough that i knew about them as people. its hard to say this movie does much more then offer the occasional chuckle. the characters are too distant to be relatable so of course when they say something funny it feels like a sad attempt to be witty. im not asking that every movie have characters that i can identify with, but its really important that at some point in a movie the audience member has a see where the character is coming from. this movie is beautifully acted. the only problem is that they play roles of people that no one really wants to see. these are 2 very distant people who eventually come together to make sense of it all, but its hard to think that the director does a very good job in showing the audience any of that. at no point later on in the movie are these characters really more developed then they were to begin with. for what its worth the movie did have a small amount of its dry humor, but in NO WAY is this movie a comedy. (NO SPOILERS AHEAD....) the ending is much different from the rest of the film and just for a second the audience gets a little piece of emotion. and you really see the characters for who they are. problem is the entire rest of the movie never set us up for such an ending. nobody wants a romantic happy ending garbage heap, but this movie was just so fixated on trying to be real that it just ended up being boring. as a viewer i felt that i was finally given the ending only because the director knew its what i wanted to see, and NoT because it was the actual direction the movie was meant to take. life doesnt always have a clear cut road and there arent always yes or no answers. this movie tries so hard to convey that message, but from actor to audience, somewhere in between the message seems to have been Lost in Translation.

Tara B gave it a10:
Just a simple film told in the most graceful, lyrical way, with subtle, perfectly cast performances but Murray and Johanson.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use