CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Midsummer Night's Dream, A
Fox Searchlight Pictures

Midsummer Night's Dream, A reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 61 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.1 out of 10
based on 24 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 6 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for some sexual content

Starring Kevin Kline, Michelle Pfeiffer, Stanley Tucci, Rupert Everett, Calista Flockhart, Christian Bale, David Strathairn, and Sophie Marceau

Shakespeare's classic romantic comedy set in 19th century Tuscany.


GENRE(S): Romance  
WRITTEN BY: Michael Hoffman
William Shakespeare (play)
 
DIRECTED BY: Michael Hoffman  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: April 17, 2001 
Video: April 17, 2001 
Theatrical: May 14, 1999 
RUNNING TIME: 116 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: UK / Italy 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

89
Austin Chronicle Russell Smith
For my money the most gloriously, enchantingly trivial play in the Shakespearean canon, A Midsummer Night's Dream may also be the most screwup-proof of the bard's works.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
A thoroughly enjoyable piece of cinema that does credit to its director and cast.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Jane Horwitz
Only the title is clunky in this felicitous marriage of cinematic trickery, theatrical whimsy and the Bard's fabulous tale.
Read Full Review
80
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
Hoffman (Soapdish, One Fine Day) leads a first-rate cast in an intelligent, fully realized adaptation of Shakespeare's most popular comedy that's at once highly cinematic and true to its source.
Read Full Review
80
Dallas Observer M. V. Moorhead
One of the best of the many delights of director Michael Hoffman's new film -- is that he manages to have it both ways -- the gauzy fantasy and the bacchanal.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
The well chosen cast helps -- no one strikes a false note.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Most of the original play's magical speeches are preserved here, and however far this film may seem to stray from the original text, the delights remain. [14 May 1999, Friday, p.A]
75
San Francisco Examiner Wesley Morris
A gorgeous sliver of grown-up ambrosia.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Stack
A playful, sexy piece of work -- just what the Bard might have conjured up for a movie adaptation of his beloved spring-fever comedy.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
It is an enchanted folly suggesting that romance is a matter of chance, since love is blind; at the right moment we are likely to fall in love with the first person our eyes light upon.
Read Full Review
70
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Hoffman introduces a memorable sensuality to the movie.
Read Full Review
70
Slate David Edelstein
Hoffman has wedged the play into a weirdly inapposite setting, has stupidly cut and even more stupidly embellished it, and has miscast it almost to a player. And yet the damn thing works: Shakespeare staggers through, mutilated but triumphant.
Read Full Review
63
USA Today Susan Wloszczyna
The major flaw, the clash of acting styles, is at least fascinating to observe. [14 May 1999, Life, p.8E]
60
Variety Emanuel Levy
Whimsical, intermittently enjoyable but decidedly unmagical.
Read Full Review
60
Newsweek Jack Kroll
Uneven but spunkily energetic movie.
Read Full Review
58
Entertainment Weekly Alice King
Kline turns in a bravura performance -- he's one of the few in this star-packed cast who actually knows what to do with Shakespeare's poetry.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Elvis Mitchell
A parade of incongruities, with performances ranging from the sublime to the you-know-what.
Read Full Review
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak
Shakespeare's comical, all-too-human tale of lust, foreplay and wordplay is buried beneath bad taste.
Read Full Review
50
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The set design is gung-ho Hallmark (Tinkerbell lights, that sort of thing) with a strong whiff of Fellini (the fairy glade looks like a pre-Raphaelite red-light district).
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
If the picture is often less spellbinding than it wants to be, it's partly Hoffman's fault for creating fantasy moods through traditional stage devices -- lavish props, cute makeup, peek-a-boo costumes -- that seem rather tame for this age of morphed-up visual surprises.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
A thoroughly respectable affair: Your high school English teacher would approve, and parts are terrifically enjoyable.
Read Full Review
50
Village Voice Jessica Winter
The early scenes whir and buzz along to create quite a pleasing clamor.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
This is a chance to see Shakespeare with mud wrestling, something the Bard surely would have put in if only he'd thought of it himself… Though the actors have no major problems handling the language, the whole venture is listless when it should be sparkling. Shakespeare, even with mud wrestling, needn't be quite so much of a slog. [14 May 1999, Calendar, p.F-6]
40
The New Yorker David Denby
Kevin Kline does his best movie work yet as Nick Bottom...But in most other ways this "Midsummer Night" is hard to endure.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.1 (out of 10) based on 6 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Fred B. gave it a10:
Beautifully entertaining take on Shakespeare's play, laced with Italian opera and marvelous performances, by Kline and Flockhart particularly. The giddy poetry rolls on and on and what Pffeifer might lack in delivery she makes up for in lovestruck appeal. Bravo.

Zack O. gave it a 0:
What the hell is this crap? CRAP CRAP CRAP! thats wat it is. this movie is boring and to prove it, i have to watch this stupid movie in school for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES! anything watched for education is 100% boring and stupid. it's not funny, it's long, you can't understand what the hell they are trying to say, and it sucks. period.

To Mulroneycakes Or Not To Mulroneycakes gave it an 8:
I like the fact that, because of the way Metacritic works, Wild Bill Shakespeare is credited on the site as co-writer. He'd fit in quite well in Hollywood. No-one was better at working within the studio system than him. Of course, none of the big Tinseltown execs can carry the threat of execution. Except maybe Harvey Weinstein. The film? It's a good one; a faithful, well-cast retelling of the play, with only a few problems - Flockhart, though great, isn't particularly tall, and is therefore all wrong for Helena; and what benefits there were in updating the play to 19th century Italy are only obvious in Michael Hoffman's head. But that's nitpicking. The film's worth seeing, basically, for Kline. The man was born to play Bottom.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use