Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Mona Lisa Smile

EMAILPRINTColumbia Pictures / Sony Pictures Entertainment

Mona Lisa Smile reviews
45
4.7 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 41 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 50 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Comedy  |  Drama  |  Romance

Written by: Lawrence Konner
Mark Rosenthal

Directed by: Mike Newell

Release Date:
Theatrical: December 19, 2003
DVD: March 9, 2004

Running Time: 125 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for sexual content and thematic issues

Starring Julia Roberts, Kirsten Dunst, Julia Stiles, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Dominic West, John Slattery, Marcia Gay Harden, and Ginnifer Goodwin

Set at all-female Wellesley College in 1953, this is an uplifting and poignant drama about one woman's desire to enrich the lives of her students. (Sony)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

75

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

The most radical thing about the movie, the thing that may make it most appealing to modern audiences, is that the filmmakers say both sides are right.

Read Full Review >
75

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

The reliable Mike Newell directs Mona Lisa Smile with such assurance that the important moments are never mawkish or dull, and he encourages the women to act with absolute conviction.

Read Full Review >
75

Premiere Sharon Allen Burke

Director Mike Newell strips away facades and keeps this movie singing to the feel-good ending where everyone learns a life lesson by graduation time, whatever their choice may be.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The characters involve us, we sympathize with their dreams and despair of their matrimonial tunnel vision, and at the end we are relieved that we listened to Miss Watson and became the wonderful people who we are today.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

The movie, with its panorama of emotional epiphanies and its belief in the talent and grace of young women, is nevertheless bracing.

Read Full Review >
67

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

A strangely mixed blessing filled with glossy production values and vibrant supporting performances but suffers mightily from a lack of credibility and the grinding predictability of its plot.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

The men here are negligible, but all the actresses are good -- especially Dunst, who shows a previously unrevealed gift for blending cold conservative roots, starchy appearance, forgiveness and unexpected redemption.

Read Full Review >
63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

First things first: As one of my wise editors noted, no person who can flash as many teeth as Julia Roberts should ever star in a movie called Mona Lisa Smile.

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

Plays out as little more than a diversion, one that does not truly break any new ground. But it's undeniably interesting and leaves plenty of room for a more thoughtful film about women and education.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis

For all its flaws, its obvious if irrelevant similarity to "Dead Poets Society," it lets us spend some quality time with some of the finest actresses in American film as they give energetic life to one of the most radically underrepresented minorities in Hollywood: the intelligent woman.

Read Full Review >
60

The New York Times Stephen Holden

Mr. Newell is master of the feel-good ensemble piece whose shallowness is partly masked by the expertise of a high-toned cast.

Read Full Review >
60

The New Yorker David Denby

The fight against traditionalism has long been won, so the movie’s indignation feels superfluous, but Mike Newell’s direction is solid, the period décor and costumes are a sombre riot of chintz and pleated skirts, and the movie has an air of measured craft and intelligence. [22 & 29 December 2003, p. 166]

60

Empire Anna Smith

There are some roles Julia Roberts was born to play -- a tart with a heart, say, or a likeable and famous actor -- but a charismatic, inspiring 1950s teacher is not one of them.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

Still, if it doesn't go down in film history as a key moment in Roberts' career, it might very well be remembered as a breakthrough for one of its trio of rising stars.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Reader Reece Pendleton

Oscillating between a furrowed brow and her trademark horsey smile, Roberts battles the repressed harpies on the faculty and strives to shake her students out of their conformist mind-sets. Dispensing with character development, Lawrence Konner and Mark Rosenthal's lifeless script shunts its caricatures from one predictable plot point to the next.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Roberts brings a sense of personal conviction to her part -- she's quite a feminist herself -- and as much sense of humor as the corny screenplay allows.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

There's a spark missing, and where it's missing is in Roberts' conscientious but all too reserved performance.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jami Bernard

A movie about a maverick ought to be a little daring as well, and Mona Lisa Smile is as safe and predictable as chintz.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Post Jonathan Foreman

Isn't boring, but it is sanctimonious, relentlessly predictable and willfully ignorant of the period it's set in.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

From her speech patterns to her body language, Roberts's performance is wrong for the period.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

Rote characterizations and a trite, even condescending, attitude toward that era's misguided mores robs the film of the satiric punch Todd Haynes delivered in "Far From Heaven."

Read Full Review >
50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The most likely facial expression to be elicited by Mona Lisa Smile is a grimace.

Read Full Review >
50

Dallas Observer Robert Wilonsky

You will leave Mona Lisa Smile with only the slightest hint of the grin every slick studio movie gives you--the grin of reassurance and superiority. But you will not be changed, only out about eight bucks.

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Claudia Puig

Rather than being a fascinating exploration of a much more constrained time in our social history, the film simply feels anachronistic.

Read Full Review >
50

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

In terms of the gap between the movie it's trying to be and the movie it actually is, Mona Lisa Smile is in many ways indefensible. Yet for all its problems, it's satisfyingly movielike. The minutes drift by pleasurably and mindlessly.

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach

Put simply, Mona Lisa Smile is too much of a stacked deck -- a movie too concerned with ensuring that audiences feel a certain way to risk anything like nuance or interpretation.

Read Full Review >
40

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

It almost takes skill to make this cast dull, but the relentlessly tepid film does it anyway, by never getting the characters straight.

Read Full Review >
40

LA Weekly Scott Foundas

What makes the movie seem crass is its refusal to present (or even to see) more than one side of any given issue. In the logic of Konner and Rosenthal, here abetted by director Mike Newell, you're either a Jackson Pollock or a Norman Rockwell.

Read Full Review >
40

Time Richard Corliss

Maybe Wellesley isn't the only injured party here. Can an audience sue for cruel and edifying punishment?

Read Full Review >
40

Variety David Rooney

An appealing female cast gives the hollowly formulaic Mona Lisa Smile more dignity than it perhaps deserves, yet it's Julia Roberts in an ill-suited starring role that represents one of the film's chief shortcomings.

Read Full Review >
40

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Director Mike Newell and screenwriters Lawrence Konner and Mark Rosenthal should have uncorseted their own imaginations. The girls on display are all tightly stereotyped.

Read Full Review >
40

Newsweek David Ansen

Newell, no hack, tries not to milk the cliches shamelessly, and that may be the movie's final undoing. Lacking the courage of its own vulgarity, Mona Lisa Smile is as tepid as old bathwater.

Read Full Review >
40

Village Voice Jessica Winter

Mona Lisa Smile's only mysteries are the result of frenzied corner-cutting as Newell & Co. speed through the last reel, an exhausting cram session of hair-trigger speechifying and identity transformations bordering on the science-fictional.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat Kevin Carr

Could be subtitled “The Parade of Overrated Actresses.”

Read Full Review >
40

Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones

There's just no reconciling the film's ambivalent message. Newell hangs a modern sensibility on a supposed period piece, and hangs his film in the process.

Read Full Review >
38

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

As artistic achievements go, Mona Lisa Smile is strictly a paint-by-numbers affair. No shading. Little in the way of perspective. To call it one-dimensional would be an act of charity.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Like the turtleneck cashmere sweaters and girdles that tie down these promising women, the movie is trite and trussed.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Like the turtleneck cashmere sweaters and girdles that tie down these promising women, the movie is trite and trussed.

Read Full Review >
30

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

The performances, under Mike Newell's direction, range from conventional (Ms. Roberts) to dreadful, and the script is as shallow as an old Cosmo cover story.

25

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

It's a gussied-up sorority-of-rising-stars project produced, I fantasize, by baby-boomer studio guys whose younger spouses articulately defend a woman's right to stay home and raise the kids.

Read Full Review >
25

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

"Irritating" doesn't begin to describe Julia Roberts as Katherine, an art-history prof who arrives at Wellesley in 1953.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 4.7 (out of 10) based on 50 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Sandy C. gave it a6:
Very enjoyable movie with good performances.

Joe B. gave it an8:
Very entertaining movie. Fine performances and an interesting story.

Nessa R gave it a 9:
I loved the movie, I found it interesting to watch and i thought it great actoring by all performers... And the story line was heart touching. I recommend anyone to watch it.

Samantha L. gave it a 10:
I loved it! It was very good, and Julia Roberts was perfect. How stereotypical of people to think that Julia can only star in "prostitute" movies! I give it two thumbs up.

Sarah B. gave it a 7:
This, obviously, is a chick flick, since it's centered around many different women and their jobs/roles/duties in the 1950s. I really liked the movie, and if you started the movie with an open mind, you might have had a different opinion, instead of rating it depressingly low.

Patrick H. gave it an 8:
Very good overall. Excellent acting, and a very nice topic. Sometimes a little confusing, but still a great film.

Morr B. gave it a 7:
Very enjoyable trip back to the 50's which captures much of the look and the attitudes of the period, in spite of the predictable story line.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use