|
Upcoming Release Calendar
38
12 Rounds Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Oliver Twist
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: PG-13 for disturbing images
Starring Ben Kingsley, Barney Clark, Jamie Foreman, Harry Eden, Leanne Rowe, Lewis Chase, Edward Hardwicke, and Jeremy Swift
Director Roman Polanski and writer Ronald Harwood re-imagine Charles Dickens' classic story of a young boy who gets involved with a gang of pickpockets in 19th Century London. (Sony Pictures Entertainment)
| GENRE(S): | Drama | Family/Kids |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Ronald Harwood
Charles Dickens (novel) |
| DIRECTED BY: | Roman Polanski |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: January 24, 2006 Theatrical: September 23, 2005 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 130 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | UK / Czech Republic / France / Italy |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 7.3 (out of 10) based on 26 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
[Anonymous] gave it an8:
Reading the film critics, their main grip seems to be that "Oliver Twist" is not polenskian enough. How about Dickensian? Is anything wrong with a good narrative and lovely cinematography?
Manolis S. gave it a10:
A very personal take on Oliver Twist for Polanski, full of emotions, similar to the Pianist, where people look at life through windows, little Oliver on the road gathers all good and positive aspects of life through his adventures, near masterpiece, cinema at its best!!
Crysania gave it a4:
Lots of people who had reviewed this movie would compare it either with the book, adapted play or previous films. As I did not have any prior experience with any of those materials, I could do an unbias review. Boring was the verdict. Although the acting was good, the production lavish and good directing from Polanski, it failed to exhume any feelings I may have had for any of those characters except for a brief interlude at the end. Best to watch it with the sub-titles on.
Brian M. gave it a4:
I just couldn't get into it. None of the characters connected with me. I actually turned off the DVD about two-thirds of the way through, and never finished it, because I was bored.
Ilze S. gave it a2:
The movie is boring. The book is much better than this adaptation. I expected more, there are no pleasure in this film. It’s dark and slow. I don’t like Charles Dickens very much, but Great Expectations was good book and good movie. If the director was someone else, I think they could get much better result than this jam.
Emma C. gave it a6:
I think most of the viewers have seen this act out thing already.so when we saw this movie...we will like already know what will be going on in the next secne.so i may thought that to change some of the scene into better ones.
david b. gave it a9:
If you expect the singalong jollity that Oliver! delivered don't watch this version. This film offers the viewer a valid interpretation of life in those times. The sets are by no means polished stages, these come across as real muddy streets filled with violent drunkards and brutes. Not that there aren't any compassionate characters, for there are a few - but they are strikingly naive in their expectations of the behaviour of others. The actors in this film are not larger than the roles they are playing - and that adds to the realism. Kingsley's Fagin is not the lovable entertainer portrayed by Moody - but his is far more appropriate. I think Dickens would approve.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use