DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Recent DVD/Video Releases
60
9
xx
Across the Hall
56
Adam
37
Amelia
73
Amreeka
35
Babysitters, The
70
Big Fan
57
Boys Are Back, The
81
Bright Star![]()
71
Bronson
60
Brothers at War
55
Brothers Bloom, The
45
Burning Plain, The
xx
Carriers
64
Che
57
Chelsea on the Rocks
66
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
23
Couples Retreat
54
Dare
68
Departures
19
Downloading Nancy
55
Endgame
39
Fame
30
Final Destination, The
27
Gamer
50
Give Me Your Hand
46
Halloween II
73
House of the Devil, The
94
Hurt Locker, The![]()
55
I Can Do Bad All By Myself
17
I Hate Valentine's Day
26
I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
83
In the Loop![]()
58
Invention of Lying, The
47
Jennifer's Body
41
Little Ashes
80
Lorna's Silence
33
Love Happens
67
Michael Jackson's This Is It
xx
Ministers, The
67
Moon
59
More Than a Game
49
New York, I Love You
66
No Impact Man
47
Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
28
Pandorum
68
Paranormal Activity
85
Passing Strange![]()
63
Perfect Getaway, A
44
Peter and Vandy
54
Pontypool
35
Post Grad
30
Saw VI
79
Serious Man, A
36
Serious Moonlight
76
Soul Power
40
Spiral
39
St. Trinian's
33
Stepfather, The
45
Surrogates
47
Time Traveler's Wife
43
Tru Loved
61
Trucker
47
Weather Girl
67
Whip It
28
Whiteout
73
Zombieland
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Player, The

Universal acclaim
Based on 20 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 8 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller
Written by: Michael Tolkin (also novel)
Directed by: Robert Altman
Release Date:
Theatrical: April 3, 1992
DVD: August 22, 1997
Running Time: 124 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R
Starring Tim Robbins, Greta Scacchi, Fred Ward, Whoopi Goldberg, Peter Gallagher, Vincent D'Onofrio, Dean Stockwell, and Lyle Lovett
Robert Altman takes on the Hollywood studio system.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: A Prairie Home Companion Cookie's Fortune Dr. T and the Women Gosford Park M*A*S*H Short Cuts The Company The Gingerbread Man Three Women
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Time Richard Corliss
Michael Tolkin's script abounds in such cynical wisdom, but it never loses an appreciation for the grace with which these snakes consume their victims. [13 April 1992]
Washington Post Desson Thomson
A rare commodity. It's brilliant and a guilty pleasure. A subtle damning of things Hollywood, Robert Altman's seriocomedy slices its target with a thousand, imperceptible razor cuts.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Edward Guthmann
Remarkable also for the uniform excellence of its cast, and for the pleasure [Altman's] actors take in the wide berth he allows them. [24 Apr 1992]
Rolling Stone Staff (Not Credited)
What makes The Player the best and boldest American comedy in years is Altman's wizardry at leavening anger with cathartic wit. He sticks it to every target, himself and us included, with a wicked zest that hurts only when you laugh -- and The Player keeps you laughing constantly.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Gene Siskel
What "M.A.S.H." did to service comedies, what "McCabe and Mrs. Miller" did to westerns, what "The Long Goodbye" did to detective pictures, The Player does the to Hollywood success story. [24 April 1992]
Washington Post Hal Hinson
The film, which begins with a single, gorgeously sustained eight-minute camera move, is blissfully out of touch with contemporary trends in moviemaking...surprising, both in style and narrative.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
The film is sublime entertainment, at once ticklish and suspenseful, cynical and sincere. By its very existence, Altman's comedy about the death of Hollywood lets you know that movies are still alive and kicking.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
This is the master at the top of his form, his erratic genius harnessed and everything clicking, everything flowing, a fresh creation from a mature artist.
Read Full Review >USA Today Mike Clark
Joins company with "Sullivan's Travels" and "Sunset Boulevard" as the quintessential Hollywood peek-a-boos...[and] Tim Robbins' modulated performance rates rhapsodic praise. [10 Apr 1992]
The New Yorker Terrence Rafferty
With breathtaking assurance, the movie veers from psychological-thriller suspense to goofball comedy to icy satire: it's Patricia Highsmith meets Monty Python meets Nathaniel West. [20 Apr 1992, p.81]
Wall Street Journal Julie Salamon
This brilliant satire, styled as a murder mystery, is the best insider's view of Hollywood since "Sunset Boulevard." [15 Dec 1992, p.A16(E)]
The New York Times Vincent Canby
So entertaining, so flip and so genially irreverent that it seems to announce the return of the great gregarious film maker whose "Nashville" remains one of the classics of the 1970's.
Read Full Review >Variety Staff (Not Credited)
Mercilessly satiric yet good-natured, this enormously entertaining slam dunk quite possibly is the most resonant Hollywood saga since the days of "Sunset Blvd." and "The Bad and the Beautiful."
Austin Chronicle Steve Davis
From its brilliant and sublime opening sequence to its self-reflexive ending, The Player distills everything that's wrong with the American film industry with the precision of someone who's been there.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
The film should captivate anyone with a taste for bold cinematics, unpredictable storytelling, and pitch-black humor aimed at the worthiest of targets: a self-involved and self-congratulatory, industry that often gives lip service to art while worshipping the bottom line. [10 Apr 1992]
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Even when Griffin has a heart of stone, Tim Robbins is lacking in the knid of ice-cold magnetism that allows a thorough bastard to hold the screen like nobody's business. [10 Apr 1992]
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
The surface activity keeps one occupied, but never adds up to much because none of the characters is developed beyond the cartoon level; and the snobby sense of knowingness that's over everything is uncomfortably close to what the movie is supposed to be dissecting.
Read Full Review >The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
In crudest terms, there's no one to root for, and unlike Mamet or Pinter, for instance, the story isn't remotely strong enough to thrive without such a center [The film s]trains hard to be smart and is ultimately repellent. [11 May 1992]
What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 9.2 (out of 10) based on 8 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Mike C. gave it a 9:
A very clever movie with a classic twist at the end (the Willis/Roberts bit). But Robbins is too blank. He is miscast I think. The lead here calls for somebody you can like AND hate. Robbins is just too likeable. He should have played the Gallagher role, or the D'Onfrio role. D'Onofrio should have been the lead. Or someone else, maybe Hugh Grant, for instance.
This Is Gilbert Mulroneycakes Calling From Rockall gave it a 10:
Once again, Yoon Min Cho and I have been watching different films with the same title. The film I saw is easily the least good-natured film Altman has ever made. It has curiousity, insight, ruthlessness and passion in spades, and no-one but no-one gets a pat on the back - or when they do, it's a very hard one that wooshes all the air out of their lungs at once. Don't overthink the celebrity cameos either - the only ones that are designed to make any impact are Bruce Willis and Julia Roberts. Almost everyone else will pretty much pass you by. Besides, YMC's spoilt the film for himself by overthinking like that. Who cares if they're acting the martyr while faking self-criticism? Seems to me that the joke's on them if they are, because Hollywood doesn't come out of this film in a very good light. Whatever, at least he didn't say - as some chancer pretending to be a movie critic here in Britain once said - that it was "sloppily directed". If I ever find that one person - and the search goes on - I will, unfortunately, be forced to beat him with a truncheon, take him into a room, tie him up, and force him to watch one of the most incredible single shots in cinema history prior to the entirety of "Russian Ark" - the opening eight-minute crane tracking shot of the hugest area you can imagine, a shot which can only have been done by Robert Altman, possibly conceptualised with the assistance of some of his herbal cigarettes. It's a beautiful thing. If it was up to me, no movie with a shot like that could get anything less than a green Meta rating. And even though it's not up to me - which is just as well, because I'd only break the website in the first few minutes - that's what it's getting, because it's a nasty masterpiece. Anyone else made it, it'd be the jewel in his crown. But Altman keeps making those great movies, so this is more like a little emerald on the side. Still gets 10 though.
Yoon Min C. gave it a 6:
Too glib and good-natured, this limp satire of Hollywood industry is utterly toothless. Altman's satire has neither genuine curiosity, scandalous insight, nor the ruthlessness or the passion to go for the jugular. Rather, every shallow exec gets a pat on their back for their ability to squeeze out of tight corners and make deals, and every celebrity--who eagerly lined up to appear as cameo--gets to play both martyr to and collaborator with the system, thereby both patting themselves on the back AND pretending to be self-critical. This is a long, long way away from Nashville which was composed of genuinely tragic-comic elements. Fairly decent script, competently acted, though Tim Robbins is no Gordon Gekko.
Garett T. gave it a 10:
One of the best films ever made by Altman, and one of the best films ever made.
Andy B. gave it a 10:
An absolute must-see. In my mind, this is Altman's best work. The first shot is the coolest I've ever seen.
