DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Recent DVD/Video Releases
60
9
xx
Across the Hall
56
Adam
37
Amelia
73
Amreeka
35
Babysitters, The
70
Big Fan
57
Boys Are Back, The
81
Bright Star![]()
71
Bronson
60
Brothers at War
55
Brothers Bloom, The
45
Burning Plain, The
xx
Carriers
64
Che
57
Chelsea on the Rocks
66
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
23
Couples Retreat
54
Dare
68
Departures
19
Downloading Nancy
55
Endgame
39
Fame
30
Final Destination, The
27
Gamer
50
Give Me Your Hand
46
Halloween II
73
House of the Devil, The
94
Hurt Locker, The![]()
55
I Can Do Bad All By Myself
17
I Hate Valentine's Day
26
I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
83
In the Loop![]()
58
Invention of Lying, The
47
Jennifer's Body
41
Little Ashes
80
Lorna's Silence
33
Love Happens
67
Michael Jackson's This Is It
xx
Ministers, The
67
Moon
59
More Than a Game
49
New York, I Love You
66
No Impact Man
47
Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
28
Pandorum
68
Paranormal Activity
85
Passing Strange![]()
63
Perfect Getaway, A
44
Peter and Vandy
54
Pontypool
35
Post Grad
30
Saw VI
79
Serious Man, A
36
Serious Moonlight
76
Soul Power
40
Spiral
39
St. Trinian's
33
Stepfather, The
45
Surrogates
47
Time Traveler's Wife
43
Tru Loved
61
Trucker
47
Weather Girl
67
Whip It
28
Whiteout
73
Zombieland
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Producers, The

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 37 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 139 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Comedy | Musical
Written by:
Mel Brooks (also 1968 screenplay, 2001 stage play book & lyrics)
Thomas Meehan (also 2001 stage play music)
Directed by: Susan Stroman
Release Date:
Theatrical: December 16, 2005
DVD: May 16, 2006
Running Time: 134 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: PG-13 for sexual humor and references
Starring Nathan Lane, Matthew Broderick, Uma Thurman, Will Ferrell, Roger Bart, Gary Beach, Andrea Martin, and Debra Monk
The movie classic that became a Broadway sensation now becomes a movie musical event.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: The Producers (1968)
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
It's a classic example of how a movie can be great without, strictly speaking, being good. But when something is this funny, who wants to speak strictly?
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Ty Burr
Susan Stroman directed the show on Broadway and what she has done here is photograph that show -- no more, no less. This is good news for anyone who couldn't afford a trip to New York and $100 tickets, but it's a fairly odd approach to cinema.
Read Full Review >Premiere Staff (not credited)
Once you drink The Producers' Kool-Aid, it's a thoroughly enjoyable descent into madness.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Stephen Hunter
It's too long to be great and it's too square to be great and it's too loud to be great and it finds homosexual effeminacy too funny to ever be called great, but I can't imagine anyone coming out sadder than they went in.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Brooks's sweetness, innocence, and boundless love of the infantile inform everything from the brassy production numbers (capped by an homage to Jailhouse Rock) to the final credits.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Melissa Levine
In the end, The Producers is an enjoyable romp, and at times--as when Hitler sings "Heil Myself"--it's hilarious. But it's not transcendent.
Read Full Review >Time Richard Schickel
There's no attempt to address the show's endemic weak spots--a slow start and a contrived end. Mostly Stroman just lets it rip. But in some respects the movie is an improvement on the show.
Read Full Review >Village Voice J. Hoberman
Broderick is a genuine trouper, hoofing his way through his big numbers, while Lane's antics are difficult to resist.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Steve Davis
In the world of Mel Brooks, everything is fair game and anything is good for a laugh. God bless Mel Brooks.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
The new film is a nauseatingly unsteady medley of brilliance and foolish nonsense.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
Enough is enough. Somebody should just stop remaking The Producers.
Read Full Review >Variety Todd McCarthy
So determinedly old-fashioned it makes a strong claim to being the best film musical of 1959.
Read Full Review >Empire Olly Richards
As a chance to see the celebrated Broadway show with the original cast, this is a treat. As a re-interpretation of a classic, though, it's a disappointment.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Brooks gives himself the last word, appearing onscreen for the first time amid chorus girls oozing PG-13 pulchritude. "Go home!" he says. "It's over!" Could he be referring to his career?
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Christine Dolan
The chemistry is intact, but performances that were reaching-for-the-balcony big on Broadway haven't been scaled back a bit for a more intimate, up-close medium.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak
Can't find its rhythm and stride. It plays it far too safe and slick.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jack Mathews
If you have seen the play, especially if you've seen it with the original cast, treasure the memory and protect it. The movie will attack it like a virus.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Rory L. Aronsky
It's the curse of overacting and overdone shtick that does them in.
Read Full Review >Newsweek David Ansen
The theatricality is off the charts. Lane aims for the balconies; Broderick tones it down for the camera a bit.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
The best two performances belong to Uma Thurman and Will Ferrell. For the film to work, though, the two best roles should belong to Tony-winning Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick in the title roles.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
The accountant in Bloom would probably approve of the new Producers: It's an efficient extension of a popular brand. In theory, what's not to like? In reality, the whole schmear.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Scott Foundas
The musical film version of The Producers is, for better or worse, a faithful record of the stage production, adhering to the same if-it-ain't-broke-don't-fix-it philosophy that informed the recent "Rent."
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
The Producers is a movie based on a play based on a movie about a play. And that's probably the funniest thing about it.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
The film falls short even as a record of Broderick and Lane's crowd-pleasing rapport: Both have done the show so many times that every scrap of life is gone.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Stroman should have studied the original Producers that Brooks directed in 1968, with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder. It answers the question "Where did they go right?"
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Most of the bits and performances have a hard time making the transition from stage to screen.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
This is the stage experience documented on film, from the perspective of someone sitting front row centre watching actors pitching for the back rows of the balcony.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust
Whereas the original film is gleefully crass and energetically paced, the movie musical, weighing in at a robust two-plus hours, is bloated and self-satisfied. Whatever spectacle the stage musical possessed to make it such a box-office behemoth fails to transfer to the screen.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Dana Stevens
Ms. Thurman is the one bit of genuine radiance in this aggressively and pointlessly shiny, noisy spectacle.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
The Producers on screen, as a musical, does not work. It is not very funny. It doesn't look right. It's depressing.
Read Full Review >New York Post Kyle Smith
From bad to worse - Even in verse - The Producers moves like a hearse -Mildness and blandness -Mugging like madness - Who knew that "Rent" would win this fight? - Murdering a genre's just not all right!
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The Producers is nightmarish, in its febrile way, a head-bangingly primitive version of an overrated Broadway show that grew out of a clumsy 1968 movie with an inflated reputation.
Slate David Edelstein
There are no real people in The Producers --only actors laboring to dispel whatever magic they once were thought to possess. The director, Susan Stroman, has brought the Broadway smash to the screen (where it began, almost 40 years ago) with cataclysmic results.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 7.9 (out of 10) based on 139 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Ken gave it a6:
Though some of the humor falls flat and it suffers from an unbearably long ending, The Producers is quite a fun and exuberant movie.
Roy R. gave it a0:
I'm someone who has a fairly strong stomach for bad films, it takes a nasty ride for me to stop appreciating something even as wallpaper, That said I turned this off. It was making me sick so I turned it off.
John H. gave it an8:
I never saw the Broadway production. I am too young (15) to know the original version. But this movie seemed like a good performance of a good musical. It does not stand out for its musical virtues, but nothing on Broadway (besides Soundheim) is of musical caliber anywhere near the average classical CD I can pick up at the library. Musicals are never created to showcase music alone, anyway. Two complaints seem to be: that the movie does not convey the full brilliance of the Broadway version, and that it does not take advantage of the movie-medium. As to the second, I would be sorely upset if any more of the music was cut out; I rented the DVD to see a full musical for a fortieth the price, not a destroyed and non-musical movie based on a musical which was originally based on a non-musical movie that was (apparently) great to begin with. And, if the Broadway rendition was much better than this one, it must truly have been magnificent; this one is quite good.
Melissa M. gave it a2:
I was truely disappointed. This is the first Mel Brooks production I've ever seen that I didn't like. I don't think I laughed a single time. Just Mel cracking jokes at Jews and Gays and Nazi's because he can -- after all, he is Mel... Miss this one, hopefully he will bounce back.
J Liddy gave it a3:
This movie disapoints. I wonder if those reviewers who rated this movie highly ever saw the original whick was truely a scream and should be seen so as to put this remake in context. The role of "LSD" as played by Dick Shawn was incredibly funny but was written out of the remake. Will Ferrel could have been a great "LSD". Yet the originally small role of the swedish secretary was expanded, unecesary, and boring. Nathan Lane is Talented but Zero Mostel was a genius who's portrayal of Max reached into the audience's head whith madcap angst. I never fully apeciated his talent until now. Rent this movie, but buy the original and enjoy it for years to come.
A Movie Critic gave it a5:
Too long. The problem is the songs, which serve to interrupt the comedy and story, and end up dragging on and on. I'm sure they were entertaining on Broadway, but on a screen, it's just not. It's boring, and the songs drag on and on. On a Broadway stage, songs can go on and on because there's something exciting, (I guess) about seeing big musical numbers performed right in front of you. But in a movie, on a screen, they've got to be short and quick, because they do nothing but interrupt the plot. The movie, (when there's no singing going on,) is funny, and the idea was always a creative one, and there are some very funny performanes here. But you can't enjoy the movie when it keeps interrupting itself for yet another pointless musical number. Clocking in at over 2 hours, it's a long movie, and one that would have been much better with at least 30 minutes cut. And there's no question about where the cuts should have taken place; the SONGS. Some could have easily been eliminated (or at the very least shortened) and it would have greatly benefitted the movie.
Jeff F. gave it a7:
Pretty good film,but why did they leave out the best parts of the original? L.S.D. The bar scene and blowing up the theater.
