GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Red Dragon
MCA/Universal Pictures

Red Dragon reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 60 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.4 out of 10
based on 37 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 29 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence, grisly images, language, some nudity and sexuality

Starring Anthony Hopkins, Edward Norton, Ralph Fiennes, Harvey Keitel, Emily Watson, Mary-Louise Parker, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Anthony Heald

The first and most terrifying chapter in the Hannibal Lecter trilogy. (Universal Pictures)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Ted Tally
Thomas Harris (novel)
 
DIRECTED BY: Brett Ratner  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: April 1, 2003 
Video: April 1, 2003 
Theatrical: October 4, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

90
Washington Post Staff (Not credited)
The film itself represents movie craftsmanship -- elegant, dark, alluring, frightening, mesmerizing -- at its best.
Read Full Review
90
Variety Todd McCarthy
Audiences will be excused for any feelings of déjà vu the new film might inspire. That won't prevent them from watching it in rapt, anxious silence, however, as the gruesome crimes, twisted psychology and deterministic dread that lie at the heart of Harris' work are laid out with care and skill.
Read Full Review
90
Time Richard Corliss
This darkly seductive, flawlessly acted piece is worlds removed from most horror films. Here monsters have their grandeur, heroes their gravity. And when they collide, a dance of death ensues between two souls doomed to understand each other.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
To my surprise, Ratner does a sure, stylish job, appreciating the droll humor of Lecter's predicament, creating a depraved new villain in the Tooth Fairy (Ralph Fiennes), and using the quiet, intense skills of Norton to create a character whose old fears feed into his new ones. There is also humor, of the uneasy he-can't-get-away-with-this variety, in the character of a nosy scandal-sheet reporter (Philip Seymour Hoffman).
Read Full Review
80
Film Threat David Grove
Is Red Dragon a better film than "Manhunter?" I don’t know. I think it stands on its own, but I wonder how much people who are intimately familiar with "Manhunter" will be shocked by it, although the ending is altogether different and much more realized, I think.
Read Full Review
80
Newsweek David Ansen
Red Dragon is certainly an improvement on “Hannibal.” It has something the Ridley Scott movie didn’t -- a good story -- and it will no doubt keep the franchise rolling in dough.
80
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
Thankfully, Emily Watson comes to his rescue with her spot-on portrayal of the killer's blind girlfriend; her rich performance works wonders in the absence of Jodie Foster. Now, if only they could remake Hannibal before they assemble that boxed set.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
It's chilling what Fiennes can do with so very little; he looks like a wounded puppy half the time and sounds like one to boot.
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
The most refreshing aspect of Red Dragon is its reliance on old-fashioned acting instead of computer-aided gizmos. Hopkins overdoes his role at times -- his vocal tones are almost campy -- but his piercing eyes are as menacing as ever, and Ralph Fiennes is scarily good as his fellow lunatic.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
It's frightening enough, to be sure, but too often it feels like a well-executed but rote exercise.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Ratner is canny enough to close the movie with a devilish tease that will send the Lambs faithful out with a delirious smile. What Red Dragon won't do is haunt your nightmares. Who could have guessed Hannibal Lecter would ever become such a crack-up?
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Ty Burr
As Hopkins's Lecter is concerned, it's official: He's Freddy Krueger.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Red Dragon is very much a product, and a superior one, of our times. So is Anthony Hopkins' top-notch fiend, the bad doctor.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
I quibble over a film that has none of the artistic pretensions of "The Silence of the Lambs." This is more of a greatest-hits Hannibal movie, with a thunderingly portentous soundtrack, lots of mugging and autopsy detail, and a bang-up double ending.
Read Full Review
70
Film Threat Rick Kisonak
The only downside to this delectable third course? The regrettable likelihood that Lecter fans will have to make do without dessert.
Read Full Review
70
LA Weekly Ron Stringer
What Ratner brings to the proceedings is an awareness that what worked for "Silence" -- namely screenwriter Ted Tally, production designer Kristi Zea and, of course, Anthony Hopkins as Lecter -- will work overtime here, to enhance the project at hand and provide a seamless connection back to Jonathan Demme's multiple-Oscar winner.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
An absorbing film, acted with real force by all parties and directed with competence and assuredness if something less than inspiration.
67
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
A thriller made from a completist's checklist rather than with a cultist's passion.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Our time is plagued with primitive directors toiling in the name of entertainment, and protected by an industry that rewards competence over excellence. They're the reason why this movie is simply average, and why all the Red Dragons look so uniformly beige.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
For all its brilliant touches, Dragon loses its fire midway, nearly flickering out by its perfunctory conclusion.
Read Full Review
63
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Has the grisly appetite, if not the execution of the original. What it also has are monstrously good Ralph Fiennes and Edward Norton, plus a fine young Hannibal to save it.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Staff (Not credited)
Red Dragon is merely the distant echoes of what we liked about "Lambs."
Read Full Review
60
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
For all the lunacies bared within this film, it has the tick and thrum of a solid studio machine, occasionally shocking but never surprising; it will be watched by everybody, but it feels as if it were made by nobody. [14 & 21 October 2002, p. 226]
60
The New York Times A.O. Scott
The entire picture is a third-generation Xerox copy, in part because adapting Mr. Harris's books for the screen seems to turn directors into rigid formalists.
Read Full Review
60
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
There's no freshness here, no sense of newness or discovery. In its place, there's an earnest desire not to drop the ball, a determination to risk as little as possible in keeping this golden egg from cracking wide open.
Read Full Review
60
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Without the top-notch cast it would be indistinguishable from hundreds of pedestrian serial-killer pictures that clog video store shelves.
Read Full Review
50
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
If you buy the overprocessed headcheese of the serial killer as refined genius, you'll love Red Dragon. Or maybe not. Even Hannibal Lecter devotees may lose patience with this picture's grandiose, self-serious ponderousness -- that's Lecterese for, "It's kind of boring in patches, actually."
Read Full Review
50
Slate David Edelstein
It more or less works.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Red Dragon is done in a painfully mechanical, by-the-book manner. Scenes are assembled to move the plot from point A to point B. There's no atmosphere. No tension. Flat performances. All of these problems are rightfully laid at the feet of the man in charge.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Edward Guthmann
In Hollywood, where integrity is rapidly consumed and careers defined by market value, there's trash and there's trash with a pedigree.
Read Full Review
50
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Suffers from franchise fatigue. Its rote suspense is strictly a business proposition.
Read Full Review
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Basically lives up to the old adage that the final work in a trilogy is invariably the weakest.
Read Full Review
50
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
I can't tell you if Red Dragon is more faithful to Harris' book than "Manhunter," which I haven't seen in 16 years. I can tell you it's less artful and atmospheric, a straight-ahead thriller that never rises above superficiality.
Read Full Review
40
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Norton is a strong lead in an overwrought, mediocre film that trumps even Hannibal in its mercenary shamelessness.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Frank Whaley and Philip Seymour Hoffman play minor characters so annoying they might as well wear T-shirts reading "Eat My Brain."
Read Full Review
40
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
I say don't bite unless your taste runs to thin gruel, and grueling gruel at that.
20
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
Red Dragon's formula is so risible and rote by now that the natural reaction to scenes of peril, torture, and suffering is flippant laughter.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.4 (out of 10) based on 29 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Riren gave it an8:
When you're in Hannibal Lecter's universe, it's sometimes too easy to think all the dark atmosphere comes easy. Red Dragon actually works very hard and does the best job at the true uncomfortable yet tantalizing feel in a 'Lecter' flick since Silence of the Lambs. While a few moments are almost cartoonishly out of place, and a few plot threads only make true sense if you read the book (the Toothy Fairy killer's psychosis began when he was adopted by a violent old woman who so traumatized him that he represses almost everything and needs identities to deal with his feelings), it's quite a good movie. Edward Norton carries the helm so that we don't miss Anthony Hopkins too much, and Hopkins does appear often enough to satiate us, though thankfully not too much to completely steal this movie from the real killer like he did in Silence of the Lambs. Hopkins is who we came to the theatre to see, after all.

Farah D. gave it a10:
The movie " hannibal" was a complete failure so it might be uncounted . 'the red dragon "is exactly the twin of "the silence of the lamp ", it holds the same glorious reasons of smashing success the first chapter possessed . the two transcends old definitions of good and evil but they dig deeper into a more horrifying realms of the human psyche . and in this movie the spectator is as much involved with the criminal as with detective and Dr lecter in between acting the godlike connection .though it fades for some moments , yet the flame of expecting , guessing, waiting, hoping, fearing consumes from within leaving you with an exotic feeling of sweet exhaustion . you are changed somehow although this strange experience has nothing to do with your real life tomorrow morning!

Susan P. gave it an 8:
The story is as usual...but the actors are marvellous, specially Ralph Fiennes Emily Watson.

Michael M. gave it an 8:
The third installment of the Hannibal Lector trilogy, and prequel to both 'Silence of the Lambs' and 'Hannibal' is a great thriller, that is unfortunatly underrated by most critics. In my opinion, this chapter in the horrifying series is better than 'Hannibal' but slightly not as good as 'The Silence of the Lambs'. Red Dragon definetly has the most acting talent - Anthony Hopkins, Edward Norton, Ralph Fiennes, Harvey Keital, Emily Watson, Mary Louise Parker and Philip Seymour Hoffman. Also, Red Dragon has the least blood and gore, but is probably the scariest film of all of them. The story is about a young hero cop Will Graham (Edward Norton) who in the beginning of the film catches Hannibal Lector (Anthony Hopkins), but leaving both Hannibal and him severly injured. After catching Hannibal, Will decides to retire. About a year into retirement his old cop buddy Lt. Jack Crawford (Harvey Keital) asks for his help on a series of murders down by a serial killer (Ralph Fiennes) the police like to call "The Tooth Fairy". Why Tooth Fairy? Because he is a cannibal just like Hannibal and bites human flesh off his victims leaving a series of bite marks. Will decides to investigate the case, and asking help from Hannibal, since he knows how a criminal thinks. This is a great thriller but unfortunatly not as good as 1991's Best Picture winner 'The Silence of the Lambs'. (2/22/03)

Martin L. gave it a 10:
Ok, I like horror movies, but this is probably one of the best.

Pat C. gave it a 5:
Essential viewing for those who've developed an appetite for all things Hannibal. Does some things better than expected, other things not so well. As a remake of "Manhunter" it deviates by going Fatal-Attraction with the madman on the second floor of the home of Norton's suitably terrified family, where no self-respecting calculating remorseless serial hellhound would venture.

James B. gave it a 1:
Red Dragon escapes"0" only out of respect for its good cast. This is, as the high ratings of both the pros and amateurs above suggest, a juvenile, cultist bit of marketing trash for the admirers of the pompous Harris, who broadcasts his nastiness(the trademark of these times) through Lecter, a spirited bore now. The Village Voice critic seems to be the only one to notice, let alone comment on, the alternately silly, and sententious dialogue. Manhunter was no better than good, as far as that goes, but its workmanlike quality suited the police procedural material well, and allowed the less noted cast, especially the now-omnipresent Brian Cox, to do their work well. Norton might appeal to some viewers as another world-weary detective, but to me his portrayal is more somnabulistic than sympathetically jaded. Go for the laughs. Cheers, Mr. Tally!

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use