GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Red Planet
Warner Bros.

Red Planet reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 34 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.8 out of 10
based on 27 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 9 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for sci-fi violence, brief nudity and language

Starring Val Kilmer, Tom Sizemore, Carrie-Anne Moss, Benjamin Bratt, Simon Baker, and Terence Stamp

Mission Commander Kate Bowman (Moss) is the pilot and commander of the most important mission of the 21st century: saving the human race. It's 2050, Earth is dying, and colonizing Mars is the only alternative to obliteration. (Warner Bros.)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Chuck Pfarrer (also story)
Jonathan Lemkin
 
DIRECTED BY: Antony Hoffman  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 27, 2001 
Video: March 27, 2001 
Theatrical: November 10, 2000 
RUNNING TIME: 116 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
To like that kind of story is to like this kind of movie.
Read Full Review
67
Austin Chronicle Russell Smith
I loved this movie. Or perhaps I should say the 15-year-old boy in me -- the dreamy, disaffected misfit with his head in the stars and a stack of Bantam sci-fi paperbacks as his sole defense against small-town boredom -- loved it.
Read Full Review
60
LA Weekly Greg Burk
A fun movie. Not scary-fun. If you're a male over 10 years old, that should be enough.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It does boast loads of cool gadgetry and some impressive special effects. It's not much, but at least the movie always gives you something to look at.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
It stars the striking Moss, that fierce beauty from "The Matrix," as the sternest, sexiest babe in space since Sigourney Weaver's Lieutenant Ripley.
Read Full Review
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
Fails to generate the elementary visceral thrills we've come to expect from science-fiction thrillers, let alone a compelling human drama.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas
When it comes to special effects, the filmmakers have spared no expense. But when it comes to the story, audiences have been shortchanged.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
Watch out for space junk.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Examiner Walter Addiego
Good-looking and empty.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Marc Caro
The slogan for Red Planet could be "In space no one can hear you yawn."
Read Full Review
50
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Watching the movie, it's hard to imagine why anyone would dream of going back there.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Charles Taylor
Isn't particularly offensive, except in its total mediocrity.
Read Full Review
40
Slate David Edelstein
Dull-witted.
Read Full Review
40
Film.com Robert Horton
Moss -- in her first big role since "The Matrix" -- is the main reason to see Red Planet, a badly written and visually scenic space opus.
Read Full Review
40
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
Visit Red Planet, and you'll boldly go where everyone has gone before.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Frank Lovece
Overblown, ridiculously contrived drive-in flick.
Read Full Review
38
Mr. Showbiz Michael Atkinson
The characters aren't convincingly written, rarely if ever behave like believable humans, and consequently don't matter to us in the least.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Susan Wloszczyna
You can always judge a sci-fi thriller by its aliens. What does Planet offer -- Space roaches.
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
Isn't as bad as the year's first abysmal Martian movie, "Mission to Mars," but it's pretty close.
Read Full Review
30
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
I don't know the actual budget of this adventure yarn, but it feels like a middle-range effort whose heart is with the bargain-basement offerings of yesteryear.
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Dennis Lim
A pale, patchy amalgam of the year's two unfairly reviled interplanetary adventures, "Supernova" and "Mission to Mars," the lunkheaded Red Planet distinguishes itself with a touching pretense of scientific veracity.
Read Full Review
30
The New York Times Stephen Holden
A leaden, skimpily plotted space-age Outward Bound adventure with vague allegorical aspirations that remain entirely unrealized.
Read Full Review
25
Boston Globe Jay Carr
The question in Red Planet isn't whether there's any life on Mars, but whether there's any life in the film. The answer is no.
Read Full Review
25
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Crash-lands as disastrously as the heroes and never quite recovers its wits.
Read Full Review
20
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Pfarrer's screenplay feels older than the Martian hills.
Read Full Review
20
Variety Todd McCarthy
As dull and arid as a hike through the desert.
Read Full Review
0
San Francisco Chronicle Bob Graham
There still is no life on Mars. Red Planet is airless.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.8 (out of 10) based on 9 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Patrick b gave it a10:
Best Mars movie there is. Some unrealistic science facts.. yeah.. but also some part of it IS realistic and fun to watch, I especially like the ship design how they actually make an artificial intelligence and make it work with G-forces, oh well.

T M gave it a1:
A basic tenet of scifi flicks is that they should at least get the science right. Great ones take accurate science and extrapolate to create fantastic but not improbable results. This movie can't even bother to get the genetic code right (A,G,T,P???)or to figure out that insects aren't nematodes much less be creative about life and human existence might happen on Mars.

Pat C. gave it a 1:
A visionary movie of what we can expect Mars to be like if Hollywood gets there first.

raVen gave it a 6:
Too unrealistic!?!? (Newsflash: Val Kilmer isn't a real astronaut, either). It's a good little flick--sit down and eat your popcorn.

CB B gave it a 3:
This film was too unrealistic. Algae eating bugs on Mars, please! How ridiculous.

Wobiekisser M. gave it a 5:
This is one of the worst alien/planet movies I've ever seen, yet while I was watching it something weird took place, I found myself actually having fun watching it.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use