GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The
New Line Cinema

Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 94 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.6 out of 10
based on 42 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 899 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for intense epic battle sequences and frightening images

Starring Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, John Rhys-Davies, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, and Liv Tyler

Sauron's forces have laid siege to Minas Tirith, the capital of Gondor, in their efforts to eliminate the race of men. The once-great kingdom, watched over by a fading steward, has never been in more desperate need of its king. But can Aragorn (Mortensen) answer the call of his heritage and become what he was born to be? In no small measure, the fate of Middle-earth rests on his broad shoulders. (New Line Cinema)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Drama  |  Fantasy  
WRITTEN BY: Frances Walsh
Philippa Boyens
Peter Jackson
J.R.R. Tolkien (novel Return of the King)
 
DIRECTED BY: Peter Jackson  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: May 25, 2004 
Video: May 25, 2004 
Theatrical: December 17, 2003 
RUNNING TIME: 210 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / New Zealand 

Named Best Picture at the 76th Annual Academy Awards, where it picked up a record-tying total of 11 Oscars, including Best Director (Peter Jackson) and Best Adapted Screenplay. Received a Golden Globe as Best Picture (Drama) of 2003, and Jackson earned another for Best Director. Named best picture of 2003 by the New York Film Critics Circle, Southeastern Film Critics Association, Chicago Film Critics Association, Broadcast Film Critics Association, and the Online Film Critics Society. Included on the AFI's list of 10 best films of 2003.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
The conclusion of Peter Jackson's masterwork is passionate and literate, detailed and expansive, and it's conceived with a risk-taking flair for old-fashioned movie magic at its most precious.
Read Full Review
100
The Hollywood Reporter David Hunter
An epic success and a history-making production that finishes with a masterfully entertaining final installment.
Read Full Review
100
Newsweek David Ansen
The second installment was better than the first, and this one is best of all. It has spectacular action scenes and imaginary creatures, and it’s by far the most moving chapter. The performances have deepened.
Read Full Review
100
Time Richard Corliss
The second half of the film elevates all the story elements to Beethovenian crescendo. Here is an epic with literature's depth and opera's splendor -- and one that could be achieved only in movies. What could be more terrific?
Read Full Review
100
Variety Todd McCarthy
Represents that filmmaking rarity -- a third part of a trilogy that is decisively the best of the lot. With epic conflict, staggering battles, striking landscapes and effects, and resolved character arcs all leading to a dramatic conclusion to more than nine hours of masterful storytelling.
Read Full Review
100
Empire Alan Morrison
Those who have walked beside these heroes every step of the way on such a long journey deserve the emotional pay-off as well as the action peaks, and they will be genuinely touched as the final credits roll.
Read Full Review
100
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Labeling this as a "movie" is almost an injustice. This is an experience of epic scope and grandeur, amazing emotional power, and relentless momentum.
Read Full Review
100
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
Jackson is rare among the makers of epic movies in that he knows how to do the small stuff, too. The Return of the King has “heart”--how else could it pump out all that blood?
Read Full Review
100
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
The most emotionally satisfying because, in addition to having both more intimate drama and more spectacular battles, it resolves all of the issues raised before.
Read Full Review
100
New York Post Lou Lumenick
A majestic conclusion to a nine-plus-hours epic that stirs the heart, mind and soul as few films ever have.
Read Full Review
100
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Like all great fantasies and epics, this one leaves you with the sense that its wonders are real, its dreams are palpable.
Read Full Review
100
USA Today Claudia Puig
As good as each individual movie is, the third film vaults the work into the stratosphere of classic movies. Key characters are enhanced, new civilizations visited and battles fought more intensely, while feelings and motivations are plumbed more deeply and movingly.
Read Full Review
100
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
As completely real on the psychological level as its up-to-the-moment visual effects have on the physical.
Read Full Review
100
The New York Times A.O. Scott
It's been a long time since a commercially oriented film with the scale of "King" ended with such an enduring and heartbreaking coda.
Read Full Review
100
Slate David Edelstein
It might be the cinema's most astonishing holy war film. The Lord of the Rings took seven years and an army of gifted artists to execute, and the striving of its makers is in every splendid frame. It's more than a movie--it's a gift.
Read Full Review
100
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Jackson had the vision, persistence, insight and patience for this mighty job, plus the smarts to shape stage veterans and overlooked film actors into a seamless cast. He's made himself as immortal as a movie director can be.
Read Full Review
100
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Feels like a miracle, a movie that exceeds even the most formidable expectations without straying from its singular path. All hail this King.
Read Full Review
100
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
It rises, all on its own, to the realm of masterwork.
Read Full Review
100
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
First and foremost, it soars because its grand design and numerous story problems were worked out half a century ago by a guy named Tolkien, and Jackson was smart enough to realize this.
Read Full Review
100
Washington Post Desson Thomson
This movie is not only a thrilling experience, it closes the book on a truly satisfying trilogy.
Read Full Review
100
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
This film is a miracle, an extravaganza equal to its predecessors and in some ways more stunning. It is a profound testament to the extraordinary power of moving images and sound.
Read Full Review
100
Film Threat Clint Morris
A masterful moment in cinema. Jackson has created a film that's deemed to be liked –- even loved -- by almost anyone of all ages. It's destined to become a classic series.
Read Full Review
100
LA Weekly Scott Foundas
The deep satisfaction of The Return of the King is in surrendering ourselves to the finale, in letting Jackson's superb storytelling (with due credit to co-screenwriters Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens) surround us like a blazing campfire tale -- which it does, gloriously.
Read Full Review
100
Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall
Ties everything together with a dazzling synthesis of pagan animism, heroic quest mythology, orientalism, Pre-Raphaelite imagery, 1950s sci-fi creature features, and Hollywood war epics.
Read Full Review
100
Premiere Glenn Kenny
A phantasmagorical slab of epic entertainment that satisfies on every conceivable level.
Read Full Review
100
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
From the acting to the special effects to the landscapes to the cinematography, editing and music, to the details of decor, wardrobe and armaments, we never once feel that we are in anything but the hands of an absolute master of the medium.
Read Full Review
100
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The invisible wizard Peter Jackson makes use of every scene to show us the meaning of magnificence. Never has a filmmaker aimed higher, or achieved more.
90
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Then, finally, there are the endings, all six of them...For us outsiders, it seems like too much of a good thing...But all those are minor rants: The big fact is that The Return of the King puts you there at Waterloo, or Thermopylae or the Bulge, any desperate place where men ran low on blood and iron and ammo, but not on courage.
Read Full Review
90
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
I love Jackson's "Rings" saga despite his propensity for whimsical animation whenever he tries to strike a chord of dread or menace.
Read Full Review
90
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
All in all, it's a fitting conclusion to the series, and yet there are disappointments built in. For one, Jackson has opted not to film Tolkien's downbeat "Scouring Of The Shire" epilogue.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Ty Burr
Yet what I felt when the lights came up at the end of this visionary, titanic, relentless experience was something different: a strange relief that it was, at last, over.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is little enough psychological depth anywhere in the films, actually, and they exist mostly as surface, gesture, archetype and spectacle. They do that magnificently well, but one feels at the end that nothing actual and human has been at stake.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
This is a film in which ideas resonate as well as action. Gandalf’s words to Pippin about death have a muscular poetry.
Read Full Review
80
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
Peter Jackson has not really made a movie of The Lord of the Rings; he has sprung clear of it to forge something new. He has drawn a deep breath, and taken the plunge. [5 January 2004, p. 89]
80
Village Voice J. Hoberman
In short, this Krakatoa is at once exhausting and riveting. It's a technological marvel, and for those not with the program, a bit of a bore.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
It’s odd and unfortunate, however, that The Return of the King just barely misses the eye-misting emotional wallop of the series’ previous installment, The Two Towers, which had a lyrical subtlety underpinning the vast vistas of growing chaos (and Christopher Lee hardly hurt matters) and hobbits-in-peril.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
The [final] battle is vast, and undoubtedly required thousands of hours of matching puppetry, robotics and computer code, but it is not without tedium.
Read Full Review
75
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
The Return of the King is too long...The various story lines...come together in stilted, episodic ways. The narrative is less-than-seamless.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Though an estimable success overall, The Return of the King has several scenes too many and too great a concentration on battles.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Despite its length, the film only starts feeling as long at the end -- or, more correctly, ends. Serious fans of the novels will be prepared for the serial codicils, but the uninitiated are likely to think the film is over several times before it actually is.
Read Full Review
70
Film Threat Kevin Carr
If The Return of the King was 2 1/2 hours long, it would have rocked. It would have been better than The Two Towers, which is the best film in the series.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Add a lot of dull acting -- except Sir Ian McKellen and Andy Serkis -- and you have an uneven movie with yawns aplenty.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 8.6 (out of 10) based on 899 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

George S. gave it a10:
This movie is supreme in every aspect: visualy, story-wise, directing and with an extraordinary soundtrack. My personal favorite ever since I saw it!

Stabs M. gave it a5:
Look, the movie was good. The best that can be done turning the compelling, but slow-paced and sprawling, Tolkein trilogy into a movie. I loved the books. I liked the movies fine. But I never understood the intense love-a-thon thrown to the movies - they aren't exactly masterpieces of anything but special effects (though the special effects were incredible). It isn't like there's any acting in the movie, and it isn't like they were somehow better than the books, you know?

Adnan A. gave it a10:
I don't remember when I watched the return of the king for the first time, but I know this. Watching it now, I can only say that this movie imparts a feeling which I cannot express it in words. The lord of the rings trilogy is and will always remain my favorite! Story... If you haven't watched the first two then it's gonna be difficult for you to keep up with the story but if you get the plot then it's a story that's gonna captivate you even after the end of the movie. Kudos to J.R.R.Tolkien for creating such a world and Peter Jackson for filling this world with life. Acting... Every character is special and all the credit goes to the actors. Each and every actor, has carried out his/her roles with dedication and devotion. No complaints. Direction... I'd only say that no other person in this universe could have made lord of the rings other than Peter Jackson. Visuals... I don't think any movie will ever be able to come up to the level of return of the king in terms of visuals. It's not easy for a 3 hour movie to keep you entertained for long but this movie makes you beg for more! Such movies are made once in a decade and to not see them is the biggest mistake of your life. THE LORD OF THE RINGS IS A JOURNEY OF EPIC PROPORTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!

Ian O. gave it a10:
This movie ROCKS!!! Intense action, amazing action and good story line I loved the books and the movie livies up to standerd this is a must see movie.

ROB gave it a10:
It kept me focused the entire 3+ hours, and excited. That is a testament to a truly great epic. It had everything I could ask for in a fantasy movie.

Harry gave it a10:
It is cinema at its finest. The story, told through a genuine narrative, is very deep, as it is full of symbolism. Tolkien had vision when he wrote the books. Jackson then made the films. They were perfect. He envisioned one of the most imaginative world with so much skill, making every detail feel realistic. The beauty of the score and the magical atmosphere of the Elvish culture is simply unforgettable. The performances are really good. I didn't see actors, I saw mythological creatures. The film is full of emotions, touching themes such as friendship, courage and love. The films are deeper than what they seem, even philosophical, with Gollum being the most complex character of the series. His transformation is extraordinary, he could be a reflect of a psycho's psychology. The film is a cinematic achievement.

Brandon S. gave it a10:
A classic in every sense. These movies were essentially one 14-hour epic broken into three installments (just as the original is really one long novel broken into three books). Completely amazing, groundbreaking, and full of heart. It's set the bar by which all future epics will be judged.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use