GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Ring, The
DreamWorks Distribution LLC

Ring, The reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 57 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.9 out of 10
based on 36 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 81 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for thematic elements, disturbing images, language and some drug references

Starring Naomi Watts, Martin Henderson, David Dorfman, Brian Cox, Jane Alexander, Lindsay Frost, Amber Tamblyn, and Rachael Bella

In this remake of one of Japan's biggest box office hits, Naomi Watts plays a journalist who discovers a mysterious videotape that is connected to several deaths.


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Ehren Kruger
Hiroshi Takahashi (1998 screenplay Ringu)
Kôji Suzuki (novel Ringu)
 
DIRECTED BY: Gore Verbinski  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 4, 2003 
Video: March 4, 2003 
Theatrical: October 18, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 109 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / Japan 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
San Francisco Chronicle C.W. Nevius
So good it's scary.
Read Full Review
90
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
The creepiest, clammiest, twitchiest squealfest in months. It offers, among its many pleasures, the happiness of safe fear.
Read Full Review
80
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
At last Dreamworks has given us the stuff of nightmare.
Read Full Review
80
Film Threat Jim Agnew
Dark, disturbing and original throughout. You know that you’re going to see something a little different than your usual studio crap.
Read Full Review
80
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
The pickings are slim for scares this Halloween season (Ghost Ship, Below), so The Ring wins first prize by default.
Read Full Review
80
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
As a marriage of big-budget filmmaking and old-fashioned scare tactics, it easily ranks alongside last year's "The Others."
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Schickel
An edgy, watchable film, but one that makes you feel more squeamish than screamish.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
The less said about The Ring, the better for you, the sooner-to-be-freaked-out.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Robert K. Elder
Ends up a few frames short of the perfect horror film, but very few.
Read Full Review
75
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
The best thing about the movie, which is a very elegantly crafted piece of gothic snuff hokum, is the way it teases and intrigues us with the revelation of what's on that tape.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
The Ring, is going to be this year's version of the "Blair Witch" and "Sixth Sense" phenomenon.
Read Full Review
75
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
If your senses haven't been dulled by slasher films and gorefests, if you're a connoisseur of psychological horror, this is your ticket.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Ken Fox
A frighteningly good horror movie with enough solid scares to freeze the blood of ardent fans and newcomers alike.
Read Full Review
70
Newsweek David Ansen
This visually stunning movie serves up generous dollops of designer creepiness.
70
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
A deviously engineered parasite that'll crawl under your skin and live in your nervous system for a while if you give it half a chance.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
It's a workmanlike, passably engrossing horror flick that copies well from the Japanese original. When it's good, it's not original, and when it's original, it's not so good.
Read Full Review
63
USA Today Claudia Puig
Too many threads are left dangling and the movie ultimately proves too implausible to put alongside those horror classics.
Read Full Review
63
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
What we have here is a suburban-legend movie stripped of rough edges and cut off from any depth that might have made it insidiously haunting.
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It's an understatement to say that The Ring is not your ordinary horror film. And never forget to rewind.
Read Full Review
60
Slate David Edelstein
The movie is meant to get into you like a virus, and it does.
Read Full Review
60
LA Weekly David Chute
In the final reel, the tension dissipates with a flabby hiss, as the film devolves into a banal, conventional ghost story.
Read Full Review
58
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Never quite catches fire. They take a crackerjack premise and a comely, committed leading lady and turn in a merely OK film.
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
The kind of dread dark horror film where you better hope nobody in the audience snickers, because the film teeters right on the edge of the ridiculous.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Lou Lumenick
A stylish but distressingly generic and not particularly scary American remake of a phenomenally popular Japanese supernatural thriller that spawned two sequels and a TV miniseries.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Takes things too far by leaving about 75% of its questions unanswered. This isn't an artistic choice; it's screenwriting sloppiness, and it results in a profoundly dissatisfying experience.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
A creepy, oozy, dopey remake of the stylish 1998 Japanese thriller, "Ringu."
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Has its creepy moments, but also its cliches.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Certainly acceptable. But no one seeing it is going to feel as spooked as executive producer Roy Lee. To make an audience feel that intensely, you need a different kind of director and a different kind of film.
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
The unworthy new Hollywood remake of Japan's horror phenomenon, ''Ring,'' has packed on a definite article and a whole lot of hooey.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Todd McCarthy
Comes across in muted fashion, with uninvolving characters and lack of genuine excitement or fright creating a second-rate, second-hand feel.
Read Full Review
40
The New York Times A.O. Scott
While impressively made, this impassive and cold feature fails, in a spectacular fashion, to deliver the thrills.
Read Full Review
40
Film Threat Rick Kisonak
Watts is extra-watchable and, as I say, the filmmaker does achieve a style and tone the script never comes close to living up to. Otherwise, Verbinski's adaptation of the 1998 Japanese hit "Ringu" misses the mark almost completely.
Read Full Review
38
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
I hated it, but I grant that it does tap into a vein of technological horror - the fear of the VCR! - that will have young videophiles chatting it up for weeks
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
Requiring an enormous amount of suspended disbelief, the original Rings may be a culture-specific phenom; despite strenuous efforts to Americanize Nakata's field of bad dreams, the preview audience did a lot of cackling.
Read Full Review
30
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Won't kill you, but it could bore you half to death.
30
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
It's an utter waste of Watts; there's not a trace here of the talent on display in Mulholland Drive, perhaps because the script doesn't bother to give her a character.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.9 (out of 10) based on 81 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a9:
Its cryptic images and creepy symbolism get under your skin and never leave again. You'll reference this movie far after you've seen it.

Jivko gave it a10:
Excellent movie.

Gordon M. gave it a10:
This is the best movie of all time! I personally can't see what people are moaning about! I was so scared when Samara came out of the T.V. It is the perfect horror movie, and Naomi Watts played the part perfectly. My friends love it, I love it, so it IS the best movie ever made!

Kevin B. gave it a1:
okey dokey...first off: the only reason it gets a 1 is cause some of the screen shots were pretty cool, being a black & white photographer and all. But as a movie? This was a complete and utter waste of time...sadly most scarey movies are like this today: not scarey. A little girl who records herself crawling out of a well, and then gives it to somebody and makes funny noises. The only reason I saw it in the theater? A friend of mine was scared to see it. While alot of people were screaming in fear, me and a few other strangers got together and made fun of it. OMG! a little girl with black hair! AH save me! now i cant sleep for Weeks!!!

Will gave it a10:
I was shocked and appauled when I saw that The Ring only scored a 57 on metacritic.com. Clearly the reviewers presented failed to see not only the cinematic brilliance of the film, but the intelligence of it's winding plotline. Some of the shots in The Ring are simply breathtaking, and the cinematography alone makes it worth seeing. As well, the "evil" tape itself is very sophisticated, and many of the images presented are viewed by many psychologists as "death images" i.e the maggots, the empty chair, and the ladder to nowhere. As for the plot line; it twists and turns always keeps you guessing. Despite it's complexity, their are no loose ends left, and by the end of the movie everything fits together like clockwork. Like other artistic horror movies such as 28 Days Later, The Ring is horrifying in it's imagery and atmosphere, not through blood and guts. It may not be the scariest movie that you'll ever see, but I definitely had goosebumps throughout. I'm VERY dissapointed to see that so many of the above reviews have failed to see the intelligence that Verbinski applies to each and every camera angle. If you have half a brain about you, I recommend The Ring over any other horror movie in recent years.

Lauren s. gave it a10:
I had to sleep with my parents for three nights. very very terrifying. my friends and i are still scared of samara. compelling, and psychlogical. loved it.

Mel gave it a6:
Let's face it, this movie is not scary. It draws you in because you wonder what happened to the little girl and why she wants to hurt people, but sleepless nights? I don't think so! 'White Noise' gave me sleepless nights and is far scarier. This is just an interesting supernatural thriller.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use