Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Ring, The

EMAILPRINTDreamWorks Distribution LLC

Ring, The reviews
57
6.9 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 36 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 83 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller

Written by: Ehren Kruger
Hiroshi Takahashi (1998 screenplay Ringu)
Kôji Suzuki (novel Ringu)

Directed by: Gore Verbinski

Release Date:
Theatrical: October 18, 2002
DVD: March 4, 2003

Running Time: 109 minutes, Color

Origin: USA / Japan

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for thematic elements, disturbing images, language and some drug references

Starring Naomi Watts, Martin Henderson, David Dorfman, Brian Cox, Jane Alexander, Lindsay Frost, Amber Tamblyn, and Rachael Bella

In this remake of one of Japan's biggest box office hits, Naomi Watts plays a journalist who discovers a mysterious videotape that is connected to several deaths.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

San Francisco Chronicle C.W. Nevius

So good it's scary.

Read Full Review >
90

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

The creepiest, clammiest, twitchiest squealfest in months. It offers, among its many pleasures, the happiness of safe fear.

Read Full Review >
80

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

At last Dreamworks has given us the stuff of nightmare.

Read Full Review >
80

Film Threat Jim Agnew

Dark, disturbing and original throughout. You know that you’re going to see something a little different than your usual studio crap.

Read Full Review >
80

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

The pickings are slim for scares this Halloween season (Ghost Ship, Below), so The Ring wins first prize by default.

Read Full Review >
80

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

As a marriage of big-budget filmmaking and old-fashioned scare tactics, it easily ranks alongside last year's "The Others."

Read Full Review >
80

Time Richard Schickel

An edgy, watchable film, but one that makes you feel more squeamish than screamish.

Read Full Review >
78

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

The less said about The Ring, the better for you, the sooner-to-be-freaked-out.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Robert K. Elder

Ends up a few frames short of the perfect horror film, but very few.

Read Full Review >
75

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

The best thing about the movie, which is a very elegantly crafted piece of gothic snuff hokum, is the way it teases and intrigues us with the revelation of what's on that tape.

Read Full Review >
75

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

The Ring, is going to be this year's version of the "Blair Witch" and "Sixth Sense" phenomenon.

Read Full Review >
75

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

If your senses haven't been dulled by slasher films and gorefests, if you're a connoisseur of psychological horror, this is your ticket.

Read Full Review >
70

TV Guide Ken Fox

A frighteningly good horror movie with enough solid scares to freeze the blood of ardent fans and newcomers alike.

Read Full Review >
70

Newsweek David Ansen

This visually stunning movie serves up generous dollops of designer creepiness.

70

Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir

A deviously engineered parasite that'll crawl under your skin and live in your nervous system for a while if you give it half a chance.

Read Full Review >
63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

It's a workmanlike, passably engrossing horror flick that copies well from the Japanese original. When it's good, it's not original, and when it's original, it's not so good.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Claudia Puig

Too many threads are left dangling and the movie ultimately proves too implausible to put alongside those horror classics.

Read Full Review >
63

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

What we have here is a suburban-legend movie stripped of rough edges and cut off from any depth that might have made it insidiously haunting.

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

It's an understatement to say that The Ring is not your ordinary horror film. And never forget to rewind.

Read Full Review >
60

Slate David Edelstein

The movie is meant to get into you like a virus, and it does.

Read Full Review >
60

LA Weekly David Chute

In the final reel, the tension dissipates with a flabby hiss, as the film devolves into a banal, conventional ghost story.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

Never quite catches fire. They take a crackerjack premise and a comely, committed leading lady and turn in a merely OK film.

50

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The kind of dread dark horror film where you better hope nobody in the audience snickers, because the film teeters right on the edge of the ridiculous.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Post Lou Lumenick

A stylish but distressingly generic and not particularly scary American remake of a phenomenally popular Japanese supernatural thriller that spawned two sequels and a TV miniseries.

Read Full Review >
50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Takes things too far by leaving about 75% of its questions unanswered. This isn't an artistic choice; it's screenwriting sloppiness, and it results in a profoundly dissatisfying experience.

Read Full Review >
50

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

A creepy, oozy, dopey remake of the stylish 1998 Japanese thriller, "Ringu."

Read Full Review >
50

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Has its creepy moments, but also its cliches.

Read Full Review >
50

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

Certainly acceptable. But no one seeing it is going to feel as spooked as executive producer Roy Lee. To make an audience feel that intensely, you need a different kind of director and a different kind of film.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

The unworthy new Hollywood remake of Japan's horror phenomenon, ''Ring,'' has packed on a definite article and a whole lot of hooey.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Todd McCarthy

Comes across in muted fashion, with uninvolving characters and lack of genuine excitement or fright creating a second-rate, second-hand feel.

Read Full Review >
40

The New York Times A.O. Scott

While impressively made, this impassive and cold feature fails, in a spectacular fashion, to deliver the thrills.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat Rick Kisonak

Watts is extra-watchable and, as I say, the filmmaker does achieve a style and tone the script never comes close to living up to. Otherwise, Verbinski's adaptation of the 1998 Japanese hit "Ringu" misses the mark almost completely.

Read Full Review >
38

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

I hated it, but I grant that it does tap into a vein of technological horror - the fear of the VCR! - that will have young videophiles chatting it up for weeks

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice Michael Atkinson

Requiring an enormous amount of suspended disbelief, the original Rings may be a culture-specific phenom; despite strenuous efforts to Americanize Nakata's field of bad dreams, the preview audience did a lot of cackling.

Read Full Review >
30

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Won't kill you, but it could bore you half to death.

30

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

It's an utter waste of Watts; there's not a trace here of the talent on display in Mulholland Drive, perhaps because the script doesn't bother to give her a character.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.9 (out of 10) based on 83 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Gavin C gave it an8:
It will be difficult to find a modern horror movie quite as scary as this.

Aaron M gave it an8:
I'd say it's more of a Mystery/suspense than a horror movie. It was interesting finding out what all of the weird stuff was about. Not particularly "scary" but the video is freaking creepy.

Nathan A gave it a9:
Movie was freaking brilliant. Watched it at night with sound turned all the way up on my 32 inch T.V. Scared the living daylights outta me. Story was decent, Special effects was great, music brought the entire movie together nicely and it was scary. It did a times become a bit cheesy and rather drawn out but, overall it was a good movie which entertained me a lot. Which in the end, is all that matters.

[Anonymous] gave it a9:
Its cryptic images and creepy symbolism get under your skin and never leave again. You'll reference this movie far after you've seen it.

Jivko gave it a10:
Excellent movie.

Gordon M. gave it a10:
This is the best movie of all time! I personally can't see what people are moaning about! I was so scared when Samara came out of the T.V. It is the perfect horror movie, and Naomi Watts played the part perfectly. My friends love it, I love it, so it IS the best movie ever made!

Kevin B. gave it a1:
okey dokey...first off: the only reason it gets a 1 is cause some of the screen shots were pretty cool, being a black & white photographer and all. But as a movie? This was a complete and utter waste of time...sadly most scarey movies are like this today: not scarey. A little girl who records herself crawling out of a well, and then gives it to somebody and makes funny noises. The only reason I saw it in the theater? A friend of mine was scared to see it. While alot of people were screaming in fear, me and a few other strangers got together and made fun of it. OMG! a little girl with black hair! AH save me! now i cant sleep for Weeks!!!

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use