GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Saw V
Lionsgate

Saw V reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 19 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.7 out of 10
based on 12 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 103 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, language and brief nudity

Starring Tobin Bell, Costas Mandylor, Scott Patterson, Mark Rolston, Betsy Russell, Carlo Rota, and Julie Benz

In the fifth installment of the SAW franchise, Hoffman is seemingly the last person alive to carry on the Jigsaw legacy. But when his secret is threatened, Hoffman must go on the hunt to eliminate all loose ends. (Lionsgate)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Crime  |  Horror  |  Mystery  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Patrick Melton
Marcus Dunstan
 
DIRECTED BY: David Hackl  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: January 20, 2009 
Theatrical: October 24, 2008 
RUNNING TIME: 88 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

42
Entertainment Weekly Gregory Kirschling
The production values have become so horror-movie shoddy that Saw V has more in common with kitsch like "Friday the 13th Part V" than the original "Saw."
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Luke Y. Thompson
The method to the madness of the traps turns out to be quite clever, but the rewriting of Saw mythology is the slasher equivalent of revising Star Wars so that Greedo fires at Han Solo first.
Read Full Review
40
Film Threat Scott Mendelson
This is easily the smallest-scale of the sequels, and it has the feeling of a massively shrunken budget.
Read Full Review
38
TV Guide Jeremy Wheeler
It's cheap, sloppy, and too jumbled up to know what it should be.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Truly, the greatest torture of all is boredom.
Read Full Review
25
USA Today Claudia Puig
Saw V is a terrible combination: grisly and tedious. Let's just call it bloody dull.
Read Full Review
25
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Devotes so much time and energy to flashbacks and recycling footage from its predecessors that it threatens to implode.
Read Full Review
20
New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
This year's installment is as disappointing as a Halloween bag filled with nothing but raisins.
Read Full Review
20
The Hollywood Reporter Frank Scheck
By-the-numbers retread.
Read Full Review
12
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Oh, Jigsaw. Here we go again. You kill. I doze off. Someone at the studio goes "ka-ching!"
Read Full Review
10
Los Angeles Times Sam Adams
A particularly dull and discombobulated affair, shot and acted with all the flair of a basic-cable procedural. Patterson and Mandylor are so wooden that their cat-and-mouse game has all the excitement of watching dust bunnies swirl in an air current.
Read Full Review
10
The New York Times Nathan Lee
Skips back and forth in time, trying to piece together who did what, when and why. The only question really worth asking here: Who cares?
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.7 (out of 10) based on 103 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Chris K. gave it a7:
Are these movies starting to get disgusting and to similar.

Tim E gave it a0:
I've seen all the Saw movies and this one was really weak. The plot was sort of nothing, the "game" itsself was really short. I think this series is done.

daniel daniel gave it a0:
saw is the most disgusting thing ever,how can any of you saw saw 1-4 are the best is it nice watching others get tortured, i know it is only a movie but a movie represents something i am not saying dont watch em but still you cant say they give you anything you to learn

mauricio l. gave it a6:
Ok , if u have seen all the others u have to see this one ,. i really liked it. and it really gives a concluicion to all of the otthers.

Jay H gave it a3:
Unpleasant people doing extremely unpleasant things. My, what fun! Extremely gory and nasty, not much of a plot. The acting is fair. Pointless.

Jessica S. gave it a2:
At first I was a big Saw fan as i enjoy gory horror films, and i like all of the games throughout the films. This Saw went so far away from the first movie it was unbelievable, After all when you go to watch a horror you do expect blood, all there was in this was one game which was crap, a plot that jumped around from 1 saw to another throughout it made you feel dizzy and a ending which was a total let down, i mean i love saw 1 but it has now got terribly numb.

Sawno M. gave it a0:
Saw 1 and 3 were great, (i personally prefer three) saw 2 was alright, but saw 4 was pretty bad. by saw 4 they were making shit up and production values were getting lower. But by saw five... well lets just say it was MORTIFYING.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use