CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



Seeker: The Dark Is Rising, The
20th Century Fox

Seeker: The Dark Is Rising, The reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 38 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
2.3 out of 10
based on 21 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 34 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG for fantasy action and some scary images

Starring Christopher Eccleston, Ian McShane, Jonathan Jackson, Gregory Smith, Amelia Warner, Wendy Crewson, James Cosmo, and Alexander Ludwig

The Dark is Rising tells the story of Will Stanton, who learns on the eve of his 11th birthday that he is actually the last of the "Old Ones," a group of immortal warriors and guardians dedicated to fighting the forces of the Dark. The Dark is amidst its last great Rising to defeat the Light and take free will from the human race forever. Will, having been born with a great gift of power, is called upon a monumental heroic quest. (Walden Media)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Adventure  |  Drama  |  Fantasy  
WRITTEN BY: Susan Cooper (novel)
John Hodge
 
DIRECTED BY: David L. Cunningham  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 18, 2008 
Theatrical: October 5, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 94 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Gianni Truzzi
The books' magic was rooted in its ties to Arthurian legend and British folklore, grandiose elements which Cunningham and Hodge have stripped.
Read Full Review
67
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The movie has a lot going for it, including wonderful sets and locations - in Bucharest, Romania! - that create a heightened-reality English hamlet with pub, church, manor and shops (make that shoppes!). And the lead actor, Ludwig, registers the growth spurts of the stripling hero with the sensitivity and precision of an emotional seismograph.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
This is a reasonable choice for bored tweens - as long as they don't demand too much magic from their movies.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Tribune Kelley L. Carter
At its best, The Seeker is a pretty vivid fantasy book come-to-life; it does a decent, passable job of adding to the canon of kid-lit flicks.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Claudia Puig
Starts out with promise but staggers under the weight of trying to take on too much. The tone is murky: The story attempts to blend adolescent angst with fantasy adventure, and the result is rather clunky.
Read Full Review
50
The Hollywood Reporter Stephen Farber
The film plods along without a lot of excitement or inspiration.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Dennis Harvey
Slick, good-looking, cluttered pic won't please fans of novelist Susan Cooper's original "The Dark Is Rising" sequence. But then, they are mostly grown-ups by now, and this very Hollywood-style adaptation of a very English book is aimed squarely at tweens.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Jeannette Catsoulis
Feels passé and lacks a charismatic lead. Too bad Daniel Radcliffe is an only child.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
Whether you fully embrace the Harry Potter phenomenon or simply live with it, there's no question that J. K. Rowling is an imaginative story-spinner. The trouble is that she has ruined the field for the legions of the second-rate.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Ken Fox
Though stylishly produced, this clumsy parable will probably engender more boredom than sequels.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein
A mostly entertaining movie with built-in appeal to young audiences. The good news for parents is that it won't put them to sleep.
Read Full Review
42
Entertainment Weekly Gregory Kirschling
A movie that should've been made shortly after its source material -- Susan Cooper's Newbery winner -- debuted in 1973. As is, it feels entirely too generic to work today.
Read Full Review
40
Washington Post Desson Thomson
This movie is a particular disappointment. Although The Seeker is in Walden's tradition of positive storytelling, John Hodge's script is guilty of downright goofy utterances on occasion.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Robert Wilonsky
From its less-than-special effects to its rushed ending, this whole endeavor is a lazy, wasted emasculation of a beloved series deserving of more thoughtful treatment. Guess they have four more books left to get it right. Oh, joy.
Read Full Review
40
Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust
Dreary, spectacle-driven adaptation.
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Kyle Smith
A kid unversed in other name-brand fantasy movies might go for The Seeker, but in 2007 it's redundant, a puttering Potter without wit and whimsy.
Read Full Review
38
Premiere Laura Repstad
This film should have soared, but doesn't quite get off the ground.
Read Full Review
38
Boston Globe Ty Burr
The producers - Fox Films and the usually reliable Walden Media - have tried to gin up the story for multiplex audiences. They've succeeded in making a movie for no audience at all.
Read Full Review
33
The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson
Final score: Book 1, Movie 0.
Read Full Review
25
Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
It's trying to fill some perceived market void created by the end of "Harry Potter."
Read Full Review
0
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
None of this made a lick of sense to me, nor did it appear to be all that obvious to either the cast or screenwriter Hodge, whose work here feels as though he'd given up in frustration halfway through before deciding to see how far he could push the vaguely Harry Potter-esque shenanigans before getting sacked.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 2.3 (out of 10) based on 34 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Giorgos D. gave it a0:
Sincerely it was the worst film i ever saw. Imagine yourself going to see the next episode of star wars not knowing that due to cuts it was shot with bad acting drunk puppets that forgot all the time the dialogs. If you want to catch a sleep in a nice warm theater here's the chance!

Zac M. gave it a1:
Wow, this movie was disappointing; I absolutely loved the books, but this almost made me cry. The only redeeming quality this had at all was that it took up a boring Sunday afternoon.

JD gave it a0:
This is not a Harry Potter wannabe. This is not a fantasy/adventure film. This is not fit for a straight to DVD release. This is not fit for TV viewing. This is simply not a movie.

Nina K gave it a0:
I wish it were possible to give a movie a negative rating. If you have ever read the books this movie is supposedly based on - strike that, if you have ever met anyone who's read the books this movie is supposedly based on, chew your arm off rather than go to see this movie. Will Stanton is American? His father is a physicist? Maggie Barnes is a girl at his school? No Walker? I would have been willing to forgive a great deal if they had only incorporated a fraction of the poetry from the books. No luck. Just a bunch of rooks, reminding us how we'd been rooked into seeing this movie.

Samuel C gave it a0:
Don't be misled by the title: the movie is nothing like the series of books. This seems like the first of what will be a long series of cheap Harry Potter knock offs. The entire plot of Susan Cooper's beloved children's books has changed entirely, including the addition and removal of many characters to make the film an absurd highlight reel of special effects without a soul, message, or any artistic merit. This to me seems like a tech demo. There are several cool special effects moments, and one or two scenes that are genuinely freaky or slightly disturbing. On the flipside, however, this may scare children. This movie isn't for the easily spooked child. The best part of this film was clearly the very beginning,, .before I realized the masochism inherent in watching the film.

Johannes H gave it a0:
Just awful. For a movie whose title is the seeker, it spends little to no time actually searching. The signs more or less dump themselves onto the main character at the most unrealistical and logic defying places and times ever. Alot of the scenes are directly incoherent and even a further amount woefully underbuilt. It would seem like the person in charge of cutting the movie didnt really bother to watch the movie trough in the end, which is understandable. I couldn't have been the only one who thought "huh" at the Mark-Will scene. This thing is basically an amateurish shallow fling with a non-amateurish budget, that's all too often wading in cliches that will make you cringe.

Bart C. gave it a1:
Haha three JC's in a row. Look at the bottom. The first three reviews. Coincidence they're all perfect high scores? Hahaha... I loved the books...as for the movies, well...don't the reviews say it all.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use