Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Shanghai Knights

EMAILPRINTTouchstone Pictures / Buena Vista Pictures

Shanghai Knights reviews
58
7.7 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 33 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 13 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Comedy

Written by: Alfred Gough (also characters)
Miles Millar (also characters)

Directed by: David Dobkin

Release Date:
Theatrical: February 7, 2003
DVD: July 15, 2003

Running Time: 97 minutes, Color

Origin: USA / UK

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for action violence and sexual content

Starring Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Fann Wong, Donnie Yen, Aaron Johnson, and Aidan Gillen

After taming the wild west in the comedy "Shanghai Noon," Chon Wang (Chan) and Roy O'Bannon (Wilson) are back in the saddle, but off the range. This time, they're out to settle a score in civilized London. (Buena Vista Pictures)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80

Variety Joe Leydon

A hugely entertaining and more lavishly mounted follow-up to 2000's "Shanghai Noon," the high-concept East-meets-Western that first teamed top-billed duo, pic rides even taller in the saddle as a fleet and funny crowd-pleaser.

Read Full Review >
80

The New York Times A.O. Scott

With Shanghai Knights, he (Chan) has come through with one of his best. This time, it's personable.

Read Full Review >
80

LA Weekly Chuck Wilson

Turns out to be that rarest of Hollywood creatures: a sequel that one-ups the original…These two smart, happy movie stars prove that silliness doesn’t have to be moronic.

Read Full Review >
80

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

Far from great but greatly entertaining.

Read Full Review >
80

Salon.com Charles Taylor

What Chan represents -- the humor and charm and the sheer physical beauty of seeing him in action -- as well as the lazy, ping-pong repartee he achieves with Wilson, is the essence of the casual, deceptively artless art of movies.

Read Full Review >
80

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

Coasts heavily on Chan and Wilson's charm, which would be a big problem if those prodigiously gifted stars weren't taking on roles that fit like two pairs of comfortable slippers.

Read Full Review >
75

Miami Herald Christine Dolen

A hoot.

Read Full Review >
75

USA Today Mike Clark

The star interplay and anachronisms recapture some of the surreal spirit of the Crosby-Hope Road movies, and the end-credit outtakes are funny enough to sustain that getting-hoary device for at least one more picture.

Read Full Review >
75

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

Actually a pretty entertaining movie, in a kick-you-in-the-pants kind of way. A relative rarity -- a solid no-brow comedy.

Read Full Review >
75

New York Post Lou Lumenick

That his dialogue is often deliberately anachronistic is part of the joke -- and Wilson's sly delivery is often funnier than the lines themselves.

Read Full Review >
75

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

This is an action-comedy sequel so indefatigably preposterous and farklemt -- as they say in certain Upper West Side saloons -- that it actually improves on the original.

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

There are three action sequences here so delightful, so hilariously deploying an old tool for a new use, that they prompt smiles long after I saw the film.

Read Full Review >
75

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

The unlikely cowboys play off each other's strengths like the best doubles team in tennis. The exquisiteness of this match is that Chan and Wilson are both reactive comedy actors.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Bounds from one gag to another like an eager puppy.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

Despite his advancing years, Chan delivers some fleet slapstick; like his hero Buster Keaton he works intuitively with levers, pulleys, ladders, and umbrellas.

Read Full Review >
67

Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan

This is a movie where you can just sit back and revel in it, warts and all.

Read Full Review >
67

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

For what it's worth, the film also goes out of its way to be a lavish visual re-creation of the 1880s.

Read Full Review >
63

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

Uproarious imbecility.

Read Full Review >
63

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

It's a gimcrack assemblage of gags, action scenes, favorite moments from the first hit and diorama-like views of high and low Victorian culture.

Read Full Review >
63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Pretty mediocre entertainment, and probably better suited for home viewing than a trip to the multiplex.

Read Full Review >
60

Film Threat Ron Wells

Only promised a few good fights, a lot of chuckles, and an easy way to kill a couple of hours. In today's Hollywood that's hard enough to deliver.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis

Loving Jackie Chan has always been easy, which is why it would be nice if he could find better material in which to bask in his long-sought American stardom or, alternately, ease into bad movies as effortlessly as his co-star.

Read Full Review >
60

Village Voice Ed Park

The adventure-book pace and topsy-turvy English setting evoke the feel of Stephen Sommers's "Mummy" films.

Read Full Review >
50

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

A machine for killing time, and it does so fairly painlessly.

50

Boston Globe Ty Burr

So appallingly slipshod in all the usual departments is this sequel to the engaging martial-arts comedy Western ''Shanghai Noon'' that you're tempted to cite its makers for contempt.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Mark Caro

Chan and Wilson's easy camaraderie remains eminently watchable, but the rough edges from last time out are missed.

Read Full Review >
40

Austin Chronicle Steve Davis

If you’re the type of moviegoer who finds the idea of 19th-century characters using phrases such as "Be cool" and "You must work out" in their conversations, this is the film for you.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat David Grove

I would also like to state for a fact that fight scenes in absence of all other drama aren’t interesting to watch.

Read Full Review >
40

Dallas Observer Robert Wilonsky

Why would the writers bother with narrative when the story is just something that kills time, and brain cells, between feats and fists of fury?

Read Full Review >
40

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Most of the film's humor derives from smug anachronisms (the Brit-pop soundtrack, Wang and Roy's use of modern slang) and jokes about bad English food, teeth and weather that were old when Victoria was a girl.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

It's too bad Chan's imagination and delicacy were wasted in this movie.

Read Full Review >
25

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Grating.

Read Full Review >
0

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Desperately unfunny action comedy.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.7 (out of 10) based on 13 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a7:
Nice Jackie Chan movie. Good martial arts, and his character's sister is played well.

Michael M. gave it a 6:
This sequel is actually better and funnier than the original. It also has cooler fight scenes too. It is actually a pretty good movie. I laughed really hard in the theater. The story is about a former chinese warrior Chon Wang (Jackie Chan) who after his father gets killed by a ruthless heir of the thrown, seek vengeance on him with the help of his old partner Roy O'Bannon (Owen Wilson) and his sister from China who told him about the death of his father. This one has actually more action and is more funny than the original by a long shot. I personally think that Shanghai Noon and Shanghai Knights are way better than the Rush Hour movies. I would say this is probably one of Jackie Chan's best movies, and his best comedy for sure. I would recommend this to fans of both Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan and Action/Comedy fans as well. (14 February 2003)

MMM&GGG R&S gave it a 9:
The movie was hilarious, and it succeeded a little more than the first one.

Bubba Fresh gave it a 6:
Chan didn't seem nearly as challenged doing stunts as previous movies and the comedy was nothing spectacular so all in all a average movie.

Acid gave it an 8:
Owen wilson will always draw laughs and jackie always delivers eye candy action and in this sequel, so does his sister. Overall, its great buddy comedy or whatever its called.

Arabella F. gave it a 10:
Brilliant! Loved the Singing in the Rain dance/fight. Loved the way that Chon and Roy don't argue with each other all the way through - they genuinely like each other's company and so do we. There isn't a dull moment in it, it's fast paced, slickly edited and cleverly directed with enough looseness to allow Chan and Wilson to excel at their own thing. Jackie Chan is astounding as always and his acting in the final scenes shows that he should be given some serious dramatic roles. Owen Wilson makes comedy look easy. The villains are villainous and funny. The costumes are sumptious, music score is sweepingly perfect, Fann Wong is a good addition to the Shanghai family and - in the tradition of Bing and Bob we'd like seven sequels, please. Oh, and Jackie Chan is sex on a chopstick.

Hades gave it a 9:
I thought the movie was great entertainment. In the sense of action and comedy, it was a great buddy feel good movie. However it did take a moment to get started but once it did it was fantastic. I can't wait for the 3rd one, a couple of complaints though, are that yes, some of the jokes are pretty wretched, met by an awkward silence by the viewing audience, but what movie ISNT guilty of that?? Also my other complaint is that Donnie Yen's talents as a martial artist weren't exhibited nearly enough in this film considering how much an impressive fighter he is his scenes could have been 10x better had he had the camera time to exhibit his skills to the max. Overall good entertainment.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use