|

New This Week
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

34
10,000 B.C.
37
Air I Breathe, The
52
Be Kind Rewind
47
Boarding Gate
46
Bonneville
42
Bucket List, The
70
Caramel
49
Cassandra's Dream
44
Chaos Theory
54
Charlie Bartlett
64
Chronicle of an Escape
63
City of Men
78
Control
66
Darfur Now
59
Definitely, Maybe
41
Drillbit Taylor
36
Eye, The
46
Finishing the Game
35
Flakes
38
Flash Point
57
Flawless
29
Fool's Gold
41
Funny Games
66
George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
65
Grace Is Gone
57
Hammer, The
68
Honeydripper
67
In Bruges
xx
Jack and Jill vs. the World
35
Jumper
9
Meet the Spartans
52
My Blueberry Nights
48
National Treasure: Book of Secrets
50
Other Boleyn Girl, The
90
Persepolis
44
Rails & Ties
46
Rambo
36
Remember the Daze
47
Semi-Pro
24
Sex and Death 101
76
Shotgun Stories
63
Signal, The
62
Spiderwick Chronicles, The
12
Strange Wilderness
45
Tyler Perry's Meet the Browns
59
Under the Same Moon
40
Vantage Point
55
Walker, The
37
War, Inc.
46
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
60
What Would Jesus Buy?
51
Wild West Comedy Show: 30 Days & 30 Nights - Hollywood to the Heartland
17
Witless Protection
90
Persepolis
78
Control
76
Shotgun Stories
70
Caramel
68
Honeydripper
67
In Bruges
66
Darfur Now
66
George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
65
Grace Is Gone
64
Chronicle of an Escape
63
City of Men
63
Signal, The
62
Spiderwick Chronicles, The
60
What Would Jesus Buy?
59
Under the Same Moon
59
Definitely, Maybe
57
Flawless
57
Hammer, The
55
Walker, The
54
Charlie Bartlett
52
Be Kind Rewind
52
My Blueberry Nights
51
Wild West Comedy Show: 30 Days & 30 Nights - Hollywood to the Heartland
50
Other Boleyn Girl, The
49
Cassandra's Dream
48
National Treasure: Book of Secrets
47
Boarding Gate
47
Semi-Pro
46
Finishing the Game
46
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
46
Bonneville
46
Rambo
45
Tyler Perry's Meet the Browns
44
Rails & Ties
44
Chaos Theory
42
Bucket List, The
41
Funny Games
41
Drillbit Taylor
40
Vantage Point
38
Flash Point
37
Air I Breathe, The
37
War, Inc.
36
Remember the Daze
36
Eye, The
35
Jumper
35
Flakes
34
10,000 B.C.
29
Fool's Gold
24
Sex and Death 101
17
Witless Protection
12
Strange Wilderness
9
Meet the Spartans
xx
Jack and Jill vs. the World
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Showgirls
MGM
FILM:
MPAA RATING: NC-17 for nudity and erotic sexuality throughout, and for some graphic language and sexual violence.
Starring
Elizabeth Berkley,
Kyle MacLachlan,
Gina Gershon,
Glenn Plummer,
Robert Davi,
Alan Rachins,
and
Gina Ravera
Seduction, passion and power struggles unfold as the creators of "Basic Instinct" blow the lid off the seemingly glamorous world of Las Vegas showdancing in this controversial film that stars Elizabeth Berkley. (MGM)
| GENRE(S): |
Drama
|
| WRITTEN BY: |
Joe Eszterhas
|
| DIRECTED BY: |
Paul Verhoeven
|
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: April 25, 2000
Video: January 2, 1996
Theatrical: September 22, 1995
|
| RUNNING TIME: |
131 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: |
USA |
The film picked up 7 Razzie awards in 1996, including Worst Actress, Director, New Star, Screenplay, Original Song, and Worst Picture. Showgirls also won Worst Movie of the Decade at the 2000 Razzie Awards.

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
63
USA Today
Susan Wloszczyna
Who knew such a seamy swim in the misogynistic swill of life could be so entertaining?

60
The New Republic
Stanley Kauffmann
What matters much more than the story or the Spicy Stuff is the dancing, the show-biz dancing. It's electric. Exciting. And there's lots of it. [23 Oct 1995]
58
Entertainment Weekly
Owen Gleiberman
As Nomi, Elizabeth Berkley has exactly two emotions -- hot and bothered -- but her party-doll blowsiness works for the picture.

50
Chicago Sun-Times
Roger Ebert
If the plot and screenplay are juvenile, the production values are first-rate, and the lead performance by newcomer Elizabeth Berkley has a fierce energy that's always interesting.

50
Chicago Tribune
Gene Siskel
The film's big lap-dance sequence is impressive, however, if only for the sheer athleticism of Elizabeth Berkley's contortion. Later, when she pulls the same stunt in a swimming pool, we recognize the show for what it is--a male fantasy film in which the women are little more than rag dolls. [22 Sept 1995]
50
Christian Science Monitor
David Sterritt
In its depiction of the Las Vegas nightclub scene and in its own cinematic strategies, the film is quite instructive about the intersection of sex, money, and entertainment in some areas of popular American culture. [29 Sept 1995]
30
TV Guide
Harlan Jacobson
After an onslaught of prerelease hype promising the erotic experience of a lifetime, Showgirls reveals itself as a 131-minute dose of cinematic saltpeter.

30
Washington Post
Desson Thomson
To take Showgirls that seriously (as either trash-art or appalling pornography) wouldn't be worth the exertion.

25
San Francisco Chronicle
Mick LaSalle
What's completely baffling is that everyone in the film thinks Nomi is one heck of a dancer, even though her one move -- throwing her arms out stiffly -- is straight out of "Dr. Strangelove."

20
Washington Post
Rita Kempley
This film is just a coarser, dumber, smuttier remake of the 1983 Eszterhas-penned "Flashdance," throbbing music, working-class Cinderella and all.

12
ReelViews
James Berardinelli
This film is like a shiny, red apple that's rotten to the core -- despite slick direction and a glossy sheen, it reeks of decay. Showgirls isn't a good drama, a good thriller, or even good pornography.

0
Variety
Todd McCarthy
Impossibly vulgar, tawdry and coarse, this much-touted major studio splash into NC-17 waters is akin to being keelhauled through a cesspool, with sharks swimming alongside.

0
The New York Times
Elvis Mitchell
The film makers had declared they were bravely exploring new levels of licentiousness, but the biggest risk they've taken here is making a nearly $40 million movie without anyone who can act. The absence of both drama and eroticism turns Showgirls into a bare-butted bore. [22 Sept 1995]
0
Time
Richard Corliss
Obscene level of incompetence, excessive inanity in the story line, gross negligence of the viewer's intelligence, a prurient interest in the quick buck. [2 Oct 1995]
0
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Rick Groen
There's nothing even mildly intriguing, or remotely galvanizing, about Showgirls.

0
Chicago Reader
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The cynicism of the writer and director smacks of such self-hatred (fully acknowledged in the film's closing shot) that their disgust spills over onto all their characters (and their audience too), and inasmuch as everybody here is one kind of whore or another at virtually every moment, the fine moral distinctions this movie insists on making sometimes seem about as arcane and as loony as medieval theology about angels dancing on the heads of pins.

0
Austin Chronicle
Marjorie Baumgarten
The story is so shabbily built that it can make no valid claim to motives other than the filmmakers' mercenary desires to cash in on the public's prurient interests. And even on this bottom-feeder level, Showgirls fails to deliver the goods.

0
San Francisco Examiner
Barbara Shulgasser
That Berkley cannot act is indisputable. But her dancing looks like a seizure.

0
Los Angeles Times
Kenneth Turan
Lacking the combustible Sharon Stone and Michael Douglas in leading roles, Showgirls descends into incoherent tedium. Though the filmmakers' incessant talk about vision, artistry and honest self-expression lead one to expect a sexually explicit biopic about the Dalai Lama, what is in fact provided is depressing and disappointing as well as dehumanizing.


The average user rating for this movie is 6.7 (out of 10) based on 28 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Read more user comments...
Discuss this movie in our forums |
|