Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Showgirls

EMAILPRINTMGM

Showgirls reviews
16
6.5 User Score:

Overwhelming dislike

Based on 19 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 29 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama

Written by: Joe Eszterhas

Directed by: Paul Verhoeven

Release Date:
Theatrical: September 22, 1995
DVD: April 25, 2000

Running Time: 131 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: NC-17 for nudity and erotic sexuality throughout, and for some graphic language and sexual violence.

Starring Elizabeth Berkley, Kyle MacLachlan, Gina Gershon, Glenn Plummer, Robert Davi, Alan Rachins, and Gina Ravera

Seduction, passion and power struggles unfold as the creators of "Basic Instinct" blow the lid off the seemingly glamorous world of Las Vegas showdancing in this controversial film that stars Elizabeth Berkley. (MGM)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

63

USA Today Susan Wloszczyna

Who knew such a seamy swim in the misogynistic swill of life could be so entertaining?

Read Full Review >
60

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

What matters much more than the story or the Spicy Stuff is the dancing, the show-biz dancing. It's electric. Exciting. And there's lots of it. [23 Oct 1995]

58

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

As Nomi, Elizabeth Berkley has exactly two emotions -- hot and bothered -- but her party-doll blowsiness works for the picture.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

If the plot and screenplay are juvenile, the production values are first-rate, and the lead performance by newcomer Elizabeth Berkley has a fierce energy that's always interesting.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Gene Siskel

The film's big lap-dance sequence is impressive, however, if only for the sheer athleticism of Elizabeth Berkley's contortion. Later, when she pulls the same stunt in a swimming pool, we recognize the show for what it is--a male fantasy film in which the women are little more than rag dolls. [22 Sept 1995]

50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

In its depiction of the Las Vegas nightclub scene and in its own cinematic strategies, the film is quite instructive about the intersection of sex, money, and entertainment in some areas of popular American culture. [29 Sept 1995]

30

TV Guide Harlan Jacobson

After an onslaught of prerelease hype promising the erotic experience of a lifetime, Showgirls reveals itself as a 131-minute dose of cinematic saltpeter.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

To take Showgirls that seriously (as either trash-art or appalling pornography) wouldn't be worth the exertion.

Read Full Review >
25

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

What's completely baffling is that everyone in the film thinks Nomi is one heck of a dancer, even though her one move -- throwing her arms out stiffly -- is straight out of "Dr. Strangelove."

Read Full Review >
20

Washington Post Rita Kempley

This film is just a coarser, dumber, smuttier remake of the 1983 Eszterhas-penned "Flashdance," throbbing music, working-class Cinderella and all.

Read Full Review >
12

ReelViews James Berardinelli

This film is like a shiny, red apple that's rotten to the core -- despite slick direction and a glossy sheen, it reeks of decay. Showgirls isn't a good drama, a good thriller, or even good pornography.

Read Full Review >
0

Variety Todd McCarthy

Impossibly vulgar, tawdry and coarse, this much-touted major studio splash into NC-17 waters is akin to being keelhauled through a cesspool, with sharks swimming alongside.

Read Full Review >
0

The New York Times Elvis Mitchell

The film makers had declared they were bravely exploring new levels of licentiousness, but the biggest risk they've taken here is making a nearly $40 million movie without anyone who can act. The absence of both drama and eroticism turns Showgirls into a bare-butted bore. [22 Sept 1995]

0

Time Richard Corliss

Obscene level of incompetence, excessive inanity in the story line, gross negligence of the viewer's intelligence, a prurient interest in the quick buck. [2 Oct 1995]

0

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

There's nothing even mildly intriguing, or remotely galvanizing, about Showgirls.

Read Full Review >
0

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

The cynicism of the writer and director smacks of such self-hatred (fully acknowledged in the film's closing shot) that their disgust spills over onto all their characters (and their audience too), and inasmuch as everybody here is one kind of whore or another at virtually every moment, the fine moral distinctions this movie insists on making sometimes seem about as arcane and as loony as medieval theology about angels dancing on the heads of pins.

Read Full Review >
0

Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten

The story is so shabbily built that it can make no valid claim to motives other than the filmmakers' mercenary desires to cash in on the public's prurient interests. And even on this bottom-feeder level, Showgirls fails to deliver the goods.

Read Full Review >
0

San Francisco Examiner Barbara Shulgasser

That Berkley cannot act is indisputable. But her dancing looks like a seizure.

Read Full Review >
0

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

Lacking the combustible Sharon Stone and Michael Douglas in leading roles, Showgirls descends into incoherent tedium. Though the filmmakers' incessant talk about vision, artistry and honest self-expression lead one to expect a sexually explicit biopic about the Dalai Lama, what is in fact provided is depressing and disappointing as well as dehumanizing.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.5 (out of 10) based on 29 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

R D. gave it a3:
Not very erotic. I mean some scenes are very sexy like Elizabeth Berkeley's lap dance or her final French kiss with Gina Gershon. But the movie is not well acted and directed. Although, it is not that the movie has no redeeming qualities at all (infact, it is very unintentionally funny at times), but still a very bad movie.

Patrick J gave it a7:
"Its a Versace" Nomi sums it up herself nicely. Also deserves at least a six out of 10 for being six points better than the atrocious Striptease.

Sabrina J. gave it a7:
Not to be taken to serious. It's a very clean T & A movie. This movie will be a classic!!

Mark M. gave it a9:
A cult Classic, much better then you think. Don't make the mistake to take this film to seriously.

Sam gave it a0:
It's gone beyond the well-loved "so bad it's good" bar and gone down to something much, much worse.

Darrel B. gave it a10:
This movie is great. Who doesnt love sex and nudity.

Leonardo F gave it a10:
The authentic guilty pleasure.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use