|
New This Week
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Signs
Touchstone Pictures
FILM:
MPAA RATING: PG-13 for some frightening moments
Starring
Mel Gibson,
Joaquin Phoenix,
Rory Culkin,
Abigail Breslin,
Cherry Jones,
Patricia Kalember,
and
Jose L. Rodriguez
Everything that farmer Graham Hess (Gibson) assumed about the world is changed when he discovers a message - an intricate pattern of circles and lines - carved into his crops. (Touchstone Pictures)
| GENRE(S): |
Suspense/Thriller
|
| WRITTEN BY: |
M. Night Shyamalan
|
| DIRECTED BY: |
M. Night Shyamalan
|
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: January 7, 2003
Video: January 7, 2003
Theatrical: August 2, 2002
|
| RUNNING TIME: |
120 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: |
USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
100
Chicago Sun-Times
Roger Ebert
The work of a born filmmaker, able to summon apprehension out of thin air.
88
Miami Herald
Rene Rodriguez
If "The Sixth Sense" was Shyamalan's take on ghost stories and "Unbreakable" his ode to comic books, then Signs is the evil cousin to Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."
80
Newsweek
David Ansen
One of the things that makes Signs such a refreshing summer movie is that it goes against almost all the grains of contemporary Hollywood razzle-dazzle filmmaking -- as did “The Sixth Sense.”
80
New Times (L.A.)
Robert Wilonsky
Signs blessedly displays a sense of giddy dark humor absent from Shyamalan's previous outings. It appears for much of the film he's merely having fun with the genre, goofing on its paranoid roots.
80
Film Threat
Clint Morris
Shyamalan’s film blends together elements of humanity, faith, drama, tears, tension, terror, humour and the supernatural and succeeds in being one of the sharpest and most exciting films of the year.
80
Chicago Reader
Hank Sartin
Borrowing heavily from "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," Shyamalan tries to lighten his trademark gloomy tone -- and almost kills the suspense he's working so hard to achieve.
80
Wall Street Journal
Nancy deWolf Smith
Mr. Shyamalan is a new national treasure, as attuned to our sensibilities and everyday life as Steven Spielberg.
80
Washington Post
Ann Hornaday
For filmgoers whose idea of a good time is getting the stuffing scared out of them (who are you guys, anyway?), Signs should prove to be time well spent.
80
Rolling Stone
Peter Travers
Follow Shyamalan's Signs. It will take a piece out of you.
75
Chicago Tribune
Michael Wilmington
Signs -- though Shyamalan's most visually beautiful work -- seems thinner, barely more than a sketch for a movie, with characters trapped in formulas. Beautifully trapped perhaps -- but paralyzed nonetheless.
75
Boston Globe
Ty Burr
Its quirks are exactly what make Signs interesting, entertaining, and good.
75
ReelViews
James Berardinelli
By limiting the number of special effects shots and treating the film more like a horror movie than a science fiction spectacle, Shyamalan creates a claustrophobic atmosphere and keeps the tension level high. There were times during this film when I was strongly reminded of "Panic Room."
75
New York Post
Lou Lumenick
A beautifully crafted, white-knuckle, roller-coaster ride of old-school filmmaking -- the kind that believes that the less you show, the better.
75
Philadelphia Inquirer
Steven Rea
Signs is about God and family, too, but it's also about scaring the bejesus out of you -- and on that level it works like a miracle.
70
The New Yorker
Anthony Lane
Shyamalan often tries too hard, but nobody else can conjure such a sudden flood of worry, or summon so unmistakable a stink of evil, and you come out of Signs, as you did from "The Sixth Sense," in severe need of loud music, bad jokes, and drinks with cherries and umbrellas in them -- anything to waft away the fug of unease. [12 August 2002, p. 82]
70
The Onion (A.V. Club)
Scott Tobias
For a big-budget Hollywood feature, the film places an unusually high amount of stock in the audience's imagination; not since "The Others" or "The Blair Witch Project" have so many shocks been indirect or kept teasingly out of view.
70
LA Weekly
Hazel-Dawn Dumpert
Even if Signs suffers a little from uneven pacing and mismatched tones of reverent homage (to "The Birds" and "War of the Worlds"), soul-searching and silly comedy, the jokes are clever, the tension continual and expertly calibrated, and the performances -- are both deep and moving.
67
Entertainment Weekly
Owen Gleiberman
It's a high-octane doomsday vision built almost entirely around our sense of anticipation, and that's both its strength and its weakness.
67
Austin Chronicle
Marc Savlov
Parcels out information like a triage medic doling out morphine; every tiny bit is carefully considered and then rationed out as though he were terrified he might exhaust his supply before the closing credits.
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Liam Lacey
The problem with Signs is not that the movie is pretentious -- or ambitious -- enough to try to combine "The Book of Job" and "Invasion of the Body Snatchers." The problem is that Signs manages to be both so terribly serious and so unimportant at the same time.
63
USA Today
Mike Clark
The movie keeps you watching and, at times, even gripped for more than an hour. But, at the end, it leaves us feeling detached and underwhelmed.
60
Los Angeles Times
Kenneth Turan
Shyamalan's great gift is the creation of atmosphere, the conjuring of spooky, unseen menace. When he gets around to doing this in Signs, all is well, but it's a tossup as to whether the film offers enough of a payoff considering how long it takes to get where it's going.
60
Variety
Todd McCarthy
All smoke and mirrors. With his third straight excursion into the supernatural, M. Night Shyamalan has begun revealing the hand that works his spooky tricks so much that the lack of substance is plainly seen.
60
New York Magazine
Peter Rainer
Shyamalan wants to be the metaphysical poet of movies, but he's dangerously close to becoming its O. Henry. The best surprise ending he could give us in his next movie would be no surprise ending at all.
58
Portland Oregonian
Shawn Levy
A deeply weird film, accomplished, gripping, disorienting, icily adept and barking mad at once. It makes for invigorating viewing.
50
Salon.com
Andrew O'Hehir
Once again, the filmmaker gets incredibly wobbly at the end of his story, and his resolution of both the alien incursion and of Graham's crisis of faith feels more like a cheap trick than the product of a genuine belief in anything at all.
50
New York Daily News
Jack Mathews
Shyamalan has learned from his idol (Spielberg) how to manipulate audience emotion through the intimacy of an ordinary family that is "contacted." But he is even more shameless about it.
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Sean Axmaker
Shyamalan has learned the lessons that so many horror directors ignore: Suggestion is scarier than revelation.
50
Washington Post
Desson Thomson
Even though he shows some master touches throughout the movie, Shyamalan flits a little too lightly across the surface, like a pond skater.
50
Slate
David Edelstein
As a scare picture, Signs is good enough. As a religious parable, it's scarier -- and I don't mean that as a compliment.
50
The New York Times
Dana Stevens
Mr. Shyamalan never gives us anything to believe in, other than his own power to solve problems of his own posing, and his command of a narrative logic is as circular -- and as empty -- as those bare patches out in the cornfield.
40
TV Guide
Maitland McDonagh
The film's underlying themes dovetail efficiently with the action but don't generate the emotional gut punch the movie needs; overall it feels padded and logy.
38
Baltimore Sun
Michael Sragow
Shyamalan plows the same old ground of juiced-up surprise endings.
25
Christian Science Monitor
David Sterritt
It's encouraging to see Hollywood tackle themes of faith and religion, but here, too, Shyamalan is timid, reducing them to fuzzy New Age clichés. Add wooden acting, stilted dialogue, and a faux-arty style, and you have a thudding disappointment.
25
San Francisco Chronicle
Mick LaSalle
Promised to be the season's thoughtful action picture, turns out to have few thoughts and no thrills.
10
Village Voice
Jessica Winter
Sitting through the last reel is significantly less charming than listening to a four-year-old with a taste for exaggeration recount his Halloween trip to the Haunted House.
 The average user rating for this movie is 5.8 (out of 10) based on 148 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Read more user comments...
Discuss this movie in our forums |
|
