CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Solaris (re-release)
Kino International

Solaris (re-release) reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 90 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.8 out of 10
based on 8 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 15 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: Not Rated

Starring Natalya Bondarchuk, Donatas Banionis, Jüri Järvet, Vladislav Dvorzhetsky, Nikolai Grinko, and Anatoli Solonitsyn

Based on Stanislaw Lem's novel, this 1972 allegory takes place on a space station near a mysterious planet.


GENRE(S): Sci-fi  
WRITTEN BY: Andrei Tarkovsky
Fridrikh Gorenshtein
Stanislaw Lem (novel)
 
DIRECTED BY: Andrei Tarkovsky  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: November 26, 2002 
Video: August 29, 1995 
Theatrical: October 18, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 165 minutes, Color / BW 
ORIGIN: Soviet Union 
LANGUAGE(S): Russian (with English subtitles) 

Winner, Special Jury Prize, 1972 Cannes Film Festival

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas
A dazzlingly imaginative work with awesome production values and special effects that bear comparison to those of "2001."
Read Full Review
100
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
An amazing celluloid poem by a filmmaker whom Ingmar Bergman called "the greatest." He very nearly was. He was also, perhaps, too pure a creator and reckless a citizen to survive unscathed.
Read Full Review
100
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Stands with the greatest science-fiction movies ever made.
Read Full Review
90
Washington Post Desson Thomson
His (Tarkovsky's) pictures, and his sounds -- such as the symphonic drip of raindrops in a wooded pond -- tell more than just the immediate story; they rejuvenate the mind.
Read Full Review
90
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Tarkovsky's eerie mystic parable is given substance by the filmmaker's boldly original grasp of film language and the remarkable performances by all the principals.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Routinely called Tarkovsky's reply to Kubrick's "2001" -- But Kubrick's film is outward, charting man's next step in the universe, while Tarkovsky's is inward, asking about the nature and reality of the human personality.
Read Full Review
80
TV Guide Staff (Not Credited)
Slow, but ravishingly beautiful and charged with a real poignancy.
Read Full Review
70
Village Voice J. Hoberman
The most pop film the great Russian filmmaker ever made.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 8.8 (out of 10) based on 15 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

dave z gave it a10:
I was unemployed the 1st winter after graduating college and decided to watch foreign films to see the difference. The standard by which I rate films is strongly influenced by masterpieces such as "Solaris." Do yourself a favor... don't watch the American remake of this film (it does this film no justice at all... would you watch a remake of star wars by any other director than Lucas?). See the original and let yourself open up to a movie that although slow, is paced for you to contemplate rather than merely watch. Would I watch it again? Only if showing it to someone who has been blinded by the myriad amounts of garbage that is mass produced by Hollywood for the insatiable appetite of American dvd junkies. (sorry, the movie is a little long like my explanation of it).

Alexey gave it a9:
Tarkovsky's Solaris is a great movie, the only problematic thing is first 3rd of it, that is a bit difficult to get into. That's why DVD is so great, you can scroll through it. And later watch the whole thing, because all of tarkovsky's films should be watched more then once.

Gilbert Mulroneycakes Apologises To A Nation In Shock gave it an 8:
Oh. I'm sorry, I seem to have buggerarse twatted the display. I do apologise, especially if there turns out to be no way to get rid of the damn thing. [Ed: Ahhh... didn't noticed, but fixed now.]

Yoon C. gave it a 9:
Strangely, this sci-fi film works best when it takes place on Earth but then Tarkovsky was always an earthy(and earthbound)director. In the opening scene, Tarkovsky renders our world with its plants and water alien, strange, otherwordly. He gazes upon our 'normal' world with a contemplative mood, as though perceiving sound and scenery with a sixth sense. The effect is both awesome and poetic. Our planet becomes an alien planet. Once in space, the movie slowly bogs down into discourse on Russian mysticism in the sterile and futuristic setting of the spacecraft; the effect is confusing and confused, which may explain why neither Tarkovsky nor Lem was happy with the result. Still, the movie is mesmerizing throughout with many hypnotic trance-like moments as when lovers drift in the air for a brief duration in zero gravity or when the replica of the hero's dead wife stares at a painting and explores its illustrations as dream imagery. The film offers many perspectives, some divergent and some intersecting, suggesting that everything is alien, a mystery, that we are enigmas unto ourselves, and that what we consider truth is at best a mirror reflection of our egos projected onto the infinite plane of the universe both within and without us.

Nelson D. gave it an 8:
Arenas needed to make money and impress Vivendi on this one. They sure did, and Blades/Leguizamo/Sonia Braga/Rossellini is a powerful package for international markets. Critics aside, the film had a clear mark, and hit it. I enjoyed this flick...and love the soundtrack!

Donald W. gave it a 7:
Slow and ponderous at times, but beautiful to watch. Would be severely edited and shortened today. English titles are sometimes sketchy. Not for the mainstream viewer.

Yon L. gave it a 6:
Stanislaw Lem hated the film version, probably because he was afraid people would see it and think that he wrote a line like "I love you more than any scientific truth".

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use