New This Week
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

sort by name

sort by score

17 88 Minutes
55 Baby Mama
78 Before I Forget
80 Bigger, Stronger, Faster*
75 Boy A
32 Chapter 27
54 CSNY: Déjà Vu
31 Deception
64 Fall, The
51 Finding Amanda
57 Forbidden Kingdom, The
67 Forgetting Sarah Marshall
34 Happening, The
27 How to Rob a Bank
79 Iron Man
46 Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer
62 Kabluey
56 Leatherheads
72 Lou Reed's Berlin
24 Love Guru, The
37 Made of Honor
65 Married Life
52 Mother of Tears, The
70 Outsourced
83 Paranoid Park
55 Pathology
22 Postal
51 Promotion, The
77 Rape of Europa, The
69 Redbelt
48 Run, Fat Boy, Run
30 Sarah Landon and the Paranormal Hour
53 Sex and the City: The Movie
67 Snow Angels
66 Son of Rambow
37 Speed Racer
82 Taxi to the Dark Side
56 Then She Found Me
79 Visitor, The
65 Water Lilies
36 What Happens in Vegas...
45 Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden?
54 You Don't Mess with the Zohan
75 Young@Heart

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Stepford Wives, The
Paramount Pictures


3.2

based on 40 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

based on 57 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

FILM:

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for sexual content, thematic material and language

Starring Nicole Kidman, Bette Midler, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Walken, Faith Hill, Glenn Close, Roger Bart, and Jon Lovitz

Stepford has a secret. All of the wives are far too perfect, and all of the husbands are way too happy. The Stepford Wives is a sophisticated and comic re-imagining of the 1975 suspense classic. Welcome to Stepford -- the American way of love. (Paramount Pictures)

GENRE(S):	Comedy \| Drama \| Musical \| Suspense/Thriller
WRITTEN BY:	Paul Rudnick Ira Levin (book)
DIRECTED BY:	Frank Oz
RELEASE DATE:	DVD: November 9, 2004 Video: November 9, 2004 Theatrical: June 11, 2004
RUNNING TIME:	93 minutes, Color
ORIGIN:	USA

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

LA Weekly Ella Taylor

Contrary to recent rumors that it was a dud, the new Stepford Wives, with its chocolate-box visual style, archly heavy-handed foreshadowing and its scene-for-scene parody of the original's fright strategies (Walken's waxy menace is once again played for laughs), is a gas.

Newsweek Cathleen McGuigan

Glenn Close, Bette Midler and Roger Bart (who plays one half of a gay couple slated for Stepfordizing) are hilarious, and even Nicole Kidman flashes comedic gifts not seen since "To Die For."

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

It's hilarious -- and on purpose, too. This is the first satisfying adult summer comedy set in New England to come out of Hollywood since "The Witches of Eastwick" in 1987.

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

The star of this overachieving trifle is not Kidman, it's Paul Rudnick. The New York playwright and screenwriter ("In & Out") has taken a pair of dated watermarks from the '70s - Ira Levin's horror novel and its faithful 1975 movie adaptation - and turned them into a broad, feverishly fey parody.

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The 1975 movie tilted toward horror instead of comedy. Now here's a version that tilts the other way, and I like it a little better.

Time Richard Corliss

A film full of smart laughs.

Slate David Edelstein

I had a fabulous time. Well, I did once I accepted that it was a campfest--a great Provincetown drag show of The Stepford Wives.

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

Trying to be more antic and cuttingly funny, it misses the premise's shivery tension. The story loses us at precisely the moment it should put us in the vise.

USA Today Mike Clark

You feel some of the strain in this immaculately shot, designed and costumed farce, but it's fast and the cast is lively, even though a lost-looking Broderick rarely gets to shoot his patented bewildered look.

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

Because the entire audience knows what's going on, the filmmakers hope to distract viewers from storytelling weaknesses with an urgent sense of style.

Variety Brian Lowry

Another "remake" that merits the title in name only, The Stepford Wives isn't the "troubled" disaster that media reports have suggested it might be, yet nor do its oddly matched parts ever congeal into a fully formed creation.

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

If the filmmakers had made a point of satirizing the new makeover culture in ways that went beyond camp jibes at décor and suburbia, they might have come up with a classic.

Empire Kim Newman

It’s funny, wonderfully performed by all, visually inventive.

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

The film's creepier moments are pathetically weak, and its thematic update fails to attain the minimal credibility that even a wild farce needs to sustain itself.

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

At no time do the men -- that is, the straight ones -- believably hold the upper hand. In the new town of Stepford, there's no bitterness, no struggle, no competition, none of the scars of the sexual revolution. There's just gay apparel.

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

Great casting ideas, like Glenn Close and Christopher Walken as "the King and Queen of Stepford," don't pay off, because the filmmakers' increasingly desperate twists alter the basis of the characters.

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Close gets laughs, as does Bette Midler as a Jewish rebel. But the sting is gone.

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

Isn't so much bad as it is puny: a sporadically amusing, occasionally funny, but ultimately bland and pointless time killer.

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

Only Close, in a majestically, maniacally brittle demonstration of Stepford overdrive, has the courage to show how nutty the pursuit of domestic perfection is. In this mess of a film, she is perfection.

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Before it degenerates into a complete mess, it's an entertaining mess, and something about its willingness to please maintains the audience's goodwill throughout.

New York Post Megan Lehmann

Boasts a stellar ensemble cast and some priceless one-liners -- but those pearls of acerbic wit have been strung together on a cheap piece of thread which almost inevitably breaks in the third act.

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

The picture is mildly entertaining and stringently unoffensive (provided you're not a supersensitive upper-crusty type from Connecticut). Yet it has problems from the start.

Village Voice J. Hoberman

Almost desperate to show it gets its own point. What's funny is that the joke--"Invasion of the Body Snatchers" reconfigured as anti-feminist backlash--was scarcely fresh when Bryan Forbes shot the first movie version nearly 30 years ago.

Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis

It was somebody's nitwit idea to rip out the story's guts and brains for a sour sellout of a finale -- which finds the filmmakers behaving exactly like Stepford men and turning an original into a dummy.

The New York Times Dana Stevens

It does manage to fire off a handful of decent jokes and a few sneaky insights before losing its nerve and collapsing into incoherence.

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Unfortunately this is much tamer than it had to be--Rudnick Lite, meaning on the edge of evaporation.

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

A Frankenstein's monster of a movie: clumsy, patched together from parts that don't align properly, desperate to be loved, destined to be chased by mobs with pitchforks - those will be the critics - until it stumbles into its grave.

ReelViews James Berardinelli

If the film is to work on any level, even a comedic one, it's necessary for the viewers to sympathize with Joanna and Walter. However, the script and scattershot performances keep them at arm's length. Nicole Kidman is in full scenery-chewing mode, and Matthew Broderick hasn't been this invisible since Ferris Bueller had to go back to school.

Premiere Peter Debruge

Close is the best and worst thing about the film, delivering a performance that upstages even Christopher Walken (!), taking her over-the-top Cruella de Vil turn to its saccharine-sweet opposite.

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

Rudnick is a wit, and his script allows everyone a decent one-liner or two. But the problem with one-liners is that they only last one line, leaving a whole movie around them that needs filling in.

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

Lured to the project with John Cusack as her original co-star (cruelly replaced by Matthew Broderick), Nicole Kidman phones it in.

Film Threat Kevin Carr

The story and themes behind The Stepford Wives are way past their time. They’re products of the 1960s.

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

None of it appears to be well thought out, or thought through, and it's consequently never remotely believable.

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

The movie takes a desperately wrong turn about 45 minutes in, and you can almost hear the great sucking sound as the whole thing churns down the drain in a swirl of narrative contradictions.

Washington Post Desson Thomson

The result: an empty comedy that takes hackneyed potshots at consumerism.

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

The film contains so many endings that it's hard to tell what impressions the filmmakers want us to leave the theater with. Buy a copy of the book instead. It remains an excellent read.

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

There is no tonal consistency from scene to scene, swinging from domestic drama to farce. Most of the actors -- especially Matthew Broderick -- look lost.

Portland Oregonian Karen Karbo

So god-awful it falls into the category of needing to be seen to be believed. A purported satire of the 1975 camp horror classic, it succeeds in failing on almost every level, including knowing what it's actually satirizing.

Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten

Misbegotten is the only way to describe this remake of the 1975 film based on Ira Levin's cultural-zeitgeist novel.

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

A pitiful shambles of a remake, The Stepford Wives might have qualified as a rethinking of the 1975 original if there were any trace of coherent thought in the finished product.

The average user rating for this movie is 3.2 (out of 10) based on 57 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Nick A. gave it a1:
Well what an insult to the original, I don't care if people say this is a different take or that this is just a bit of cheesy fun, if you're going to call yourselves a remake of a film then for god sakes stick to the elements that made the original so splendid. I mean how can you take such a good cast and turn out this pile of crap. This goes down in my lists of remakes that should never see the light of day ever again.

joe s. gave it a10:
My favorite movie.

Nicole gave it a0:
To begin, I am a Kidman fan and I also enjoyed the original Stepford Wives movie. Because of the previews, I did not expect this movie to be great, and was surprised when it turned out to be FAR worse than I thought. The revised plot is terrible, the "acting" is insulting, and the ending is ridiculous. I advise you to save yourself. It is not worth the time or effort to see - not even on cable.

Peter J. gave it a3:
I rented this movie because my wife wanted to see it, so I was not expecting much at all. I expected it to be bad, and sure enough, it was. The biggest thing that bothered me was the casting. Kidman and Broderick do not go together at all. Bad chemistry. The rest of the movie was truly a bore, even my wife fell alseep. Again, I wasn't expecting much, so I can't say I was disappointed at all.

Kevin E. gave it a4:
Just keep telling yourself, 'It's about the art direction." and you might make it through. Really uneven, starts out cringe-ingly bad with Kidman mugging up a storm at her firing, picks up with the arrival of Glenn Close, falters again, picks up again with the arrival of Roger Bart as Stepford's flamingest newcomer, falters again, Midler valiantly rescues it, Walken buries it again... and on and on. A few surprisingly good, comic moments but mostly a mess. No one bothered to decide whether or not the robots were separate from or the same as the original human that was tinkered with (details!).

Ilze S. gave it a 1:
This movie was so stupid. I liked only Nicole Kidman. So empty!

Abby H. & Amy B. gave it a 7:
Amy: Good & Okay Abby: Liked It. Interesting, but not as good as the original.

Stepford Wives, The Paramount Pictures

Stepford Wives, The
Paramount Pictures