Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Total Recall

EMAILPRINTTriStar Pictures

Total Recall reviews
57
7.8 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 17 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 10 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller

Written by: Philip K. Dick (short story We Can Remember It For You Wholesale)
Ronald Shusett
Dan O'Bannon
Jon Povill

Directed by: Paul Verhoeven

Release Date:
Theatrical: June 1, 1990
DVD: September 8, 2001

Running Time: 113 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: R

Starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rachel Ticotin, Sharon Stone, Ronny Cox, Michael Ironside, Marshall Bell, Mel Johnson Jr., and Michael Champion

Doug Quaid (Schwarzenegger), a construction worker with a beautiful wife (Stone) and home in in the year 2084, decides to take a virtual vacation to Mars as a secret agent. When things go wrong during the aritificial memory implantation process, Quaid becomes reacts violently and must figure out if his life as Quaid or as the secret agent is his true life.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

One of the most complex and visually interesting science fiction movies in a long time.

Read Full Review >
83

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

Starts out as mind-bending futuristic satire and then turns relentless -- it becomes a violent, postpunk version of an Indiana Jones cliff-hanger.

Read Full Review >
80

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

A worthy entry in the dystopian cycle of SF movies launched by "Blade Runner" (including "The Terminator" and "Robocop"), this seems less derivative than most of its predecessors yet equally accomplished in its straight-ahead storytelling, with plenty of provocative satiric undertones and scenic details.

Read Full Review >
80

Time Richard Corliss

Fast, witty, glamorous, with thrill piling on giggle atop gasp. [11 June 1990, p.85]

80

Los Angeles Times Michael Wilmington

If the movie sometimes seems overwhelmed by its budget and its legendary third-act problems, it's still entertainingly raw and brutal, full of whiplash pace and juicy exaggeration. [1 June 1990, Calendar, p.F-1]

80

Variety Staff (Not Credited)

The fierce and unrelenting pace, accompanied by a tongue-in-cheek strain of humor in the roughhouse screenplay, keeps the film moving like a juggernaut.

Read Full Review >
80

Empire Kim Newman

Top-flight muscleman entertainment that is not afraid to have a brain or two in its head.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

A first-rate action movie, slickly done and with so many imaginative bonuses that, for a time, it feels like a classic in the making. It's not, but it's still solid and entertaining [1 June 1990]

75

USA Today Mike Clark

Both female roles are unexpectedly meaty, so much so that the film loses something once the far more lively Stone is dispatched. Hour one (more satirical) is better all around, though the falloff isn't fatal. [1 June 1990, Life, p.2D]

63

Chicago Tribune Johanna Steinmetz

From first to last frame, Total Recall is in your face. Its rather elegant little science-fiction story is as suffocated as the Martians are. The director has violated his own movie, going so far over the top he's still out there-weightless. [1 June 1990, Friday, p.C]

63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

An "intelligent" action film, because it presents the viewer with an opportunity to puzzle things out rather than sit mindlessly and watch people get blown to pieces.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Elvis Mitchell

Mr. Verhoeven is much better at drumming up this sort of artificial excitement than he is at knowing when to stop.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

The plot, based on a Phillip K. Dick story, is ingenious; and Arnold Schwarzenegger brings an effective blend of machismo and innocence to his role. Too bad director Paul Verhoeven lets brainless violence and tricky special effects swamp the cleverness of the tale itself. [22 June 1990, Arts, p.10]

40

TV Guide Staff (Non Credited)

Ugly, stupid, loud, offensive, and pointlessly violent--let's not mince words--this film should be called "Total Reject."

Read Full Review >
40

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Actually, any fun you might encounter in Recall can be traced, most often, to director Verhoeven, who injects some of his "Robocop" camp into this mega-dumb project.

Read Full Review >
12

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jay Scott

Guilty of gross mellerdrammer & innocent of sophistication... Guilty of being dumber than WWF wrestling & innocent of hypocrisy about its cartoon violence.

Read Full Review >
0

Washington Post Rita Kempley

The overall effect is like wading through hospital waste. Verhoeven, who also directed the maliciously stylistic "Robocop," disappoints with this appalling onslaught of blood and boredom.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.8 (out of 10) based on 10 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Tom V. gave it a10:
An intricate and clever plot, with cinematography that will keep you riveted. Perhaps the most intelligent movie starring Schwarzenegger ever.

[Anonymous] gave it a7:
The plot and concept are brilliant. I could almost say that this was a proto-Matrix. The political themes also seem a bit relevant in today's context, and may forshadow future issues in space colonization, and maybe colonization altogether. Action's nice. Sadly, some effects, once oscar winning, haven't held up over time. If today's FX were available back then, and the disturbing, bio-freaky parts kept to a minimum, this film would be damn near perfect, and it would get a nine. It's a miracle that T2, Arnold's peak, still looks awesome today, FX and all.

Andrew M. gave it an 8:
I'm going to bump up the average rating of this a little... I saw this when it was first released, back when I was a teenager, and it was some of the greatest fun I ever had at the movies. Not to be taken too seriously, the film does do some mild sermoning, but it's true strengths and attractions lie in its (at the time) groundbreaking effects and the futuristic other-world atmosphere. Not to mention some of the star-trekish characters who pop-in now and again. It's possibly not as effective these days in light of the leaping bounds made with special effects, but 13-14 years ago this film was huge!!!

Pat C. gave it a 7:
Damn good plot construction and storytelling. Makes the relativity of memory continuum a simple and accessible science fiction device. Borrows heavily from a slew of Hollywood genre so as to be a totally original creation made from components we're already comfortable with. Went on to perennial reruns on cable, where creative story line and clear plot execution rule. As contemplation of the hazards of artificially manipulated thought process, Robocop & Blade Runner are much more substantial, but this lesser concoction has stood the test of time as a reliable lower-common-denominator marketing war horse. Little of substance, but this is how good films are put together. The most memorable moments are the scary-in-their-authenticity interactions of Cox & Ironside as CEO and subordinate loose cannon, best viewed off-cable in their unsanitized glory. In the end, the film is haunted by an underlying silliness. Like its women, it turns out to be both demure and sleazy, although it contains an eye-popping rendition of the hypothetical effects of space vacuum on the human body.

Yoon C. gave it a 3:
Sharon Stone is hot, the other woman is not. Schwarzenegger is yet again typically Schwarzenegger in what is Verhoeven's umpteenth moronic action film which a few critics have defended as a post-modernist self-subversive exercise. This strikes me as examinging one's own feces and thinking it has value because it's been played with. I leave this kind of appraisal to critics with the sensibilities of proctologists.

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use