CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



Under Suspicion
Lions Gate Films

Under Suspicion reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 43 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.6 out of 10
based on 14 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 5 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for sexual content and language

Starring Morgan Freeman, Gene Hackman, Thomas Jane, and Monica Bellucci

An intense, psychological thriller, with veteran Police Captain Victor Benezet (Freeman) squaring off against prominent tax attorney Henry Hearst (Hackman) -- two life-hardened and well-matched opponents motivated by reasons more complex and personal than the pursuit of duty or the defense of reputation. (Lions Gate Films)


GENRE(S): Crime  
WRITTEN BY: Tom Provost
W. Peter Iliff
John Wainwright (book Brainwash)
 
DIRECTED BY: Stephen Hopkins  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: January 2, 2001 
Video: January 2, 2001 
Theatrical: September 22, 2000 
RUNNING TIME: 110 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / France 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

70
Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas
Offers the pleasures of a chamber drama's bravura performances from a pair of supremely accomplished pros.
Read Full Review
70
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Hackman and Freeman will pin you to your seat.
70
Film.com Henry Cabot Beck
A decent, smart, well-acted film.
Read Full Review
60
Dallas Observer Andy Klein
Ninety percent of this thriller is absolutely terrific; but the 10 percent that fails is so troubling that it threatens to undermine all that is wonderful in the rest.
Read Full Review
60
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
An engrossing, gem-hard little popcorn-cruncher.
Read Full Review
58
Entertainment Weekly Ty Burr
Pits the two actors against each other in a ''long night of the soul'' talkathon that director Stephen Hopkins' jerky editing techniques can't quite spark into sustained life.
Read Full Review
58
Mr. Showbiz Michael Atkinson
For many, the enticement of seeing two old pros smartly step through their pressurized pas de deux might be reason enough to buy a ticket.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
There is undeniable pleasure in watching these pros at work, but the murky depths of the soul can make for a dreary two hours.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Good acting and an effectively claustrophobic mood compensate for a story that doesn't add up to much in the long run.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Ken Fox
Not even the high-caliber talents of Gene Hackman and Morgan Freeman can save this stagy, ridiculously over-baked psychological thriller.
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
A profound disappointment, given its cast and source material.
Read Full Review
30
The New York Times A.O. Scott
Appears to be a somewhat sinister episode of "Nightline."
Read Full Review
20
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
Overproduced, psychologically muddled, and burdened with an enchantingly overheated screenplay.
Read Full Review
20
Village Voice Dennis Lim
Strangely, there's no thrust and parry to this potentially heavyweight mind game. The effect is more like a tennis match in which every feebly contested point ends with an unforced error.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.6 (out of 10) based on 5 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Paul gave it a 10:
Excellent film, difficult end, but very interesting. If you ask, where is the plot, you probably didn't undertsand the film.

Adrian B. gave it a 10:
Previous reviewers must not have understood this movie, an understandable shortcoming considering it's complexity. The plot was in depth and the film was basically a character study. The acting was brilliant and the directorial style was excellent. A movie that really makes you think, even after the credits roll.

Lloyd A. gave it a 0:
Too bad such good actors were in a movie this bad. Where was the plot?

Michael F. gave it a 5:
This is one boring movie. The acting though is great! The directing is very stylish but the writing is pretty bad. Who cares about the whole rape, this movie talks about the same subjects for 110 minutes! Parts are good but most of it isn't. I was really disappointed, and I always have faith in Freeman and Hackman! What a shame.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use