CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Urban Legends: Final Cut
Sony / Columbia Pictures

Urban Legends: Final Cut reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 16 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
3.8 out of 10
based on 25 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 7 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence/gore, language and some sexuality

Starring Jennifer Morrison, Matthew Davis, Joey Lawrence, and Anson Mount

Amy (Morrison), Travis (Davis) and Graham (Lawrence) are student filmmakers who would love to make it big in Hollywood. But first they've got to survive their last semester at Alpine University, a renowned film school where the competition is killer...and someone is killing the competition. (Columbia Tristar)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Silvio Horta (characters)
Paul Harris Boardman
Scott Derrickson
 
DIRECTED BY: John Ottman  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: February 6, 2001 
Video: February 6, 2001 
Theatrical: September 22, 2000 
RUNNING TIME: 98 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / Canada 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

63
San Francisco Examiner Wesley Morris
You're smarter than this, but occasionally it tricks you into thinking it might be up to something you haven't considered, like an above-average, extra-bloody episode of "Scooby Doo."
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Has slick production credits and performances that are quite adequate given the (narrow) opportunities of the genre.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Has a dark, low-budget feel and an incongruous combination of self-consciously jokey patter and gross-out gore.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Stack
Schlock, but amusing schlock.
Read Full Review
38
New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
Although it's recycled from start to finish, there are some decent jokes laced throughout, plus enough gore to satisfy the most bloodthirsty tastes.
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Lou Lumenick
You cease to care as they fall back on a catalogue of clichéd shocks, tired camera angles and an ever-mounting gore quotient.
Read Full Review
38
Boston Globe Jay Carr
Awful in ways that are just clever enough often enough to make it intermittently watchable.
Read Full Review
30
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Preposterous plotting and interchangeable young actors.
Read Full Review
25
Miami Herald Sara Wildberger
Sophomoric.
Read Full Review
20
LA Weekly Paul Malcolm
Wears its lack of originality in a crowded slasher marketplace like a red badge of desperation.
Read Full Review
20
Film.com Gemma Files
Basically a dressed-up piece of drivel, a self-referential pseudo-thriller with pretensions to pretensions of classic Hollywood suspense.
Read Full Review
20
Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector
Doesn't do much with its pseudosavvy characters.
Read Full Review
20
Salon.com Mary Elizabeth Williams
Predictable, gratuitous and just self-referential enough to believe itself hip and knowing.
Read Full Review
20
The New York Times Dave Kehr
Ottman doesn't have the firm grasp of tone necessary to make his deliberate ambiguities seem other than simple confusion, nor the sense of humor necessary to turn the deliberate clichés into effective satire.
Read Full Review
20
Los Angeles Times David Chute
Has promising raw material to burn--and that's pretty much what's been done.
Read Full Review
20
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Simply a lousy film from start to finish.
Read Full Review
20
Village Voice Nick Rutigliano
Simply less campily moronic than its predecessor, a tired kill-by-numbers.
Read Full Review
12
Chicago Tribune John Petrakis
It's hard not to feel angry that you've spent almost two hours watching this moronic exercise.
Read Full Review
12
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
Just plain bad.
Read Full Review
10
Variety Robert Koehler
A poorer film than the paltry original even as it strikes a self-consciously clever pose.
Read Full Review
10
Washington Post Desson Thomson
The only quandary in this film is in where to begin despising it.
Read Full Review
10
Film.com John Hartl
If you've seen one "Scream" rip-off, you really have seen them all.
Read Full Review
5
Mr. Showbiz Cody Clark
As for genuine willies, well, chances are you've had more disturbing encounters with, say, a belligerent Shih Tzu.
Read Full Review
0
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
No style, no irony and no smarts, just a vicious streak that lasts 90 minutes.
Read Full Review
0
Entertainment Weekly Ty Burr
Debased swill.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 3.8 (out of 10) based on 7 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Alli B gave it a10:
One of the scariest movies I've ever seen with a great plot and scarily convincing death scenes!

Elizabeth P gave it a0:
Who decided that EVERY IDIOT gets to produce a movie? It's so GOD AWFUL and cliched!!!!! I wanted to cry and gouge out my own eyes after seeing THE WORST piece of crap in the world!!!!!!!!! Forget lethal injection or life imprisonment, make murderers watch this movie!!!!!

Andrew M. gave it a 2:
Close to the worst film I have seen. I agree with most of the critics who rightly say this is rubbish. Only gets a point or two for the couple of mildly genuine scares it delivers but really, don't bother wasting your time watching it. Ohh, and other than being really bad it's really boring too!

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use