GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Walking Tall
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corporation

Walking Tall reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 44 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.7 out of 10
based on 31 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 17 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for sequences of intense violence, sexual content, drug material and language

Starring The Rock, Neal McDonough, Johnny Knoxville, John Beasley, Barbara Tarbuck, Kristen Wilson, Khleo Thomas, and Ashley Scott

A retired U.S. Special Forces soldier returns to his hometown to renew old relationships and make a new life for himself. But while he was away, his boyhood town wasted away to a dilapidated, crime-ridden shell of itself. (MGM)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Adventure  |  Crime  |  Drama  
WRITTEN BY: David Klass
Channing Gibson
David Levien
Brian Koppelman
 
DIRECTED BY: Kevin Bray  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: September 28, 2004 
Video: September 28, 2004 
Theatrical: April 2, 2004 
RUNNING TIME: 105 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

70
The Hollywood Reporter Sheri Linden
The cast acquits itself well, with the Rock evincing a quiet balance between humor and brawn.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Scott Foundas
Moves along at a clip and provides a terrific action lead for Dwayne "the Rock" Johnson.
Read Full Review
67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It still celebrates the vigilante spirit and justice delivered with a biblical swiftness, but it has been cleansed of much of its gratuitous violence and more offensive red-neck sensibilities. Mercifully, it's also a full 40 minutes shorter than the original.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
Don't go in expecting much and you'll have fun. Consider it The Rock's "Raw Deal."
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It's blunt, to the point, aggressively manipulative and, at 86 minutes, not a minute longer than it needs to be.
Read Full Review
63
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
Exciting stuff in its primitive, predictable way.
Read Full Review
60
Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall
Lacks the raw power of the original but offers its own brand of exploitative fun.
Read Full Review
60
The New York Times Dave Kehr
Walking Tall has no more fat on it than the Rock himself, a hulking yet curiously ingratiating presence who seems the most likely candidate to replace Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as America's favorite living comic book character.
Read Full Review
60
LA Weekly Robert Abele
Johnny Knoxville has a few inspired bits as Vaughn's recovering-addict chum, and The Rock carries an effortlessly soft side in the nonviolent scenes, but Bray doesn't linger too long on anything that doesn't end in a thud or wallop.
Read Full Review
60
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
This Walking Tall does have the Rock, and that, both physically and metaphorically, is no small thing.
Read Full Review
58
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
There's not a guy I know who hasn't been looking forward to seeing The Rock pick up the big wooden stick first swung by Joe Don Baker more than 30 years ago.
Read Full Review
50
Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
Unlike the original, there's no R-rated grit and no familial executions -- gotta get the young-skewing WWE fan base in there.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Although inspired by actual events, the film proceeds along formulaic wish-fulfillment lines, its dynamics unaltered by the casting of a mixed-race actor in what was originally a redneck role; it's a sign of some sort of social progress that justified ass-kicking trumps race.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
The only thing to be said for it is The Rock. I've never seen the guy wrestle, but as a movie action hero, he's the real deal.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Allison Benedikt
A fine shoot-'em-up remake. The story is mildly gripping, and the action is fresh and entertaining.
Read Full Review
50
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
There was a time when guys would grab a six-pack and watch this kind of flick at a drive-in. I mean that as a compliment.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Mike Clark
Though there's something mildly disarming about a movie this unpretentious, a few more like it might end up turning The Rock into a TV actor.
Read Full Review
50
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The movie itself is neither a catastrophe nor major.
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Johnny Knoxville, famous for "Jackass,"...is, in fact, completely convincing and probably has a legitimate movie career ahead of him and doesn't have to stuff his underpants with dead chickens and hang upside down over alligator ponds any more.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
The movie itself is just a routine showcase, modest in its aspiration and effective within its limits, entertaining in the moment but, in the end, faintly silly. On the plus side, it's only 86 minutes long.
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Walking Tall, which is credited to four different writers, is wanting for a reason to be.
Read Full Review
40
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
To its credit, the new Walking Tall is a good half-hour shorter than its predecessor, but even at 86 minutes, sitting through it is a chore.
Read Full Review
38
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Instead of generating a testosterone rush, the fight scenes release tryptophan. Not only are they boring, but they are choreographed in an amateurish fashion.
Read Full Review
38
Philadelphia Inquirer David Hiltbrand
A dull, drab and pointless rehash, Walking Tall ironically manages to diminish the Rock's stature as both a leading man and an action star.
Read Full Review
38
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jennie Punter
Okay, it's just a movie, but his "reward" just doesn't cut it, even on a basic storytelling level. A crooked casino and a nephew's experiment with drugs are not enough justification for the hero's violent acts of vengeance.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan
Actually underserves its star, who is better than schlocky material like this would lead you to believe.
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Ed Halter
The plot is so absurdly perfunctory that preview audiences snickered at its TV-drama slapdashness; the producers should have pushed the straight-camp potential much further and retitled this weak bruiser Sporting Wood.
Read Full Review
30
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
The new film stars The Rock, but The Wood might be a better description of his performance.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Desson Thomson
One mediocre, ploddingly predictable film, loaded down with cheesy Hollywood tactics.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
Retains and updates the basic plot points while losing much of the original's heart and soul.
Read Full Review
25
Premiere Addison MacDonald
Short on story, character, and attempts to win viewers' emotional investment, the film only seems to take a breath when The Rock is making the baddies lose theirs.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.7 (out of 10) based on 17 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Michael M. gave it a 5:
Entertaining, but the writing really stinks! The Rock makes for a good bad ass good guy. He has such great screen presence, he reminds me of Arnold Schwazenegger in his prime. The movie isn't too great though, kind of average really. Thumbs down.

Steve T. gave it a 3:
This new "pop culture" version is way too short. It's disapointing that people today have such a sort attention span, we can't watch a movie that does not progress very quickly or last longer than 2 hrs?! So let me get this right, the whole town was cleaned up in a weekend? I was able to watch the original version and I found it more exciting and dramatic. I'd put a 2x4 to this picture and a 10 to the original!

Jermaine B. gave it a 9:
This movie was a fun action flick and one of the better movies I've seen this summer. Its a slam bam thank you ma'am without all of the BS that alot of movies are doing nowaday I.E. Matrix (what is choice) enough with the brew haha we wanna see some butt Kicking. Much props to the Rock.

Chad S. gave it a 3:
You know it's The Rock's movie because we never get a clear look at the girl in the red bra shoot her gun. The action scenes belong to the star. She can be proactive in her underwear, but not that proactive. Categorically, you don't write off a film like this for wanting to be a piece of fluff, but they're not even trying. "Walking Tall" is so lazy, they forget to write the scene in which the hero gets his family out of town, in a concentrated effort by four scribes to keep the running time down.

Mark B. gave it a 2:
This remake of 1973's classic cult action film about the life of legendary take-no-prisoners Southern sheriff Buford Pusser's war on crime and corruption isn't this year's worst movie--just its most unnecessary. Even diehard ACLU afficionados should appreciate the passion and the fury behind Phil Karlson's original and in Joe Don Baker's electric lead performance. Anything prickly or edgy about the 1973 film (for example, the fact that Pusser was a devoted family man but was undeniably attracted to a casino waitress; here the sheriff isn't even married) is totally deleted; the result is a professional but totally generic piece of product. The Rock admittedly had displayed charisma onscreen in The Scorpion King and The Rundown, but compared to Baker, he comes off here as nothing more impressive than The Pebble. Most disconcerting of all is that the original's theme of the entire community taking a stand is nowhere to be found here; the predictable army of one superheroics are no substitute at all. Ultimately, the violence level is the only element the two films share; even so, the original was bloody, raw and messy--this one's is PG-13 slick. But speaking of that rating, adolescent boys, take heart: this movie provides you with a rare opportunity to see your first lapdance!

Blizzard Bob gave it a 10:
Dude the ones who gave this movie a bad rating have to watch this movie more closely. People were getting busted open by the rock. If u care more about the plot of the movie more than explosions and ass whopping than ur not a man. Come on people this is a mans movie. And to Kevin F. i'm a huge wrestling fan and huge fan of this movie and my IQ is 116 and that's above average. And i'm only 14.

Pat C. gave it a 1:
Sure I get off on an occasional violence flick if it's not too dumbed down and the hero has a little class. But here apparently it is simply a lot of fun to blow big bullet holes in folks that deserve it. That's not right, I don't find it entertaining, and without a little more justification for such savage behavior I don't even think it's cute. Christ, the critics rated this bloodbath the same as the Christ bloodbath. I guess any bloodbath gets mixed reviews, whether it's human garbage or the son of God getting blown away.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use