Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Walking Tall

EMAILPRINTMetro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corporation

Walking Tall reviews
44
5.7 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 31 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 17 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Action  |  Adventure  |  Crime  |  Drama

Written by: David Klass
Channing Gibson
David Levien
Brian Koppelman

Directed by: Kevin Bray

Release Date:
Theatrical: April 2, 2004
DVD: September 28, 2004

Running Time: 105 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for sequences of intense violence, sexual content, drug material and language

Starring The Rock, Neal McDonough, Johnny Knoxville, John Beasley, Barbara Tarbuck, Kristen Wilson, Khleo Thomas, and Ashley Scott

A retired U.S. Special Forces soldier returns to his hometown to renew old relationships and make a new life for himself. But while he was away, his boyhood town wasted away to a dilapidated, crime-ridden shell of itself. (MGM)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

70

The Hollywood Reporter Sheri Linden

The cast acquits itself well, with the Rock evincing a quiet balance between humor and brawn.

Read Full Review >
70

Variety Scott Foundas

Moves along at a clip and provides a terrific action lead for Dwayne "the Rock" Johnson.

Read Full Review >
67

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

It still celebrates the vigilante spirit and justice delivered with a biblical swiftness, but it has been cleansed of much of its gratuitous violence and more offensive red-neck sensibilities. Mercifully, it's also a full 40 minutes shorter than the original.

Read Full Review >
67

Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell

Don't go in expecting much and you'll have fun. Consider it The Rock's "Raw Deal."

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

It's blunt, to the point, aggressively manipulative and, at 86 minutes, not a minute longer than it needs to be.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Post Jonathan Foreman

Exciting stuff in its primitive, predictable way.

Read Full Review >
60

Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall

Lacks the raw power of the original but offers its own brand of exploitative fun.

Read Full Review >
60

The New York Times Dave Kehr

Walking Tall has no more fat on it than the Rock himself, a hulking yet curiously ingratiating presence who seems the most likely candidate to replace Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as America's favorite living comic book character.

Read Full Review >
60

LA Weekly Robert Abele

Johnny Knoxville has a few inspired bits as Vaughn's recovering-addict chum, and The Rock carries an effortlessly soft side in the nonviolent scenes, but Bray doesn't linger too long on anything that doesn't end in a thud or wallop.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

This Walking Tall does have the Rock, and that, both physically and metaphorically, is no small thing.

Read Full Review >
58

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

There's not a guy I know who hasn't been looking forward to seeing The Rock pick up the big wooden stick first swung by Joe Don Baker more than 30 years ago.

Read Full Review >
50

Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson

Unlike the original, there's no R-rated grit and no familial executions -- gotta get the young-skewing WWE fan base in there.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Although inspired by actual events, the film proceeds along formulaic wish-fulfillment lines, its dynamics unaltered by the casting of a mixed-race actor in what was originally a redneck role; it's a sign of some sort of social progress that justified ass-kicking trumps race.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

The only thing to be said for it is The Rock. I've never seen the guy wrestle, but as a movie action hero, he's the real deal.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Allison Benedikt

A fine shoot-'em-up remake. The story is mildly gripping, and the action is fresh and entertaining.

Read Full Review >
50

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

There was a time when guys would grab a six-pack and watch this kind of flick at a drive-in. I mean that as a compliment.

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Mike Clark

Though there's something mildly disarming about a movie this unpretentious, a few more like it might end up turning The Rock into a TV actor.

Read Full Review >
50

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

The movie itself is neither a catastrophe nor major.

50

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Johnny Knoxville, famous for "Jackass,"...is, in fact, completely convincing and probably has a legitimate movie career ahead of him and doesn't have to stuff his underpants with dead chickens and hang upside down over alligator ponds any more.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

The movie itself is just a routine showcase, modest in its aspiration and effective within its limits, entertaining in the moment but, in the end, faintly silly. On the plus side, it's only 86 minutes long.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

Walking Tall, which is credited to four different writers, is wanting for a reason to be.

Read Full Review >
40

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

To its credit, the new Walking Tall is a good half-hour shorter than its predecessor, but even at 86 minutes, sitting through it is a chore.

Read Full Review >
38

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Instead of generating a testosterone rush, the fight scenes release tryptophan. Not only are they boring, but they are choreographed in an amateurish fashion.

Read Full Review >
38

Philadelphia Inquirer David Hiltbrand

A dull, drab and pointless rehash, Walking Tall ironically manages to diminish the Rock's stature as both a leading man and an action star.

Read Full Review >
38

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jennie Punter

Okay, it's just a movie, but his "reward" just doesn't cut it, even on a basic storytelling level. A crooked casino and a nephew's experiment with drugs are not enough justification for the hero's violent acts of vengeance.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan

Actually underserves its star, who is better than schlocky material like this would lead you to believe.

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice Ed Halter

The plot is so absurdly perfunctory that preview audiences snickered at its TV-drama slapdashness; the producers should have pushed the straight-camp potential much further and retitled this weak bruiser Sporting Wood.

Read Full Review >
30

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

The new film stars The Rock, but The Wood might be a better description of his performance.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Desson Thomson

One mediocre, ploddingly predictable film, loaded down with cheesy Hollywood tactics.

Read Full Review >
30

Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten

Retains and updates the basic plot points while losing much of the original's heart and soul.

Read Full Review >
25

Premiere Addison MacDonald

Short on story, character, and attempts to win viewers' emotional investment, the film only seems to take a breath when The Rock is making the baddies lose theirs.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 5.7 (out of 10) based on 17 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Michael M. gave it a 5:
Entertaining, but the writing really stinks! The Rock makes for a good bad ass good guy. He has such great screen presence, he reminds me of Arnold Schwazenegger in his prime. The movie isn't too great though, kind of average really. Thumbs down.

Steve T. gave it a 3:
This new "pop culture" version is way too short. It's disapointing that people today have such a sort attention span, we can't watch a movie that does not progress very quickly or last longer than 2 hrs?! So let me get this right, the whole town was cleaned up in a weekend? I was able to watch the original version and I found it more exciting and dramatic. I'd put a 2x4 to this picture and a 10 to the original!

Jermaine B. gave it a 9:
This movie was a fun action flick and one of the better movies I've seen this summer. Its a slam bam thank you ma'am without all of the BS that alot of movies are doing nowaday I.E. Matrix (what is choice) enough with the brew haha we wanna see some butt Kicking. Much props to the Rock.

Chad S. gave it a 3:
You know it's The Rock's movie because we never get a clear look at the girl in the red bra shoot her gun. The action scenes belong to the star. She can be proactive in her underwear, but not that proactive. Categorically, you don't write off a film like this for wanting to be a piece of fluff, but they're not even trying. "Walking Tall" is so lazy, they forget to write the scene in which the hero gets his family out of town, in a concentrated effort by four scribes to keep the running time down.

Mark B. gave it a 2:
This remake of 1973's classic cult action film about the life of legendary take-no-prisoners Southern sheriff Buford Pusser's war on crime and corruption isn't this year's worst movie--just its most unnecessary. Even diehard ACLU afficionados should appreciate the passion and the fury behind Phil Karlson's original and in Joe Don Baker's electric lead performance. Anything prickly or edgy about the 1973 film (for example, the fact that Pusser was a devoted family man but was undeniably attracted to a casino waitress; here the sheriff isn't even married) is totally deleted; the result is a professional but totally generic piece of product. The Rock admittedly had displayed charisma onscreen in The Scorpion King and The Rundown, but compared to Baker, he comes off here as nothing more impressive than The Pebble. Most disconcerting of all is that the original's theme of the entire community taking a stand is nowhere to be found here; the predictable army of one superheroics are no substitute at all. Ultimately, the violence level is the only element the two films share; even so, the original was bloody, raw and messy--this one's is PG-13 slick. But speaking of that rating, adolescent boys, take heart: this movie provides you with a rare opportunity to see your first lapdance!

Blizzard Bob gave it a 10:
Dude the ones who gave this movie a bad rating have to watch this movie more closely. People were getting busted open by the rock. If u care more about the plot of the movie more than explosions and ass whopping than ur not a man. Come on people this is a mans movie. And to Kevin F. i'm a huge wrestling fan and huge fan of this movie and my IQ is 116 and that's above average. And i'm only 14.

Pat C. gave it a 1:
Sure I get off on an occasional violence flick if it's not too dumbed down and the hero has a little class. But here apparently it is simply a lot of fun to blow big bullet holes in folks that deserve it. That's not right, I don't find it entertaining, and without a little more justification for such savage behavior I don't even think it's cute. Christ, the critics rated this bloodbath the same as the Christ bloodbath. I guess any bloodbath gets mixed reviews, whether it's human garbage or the son of God getting blown away.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use