GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Wild at Heart
Samuel Goldwyn Company

Wild at Heart reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 52 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.3 out of 10
based on 18 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 9 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R

Starring Nicolas Cage, Laura Dern, Willem Dafoe, J.E. Freeman, Crispin Glover, Diane Ladd, Isabella Rossellini, and Harry Dean Stanton

David Lynch explores old theme: the story of two people (Cage and Dern) who thoroughly love each other, of two people whose love seems so strong that nothing can corrupt it. Yet, the evil forces of murder, corruption and perversion, which lurk beneath the seemingly clean surface of modern day America transform their journey into a ghost train ride and challenge their love to the extremes. (Von Marc Eberle)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Barry Gifford (novel)
David Lynch
 
DIRECTED BY: David Lynch  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: December 7, 2004 
Video: March 21, 1991 
Theatrical: August 12, 1990 
RUNNING TIME: 124 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

The film won the Palme d'Or at the 1990 Cannes Film Festival.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Starting with the outrageous and building from there, he ignites a slight love-on-the-run novel, creating a bonfire of a movie that confirms his reputation as the most exciting and innovative filmmaker of his generation.
Read Full Review
90
Variety Staff (Not Credited)
Joltingly violent, wickedly funny and rivetingly erotic, David Lynch's Wild at Heart [based on the novel by Barry Gifford] is a rollercoaster ride to redemption through an American gothic heart of darkness.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Dave Kehr
And yet there is enough of a core of sincerity to turn even the most preposterous moments-such as the film's dream-sequence finale-into something moving and true: You buy the feelings, even as the situations degenerate into the ludicrous and absurd. [17 Aug 1990, Friday, p.C]
80
Los Angeles Times Peter Rainer
The drawback to Lynch's pile-it-on method is that it is reductive. One reason Wild at Heart, for all its amazements, isn't quite as stunning as "Blue Velvet" is because it seems less the working out of a single fixed obsession than an entire smear of obsessions. [12 Aug 1990, Calendar, p.29]
80
Empire Staff (Not Credited)
Misfit cameos, apparently random asides and an almost continuous onslaught of unsettling sex and violence mean there’s no mistaking David Lynch’s hand behind the camera -- but there’s enough of a narrative to make this work as a straightforward road movie, too.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
David Lynch doesn't tell stories as much as he shows hallucinations. Wierd, wild, excessive, obsessive, idiosyncratic visions.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is something repulsive and manipulative about it, and even its best scenes have the flavor of a kid in the school yard, trying to show you pictures you don't feel like looking at.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
As a story, Wild at Heart is even less coherent than “Blue Velvet,'' to the point where whole characters and subplots disappear into a murky haze at the end. [17 Aug 1990, Arts, p.11]
50
TV Guide Staff (Non Credited)
A wacky, occasionally inventive road movie that fails to display the vision or the dark intensity of director Lynch's earlier work.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Desson Thomson
The movie's initial intensity is so great, it consumes itself. By the time we reach the final scene, which is clearly supposed to exude glorious rapture between offbeat lovers Nicolas Cage and Laura Dern, it has all the warming effect of cold ash.
Read Full Review
42
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
A lurid hodgepodge of the ''subversive'' and the secondhand, the movie lacks the primal pop pleasures of Lynch's best work.
Read Full Review
40
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
The best performance, the only one that can really be called acting, is Diane Ladd's as the mother. Ladd gives us a woman full of self-pity and shrewdness, full of sexual experience and guile, who has now reached the age when, if she wants to, she can turn off sexual heat in favor of cold power drive. [24 Sept 1990, p.32]
40
The New York Times Vincent Canby
This time, though, Mr. Lynch's conceits are less often pleasurably disorienting than out of focus.
Read Full Review
38
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jay Scott
The problem with the taboo-busters is that they feel calculated - in the past, Lynch's creepiness seemed casual and natural - and they take Wild at Heart so high it can't come down; the picture repeatedly jacks itself into frenzy only to crash into lethargy.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Mike Clark
One of the most violent opening scenes in screen history…Yet given such a visually adept exercise, the rest seems transparently off-the-cuff. There are obese trailer-camp porn stars, heavenly visions, a climactic rendition of Love Me Tender and no-point references to The Wizard of Oz - all of which top this two-hour farrago like a soggy tarp. [17 Aug 1990, Life, 4D]
30
Time Richard Corliss
The first Lynch film in which his motives -- to hang a haberdashery of bizarre incidents on the merest hook of plot -- are apparent... What's lacking is the old sense of delicious, disturbing mystery. [20 Aug 1990, p.63]
20
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
At least (John) Waters cares about most of his freaks; for Lynch they're basically exploitation fodder for a puritanical "dark vision of the universe" that seems to come straight out of junior high, complete with giggles.
Read Full Review
20
Washington Post Hal Hinson
What "Wild at Heart" feels like is a kind of housecleaning -- a disjointed collection of images and odd snatches of ideas that the director couldn't make room for anyplace else. They have no context, and as a result, no power to thrill or disturb.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.3 (out of 10) based on 9 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Fred B. gave it an8:
Wacky in spots but I liked it. Of course then I'm partial to road pictures and I like Nic Cage in almost anything.

Gnarles gave it a9:
A classic, but only if you have the guts to take it.

Mike S. gave it a5:
Nothing special, just an average movie.

Lance E. gave it a 6:
I'm a big fan of Lynch's non-Twin Peaks era work (pre-WAH, post-Lost Highway). WAH is very much a part of the Twin Peaks era. I tend to feel that this film is only for Lynch completists. It never feels sincere, and because of that, it fails to draw me into it's world. Lynch regular Jack Nance's role is particularly forced. Still, I did race out last tuesday to nab a copy. WAH contains some golden Lynch elements: Jingle Dell, the pigeon man, Bobby Peru, the weird accident-guy in the wheelchair, and the little old "me too?" man in the hotel come to mind.

Garrison T. gave it an 8:
Not nearly bad as it's reputation. Funnier after repeated viewings. One of Lynch's best and most emotional scenes is present here, found in a quiet and heartbreaking desert car crash set piece. No Blue Velvet or Mulholland Drive, but far superior to most of Lost Highway.

Jonathan E. gave it a 3:
Feels like an imitation of a David Lynch movie.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use