CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Willard
New Line Cinema

Willard reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 61 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.5 out of 10
based on 31 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 22 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for terror/violence, some sexual content and language

Starring Crispin Glover, David Parker, Laura Harring, R. Lee Ermey, Jackie Burroughs, Kristen Cloke, Rick Lazzarini, and Kim McKamy

Socially inept and saddled with a miserable job, Willard shares a powerful bond with the rats who dwell in his basement. When Willard's world is turned upside down by tragedy, those responsible must answer to his rapidly growing pack of ravenous, fearsome friends. (New Line Cinema)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Glen Morgan
Gilbert Ralston (1971 screenplay and book Ratman's Notebook)
 
DIRECTED BY: Glen Morgan  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 7, 2003 
Video: October 7, 2003 
Theatrical: March 14, 2003 
RUNNING TIME: 105 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

Bruce Davison played the role of Willard in the 1971 horror classic

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Film Threat Kevin Carr
Willard doesn’t try to be great art (although if you really think about it, there are plenty of themes borrowed from “Hamlet,” “The Birds” and “Frankenstein” to name a few). Willard just is.
Read Full Review
90
Time Joel Stein
Glover, as usual, is phenomenal.
Read Full Review
89
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Cooly feral in dark suit and tie, Glover’s the man in the gray flannel suit gone way, way over the edge, and it’s one of the most fully realized screen performances in ages, rats and all.
Read Full Review
83
Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan
The "Citizen Kane" of rat movies makes for a terrific overhaul in this wonderfully entertaining and, yes, touching take on that terribly confused man/child named Willard.
Read Full Review
80
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
In a culture clogged with appropriated effluvia and remake cop-outs, Willard is wittier and nastier than we deserve.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
This is a one-riff movie and instant cult classic.
Read Full Review
80
LA Weekly Chuck Wilson
It's one of many references to the movie-wise, but a resonant one, for Glover's performance turns out to be shockingly emotional, drawn as daringly close to the bone -- within this story's limited thematic range -- as Anthony Perkins' work in Hitchcock's seminal film.
Read Full Review
80
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
It only takes rat trainers and CGI artists to create swarms of vermin, but it takes a twisted kind of genius to treat them as equals.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Kevin M. Williams
This faithful resurrection of the original "Willard," a twisted gem in its own right, also is funny.
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Wonderfully deranged.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Jonathan Curiel
A silly, snarling romp -- a fun (if you're in the mood for it), sometimes scary look at the life of a socially awkward man whose best friend is a white rodent he names Socrates.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
Has the modesty of a savvy, smart drive-in movie with Hollywood studio polish and a movie buff's loving care.
Read Full Review
75
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
The new version is actually better. It's still a fairly ham-handed revenge-of-the-nerd horror fable, but you don't go to a movie like Willard for subtlety. You go to be skeeved out by rats, rats, and more rats, and I'm tempted to say that Willard does a fairly rat-tastic job of it.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Want your skin to crawl? This one's for you.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Morgan never reaches the heights the film probably would have hit if had been directed by Tim Burton, whose style is frequently evoked -- especially Shirley Walker's playful score, which seems channeled directly from Burton's frequent collaborator Danny Elfman.
Read Full Review
70
Dallas Observer Bill Gallo
Has plenty of dark horror style, but it lacks the weird charm of the 1971 original starring Bruce Davison...It's a nice homage.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas
The new Willard, which has taken the original's humanity and the psychological validity, leavened with a dollop of dark humor, and replaced them with a technically impressive but essentially heartless spoof.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
The pleasure comes from watching the clever rodents do their stuff. Computerized images have been kept to a minimum, and real animals provide most of the film's atmosphere.
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
As filler for the long, dry winter movie season, the movie is more than passable, and its sense of humor has a wicked, unforgiving spin that is decidedly pro-rodent.
Read Full Review
63
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
Simply twiddling with the fine-tuning on the central character is not enough to warrant remaking a film. Both Glover and Willard deserve better.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is real wit in Glover's performance. And wit, too, in R. Lee Ermey's performance as the boss, which draws heavily on Ermey's real-life experience as a drill sergeant.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Glover, wearing his close-cropped hair in a pompadour and striking beady-eyed, furrow-browed poses that scare the hair off a tarantula, makes it as much fun as a rat revenge movie can be.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Ray Conlogue
Perhaps too much energy was spent on being stylish rather than simply low-rent horrifying. The upshot is not very stylish and not very scary.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Mike Clark
The movie isn't without style, but the material can't remotely sustain 100 minutes.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
The chills are functional at best and the attempts at pathos negligible.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
As high camp, Willard might have something going for it, but not as a horror movie.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
You're just sitting there, somewhere between mildly amused and fairly bored, watching the filmmakers squander Hollywood's most eccentric character actor and a lot of very fine specimens of the order Rodentia.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Production-designed within an inch of its life, this remake's best conceit is the casting of Crispin Glover as its socially maladroit rat fancier.
Read Full Review
30
Variety Scott Foundas
Strictly for the birds.
Read Full Review
20
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Everything that was modest, soundly grounded and therefore horrifying about the 1971 rodentarama that starred Bruce Davison is now insistent, Grand-Guignol-intense and therefore shrug-offable when it isn't downright awful.
20
The New York Times Stephen Holden
The worst flaw of Willard is a clunky tone-deaf screenplay based on Gilbert Ralston's original and updated by the director. Barely a line flies by that doesn't land with a wooden thud.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.5 (out of 10) based on 22 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Sam gave it a9:
Willard isn't perfect, nor is it a classic, but it's still a great movie that has everything a horror movie needs: Scares, drama, and a a great leading actor.

Dcul gave it a3:
Perhaps I'd given in to the hype, because after renting 'Willard', I found myself wondering why I wasn't raving about it like all the critics. As far as horror movies go it's pretty mediocre, perhaps once building up a moment of slight trepidation, but the rats are barely used to any effect (I'm thinking Willard is going to go on a 'Taxi Driver' rampage, but no, we're not that lucky.) It's a ho-hum, soulless movie.

Dale E. gave it a 10:
This movie is, well, fantastic. If you want to be frightened, or see loads of people being murdered, or buckets of gore, please look elsewhere. This movie is more of a psychological drama with some dark humour sprinkled in. However, I do wish they added more story involving Willard rather than the rats, since they don't do that much anyway. I found Willard to be a fascinating character, and would have loved to see more of his interactions with other people, especially Cathryn, and maybe more on his past. Willard isn't a hero or a bad guy, he's just a lonely outcast who finds a friend in a rat, sadly the only thing that cares about him. Crispin Glover's performance is Oscar-worthy, but of course, he'll be overlooked. Sad, because his is one of the best perfomances I have seen in a while. Quiet but intense, with an almost unnerving underlying rage and sadness. Dark comedy elements occasionally pop up and amuse. However, I view this as more of a very well-made character study, not a horror movie or a black comedy. I hope someday Willard will get the attention that it truly deserves.

Matt S. gave it a 10:
A great movie. Crispin Glover's performance is terrific. He is also my favorite actor. You must see this movie, don't listen to the jerks who gave it bad reviews. They are probably just upset cause they droped their toys or something, childish little buggers, no taste at all. Can't understand art.

Billy O. gave it a 2:
Nothing happens. A mentally ill man falls in love with a rat, it gets killed, and he kills other rats. All of the rat killing was pretty sadistic and disgusting. There was really no point to this movie. Do yourself a favor, watch something else.

Angel P. gave it a 7:
Let parents beware, THIS MOVIE IS BEST NOT SHOWN TO KIDS! I think most critics, positive or not failed to realize just how truly freaky this movie is! This is true horror, the new horror. Be nice to that quiet, akward guy in your office or school from now on. We all know a Willard, and that is scary.

XISMZERO gave it a 7:
A movie who's cast makes it great but Crispin Glover makes the movie truly special. The DVD features are worth it as well. Recommended for Glover fans - others may find the movie flat.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use