|
Upcoming Release Calendar
38
12 Rounds Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
X-Men: The Last Stand
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: PG-13
Starring Patrick Stewart, Hugh Jackman, Ian McKellen, Halle Berry, Famke Janssen, Anna Paquin, Kelsey Grammer, and Rebecca Romijn
In the climax of the X-Men trilogy, a "cure" for mutancy threatens to alter the course of history. For the first time, mutants have a choice: retain their uniqueness, though it isolates and alienates them, or give up their powers and become human. (20th Century Fox)
| GENRE(S): | Action | Fantasy | Sci-fi | Suspense/Thriller |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Zak Penn
Simon Kinberg |
| DIRECTED BY: | Brett Ratner |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: October 3, 2006 Theatrical: May 26, 2006 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 103 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
Also known as "X-Men 3"
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 6.1 (out of 10) based on 289 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Jakob K gave it a6:
Nice special effects, but they killed scott :( that was really a breakdown for me. The "cyclops" is awsome. i dont know what happens in the comics to scott, do he die there too?
alex r gave it an8:
I liked this movie. It was very exciting and there was a genuine tension as to who would make it out alive in the end. It wasn't quite as good as X-2, which is a genre definer, but certainly a worthy addition to the X-men series. I thought it was better than the first movie too.
David V gave it a4:
This was definitely a step down from the previous X-Men. Gone is the character development, gone are the political allegories. The only thing worth watching in this movie is the action and some of the acting.
Eddie E gave it a0:
Bret Ratner ruined the series. He has no idea what the xmen are all about he just wanted some special effects. There was such a good foundation built by singer in the first two films.
Marc C gave it a7:
An exciting climax to the trilogy with some great moments. It needed to be longer with more depth and they should have cut out some of the minor characters. But, overall, I loved it - as an action-packed finale, it worked pretty well. Critics want everything to be Schindler's List or Atonement and as soon as you have movies about fantastic superpowers, that is not possible, so you have to embrace the fact this is a comicbook movie. It's far from perfect, but then no movie ever is, so I acceoted that,
Jerk Guy gave it a0:
This film and all the X-Men films are garbage, pure garbage, they should have called it “Wolverine and friends 1, 2 and 3”, the whole X-Men trilogy is a massive and monumental disappointment to me, I remember growing up as a child reading the comics and watching the cartoons fantasising about how awesome it would be if one day there was an X-Men movie, I’m sure there are many people who know how I felt, Ugh. They seriously did not cater these films to any generation of X-Men fans, or to anyone who isn’t 15 and under. They completely pissed on any generation of X-Men comics by using terrible, terrible plots, focusing too much of the movies around Wolverine, changing the characters too much, and leaving out too many great characters, character sub plots and character developments resulting in dull and watered down movies.
George M gave it a7:
It's not nearly as bad as it could have been. Still, Singer's perfect sense of atmosphere that was featured throughout most of the second film is missing, and the ending is waaay overly dramatic. Still fun though.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use