2020 Oscars: Full Winners List + Reviews of the Show

  • Publish Date: February 9, 2020
  • Comments: ↓ 5 user comments

Updated Monday 2/10 with additional reviews of the show

Predictable, until the end

Films with Multiple Oscar Wins - 2020
1 Parasite 4 wins
2 1917 3 wins
3 Ford v Ferrari 2 wins
  Joker 2 wins
  Once Upon a Time in Hollywood 2 wins

Heading into Sunday evening's broadcast of the 92nd Annual Academy Awards, pundits were in rare agreement about their predicted winners in nearly every one of the 24 categories, suggesting that the ceremony was going to be one of the most uneventful Oscar broadcasts in recent memory. That indeed turned out to be true—with the exception of the evening's two biggest awards.

Capping a night in which it received a year-leading four Oscar trophies altogether, Korean director Bong Joon-ho's thrilling tale of class warfare, Parasite, was the upset winner (over 1917) in the best picture category, becoming the first ever foreign-language film to receive the Academy's highest honor (after becoming just the 11th such film nominated for best picture). Bong was also an upset winner (over 1917's Sam Mendes) for best director. Parasite, by the way, was 2019's highest-scoring (and thus best-reviewed) film, and it was the first time since 2016's Moonlight that a film with the year's highest Metascore took home best picture honors. Parasite is also the first best picture winner in 11 years (since Slumdog Millionaire) without a single nomination in any of the four acting categories.

Below, find a complete list of this year's Oscar winners, followed by a look at how well experts and Metacritic users did with their Oscar predictions this year. You'll also find reviews of the broadcast from a variety of TV critics a bit further down the page.

The winners and losers

Listed below are the 2020 Academy Award winners in each of the 24 categories, compared to the consensus predictions of over 110 industry experts (more on that below).

Category   Predicted Winner Actual Winner
Best Picture n 1917 Parasite
Director n Sam Mendes
Bong Joon-ho
Lead Actress y Renée Zellweger
Renée Zellweger
Lead Actor y Joaquin Phoenix
Joaquin Phoenix
Supporting Actress y Laura Dern
Marriage Story
Laura Dern
Marriage Story
Supporting Actor y Brad Pitt
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Brad Pitt
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Original Screenplay y Bong Joon-ho and Han Jin-won
Bong Joon-ho and Han Jin-won
Adapted Screenplay y Taika Waititi
Jojo Rabbit
Taika Waititi
Jojo Rabbit
Animated Feature y Toy Story 4 Toy Story 4
Documentary Feature y American Factory American Factory
Foreign-Language Feature y Parasite Parasite
Animated Short y Hair Love Hair Love
Documentary Short y Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (if you're a girl) Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (if you're a girl)
Live-Action Short y The Neighbors' Window The Neighbors' Window
Original Score y Hildur Guðnadóttir
Hildur Guðnadóttir
Original Song y “(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again”
from Rocketman
“(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again”
from Rocketman
Cinematography y Roger Deakins
Roger Deakins
Costume Design y Little Women Little Women
Film Editing y Michael McCusker & Andrew Buckland
Ford v Ferrari
Michael McCusker & Andrew Buckland
Ford v Ferrari
Makeup & Hairstyling y Bombshell Bombshell
Production Design y Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Sound Editing n 1917 Ford v Ferrari
Sound Mixing y 1917 1917
Visual Effects y 1917 1917

How accurate were the predictions?


As indicated above, our panel of 117 industry experts, as a group, correctly forecast 21 of the 24 categories (despite getting the night's two biggest awards wrong). That's an impressive 87.5% success rate, which marks a considerable improvement over last year's 62.5% accuracy rate.

The top indivudal expert was Collider's Adam Chitwood, who matched the consensus by getting 21 of 24 categories correct. Several other experts had 20 correct picks, including Gautam Anand (The Cinemaholic), Edward Douglas (Weekend Warrior), Joyce Eng (Gold Derby), Peter Howell (Toronto Star), Scott Mantz (Collider), Matt Mueller (OnMilwaukee), and Glenn Whipp (Los Angeles Times). The worst-performing expert (among those making selections in all 24 categories) was Fansided's D.J. Rivera, who had just 10 correct picks, followed by NPR's Eric Deggans (with 11 of 24 correct) and a panel of writers at Consequence of Sound (also 11 of 24).

Metacritic users

As a group, Metacritic users performed worse than the experts and managed to correctly name just 16 of the 24 winners, good for a 67% accuracy rate. The top-performing users each had 20 correct picks; their names are:

  • Nick Chianese
  • Jonathan Ferber
  • Carlos Gómez
  • CJ Johnson
  • Matt S

How was the telecast?

How did critics react to the second straight hostless telecast, which managed to run only 32 minutes over schedule and featured a surprise (but well-received) performance of a 17-year-old Oscar-winning song by Eminem for no particular reason? Below are selections from TV critics' assessments of this year's Oscars (in no particular order); click any link to read the full review. More reviews will be added Monday morning.

The New York Times James Poniewozik

One thing a host can do is give the broadcast a shape and a voice when nothing else provides them. And this year’s show seemed to feel the vacuum more, turning out a grab bag of emotional high moments and perplexing uses of time. ... The ceremony was most effective when it simply got out of the way of its stars’ shine.

Deadline Dominic Patten

The 2020 Oscars bellowed out for a ringmaster to harness what soon became a lackluster circus. ... To bring out ex-SNL duos like Bridesmaids co-stars Maya Rudolph and Kristen Wiig or Downhill‘s Julia Louis-Dreyfus and Will Farrell and have them caught in a leg hold trap of bad writing and clear network time killing is a sin on any Sunday, but especially Oscar night.

Vanity Fair Richard Lawson

Sure, the Academy has been sheepishly apologetic about the length of the ceremony for decades now. But now that they’re actually concretely addressing it, it almost plays as a too-guilty concession, an eschewing of self-serious pomp and grandeur that makes the whole thing feel a little thin. I know; it’s unfair to rag on the Oscars for being so bloated for so many years, and then rag on them for attending to that complaint, but there it is. Maybe this show is damned either way.

The Washington Post Hank Stuever

Hostlessness is not the Oscar’s problem, not really. ... The more rote the Oscars become, the more they stand in contrast to what has perhaps become the most entertaining movie awards show — the Film Independent Spirit Awards, which took place Saturday afternoon and aired on cable channel IFC. Held under a big tent near the beach in Santa Monica, the Spirit Awards have much of what viewers say they want from these affairs: spontanaiety, diversity and the general idea that going to a star-studded event (even vicariously, on television) ought to be a lot of fun.

The Hollywood Reporter Daniel Fienberg

Like the Emmys back in the fall, this year's Oscars were a roller coaster of bizarre producing and directing decisions, a few of which paid entertainment dividends, but most of which contributed to a show that ran far over the allotted three hours and gained more of its highlights from off-the-cuff moments than scheduled bits. ... Maybe every award show doesn't need a host? This one sure did. The structure and fluidity that a host can help provide was exactly what this telecast was missing, which doesn't mean that a Billy Crystal or Ricky Gervais would have solved everything that was weird about what was a telecast without a clear theme, message, agenda or cohering purpose.

The Oregonian Kristi Turnquist

If the 2020 Oscars broadcast was competing for a “Most Confusing Mess of an Awards Show” trophy, it really hit the mark. But that’s the best that can be said for the 92nd Annual Academy Awards, which, despite a few surprises, was mostly predictable and seemed to go on forever.

Time Andrew R. Chow

While the Oscars were also hostless last year, it really felt like this time there was no one in charge. Award winners were allowed to drone on for minutes, with the producers seemingly too meek to try to play anyone off.

Gold Derby Tony Ruiz

While last year’s ceremony was more of a daring experience, this year’s comparatively by-the-numbers event showed signs that the [host-free] experiment might need to come to an end. Thankfully the ceremony was saved by a little historic Korean film, whose presence injected some much-needed joy and energy into an otherwise listless ceremony.

Variety Caroline Framke

The 92nd annual Academy Awards quickly lost its own plot amid a million distractions courtesy of ABC’s frenetic, often baffling production decisions. But then, through the sheer pleasure of the groundbreaking winners of “Parasite” breaking through the expected narrative to triumph, the show became something far more beautifully chaotic than the show’s producers could have hoped for.

IndieWire Ben Travers

So much of what was put forth during the 2020 Oscars simply didn’t work, and it would’ve added up to an ugly failure on all fronts — if not for our Lord and Savior, Director Bong.

Boston Globe Matthew Gilbert

Sometimes, a few good moments are enough to get you there. And there were a few good ones throughout the Oscarcast Sunday night, which, like every Oscarcast ever, hosted or host-free, predictable or filled with surprises, jubilant or downbeat, was longer than it needed to be. Just when you thought it was time to jump ship, for instance right at the top of the night when Janelle Monáe led dancers and Billy Porter through a largely unnecessary musical number, they pulled you back in with something small.

Star Tribune [Minneapolis] Neal Justin

Kristen Wiig and Maya Rudolph, who used their stage time to “audition” for dramatic roles, were dynamite; they always are. In fact, the case has never been stronger that they — or some other female combo from the “Saturday Night Live” family — should be front and center throughout the evening, especially if your goal is to throw a feel-good party that won’t trigger internet trolls.

Sioux City Journal Bruce Miller

Because it lacked focus (a host was needed), this year’s Academy Awards rambled as much as Zellweger and Phoenix. Someone like Jimmy Kimmel or Ellen DeGeneres could have prevented some of the train wrecks and made more of its wins.

Los Angeles Times Lorraine Ali

This year’s Oscars showed an art form in dire need of a relevancy check. Instead we got the biggest rap act of 2002 and a whole lot of jokes about the industry’s inability to see its own stasis.

Entertainment Weekly Darren Franich

[Grade: B+] Certain elements seemed to be awkwardly straining for youth appeal. ... There were other hiccups in the production that felt like problems somebody decided to invent. ... The 2020 Oscars were a bit of a shambles, and we can definitely lose all the introducers next year. But the last hour had the quality of a well-deserved coronation.

Vox Emily Todd VanDerWerff

But where the 2019 awards were sprightly and largely entertaining, the 2020 awards felt like they had absolutely no focus. As it became more and more clear that the Academy would award Best Picture to an international film for the first time, less-anxious viewers could instead focus on the curious choices in how the show was staged and produced. ... It’s entirely possible that the problem with this year’s award show wasn’t the lack of a host, but its inability to decide which elements of a traditional host to keep and which to jettison.

Vulture Jen Chaney

The most maddening thing about this year’s Oscars, which featured many delightful moments, including a semi-surprising Best Picture win for Parasite, wasn’t that it ran late. It was that there was absolutely no reason it needed to run late. If just a few segments had been snipped and some awkward transitions had been finessed, this could have been one of the best Oscar broadcasts in recent memory. It came close, but didn’t quite get there.

The Telegraph Ed Power

[4 of 5 stars] It was glamorous and surreal, indulgent and heartfelt. ... The most memorable moments were also the most orthodox.

Slate Willa Paskin

Without a host and with so many musical performances, the show felt different than usual, a little less grueling, but also a little weirder.

What do you think?

Were you happy with the Academy's choices? What did you think of the broadcast? Let us know in the comments section below. And be sure to check out our updated 2019-20 Film Awards Scorecard to get our final updated tally of the big winners from throughout the past awards season.

Comments (5)

  • AxeT  

    The so-called experts on a lot of things the media touts are a joke, particularly when it comes to Oscar predictions. It's all a crap shoot except for real standouts every now and then. One of the greatest quotes of all time about the movie business is "Nobody knows anything." That could not be more true regarding awards and The Oscars specifically. That predictions wind up correctly made is simply testament to how much of a group think herd it all is! They all follow what they're told, including members of The Academy. These "experts" are simply people who spend too much time following this nonsense because they don't have real jobs.
    Year after year The Oscars prove less and less relevant, and this show didn't help matters. It might be the worst ever. Have never agreed with the same stupid parroted criticism of the show being way too long. However, this year's did feel so very long and boring. Having no host really hurt the show as its transitions were awkward, clunky more so than last year. The great Steve Martin and Chris Rock are a good teaming but to make the women snubbed and oscarssowhite jokes then immediately following introduce WINNER from last year, a BLACK WOMAN, was laughably tone deaf and oh so telling of the ridiculous hell bent pc nonsense The Academy succumbs to. Ricky Gervais was right. Every stupid leftist tinged speech struck a sour note and showed the lack of analytical ability many of these celebrated people have. Brad Pitt (in a co-lead role but separated from Leo in Best Actor, thus more proof of political strategies in the marketing of these stupid phony things) ruined his acceptance speech by going political and mentioning a detail so specific it's already gone from the fast paced news cycle. So he forever tied his win to biased divided politics of the precise moment so he could comply to petty peer pressure. The Cone Heads declaring "workers of the world unite" was so verbatim Communist, the lack of learning from history is head spinning! Joaquin Phoenix proved he is undeniably insane with his speech and why he did such a good job in that role, though it was probably the most amusing and suspenseful bit of the whole night. Hey love that Eminem song, but why a non-sequitur from 17 years ago was performed Live just shows how lacking the movies, the producers and the proceedings are now. Oh they did it for ratings? How's that if it was a secret surprise? Billie Eilish did a nice job but having her perform this year might have blown the novelty next year if her Bond song gets nominated. Lately 007 songs not only get nominated but win (deservedly and not so, after many classics were ignored over the span). Giving four Oscars to a little seen foreign film which is good, but absurdly over-rated and possibly the most disgustingly over-praised single person ever on one Oscar broadcast shows hopeless jackass elitism. Apparently only Disney left with that many Oscars in one night before this. If this artist is going to work in Hollywood and accept the awards, he should have spoken English and just kept it brief. He proved he does speak English and yet had no problem babbling small talk in Korean while the show ran endlessly over-time.
    Every decision The Academy has made in recent years has been a blunder, from the unbelievable most incompetent public display in world history of announcing the wrong Best Picture in 2017 to ushering in about a 15% or higher increase in total membership over just two years (qualification standards dropped in favor of race-gender-age quotas in attempt to capitulate to the ridiculous angry victim mob throwing tantrums when anomalies of diversity occur any given year). Awards are bs by nature and always a crap shoot, so you cannot get equality except by putting the fix in, which is exactly what affirmative action is. It's downright antithetical to awards of merit! The decision to remove key craft categories such as cinematography from the Live broadcast was a blunder immediately retreated from. They did remove the Honorary Tribute Award which is a shame since it was a long tradition of excellence. Instead they use the time for a rapper performing something more appropriate for and indistinguishable from The Grammys, thus throwing class out the window as the decked out audience bounced around like jackasses in their seats. The Academy is so timid these days they cave to anything they perceive as making them seem more relevant instead of simply staying focused on the movies. Kobe Bryant was a great athlete and sports legend, not a movie veteran. That they gave him an Oscar is remarkable considering all the careers metoo has destroyed over far lesser allegations. They canceled the unfunny over-rated Kevin Hart because of politically incorrect comments he made a decade earlier, and nobody worthy to do the job wants the insane snowflake scrutiny that now comes with it.
    The Oscars are over. Nobody outside the industry bubble cares.

  • 1080p  

    @OlivierPiel the fact that you believe those two movies are the same, it explains how much you don't understand about those movies. please just don't comment its really embarrassing.

  • OlivierPiel  

    Parasite is not only a mediocre film, it is also a despicable one.
    Shoplifters, which Parasite eerily copies and which I didn't like either, was actually much better in every aspect.

  • MarcDoyle  

    Can't agree with you more, bimper 7. Great idea.

  • bimper7  

    The Oscar have to show more of the movies that are nominated. These quick snippets do not give enough for those who have not seen. It also one of the most entertaining parts.

    Imagine the Grammys with 5 second pieces of a song. Would not go over well. Same here.

New in Metacritic Reports

What Our Users Are Talking About

  1. /feature/94th-academy-awards-winners-and-critic-reviews Image
    2022 Oscars: Full Winners List + Reviews of the Show
    March 27, 2022 - 6 comments
    1. Sickandtired : Since Will Smith's wife Jada has screwed him over and let her rule the home and raise her children the way she is ,... Read »
    2. Christopher_G2 : Eh, a feel good movie better Green Book but weaker than The Artist or The King's Speech winning Best Pic. The Power... Read »
    3. FelicityFenwick : A little surprising that there were no "boos" following the assault on Rock, but Hollywood is gutless in that... Read »
    4. UncleWillard : Say what you will about Oscar viewship declining, but this show had the most interesting and genuine thing happen in... Read »
    5. gbarbosaf : I'm really disappointed at CODA's award as best picture. Next year perhaps they will choose a Hallmark movie. And the... Read »
    6. OlivierPiel : Disgusting. Will Smith pathetic speech is like the bully that retreats into cowardly justifications to justify his... Read »
  2. /feature/video-game-of-the-year-awards-tracker Image
    Best of 2021: Game of the Year Awards
    March 3, 2022 - 1 comment
    1. VidyaGaemAwards : Our voters awarded Metroid Dread the "Least Worst Award" for least worst game of the year, this is the equivalent of... Read »
  3. /feature/now-streaming-on-apple-tv-plus Image
    What to Watch Right Now on Apple TV+
    May 13, 2022 - 1 comment
    1. bradtem : This list is fine as far as it goes, but why don't you have a list of what's on (or coming soon) a streaming service,... Read »
  4. /feature/new-movie-trailers-january-19-2018 Image
    Film Friday (1/19): This Week's New Movie Trailers
    January 19, 2018 - 1 comment
    1. dahurtbizness : Alicia Vikander stars as Lara Croft in this reboot of a film franchise based on the 2013 reboot video game Read »
  5. /feature/now-streaming-on-amazon-instant-video Image
    What to Watch Right Now on Amazon's Prime Video
    April 26, 2022 - 15 comments
    1. 1wifwaf : *puts on pedantic hat* documentary is misspelled as 'Documetnary' for the two March 25 entries (Luci and Desi; Dear... Read »