Metacritic's 5th Annual Game Publisher Rankings

  • Publish Date: January 27, 2015
  • Comments: ↓ 12 user comments

Updated 1/27 at 5:50p: Added Devolver Digital to the mid-size rankings

Comparing the 2014 releases of game publishers

Image

Which game publishers released the best games over the past year? In what has become an annual tradition, we have sifted through 12 months of data to determine the best and worst game publishers of the past year, based solely on the quality of their 2014 releases. Sales and user reviews do not factor into these rankings; only critic reviews (as captured by each game's Metascore) are used to evaluate performance.

Find previous game publisher rankings here:
2013 releases / 2012 / 2011 / 2010
(Looking for a list of 2014's highest- and lowest-scoring games? Find that here.)

Ranking of major publishers

Once again, we have split publishers into two separately ranked groups, based on the number of games they released during the last calendar year. Our first group consists of the largest publishers, who each issued 14 or more unique titles (with Metascores) during 2014. You'll notice that our cutoff has changed from previous years, when we had a minimum of 15 unique releases to qualify as a major publisher. The reason for the change was yet another decline in the number of games released by the major game companies—mainly due to the delay of so many planned 2014 releases into 2015.

We have ranked these publishers in order from best overall game quality to worst, using a formula based on four factors:

  1. Average Metascore for all games released in 2014
  2. % of scored products with good reviews (Metascore of at least 75)
  3. % of scored products with bad reviews (49 or lower; in this case, a lower % is better)
  4. Number of "great" titles (Metascore of 90 or higher, min. 7 reviews)

Note that the Metascore average (the first factor) counts slightly more than the other factors. (Detailed scoring information appears in a table below the rankings.) In addition, note that iOS games are not included in the figures below.

Here is how the major publishers stacked up based on the quality of their 2014 releases:

1. Nintendo
Previous year's rank: 4

Nintendo
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 34
Total Products 34
Average Metascore
76.5
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Super Smash Bros. for Wii U (Wii U) 91
Best New Original Title *
Bravely Default (3DS) 85
Worst Overall Release
Chibi-Robo! Photo Finder (3DS) 49
Metacritic Users' Favorite **
(tie) Bayonetta (Wii U) 9.1
(tie) Bayonetta 2 (Wii U) 9.1
(tie) Mario Kart 8 (Wii U) 9.1

Shooting up three spots in our rankings to #1 among the large publishers, Nintendo is also the only one of the majors to finish the year with a "green" average Metascore—despite the fact that only 56% of its games received positive reviews from critics. (Basically, 2014 was not the most memorable of years in gaming history.) Nintendo's performance is even more impressive given the fact that it released more unique titles (34) than any other publisher in 2014. The Wii U and 3DS maker saw its Metascore average increase by 2.7 points in last year (compared to the previous year) even though it didn't have a single 2014 game score as highly as its 2013 leader, Super Mario 3D World. Nintendo was actually the only publisher last year with more than one game (with at least 7 reviews) to score in the 90+ range, with Super Smash Bros. for Wii U and Bayonetta 2 both hitting 91. In a reverse from 2013, the publisher's Wii U games scored more highly than its 3DS releases. The average for the former was an impressive 81.3 (for 12 Wii U releases), while its 22 3DS games averaged just 73.9.

* Not part of or related to an existing game or series
** Out of games with at least 25 user reviews.
Scored products are the number of products released last year with at least four reviews from professional critics (which is the minimum needed to have a Metascore calculated); iOS games are not included. The difference in unique titles and total products results from multi-platform releases; for example, if LEGO Call of Duty: Arkham City—A Telltale Games Series comes out on the PS4, XB1, and PC, that counts as 3 total products but just one unique title. Average Metascore is the average of all individual Metascores for all scored products in 2014, while the Metascore distribution chart shows what percentage of those Metascores were green (Metascore of 75-100), yellow (50-74) or red (0-49).

2. Ubisoft
Previous year's rank: 2

Ubisoft
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 21
Total Products 54
Average Metascore
74.1
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Rayman Legends (Xbox One) has only 6 reviews 91
best with 7+ reviews: Rayman Legends (PS4) 90
Best New Original Title
Child of Light (PS3) 89
Worst Overall Release
Shape Up (Xbox One) 52
Metacritic Users' Favorite
South Park: The Stick of Truth (PC) 8.6

Though Ubisoft's average Metascore declined by nearly a point compared to the year before, the Rayman publisher was able to hold onto its second-place ranking. Ubisoft was one of three major publishers last year to avoid releasing a single negatively reviewed game (though Shape Up, its attempt at a fitness game, came close). Ubisoft averaged 76.3 for its dozen PS4 titles, tops among all publishers with at least 5 releases for that console last year. Ubisoft's side-scrolling RPG Child of Light was also one of the highest-scoring new IPs to be released by any of the major publishers in 2014 (though the current-gen versions didn't score quite as highly as that PS3 version listed above).

3. Electronic Arts
Previous year's rank: 3

Electronic Arts
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 14
Total Products 29
Average Metascore
74.5
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Dragon Age: Inquisition (PS4) 89
Best New Original Title
Titanfall (Xbox One) 86
Worst Overall Release
NBA Live 15 (Xbox One) 53
Metacritic Users' Favorite
Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare (PS4) 7.6

Electronic Arts actually had a slightly higher average Metascore than #2 Ubisoft, but ranked one spot lower thanks to a slightly smaller percentage of positively reviewed releases as well as a lack of any 90+ games. Actually, there was a lack of games, period: EA released nine more titles (and over 20 more scored products) in 2013 than in 2014, though that reduction in quantity didn't necessarily produce the increase in quality that the company may have been expecting—EA's average Metascore was ever so slightly lower for the year. The publisher's EA Sports-branded titles averaged a 71.1 in 2014, compared to a 77.3 for its non-sports releases. The latter group was highlighted both by a strong new Dragon Age installment and the brand-new IP Titanfall, though the latter scored a lot better with critics than with Metacritic's users, and it is unclear whether it was the huge financial hit EA was hoping for. One definite disappointment—at least from a quality standpoint—was The Sims 4, which turned out to be the lowest-scoring major game in The Sims series to date (scoring 16 points lower than The Sims 3).

4. Sony
Previous year's rank: 5

Sony
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 32
Total Products 41
Average Metascore
72.5
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
The Last of Us Remastered (PS4) 95
Best New Original Title
Hohokum (PS4) 75
Worst Overall Release
SingStar: Ultimate Party (PS4) 46
Metacritic Users' Favorite
The Last of Us Remastered (PS4) 8.7

By some measurements, Sony saw a slight improvement in game quality last year, moving up one spot in the rankings and seeing its average score edge up by 0.2 points. But just 39% of Sony's 2014 releases were positively reviewed by critics, compared to 47% in 2013. One problem may have been the publisher's Vita slate: Sony's 20 handheld games averaged just 69.9, and only 5 of them received positive reviews.

5. Square Enix
Previous year's rank: (not ranked)

Sony
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 15
Total Products 25
Average Metascore
71.7
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Final Fantasy X / X-2 HD Remaster (PS Vita) 86
Best New Original Title
Murdered: Soul Suspect (PC) 59
Worst Overall Release
Deus Ex: The Fall (PC) 45
Metacritic Users' Favorite
Theatrhythm Final Fantasy: Curtain Call (3DS) 8.9

Square Enix saw its average Metascore decline by 9 points last year—easily the biggest drop among the majors, though it also more than doubled the number of unique titles it released in 2014 compared to the prior year. (Square Enix actually didn't qualify for our rankings a year ago, releasing too few games in 2013 to count even as a mid-size publisher.) Most of that expanded release slate still belonged to the Final Fantasy or Tomb Raider franchises, and Square Enix was alone among the majors not to introduce a decently reviewed new IP last year.

6. Microsoft
Previous year's rank: 6

Microsoft Studios
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 21
Total Products 23
Average Metascore
68.9
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Minecraft: Xbox One Edition (Xbox One) 88
Best New Original Title
Sunset Overdrive (Xbox One) 81
Worst Overall Release
Dead Rising 3: Chaos Rising (Xbox One) 50
Metacritic Users' Favorite
Forza Horizon 2: Storm Island (Xbox One) 8.1

While Microsoft didn't drop in our rankings, the Xbox/PC publisher can't exactly claim that 2014 was a good year. The company's average Metascore declined by over 3 points, and a mere 30% of its products received positive reviews from critics—the lowest success rate for any of the major publishers. It was also the second straight year that Microsoft failed to achieve a 90 or higher for any of its releases (after doing so in each of the three previous years). The company's Xbox One offerings were slightly better than its releases for other platforms, with a Metascore average of 69.6 for games on the new console (vs. 68.7 on PC and 66.8 on the 360).

7. Bandai Namco Games
(including D3 Publisher)
Previous year's rank: 9

Namco Bandai
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 29
Total Products 50
Average Metascore
68.0
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Dark Souls II (Xbox 360) 91
Best New Original Title
DeadCore (PC) 79
Worst Overall Release
Tenkai Knights: Brave Battle (3DS) 26
Metacritic Users' Favorite
Tales of Xillia 2 (PS3) 8.6

Believe it or not, seventh-ranked Bandai Namco Games (and, yes, the publisher's name is the inverse of what it was a year ago, though it will change yet again—to Bandai Namco Entertainment—in the spring) had the biggest year-to-year improvement of any publisher: an increase of 6.3 points vs. its 2013 average Metascore. Of course, since the company had such a poor 2013, that quality jump was only good enough to lift Bandai to 7th place among the major publishers in 2014. It probably doesn't help that virtually all of Bandai's console releases last year were for previous-generation hardware; the publisher's PC titles averaged a more respectable 76. And no major or mid-sized publisher released a game with worse reviews than robot fighter Tenkai Knights: Brave Battle.

8. Activision Blizzard
Previous year's rank: 8

Activision Blizzard
Scored Releases - 2014
Unique Titles 17
Total Products 34
Average Metascore
67.1
Metascore Distribution
Best Overall Release
Diablo III: Ultimate Evil Edition (PS4) 90
Best New Original Title
Destiny (PS4) 76
Worst Overall Release
Transformers: Rise of the Dark Spark (Wii U) 38
Metacritic Users' Favorite
Diablo III: Ultimate Evil Edition (PS4) 8.0

Activision Blizzard is a perennial presence near the bottom of our rankings, and the reason is always the same (and really quite simple): way too many terrible games. The publisher had eight different products receive negative reviews last year—that's both the largest quantity and highest percentage (24%) of bad games for any company listed on this page. In the company's defense, that's actually an improvement over the previous year, when it saw 39% of its releases score 49 or below. Activision also raised its average Metascore by nearly five points in 2014, while also increasing its percentage of titles receiving positive reviews to 44% (better than the publishers ranked at #6 and #7 above). And it even launched a fairly successful (at least in terms of revenues and publicity, if not in critical acclaim) new property in Destiny. Subtract the Activision portion of Activision Blizzard, and the picture looks far rosier: nine Blizzard Entertainment products averaged a stunning 85.5.

Recap: rankings at a glance

Here are the above rankings again in a more compact form, with the points displayed, for anyone wishing to see just how close a race it was:

Major Publisher Rankings, 2014 Releases
    Metascore Good Games Bad Games Great Games  
  Publisher Avg. Pts. % Pts. % Pts. # Pts. Total Pts.
1 Nintendo 76.5 114.8 56% 55.9 3% 97.1 2 10 277.7
2 Ubisoft 74.1 111.1 54% 53.7 0% 100.0 1 5 269.8
3 Electronic Arts 74.5 111.7 52% 51.7 0% 100.0 0 0 263.4
4 Sony 72.5 108.7 39% 39.0 5% 95.1 1 5 247.9
5 Square Enix 71.7 107.6 44% 44.0 4% 96.0 0 0 247.6
6 Microsoft 68.9 103.4 30% 30.4 0% 100.0 0 0 233.8
7 Bandai Namco Games 68.0 102.0 34% 34.0 8% 92.0 1 5 233.0
8 Activision Blizzard 67.1 100.7 44% 44.1 24% 76.5 1 5 226.3

Points for average Metascore are awarded at 1.5 x the average (with a maximum of 150 points possible). Points for good % and bad % are awarded based on a maximum of 100 each. Points for "great" games are awarded as bonus points (5.0 points per unique title). To qualify as "great," a game must have a Metascore of at least 90 and have at least 7 critic reviews.

Ranking of mid-size publishers

Each of the "mid-size" publishers listed below released between 6-13 unique titles in 2014. (As with the major publishers, we have lowered the minimum cutoff by one compared to previous years. Publishers who released fewer than six games last year are not included in this report.) They are ranked according to the exact same methodology we used to rank the larger publishers above, earning points for average Metascore, % of releases that earn positive or negative reviews, and the total number of great games.

Note that the top-ranked major publisher after 2013, Take-Two Interactive, was demoted this year to the "mid-size" group as a result of releasing far fewer games in 2014 (just 7 unique titles compared to 16 in 2013). Five of the publishers below are new to our rankings since they did not release enough games in 2013 to qualify last year. One of those was episodic adventure king Telltale Games, which had the highest average Metascore for any publisher in 2014.

Mid-Size Publisher Rankings, 2014 Releases
  Publisher Unique
Titles
Total
Products
Avg. Metascore (vs. 2013) # Great Metascore
Distribution
Points
1 Telltale Games 12 33 79.7 ▲1.6 0 GoodSo-So 307.5
2 Paradox Interactive 7 7 77.7 ▲4.0 0 GoodSo-So 288.0
3 Capcom 7 14 76.9 ▲2.3 0 GoodSo-So 286.7
4 Take-Two Interactive 7 17 75.7 ▼2.4 1 GoodSo-So 283.2
5 Sega 10 13 73.1 ▲3.6 0 GoodSo-SoBad 271.2
6 Zen Studios 6 9 74.8 n/a 0 GoodSo-So 267.8
7 Devolver Digital 7 10 76.0 n/a 0 GoodSo-So 264.0
8 Konami 6 13 71.5 ▼5.9 0 GoodSo-So 261.1
9 Slitherine 6 6 71.4 n/a 0 GoodSo-So 240.4
10 NIS America 10 11 65.7 n/a 0 GoodSo-So 225.8
11 Warner Bros. Interactive 9 23 70.7 ▼2.8 0 GoodSo-So 223.5
12 Koei Tecmo 10 19 68.0 ▲1.5 0 GoodSo-SoBad 217.8
13 Atlus Co. 8 13 67.7 ▲1.8 0 GoodSo-SoBad 216.9
14 505 Games 6 11 64.1 ▼5.2 0 GoodSo-SoBad 214.4
15 Aksys Games 6 6 62.8 ▼13.6 0 GoodSo-SoBad 210.8
16 Deep Silver 10 19 62.5 ▲4.5 0 GoodSo-SoBad 204.3
17 Focus Home Interactive 10 16 64.4 ▲4.3 0 GoodSo-SoBad 202.9

Platform-by-platform averages

Finally, here are the top publishers for each console and for the PC. In these tables, publishers are simply ranked by their average Metascores for each platform; the green, yellow, and red dots indicate individual products (with green, yellow, or red Metascores). Publishers with five or more releases for the platform were eligible for inclusion. (Note that there weren't quite enough launch titles released last year to make it worthwhile to include the next-gen consoles.)

360Highest Avg. Metascores Among Xbox One Publishers, 2014 Releases
  Publisher Xbox One Titles Average Metascore
1 Ubisoft greengreengreengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellow 73.8
2 Electronic Arts greengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellowyellow 72.7
3 Square Enix greengreenyellowyellowyellow 70.8
4 Microsoft greengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellow 69.6
5 Activision Blizzard greengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowredredred 67.0
PS3Highest Avg. Metascores Among PlayStation 4 Publishers, 2014 Releases
  Publisher PS4 Titles Average Metascore
1 Ubisoft greengreengreengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellow 76.3
2 Zen Studios greengreengreenyellowyellow 76.1
3 Sony greengreengreengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowyellowred 75.4
4 Square Enix greengreengreengreenyellowyellow 74.6
5 Electronic Arts greengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellowyellow 73.5
PCHighest Avg. Metascores Among PC Game Publishers, 2014 Releases
  Publisher PC Titles Average Metascore
1 Sega greengreengreengreengreen 81.2
2 Telltale Games greengreengreengreengreengreengreengreengreengreen 79.5
3 Electronic Arts greengreengreengreenyellowyellow 79.0
4 Paradox Interactive greengreengreengreengreenyellowyellow 77.7
5 Bandai Namco Games greengreengreengreengreengreenyellowyellowyellow 76.0

All scores in this report are from January 22, 2015, and U.S. release dates and publishers are used for all games except those never released in the U.S. iOS games are excluded.

View our previous Game Publisher Rankings:
2014 (for games released in 2013) / 2013 / 2012 / 2011

More of our best of 2014 coverage:
Best Games of 2014

Comments (12)

  • chiefgeef  

    ##Skankhunt42##

  • chiefgeef  

    okay.. I'll be forward, before stumbling into this critic's review article, or...personal spew......whatever it is, I was among the sheep. I was of those that make judgements solely from headlines and big numbers. But don't worry, the archetype of bigotry?....yea that fits: "Jason Dietz, Metacritic Features Editor" saved me from that cancer, Praise! (It is beyond me that you acknowledge yourself as such, make that two fold - that anyone, with any microscopic sense toward respectable scrutiny. Really man, "way too many terrible games" referring to Blizzard 2015 term. I understand ranking companies based off annual turnout and numbers is necessary to provide an appropriate ranking. But come on man... How can you consider yourself a critic when you have no sense of what your audience is looking gain from your brainless posts. You either have no idea or just don't care, that many people who read reviews and rankings like this are naturally unbiased and/or have personalized tastes. Myself, and i assume many others, want information, such as this, to be presented upfront and delivered accurately, being they determine if it's "terrible", I don't want to brainless thumb telling me something is terrible when first off they have no idea what my personalized tastes are. It could be good? why don't you let me determine that?

    Anywho reading this makes me throw up and laugh at the same time. What a sad excuse of a "critic" you are, If your going to be a critic, at least be a good critic...

    But then again, why even be a reviewer and/or critic in the first place. LOL. You are like **** on people who are achieving things unmeasurably greater and than your greatest achievement ...Judging people and writing about it online. LOLOL

  • chiefgeef  

    okay.. I'll be forward, before stumbling into this critic's review article, or...personal spew......whatever it is, I was among the sheep. I was of those that make judgements solely from headlines and big numbers. But don't worry, the archetype of bigotry?....yea that fits: "Jason Dietz, Metacritic Features Editor" saved me from that cancer, Praise! (It is beyond me that you acknowledge yourself as such, make that two fold - that anyone, with any microscopic sense toward respectable scrutiny. Really man, "way too many terrible games" referring to Blizzard 2015 term. I understand ranking companies based off annual turnout and numbers is necessary to provide an appropriate ranking. But come on man... How can you consider yourself a critic when you have no sense of what your audience is looking gain from your brainless posts. You either have no idea or just don't care, that many people who read reviews and rankings like this are naturally unbiased and/or have personalized tastes. Myself, and i assume many others, want information, such as this, to be presented upfront and delivered accurately, being they determine if it's "terrible", I don't want to brainless thumb telling me something is terrible when first off they have no idea what my personalized tastes are. It could be good? why don't you let me determine that?

    Anywho reading this makes me throw up and laugh at the same time. What a sad excuse of a "critic" you are, If your going to be a critic, at least be a good critic...

    But then again, why even be a reviewer and/or critic in the first place. LOL. You are like **** on people who are achieving things unmeasurably greater and than your greatest achievement ...Judging people and writing about it online. LOLOL

  • FogCityRoller  

    It's like the Wii U and 3DS switched places from last year in terms of attention being paid to the system. I've always been fond of Nintendo, but god dammit why can't they actually deliver consistently for both systems at the same time?

  • WarpWhistle  

    Got to agree with Mastah50 that throwing out user opinions on games is gross negligence for any kind of ranking here. Especially with the previous year having a lot of these critics being called out for journalistic problems, it really makes you wonder what makes these lists happen, the games that are put out, or the almighty dollar?

  • PashaAlex  

    Dull top. How EA and Ubisoft could be leaders? They leaders at copying, not making.

  • mastah50  

    Rather "biased" article throwing OUT user reviews the ones that mean the most and count the most. We all know these sites and magazines are palm fed for good scores and high on the charts ratings. We saw that in you with Rome II Total War scores.

    The only good honest feedback is from the USERS and always will be. Quit trying to whitewash the truth with your bogus articles like these.

  • KB5K  

    Kind of a silly article, to be honest. It's the development team more than the publishers that impact "game quality." Giving a publisher credit for making a great game is like giving a realtor credit for building a house. (Exemption being pubs that own their dev teams, which imo ruins the industry. Lookin at you, EA...)

  • nephx  

    Seems like Nintendo is at a advantage that noone seems to bother to review there DLC, since you counted DLC in this.

  • DemKin  

    Definitely a flat year for gaming. It comes as no surprise that only Nintendo really delivered for their system. Expecting to see that change though as Sony finally put their PS4 on track and enters the race.

New in Metacritic Reports

What Our Users Are Talking About

  1. /feature/film-critics-list-the-top-10-movies-of-2018 Image
    Best of 2018: Film Critic Top Ten Lists
    December 5, 2018 - 12 comments
    1. FelicityFenwick : I can see why Roma is at the top of the list. Two incredibly heart-breaking moments. But for my money, it's Green... Read »
  2. /feature/2018-film-awards-and-nominations-scorecard Image
    Best of 2018: Film Awards & Nominations Scorecard
    November 27, 2018 - 12 comments
    1. european_star : World Soundtrack Academy/World Soundtrack Awards missing Grammy Awards missing Read »
    2. european_star : 9th AACTA International Awards missing 22nd Hollywood Film Awards missing British Independent Film Awards 2018... Read »
    3. european_star : 9th Hollywood Music in Media Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_Hollywood_Music_in_Media_Awards 31st... Read »
    4. FelicityFenwick : Man, that TV fan is sure an activist! Let's go Green Book! Great freakin' film. Read »
  3. /feature/critics-pick-top-10-best-albums-of-2018 Image
    Best of 2018: Music Critic Top Ten Lists
    November 26, 2018 - 17 comments
    1. MikeNGarrett : Newsweek is in alphabetical order despite having numbers next to the albums. Read »
    2. MetaMania : @Djesse Erratum!! Erratum!! Noname is at no 15 at Album Of The Year's 2018 Music Year End List Aggregate. I don't... Read »
    3. MetaMania : @Djesse This is the list that counts the most. It covers much more sources like record shops and radio hosts, and... Read »
    4. Djesse : please explain why Noname-Room25 is in top5 of best rated albums this year but is absent in this 2018 list?!? doesnt... Read »
  4. /feature/new-free-games-playstation-xbox-pc-switch Image
    This Month's Free Games
    November 28, 2018 - 8 comments
    1. FelicityFenwick : Love this page... thanks for maintaining it! Read »