Assassin's Creed III Remastered Image
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 6 Critic Reviews What's this?

User Score
4.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 71 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: Relive the American Revolution or experience it for the first time in Assassin's Creed® III Remastered, with enhanced graphics and improved gameplay mechanics. Plus, Assassin's Creed Liberation Remastered and all solo DLC content are included.

Trailer

Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
Assassin's Creed III Remastered: Comparison Trailer
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 6
  2. Negative: 0 out of 6
  1. Apr 27, 2019
    80
    While the new version makes the game more accessible, offers more depth on the domain's management and a small but not marginal graphic facelift (notably sunlight management). It is unfortunately counterbalanced by the main character models being sometimes less polished, a catastrophic display of nights and a rather embarrassing bridle of the experience. This version is recommended for those who could not play the original game. However, the PC version is highly recommended, at least for the 60 FPS availability.
  2. Mar 30, 2019
    80
    If you are a fan of Assassin's Creed series but haven't played AC3 which was released in 2012, it's the perfect time to try the remastered version.
  3. Apr 7, 2019
    80
    Assassin’s Creed 3 Remastered offers some good upgrades, with smoother visuals and some UI fixes. If the overall experience feels dated at time, it still is a solid experience.
  4. Mar 28, 2019
    78
    Assassin's Creed 3 Remastered does a good job bringing an older game into the modern era, all things considered, but it can be hard to go back to.
  5. 75
    With Assassin’s Creed III Remastered, Ubisoft improved the graphics of the games but did very little to improve everything else.
  6. Mar 30, 2019
    50
    The Assassin's Creed 3 Remaster improved the graphics and very little else. There is a reason this game is one of the least popular in the series history and without anything done to address its previous faults, its age makes it even more unpalatable.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 18
  2. Negative: 11 out of 18
  1. Apr 1, 2019
    10
    whats the problem of gamers.it's not a remake it's a remastered.and I think it's so solid.even you beat gamer 2-3 times.feels like newwhats the problem of gamers.it's not a remake it's a remastered.and I think it's so solid.even you beat gamer 2-3 times.feels like new game.so enjoyable details.tiny expentions visual, fights and missions.,graphics so satisfying.don't care fps locked it's not a definition of a game's real deal.good job ubisoft. Expand
  2. Sep 2, 2020
    8
    Gameplay is fun, though the combat system is the easiest of the whole saga. I really liked the rope hook, but i think it's op in combat. ItsGameplay is fun, though the combat system is the easiest of the whole saga. I really liked the rope hook, but i think it's op in combat. Its stealth potential has not been fully exploited in the game map.
    New killing and stealth killing animations are smooth and nice.

    Graphics is really bad for a remaster. Textures did not improve; some have even gotten worse, starting from the characters' faces. There have been improvements in lighting and color saturation, even if that is perhaps a bit too exaggerated.

    Story is good, even though i never liked the mystical story of the present. The story of Connor is really well made and realistic, and i liked the character.

    Controls are kinda weird, and sometimes Connor jumps on some crates randomly instead of running forward in the ground. Same thing on the trees, sometimes it happens that it suddenly jumps down with no reason. You have to be very careful and precise.

    Worth playing for the boodthirsty gameplay and the story.
    Expand
  3. Jul 11, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Перепроходил конкретно ремастер, а не 3 часть, потому что мне понравился трейлер в котором показано, как все преобразилось в лучшую сторону, но в итоге был не то что бы сильно разочарован, но игра выдавала стабильные 60+ФПС на компьютере сборки I5-7400+GTX 1050Ti+DDR4 2400Gz, поэтому я бы сказал, что очень хорошо с правились с ремастером как игрой в первую очередь. Графика, конечно ужасна местами, не везде, но что точно слишком, так это освещение игры, на персонажах, кажется что их просто хотели сделать максимально яркими и насыщенными, привет 5 части (Unity), но это вышло игре боком. Кардинально ничего не меняли, что порадовало, вода, зелень окружение стали более красивыми, живыми какими-то я бы даже сказал, так что конкретно к ремастеру у меня придирок нет.
    По сюжету, игра наверное самая странная в плане истории персонажей, Ассассин индеец не так плохо, но то как он им становится, то как подается сюжет, это уже чересчур. Снова месть, прозрачное яблоко,малюсенький ключ, без которого не открыть огромную дыру... Вообщем, у игры очень много грехов, а самое обидное, что в игре вы можете участвовать ивентах внутри Анимуса и за его пределами, вот только за его пределами, участие вообще не имеет ни какого смысла, это все настолько линейно проделано за его пределами, что порой задаешься вопросом, а зачем вообще нужны такого рода миссии? Если они не о чем, особенно как по мне самой дурацкой и детской вышла миссия где вы в роли Дезмонда вызволяете отца из Абстерго. Злодей который вас преследует в не Анимуса, который имеет раздвоение личности или что у него там, я так и не понял, не до конца раскрытая линия Люси, просто мелка послевкусия ее смерти, о которой говорят все, но никто ничего толком не говорит. Вообщем, игра наверное самая спорная в завершении истории Дезмонда Маелса, но при этом наверное самый тупой конец, который только мог быть, по абсурдности, наверное самая мемная игра из асассинов евер. Спасибо что эти игры еще не оттолерастили.
    Expand
  4. Jun 2, 2019
    0
    One of the worst AC games ever and it got a remaster. What was the point ? Game is also full of bugs, crashes, graphical problems/glitches andOne of the worst AC games ever and it got a remaster. What was the point ? Game is also full of bugs, crashes, graphical problems/glitches and list goes on...
    Some games are bad, but this game is just... Ugly.
    Expand
  5. Mar 29, 2019
    0
    Game has 60fps lock, while the original wasn't capped. Shame on you Ubisoft.
  6. Mar 30, 2019
    0
    The worst face look of I ever seen!!!Lighting become a little better but it not cost 40$. Never buy this ****
  7. May 4, 2019
    0
    This remaster doesn't make any sense, at least on PC. Not only was III always the worst AC game in my opinion, but this almost entirelyThis remaster doesn't make any sense, at least on PC. Not only was III always the worst AC game in my opinion, but this almost entirely graphical remaster somehow manages to make everything look worse than the original. Textures are worse, the game is locked to 60 fps which the original was not, faces now look absolutely atrocious (the scared kid in the opera house at the beginning was always a bit creepy looking, but now he's nightmare fuel) and facial textures are far, far worse than before - and lip syncing is off in places where it didn't use to be. It's just amazing to me how a supposed "remaster" - and one for which they charge as a new game - can manage to take a step back in every area, seven years after the original came out. Expand

See all 18 User Reviews