Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood Image
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews What's this?

User Score
7.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 116 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: Experience authentic WWII combat as Sergeant Joe Hartsock and lead your squad beyond Carentan to liberate all of Normandy. Taking online tactics to new heights, Brothers In Arms Earned In Blood offers more unique multiplayer missions and improved online support. (Including the bundledExperience authentic WWII combat as Sergeant Joe Hartsock and lead your squad beyond Carentan to liberate all of Normandy. Taking online tactics to new heights, Brothers In Arms Earned In Blood offers more unique multiplayer missions and improved online support. (Including the bundled addition of modification support for the PC). Earned In Blood features an all-new cooperative Skirmish mode that allows one or two players to take a tour of duty through a series of authentic and harrowing custom combat missions. Arm yourself with additional authentic weapons and command new vehicles like the M10 "Wolverine" Tank Destroyer. More Challenging and Dynamic Combat - the game features close quarter urban environments and a new, next generation artificial intelligence system. [Ubisoft] Expand
Buy Now
Buy on

Trailer

Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood Gameplay Movie 1
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 23
  2. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. 95
    It's one of those sequels where all of the evolution takes place underneath the façade -- a game you've got to pick up and feel all the subtle differences. And of course, if Blood is your first Brothers experience, well, it's hard to imagine going back to anything less authentic and strategic.
  2. Excellent sense of immersion, great storytelling.
  3. 88
    Only an incremental improvement on the original. The greater flexibility of the AI and the new multiplayer options are certainly welcome additions, but the game still feels... more like Brothers in Arms v1.5 than a full sequel.
  4. 83
    The fact that you are being asked to pay full premium for what is effectively an expansion pack in all but name, may put some off.
  5. EiB feels grittier - closer to its fascinating yet fearful inspiration - than any other military shooter out there. Much of that feel comes from the credible mission design and AI already mentioned but a significant portion stems from fundamentals like the way the weapons look, sound and perform.
  6. It's fun and well produced but it's a console version of an expansion pack and nothing more.
  7. Computer Games Magazine
    70
    Marches behind its predecessor as one of the most polished tactical shooters ever released. [Jan 2006, p.44]

See all 23 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 25
  2. Negative: 7 out of 25
  1. Jun 7, 2011
    10
    main concept of the game is cool, but there are some flaws in game
    however, none of them spoil the playing experience.

    i think best of the BIA is EiB
  2. Nov 28, 2017
    10
    The best WWII shooter I've played. An improvement over the superb Hill 30 in every way with better A.I and maps that lets you use some reallyThe best WWII shooter I've played. An improvement over the superb Hill 30 in every way with better A.I and maps that lets you use some really satisfying tactics to take out the enemy. Expand
  3. MikkoV.
    Sep 29, 2006
    10
    Just great. Better AI then in the prequel and new weapons,vehicles and everything. New story is great.
  4. Jan 23, 2018
    8
    Хороший, но довольно короткий шутер с возможностью тактически управлять своим отрядом.Хороший, но довольно короткий шутер с возможностью тактически управлять своим отрядом.
  5. Oct 10, 2018
    7
    rrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddiiiiiiiiiiicccccccccccaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllll
  6. Sep 29, 2011
    4
    Graphics are pretty bad. The actual gameplay is very repetitive and although it's challenging it certainly isn't fun. Realistic? Maybe.Graphics are pretty bad. The actual gameplay is very repetitive and although it's challenging it certainly isn't fun. Realistic? Maybe. Frustrating, slow and boring? Most likely. It's not really a shooter and although it tries to be different, its flaws start to show when nobody plays multiplayer and the skirmish mode is bad as well. Nice idea, but bad execution. Expand
  7. Nov 2, 2018
    0
    Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst gameWorst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Worst game ever Expand

See all 25 User Reviews