X
- M
- Gathering
- M
- Gathering
- M
- Gathering
- M
- Gathering
Serious Sam: The First Encounter
Released On: Mar 21, 2001
87
8.4
Where to Buy
Where to Buy
Metascore
Generally Favorable
Based on 31 Critic Reviews
87
87% Positive
27 Reviews
27 Reviews
10% Mixed
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
3% Negative
1 Review
1 Review
Metascore
Generally Favorable
Based on 31 Critic Reviews
87
87% Positive
27 Reviews
27 Reviews
10% Mixed
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
3% Negative
1 Review
1 Review
Sam (sets itself apart) by it’s sense of humor and easy to learn controls. It’s also one of the brighter shooters, with lots of outside and aboveground levels mixed in with all of the dungeon crawling.
Seriously Sweet.
User Score
Generally Favorable
Based on 426 User Ratings
8.4
79% Positive
337 Ratings
337 Ratings
19% Mixed
79 Ratings
79 Ratings
2% Negative
10 Ratings
10 Ratings
User Score
Generally Favorable
Based on 426 User Ratings
8.4
79% Positive
337 Ratings
337 Ratings
19% Mixed
79 Ratings
79 Ratings
2% Negative
10 Ratings
10 Ratings
2001 GOTY, just one of the best single player FPS you can find, multiplayer is fun as well, and a gigantic amount of mods, make this one of the best games of its genre. Definitively a must-play.
Report
PC
The original Serious Sam is wild, non-stop action-packed adventure with hordes of enemies and fun weapons. A cult classic gem.
Report
PC
It's a great looking, fun-filled game that has plenty of visceral thrills and absolutely, positively the biggest battles in any shooter to date.
If you like mindlessly shooting things (like me), buy this game! Well worth the bang!
It's a fun game for those looking for a 3D shooter gone back to the basics, offering not only a fantastic array of weapons, but incredible graphics, stunning levels and hours of non-stop bullet-spraying frenzy.
This is the best dose of pure visceral excitement to hit shooters in years.
I had pretty high hopes for the title, and ultimately, I was let down more than a kid who got socks and underwear for Christmas. If you're in the market for an FPS game, go pick up "Painkiller." Same type of gameplay, much less headaches. [June 2004]
This game is very good in terms of a first-person shooter, Sam's arsenal is huge. The number of cards to pass inspires as well as the number of enemies (the most infuriating of which is the Кleer Skeleton). The phrases of The Main Character are simply gorgeous. Definitely 10/10.
Report
PC
Хороший мясной шутан. Можно считать это ремейком всего того, что выходило в 90х годах в этом жанре, только с более адекватным и щадящим левел-дизайном, когда не надо искать выход с уровня по 2 часа, потому что карточка для открытия двери спрятана в секретке или сливается с текстурами окружающей среды. Так что за то, что это действительно мясной шутан, а не симулятор поиска карточек в лабиринте, рождённым больным созданием сумасшедшего левел-дизайнера, уже можно ставить 10 из 10 в своей нише.
Из особенностей: огромные размеры арен, и большое количество врагов. Сделаны они шикарно. Жаль только таких секций не так много как бы хотелось, и чаще всего приходится ходить по коридорам каких-нибудь храмов да скучно постреливать постоянно спавнящуюся мелочь при подборе очередных патронов или аптек.
Итог - 7.5 из 10. Как мясной шутер отличная игра, но много провисающих моментов, вызывающих скуку.
Report
PC
Игра интересная топовый мясной шутер, но короткий поэтому 7/10
Report
PC
Mass murder is funny isn't it?
Now that that's out of the way let's talk about a unique franchise called Serious Sam.
Serious Sam which has had a lasting legacy, not on the gaming industry but on the fans.
Serious Sam which, despite being relatively archaic in culture and design, has survived to this day. Serious Sam which is a franchise I've now ran out of grandiose statements to make about.
Serious Sam.
And I play this game and I wonder why. Why has this strange cult classic had the staying power that better games failed at? I'm not saying this to reproach the game or fans. I genuinely believe it's an interesting case study. Let's discuss why:
I played this game a lot when I was younger and had fewer games to play, and it was great. I played it again just now and I did not enjoy myself nearly as much.
Narratively, it's good. It isn't intended to be a philosophical space opera. It doesn't take itself seriously at all. So narratively, all we're asking for here is slight context for the gameplay. It does just that and adds a few punchlines in for good measure. Nothing hysterical, but a few good lines that truly reflect the early 2000s absurdist comedy culture in the games industry. In so many ways this game parodies its predecessors, DOOM and Duke Nukem. But it doesn't stay long. Some scrawling text at the beginning and cheap one-liner at the end. We're losing a war against an alien empire and Sam travels back in time to stop it. I have no idea what our goal is in travelling back in time. But hey, Sammy is an improv kinda guy.
Art-wise, the game once again reflects the time and inspirations. I love ancient Egyptian aesthetics in games, but not much is really done here with it. It's basic geometry tailored to create a functional battle arena rather than look interesting or accurate. It works and it's not ugly. The resolution and menus don't scale well to modern systems, but that's why they released the HD versions.
What's important here is gameplay. It's the early 2000s approach of gameplay first. As it should be... EA. Regardless, this is where it loses me and will likely lose many others. This game can be hard. Irksome even. The core loop relies on run-and-gun mindless action, which usually means the devs hoped the simple mechanics and waves of viscera will carry the entire game. Personally, it doesn't.
Gaming pet peeves of mine include stun-locking, bullet-hell level of dangers in non-bullet-hell games, and difficulty which simply increases enemy count, health and damage. This game presents all of these to varying degrees.
Stun-locking only happens with a couple of enemies, and only in high enough numbers so I can give it a pass since that's inherent in their gameplay design. The other 2 are as well. There aren't as many stars in the sky as there is crap on the screen at some points. And that's all the difficulty settings really do. I understand that kind of dumb fun works for people and I don't begrudge them. I just can't relate.
That fact is made worse by the pacing in this game. Levels begin a reasonable length, but eventually increase to marathon levels. That's tiring enough, but all the enemies barring boss-types are introduced in the first 3-4. So nothing new is introduced to the gameplay loop for 70% of the game. Instead, they rely cheaply on the same few encounters. I thought I was playing Groundhog Day the game when I fought my 50th arena of 500 bulls or kleers and nothing else, despite mastering the tactic for that fight 10 levels ago. It's the speech-stutter of level design. You just can't quite spit it out and keep repeating the same 2 syllables over and over again. If this were a child, I'd have given up on him in infancy.
After all that, most bosses, including the final, are a bigger disappointment than I am. That is Seriously saying Sam-thing too. The hardest fights are just before the final boss or about 3 levels ago. Like I say, game pacing is just whack here.
Obviously the large enemy number and complexity is integrated into the game design. I don't want to give the impression I thought the devs were dumb. They're most certainly not. The variety in weapons of mass destruction is where things even out. So it is a thought out and crafted experience in the end. In fact, the minigun, laser gun and cannon are just the "I don't feel like doing this right now" guns. I also love that cannon balls have a small bounce if you fire while jumping. I don't know why.
So how did this underdog franchise win? Well, it most definitely shines more in co-op. Otherwise I don't entirely know, but I'm honestly happy it did. It may not be for me, but I can respect others enjoying this interesting piece of culture.
There internet. You have my approval to like this. You're welcome. Don't say I never do anything for you.
Report
PC
It's a fast paced FPS with good controls but gets very boring very quickly. It starts out awesome but about halfway through the rest of the game is the same exact thing over and over again. If you get the game free its worth playing until you get bored but definitely not worth playing the whole way through.
During its time it was probably one of the better games around, but nowadays there are just so many better options to play this one really doesn't hold up.
Report
PC
Summary Sam "Serious" Stone, Earth?s stud warrior, is sent back to Egypt, 3000 B.C., to fight hordes of alien monsters in this acclaimed "Doom"-sytle, back-to-basics, first-person shooter out of Croatia which is listed, amazingly, at the bargain basement price of 20 bucks!
Rated M
for Mature
Platforms:
- Xbox
- PC
Initial Release Date: Mar 21, 2001
Developer:
- Croteam
Publisher: Gathering
Genres:
