- Publisher: Cenega Publishing
- Release Date: Oct 1, 2004

- Summary:
- Developer: Black Element
- Genre(s): Action Adventure, Horror, Survival
- # of players: 1 Player
- Cheats: On GameFAQs
- More Details and Credits »
Trailer
Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 12
-
Mixed: 6 out of 12
-
Negative: 5 out of 12
-
This game rocks from the opening tutorial to the final credits. Visually, it’s more stunning than nearly anything that released last year and the spooky sounds and kickin’ soundtrack are second to none.
-
While there’s something to be said for giving value for money, I’d have preferred a more tightly paced story; a good handful of levels are just making up the numbers, and Shade would have been so much better for a bit of trim.
-
This game is so boring and annoying that I can’t force myself to play it anymore. Now I’m not going to say this is one of the worst games of the year (I think "Lords of the Realm III" deserves that honor), but as soon as this review is over I’m not going to play it anymore.
-
Shade: Wrath of Angels, is not a good game. It's not a game that I would recommend to anyone. I would recommend Blade of Darkness or even the lackluster Rune, both of which are years old, over Shade in an instant.
-
PC GamerIts generic plot and presentation are so bland, the game's few inventive features are very likely to be lost on most who play it. [Holiday 2004, p.94]
-
If Shade was scrapped and given yet another redesign, the to-do list would be endless - wishy-washy combat, braindead AI, insipid level design, soul-crushing puzzles, a towering stack of bugs.
-
Lack of inspiration and sloppiness are the hallmarks of Shade: Wrath of Angels. Clunky controls, tedious combat, frustrating difficulty, a forgettable hero, a lame story, silly dialogue, monotonous levels, typos, and bugs all add up to a big mess.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 7 out of 11
-
Mixed: 3 out of 11
-
Negative: 1 out of 11
-
Jul 19, 2017This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
-
Jun 8, 2014
-
-
AlanOct 23, 2004
-
-
JamesH.Oct 21, 2004
-
-
Feb 8, 2014
-
-
Jan 24, 2018The game contains too little action, and it is too long game but it has good graphic
-
-
DarrylAug 18, 2005
-