Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1837 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,157 out of 1837
  2. Mixed: 289 out of 1837
  3. Negative: 391 out of 1837
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. meno0_
    Dec 1, 2015
    6
    The game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extraThe game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extra items and boosters to help unlock characters or items. There are so many little and large issues that I can't recommend anyone to buy it at the moment. It's a REALLY fun game, when it works. But it's really infuriating with some of the issues that the developers failed to iron out after the closed, or open beta stages of development.

    Also, f**k ubisoft. You get around 300 renown/match, and you usually don't even get any XP or Renown from matches, due to a really annoying bug, and the ops (characters) start at 500, going up in increments of 500 up to around 2500 (I think.) It takes absolutely forever to unlock all 20 ops at this rate.

    Anyways, the gameplay is great. If they fixed the netcode, and the annoying little bugs, I'm sure it could be a contender for CS:GO.    … Expand
  2. GFGeclipse
    Oct 11, 2017
    7
    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33 playable operators, each with a unique and distinguished special ability, and play alongside four other players in 5v5 multiplayer attack versus defend game modes. Round are respawn-free, meaning if you die, you're out until the next round.
    Multiplayer is where this game is significantly flawed, which on further inspection is a big concern considering that this game is a multiplayer game.
    A reporting functionality does exist, something that is a must have for every multiplayer game, but despite this, it never seems to actually do anything. This is partially due to the consistent influx of hackers that swarm multiplayer games throughout the year, and also down to the fact that users reporting other players don't receive any form of communication on what action was eventually taken on the reported player, if any was taken at all!
    The matchmaking system is inherently flawed, and new players can expect themselves to be paired up with other new players against a team full of people that should be competing for thousands of dollars in the competitive pro league.
    The game is also riddled with bugs and glitches; some of which are addressed, but most of which are described as 'identified by the development team' and no more. So much so that they even skipped a whole DLC to provide a 'season long' (3 months) period of updates exclusively aimed at fixing issues, which was aptly named 'Operation Health'. Many players (including myself) will tell you that although this season fixed many bugs, for every bug that was fixed, another 10+ were introduced.
    It is evident by all of these attempts that Ubisoft are trying to fix this game to a point where it would excel at being a great tactical multiplayer shooter, but seasoned game design veterans like themselves should know that simply trying is not enough to meet today's industry expectation.
    As with most Ubisoft games, they try to emphasize the highly accurate and realistic visual graphics. What actually happened at launch was a terrible mess of broken lighting in nearly every inch of your screen, and textures that simply didn't live up to the expectations that Ubisoft themselves set during their E3 demo.
    As time has gone on, they have got much better, and the next update promises to improve the overall graphical quality of the game, so I have no real basis to fault them on in the graphics department writing today in 2017. Had I been writing this review a year ago, we may have seen a different story being presented.
    Player progression is an aspect of R6: Siege that I often find being misinterpreted by reviewers who haven't explored the game far enough to understand how player progression actually works. Ubisoft offers two versions of the game, the starter edition, and the standard edition. This pricing model allows gamers who aren't completely sold on the game to purchase a cheaper version where they don't instantly start with a large collection of operators (classes) to play with. They can then choose to unlock these operators with in-game currency, which cannot be purchased with real life money. This is a great move by Ubisoft which allows all players, independent of financial capacity, to experience all of the different operators in the game.
    Gameplay mechanics are where Rainbow Six: Siege properly excels. Players can use RC drones with built in cameras to scope out areas of the map before engaging, and many operators have different traps and gadgets to apply a multitude of effects (both positive and negative) to players who happen to stumble across them, ranging from concussion mines to toxic smoke canisters. These mechanics provide a fun and unique playing experience with a map that is dynamically changing throughout the round, promoting players to think on their feet and adapt to the present situation. This plays well into the re-playability of the game; you are almost guaranteed to never have a match that plays out in a predictable scenario that you have experienced before.
    Options menus are where most PC games fall very short of the mark, but R6: Siege is an exception to this. The game features a highly extensive yet immensely intuitive settings screen, and good news for some gamers, the game features out-of-the-box ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio support. The 'Ultra HD texture pack' that they offer, which is more than 20 gigabytes in size, doesn't seem to offer any form of improvement to the graphics unless you're using a fancy Dell 8K monitor, but heavily decreases the frame rate of the game, so unless you want to be the very best, you'll probably want to pass on that option.    … Expand
  3. spigotbush
    Jun 14, 2018
    5
    This game, I wish i could rate it higher. Its not a bad game at its core, the gameplay is solid, the graphics even turned down are good and turned up it looks nice. The weapons are interesting and have plenty of variety and the formula is solid. I have put quite some time into it and sometimes its great.
    The problems come from the community. I dont really have gamer friends so I play    This game, I wish i could rate it higher. Its not a bad game at its core, the gameplay is solid, the graphics even turned down are good and turned up it looks nice. The weapons are interesting and have plenty of variety and the formula is solid. I have put quite some time into it and sometimes its great.
    The problems come from the community. I dont really have gamer friends so I play casual, i have never played a single ranked game. Unfortunately the game is really biased towards groups. It is really clear when you come up against a team who talk and know each other as they just destroy the other team. Which is not a bad thing in itself, but when you are in a team of randoms is is a gamble which rarely pays off. You often end up in games with some of the most obnoxious people you could expect, who abuse the vote kick because they are bored or scream and rant because you didnt do what they wanted. Despite the fact that they never talk about plans, you are just expected to do everything for them. Team kills are rife and i dont mean accidental ones when people just walk into your firing line. Expect to be killed by your own team on 3/5 matches, either for not being telepathic or just for being the first one they see.
    If the game takes a minute to load, because it wont start until the whole player count are fully loaded up and ready (a good thing), then get ready to see a chat full of unnecessary and offensive nonsense.
    The calibre of your random team mates goes downhill drastically when school is out, a clear difference. to the point that i wont play evenings or weekends just because it is not fun.
    Ubisoft seem to take half hearted attempts to stem the toxicity but it makes no difference. For a while they were banning all over the place for toxic behaviour and the game became a nicer place for it, then they let up and its back to being unpleasant again. In my opinion they should be policing the game better in some way, it is a really high profile game and they should be making a point with it.

    if you have a good group of friends then i imagine this game is awesome. The game itself is great, well supported and kept fresh and interesting. If it wasnt for the free reign of trolls and toxicity its would be an 8-9 for me, which i think is a real shame.    … Expand
  4. Indrigis
    Feb 14, 2016
    7
    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game,    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game, motion detection alarms are not an option. It's as if Ubisoft were trying to make Counter-Strike with mutually exclusive classes instead of a proper next gen squad tactical game with customizable loadouts.

    While the maps are decent, they also have an element of luck to them, with some positions being easy to defend and some downright atrocious for any mode, and the position itself being random and not changeable (can't move the hostage/container/bombs). Getting the short end of the stick is never fun.

    And mechanically it's not very fun either. Instead of deployables being placeable via their projected model like in many other games, R6S forces the operator to shuffle back and forth until they magically raise their hands into the 'can deploy' position. It's not realistic, it's deliberately crippled control. Of course, barbed wire, bear traps and whatnot can not be placed on stairs, no, sir. Only on flat surfaces with at least a meter of free space behind them (for the operative to stand when deploying). All the traps, even the mechanical ones, have IFF, e.g. the barbed wire doesn't slow down allies. MAGIC!

    When the game works, it feels good. Yet, most of the time it just feels like "Game1 and Game2 did this so much better" and makes me wish for far more freedom in choosing loadouts and doing things.    … Expand
  5. siera97
    Mar 22, 2018
    5
    I played this game for 40 hours in pvp mode via uplay. I bought starter edition but earlier i played on standard (during free week)

    Gameplay wise this game is great, shooting feels nice, tactical options are giving a nice touch to your usuall run and kill. Thinking is almost as important as good aim. Unfortunatly matchmaking is a joke so at first you will be crushed by veteran    I played this game for 40 hours in pvp mode via uplay. I bought starter edition but earlier i played on standard (during free week)

    Gameplay wise this game is great, shooting feels nice, tactical options are giving a nice touch to your usuall run and kill. Thinking is almost as important as good aim.

    Unfortunatly matchmaking is a joke so at first you will be crushed by veteran players, either high level/rank or smurf accounts. This game is half made of smurf accounts. Strating from lvl 20 you may play rankeds where low ranking players will be much closer to your lvl of skill. This brings another problem as veteran players expect you to know maps etc.

    Toxic comunity is middle name of this game. You gonna be yelled at, and they gonna rage on chat. Occasionally you will be kicked or teamkilled. Its normal. That said there are also nice people in this game, generally based on my experience in Europe, 25% are toxic, 10% are nice, and rest simply doesnt give a **** Playing casual means nothing, they rage all the same.
    Game is also plauged by bugs. Every now and then im throwed out from mm because "The game you are trying to join is full." One day i couldnt play at all because mm wasnt working at all, so i couldnt find a match.

    Netcode and hitboxes are a big flaw too, sometimes it registers hits strangly, you see that you or enemy was aiming in one place and bullets fall in another (im talking about single shoots no recoil included). Sometimes in a death cam i can see that enemy is standing not where i saw him on my screen.

    Game isnt cheap at least by my standards, you buy this game and still have to unlock operatos. I bought starter edition as i dont mean a little grind. Time to unlock one basic op is around 10 hours. On standard edition it is much faster and takes up to one hour.

    As for fixing this game by ubi, I simply dont believe they are able to. Developers are working slowly, which can be a good thing, but they are workign to slowly. Most of bugs i have been experiencing are in this game from begining. When i bought this game about 2 week ago i got 2 free ops instead of 6. I contacted ubi support, but they werent able to fix this. So if they cant fix missing operators i doubt they can fix netcode etc. Most of problems are persent because of using Anvil engine, known from AC series, it doesnt work in multiplayer shooter with destructable objects.

    After considering all of the above i can give 5 out of 10. If all of the problems would be removed we would have 9/10 tactical shooter, sadly i doubt it will ever happen.    … Expand
  6. GalluskY
    Nov 19, 2018
    5
    This game is pleasurable as hell and frustrating in the exact same way. There is these times when you clutch a 1v4-5 and you feel incredibly powerful and then, there is these time when Ubisoft don't want you to play your game.

    The way this game has been designed is awesome, I never played a FPS like this before. One bullet kill (headshot) with every weapon. Map designed to offer an    This game is pleasurable as hell and frustrating in the exact same way. There is these times when you clutch a 1v4-5 and you feel incredibly powerful and then, there is these time when Ubisoft don't want you to play your game.

    The way this game has been designed is awesome, I never played a FPS like this before. One bullet kill (headshot) with every weapon. Map designed to offer an infinity of possibilities with the new operators offered by Ubisoft every 3 months. The gadgets of the operators that allow you to create real strategies for attacking and defending rounds with a good team. And finally, the gunfights are uncredibles.

    And then..... And then... the **** load of "NOT OKAY" things comes to punch you right in the face...

    - But what are these "Things" you're speaking of my dear rager ?
    - Oh, really bruh ? You don't know ? Here is the list :

    Headshots (HS) that are not headshots, in both ways. Someone not aiming the head and doing a HS or you (or your team mates) aiming the head but not doing an HS. Two possibilities, one, the hit regulation is shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit (yeah yeah, this much "i"), second, their servers can't handle this much of players at the same time. Basically, when you aim at the head, you expect your shot to do a nice and smooth headshot right ? Nununununununununu, not with Ubisoft bruh. Just watch and cry cuz there is nothing you can do.

    Then comes the matchmaking. Just to be clear, I'm not speaking about the ranking system (let's not make this list too long as it is already), but the actual system that make you join a game for example. This system is incredibly buggy, it will not allow you to rejoin a ranked game after a connexion issue or even better it will make you join a ranked game after you canceled your matchmaking request. Sometimes you shall not be able to play with your friends cuz the game doesn't want you to create a squad. This system will do everything it can to f**k your sessions with your friends.

    Now let's do a quick window on sync. issues. You know this time when you saw a closed door that was actually opened for the server and you died because it was opened for the enemy as well ? Nope, you don't ? Welcome to R6S.
    But, do you remember this time you launched a ranked game and your game ended up crashing at round 1 ? Nope, you still don't ? Too bad, again, welcome to R6S.

    Last, but not least, the community. OMFG. I thought overwatch had a toxic community. That was before my first game of Siege. You shall see people Team Killing you because you took "their" operators or because you did not do as they wanted it to be. You think it's a small issue ? Sure, no problem. Just try to play two casual games without being insulted or Team Killed.

    Oh, I almost forgot, there is many, sorry, MANY hackers. I guess it's part of the game.... lol

    But to be fair...

    No, just kidding, there is not such thing in R6S.

    On the other end, if you can go over these "things" I'm talking about then its the greatest FPS you may ever play. Hope this can help.

    This game is amazing and awfull at the same time, so I thought 5 was a good grade.

    Peace.    … Expand
  7. Dobian
    Apr 11, 2016
    6
    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven Shield and the series just got better. Then it started to go downhill, with future iterations like Lockdown lacking the depth and quality of their predecessors. So along comes Siege and on one level it not only meets but exceeds the game mechanics of previous Rainbow Six titles in a big way. But on another level it falls way short, simply because UbiSoft's emphasis is on drawing in the multiplayer crowd (i.e., young console gamers). So there is no single player campaign, you have no bots to manage, no planning phase. There is minimal support for co-op. You can't control mission parameters like the time limit, number of enemies, map, mission type, number of rounds. You simply get a random map with a random mission type for whatever your chosen difficulty is. There is also no map editor so you must make do with the official maps provided. So on the whole, the game has very little content for gamers who are interested in the core RS experience established in games like Raven Shield and Rogue Spear. Rainbow Six has always had multiplayer pvp, but the heart of the series has always been tactical cooperative mission planning and execution.

    The gameplay itself is great. There are many large and well-designed maps. The graphics and animations are terrific. The shooting mechanics are fine, and the characters you can unlock have a lot of neat tricks they can do, from breaching charges to emp grenades. Using the destructible environments to create new sight lines or entrances is great fun. The drone is cool and very useful. The downside of the situation missions and terrorist hunts is they sometimes take the "waves of enemies" approach that is more CoD than tactical shooter. And the inclusion of suicide bombers in every mission that are more Jason Vorhees than a human enemy is kind of ridiculous. Still, the action is a lot of fun.

    Another negative for me is the whole cash-grab aspect of this game, with a rewards system that encourages multiplayer players to spend even more money on top of this game's already steep price tag of sixty bucks to get important upgrades quicker. And charging money for things like weapon skins that should have been opened up to the modding community like other games (e.g., Skyrim) do.

    Siege is a good game for what it is, but for me it's not a fully Rainbow Six game, it's more a game for the CoD crowd, just like the new Tomb Raiders are not fully Tomb Raider games, but are more for the Uncharted crowd. Without any real support for single player or co-op, the game ultimately lacks staying power since playing options will diminish as the online community shrinks over time. I expect Siege will end up on a dusty shelf or uninstalled on Steam for most players by the end of the year.    … Expand
  8. Dmitry_B
    Apr 23, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, whichRainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, which have masive impact on gameplay. This is main reason why entry in cybersport arena of this game is too complicated, and thi is why it will be never on same spotlight as Counter Strike: Global Offensive. All this is going this garbage tehnical state, which sometimes will give you so much anger, that you will delete this game after 10 seconds.… Expand
  9. Traslogan
    Aug 24, 2017
    5
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.
    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive,    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.

    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive, but the developers, even during this "operation health" project that they've claimed will improve the game, are never fixing the critical issues that make the game have no incentive for you to even try and play.

    A few examples:
    It takes 10 games to get a rank assigned in Ranked mode. The game rigs the 10 games so you are almost always with randoms and usually other unranked players, but rarely against other unranked players and usually organized teams.
    Upon being ranked, you will be given a poor rank thanks to this even if you perform well (Because the rank system is extremely volatile and even if you get 30 kills, losing is still that punishing), and you will begin waiting 10-15 minutes for a game because it now refuses to put you with anyone other than those at said horrendous ranks, but the game will continue to tell you that you will only wait 1 -2 minutes, and will continue blatantly lying at all times.
    There's no requirements for people to have before playing Ranked, so people jump straight into Ranked and ruin it for everyone else after just learning the keybinds in on game of casual. This is a problem with the community, but it's one that is critical and fixable by the devs.

    The only reason this game hasn't become as horrendous as Counter Strike Global Offensive is because, unlike Valve, they haven't started banning people for complaining on the forums. Yet.    … Expand
  10. juliiouse
    Jan 2, 2017
    7
    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control over the attackers, who spend their time slowly wresting control from the defenders, either through direct confrontation or taking their resources apart.

    The difference between the two teams is striking: the defenders have access to fixed position CCTV that offers a huge amount of visibility in a fixed-- and easily destroyed position-- whilst the attackers have access to drones, which offer mobile visibility but from the level of a small rodent, affording the attackers less direct information but the ability to see any part of the area. The defenders are given time to set traps, put up barricades and attempt to funnel the movements of the attackers into specific chokepoints, whilst the attackers are given flashbangs, explosives and longer range weapons to shoot into the buildings.

    This set up creates a lot of tension, as defenders feel like homeowners experiencing a break in whilst the attacking team feel like unwelcome invaders in a hostile world, which has helped to create one of the most intense multiplayer experiences I've had in a while.

    The slower, more methodical pace required by both sides and reliance on information and teamwork creates a solid experience, but one which requires a few friends and a teamspeak/discord server. Playing which a matchmade team just does not work as well, as many will be averse to using the microphone and so information is not distributed to the team fast enough.

    Graphically, the game is serviceable: weapons tear up scenery, explosions and smoke pop off all around you and lights reflect across the floor as you make your way through the match. This is great, but the graphics can sometimes feel a little flat, which can make distinguishing between the many different operators relatively difficult.

    The audio design is where the game comes into it's own. You will quickly find yourself relying on the various sounds heard throughout the level, from the zipping noise of a rappel to the heavy footed running of an enemy above you locating the objective. All of these instill a sense in more experience players and create some very tense moments: in a recent game I was sprinting toward a hostage when the floor below and wall to the side of me erupted into a hell of bullets as two enemies had picked up my footsteps.

    The destructible environments of the game are top-notch. Walls blow apart, barricades are destroyed and hastily rebuilt and bullets fly through soft surfaces, creating another level to the map design and engagements felt throughout.

    Though the game is not perfect due to difficulties playing when friends are not around and the graphics can make things less clear than they could be, I would still recommend picking this game up in any sale.    … Expand
  11. JanekDelux
    Jul 17, 2021
    5
    This game back in 2016 used to be my favourite. The characters had unique but not overpowered abilities (for the most part). The game had and still has its flaws; like problems with net-code and aim but overall i enjoyed it.
    Until they had decided to remove half of the maps from competitive scene and add characters with abilities like from overwatch. I know they did remake those maps, and    This game back in 2016 used to be my favourite. The characters had unique but not overpowered abilities (for the most part). The game had and still has its flaws; like problems with net-code and aim but overall i enjoyed it.
    Until they had decided to remove half of the maps from competitive scene and add characters with abilities like from overwatch. I know they did remake those maps, and thats good. But the problem is those maps still have same problems they had before remake: like spawnpeeking.

    I don't despise this game, but i think things need to be changed in order to revive its old charm.

    5.6/10    … Expand
  12. Jokerlocco
    Jan 25, 2020
    7
    This analysis is in Spanish (my original language) and in English / Este análisis esta en español (mi idioma nativo) y en inglés con la ayuda del traductor de Google.

    [ENGLISH] Despite being from Ubisoft, I can assure you that this game is very good. If you are a person who likes to play competitively, I recommend it. It is a very realistic game, tactical and strategic, that is, a    This analysis is in Spanish (my original language) and in English / Este análisis esta en español (mi idioma nativo) y en inglés con la ayuda del traductor de Google.

    [ENGLISH]
    Despite being from Ubisoft, I can assure you that this game is very good. If you are a person who likes to play competitively, I recommend it.
    It is a very realistic game, tactical and strategic, that is, a difficult game.
    If you really want to be a professional in this game, it will take you many hours. I, for example, to stop being useless, I had to play 24 hours. But with patience and dedication, you can fall in love with this great title.
    The tension that gives you when playing, is great, and the feeling when winning a round, indescribable.
    Each character has a different ability and that makes it more entertaining. For example, we have one of the Russians, Fuze, who throws numerous grenades into a room through a wall or window. It is very annoying, but for this we have in the opposite team, Jager, which can place in the room, an artifact that eliminates the bombs that enter the room, that is, Fuze is ****
    If you want to unlock new characters without using real money, I must announce that it is very expensive, and needs MANY hours of play.

    In short, I recommend your purchase if you are a patient player and veteran / professional in the shooter.

    PS: To play it I recommend that you have good helmets and good Internet. Another important point to comment, is that I do not recommend buying the "starter edition" version (€ 15), it's not worth it. Buy the normal edition.

    [ESPAÑOL]
    A pesar de ser de Ubisoft, puedo asegurar que este juego es muy bueno. Si eres una persona que le gusta jugar competitivamente, te lo recomiendo. Es un juego muy realista, táctico y estratégico, es decir, un juego difícil.
    Si realmente quieres ser un profesional en este juego, te llevara muchas horas. Yo, por ejemplo, para dejar de ser un inútil, he tenido que jugar 24 horas. Pero con paciencia y dedicación, puedes enamorarte de este grandísimo título.
    La tensión que te otorga al jugar, es magnífica, y la sensación a la hora de ganar una ronda, indescriptible.
    Cada personaje tiene una habilidad distinta y eso lo hace más entretenido. Por ejemplo, tenemos a uno de los rusos, Fuze, el cual lanza numerosas granadas en el interior de una habitación a través de una pared o ventana. Es muy molesto, pero para ello tenemos en el equipo opuesto, a Jager, el cual puede colocar en la habitación, un artefacto que elimina las bombas que entren en la sala, es decir, fastidiaremos a Fuze.
    Si quieres desbloquear a nuevos personajes sin utilizar dinero real, debo advertirte que es muy costoso, y necesitaras MUCHAS horas de juego.

    En fin, recomiendo su compra si eres un jugador paciente y veterano/profesional en los shooter.

    PD: Para jugarlo recomiendo que tengáis unos buenos cascos y buen Internet. Otro punto importante a comentar, es que no recomiendo comprar la versión "starter edition" (15€), no merece la pena. Comprad la edición normal.    … Expand
  13. TheCraftingZomb
    Jun 22, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games.Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games. Unlocking characters and gaining exp will take a very long time and will probably get boring after a while.… Expand
  14. Kakafria
    Nov 22, 2021
    6
    ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃                ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃           
  15. cohlestic
    Dec 11, 2021
    5
    I played this game almost 1.5k hours (my last rank is diamond, before the rank update) and still broken. Bugs, server problems, toxic and racist player are everywhere in this game. I do not recommend this game as hell.
  16. Jackie_Jackson
    May 26, 2022
    7
    Как же хороша некогда была великая сига так же плоха она сейчас и будет становиться ещё хуже и хуже это точно
  17. CustomPhase
    Dec 28, 2015
    5
    Let me clear it out first - the game itself, its moment-to-moment gameplay and features are amazing. I really, really enjoy some moments of it, and i think this game may have huge potencial...
    BUT
    Everything is completely ruined by an awful, i repeat, HORRENDOUSLY AWFUL, tech-side state of the game and its servers. And im not alone here. Seriously, have this game went through multiple    Let me clear it out first - the game itself, its moment-to-moment gameplay and features are amazing. I really, really enjoy some moments of it, and i think this game may have huge potencial...
    BUT
    Everything is completely ruined by an awful, i repeat, HORRENDOUSLY AWFUL, tech-side state of the game and its servers. And im not alone here. Seriously, have this game went through multiple test stages, or they just say so? I dont know how they cold have missed all of these issues. And they are found amongst the majority of players, and you can find those in pretty much any negative review for this game:
    - awful netcode with random delays and discrepancies between what you see and what you actually get, even with 40 hours to actually understand whats going on, and experience everything, that developers **** up.

    In short - dont buy it now. Read reviews later down the update line, 2-3 updates/patches in. See if most of these problems are fixed, and if they are - then go for it, you'll have a lot of fun.    … Expand
  18. lilschreck
    Dec 20, 2015
    7
    -awful hit detection
    -awful lighting and blinding effects (your eyes should naturally adjust to lighting, you don't in this game at all to the point where you should just avoid engaging enemies in areas of different lighting)
    -barely any content. (people that complain about battlefront should play this game) good initial premise of what a tactical shooter should be, but failed to    -awful hit detection
    -awful lighting and blinding effects (your eyes should naturally adjust to lighting, you don't in this game at all to the point where you should just avoid engaging enemies in areas of different lighting)
    -barely any content. (people that complain about battlefront should play this game)

    good initial premise of what a tactical shooter should be, but failed to deliver on critical areas
    I'm a huge fan of tome clancy tactical shooting games, but this was just a disapointment    … Expand
  19. Jaker747
    Oct 5, 2018
    5
    I wanted to like this game. When I saw and tried mechanics and graphics, I was just struck with an indescribable amount of amazingness. But this all became worthless when I played multiplayer. It is whoever has lightning fast reactions wins. Whoever sees the other first wins. It is luck based and biased toward fast people.
  20. HappyPhilXD
    Sep 16, 2017
    5
    So, the game is in Beta since launch (don't miss that beta sign when entering multiplayer) it's still haveing a big ptoblem with hacks they can't detect and the massive netcode problem and pings are all over the place. And then they want you to pay for 2 Season passes for a game in beta.
  21. rustyfeeder
    Dec 3, 2015
    6
    Would not recommend buying this game. It's team focused so you won't be getting max fun when playing alone. Apart from that it may be difficult to find a match. Overall this game does not worth the price tag.
  22. SenshudoTV
    Dec 2, 2015
    7
    Rainbow Six Siege offers a change of pace from your traditional run-and-gun shooters of today, bringing the real experience of teamwork to the table unlike any other game today. Players will be required to think more tactically about how they achieve victory rather just point and shoot. However, the £40 retail price is a little high given that it lacks the well-known Tom Clancy storyRainbow Six Siege offers a change of pace from your traditional run-and-gun shooters of today, bringing the real experience of teamwork to the table unlike any other game today. Players will be required to think more tactically about how they achieve victory rather just point and shoot. However, the £40 retail price is a little high given that it lacks the well-known Tom Clancy story driven experience that core fans enjoy.… Expand
  23. Pipemastersven
    Dec 1, 2015
    7
    Very hardcore and tactical gameplay - quite punishing if you're up against a good team -- picked it up for around 30USD - so not fussed about value for money;
    A bit of a shame that there is no story line and multiple loadouts -- def. not worth $60+ like some people are paying
  24. acidkill
    Dec 6, 2015
    7
    i'm a big rainbow six fan been waiting for this game a long time but have to say it not really what i was hoping terorist hunt is more a trukey shoot with enemys that just keep comming it more a fps shooter then a tactical game good thing is i got vegas for free a that's a much better game that this a big big shame !!!!!!!!!
  25. gordonbays
    Jan 19, 2016
    5
    Polished game but lack the essence of great fps games. The "maps" are very small and the gameplay is fast paced, not really addicting game. There is much room to learn from suceess games like CS.
  26. Mjr_REAPER
    Dec 18, 2016
    6
    The game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damageThe game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damage floors and ceilings is very limited, the system DLC gives to be desired a lot of things every year new season pass Ubisoft seriously. Although the DLC is free, we can use the currency in the game to unlock new operators, however, the price of each operator is set so that the player took x hours forcing it to buy season pass that guarantees instant access to operators.… Expand
  27. ememong
    Feb 17, 2019
    6
    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта прекрасная солянка приправлена уксусом, в виде огромного количества багов, постоянных вылетов серверов, плохой оптимизации и многого другого. Просто невозможно понять, как могут быть настолько разносторонние баги. Если ошибки механик (которых очень много, и они действительно мешают играть) еще допустимы (хоть и не в таком количестве), то такие баги, как снятие очков рейтинга за победу или пропажа вещей после открытия лутбокса, это необъяснимо. Да я даже за некоторых оперативников не могу играть теперь, например за Blitz, это опер. с щитом, которого я люблю всем сердцем, но мне пришлось его отпустить, потому что его щит теперь пропускает пули, опять же из-за багов.
    Ладно бы данные ошибки фиксили, но нет, лучше выпускать новых оперативников, новые карты, которые несут еще больше багов!
    Аналогов данной игры я найти не могу, поэтому и до сих пор в нее играю, и искренне надеюсь, что UBISOFT когда-нибудь да возьмутся за голову, а пока, очень плохо.    … Expand
  28. KITR
    Jul 15, 2019
    5
    Bad game. Well, actually not that bad, but community, updates, new characters, just not good. But it's fun to play, This game can actually entertain you. You can find fun here. It's hard, but possible
  29. sscott0829tw
    Dec 1, 2015
    7
    A good FPS online game,the maps are really well designed,every maps offers lots of ways for players to go,enemy can come from all directions.It looks like a pro version of Counter Strike.Multiplayer and terrorist hunt are fun and challenging,the AI has improved a lot from the beta.And Ubisoft said that there will be a lot of free DLC.But the game really need a single player campaign,everyA good FPS online game,the maps are really well designed,every maps offers lots of ways for players to go,enemy can come from all directions.It looks like a pro version of Counter Strike.Multiplayer and terrorist hunt are fun and challenging,the AI has improved a lot from the beta.And Ubisoft said that there will be a lot of free DLC.But the game really need a single player campaign,every rainbow 6 has a campaign...And the server is pretty bad,ran into loading bugs or lagging problems sometimes.Love all the operators in the game,each of it is unique and have cook gadgets,make everyone in the team really have something to do.Best destrucible environment in gaming I have ever seen.In it's current state,this game is lack of content for sure,needs more mode,more maps and more weapons,.Hope that they can come up with new DLC soon.… Expand
  30. Korisana
    Dec 4, 2015
    6
    R6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommendR6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommend holding off until you can get this at a price point under $40.… Expand
  31. Hackerbee
    Mar 13, 2018
    6
    Man has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but itMan has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but it is probably one of the single best multiplayer fps games ever made now, it looses points due to Ubisoft botching the launch and taking 2 years to get their **** together with this game, and 2 more points for launching without anticheat back in the day. but it is a great game now and @ 20$ for the starter edition well worth your money if you like team based fps games.

    Old review from when the game first came out:

    This game gets a 2 for only after a year getting a real anticheat (Battle eye), and for the incredible destructibility that the environments in the game offer. albeit to late to make this game what it could have been.
    The game has way to much interp, and has a very real problem with people exploiting the **** netcode and ping advantage afforded by this.
    This game had the potential to have over throne CSGO as the big competitive shooter, but languished in Ubisofts incompetent hands, game breaking bug after game breaking bug fixed and then introduced by Ubisoft, and day one issues that continue to plague this game to this day. most glaring of which is the **** netcode, and broken matchmaker that can leave you sitting in queue for upwards of 40 mins, in some cases in ranked. it completely kills the momentum of the game, but that is not even what really killed this game, no its death came early right at launch when this game was left with no anticheat what so ever for at least 3 months before "Fairfight" came, and even then it was highly ineffectual to the point that the game became unplayable due to the amount of rampaging wallhackers in the community. only after the introduction of Battleeye did the game really show its true potential, while still being hamstrung by **** netcode and broken matchmaker. This game is a prime example of how a big name Developer can absolutely destroy a great idea.    … Expand
  32. kingog
    Dec 2, 2016
    6
    The Game is okay, but this Dlc´s System not, Season Pass 2 ?!?!?! wtf is going on, i paid for an game that has 2 game modes (Locker-Ranked)an F2P has more Modes than this, and now they will bring season pass 2 ?! i thought they will make the GAME BIGGER, with Team- Deathmatch etc...... but one mode for an paid game is poor.....
  33. JohnConnor333
    Dec 1, 2015
    5
    Not to minimize the rediculous "0" ratings, teh fact that this game is getting 10's is just as much of a joke. The game is not currently playable online, consistent disconnects. 10's must be coming from ubisoft, what a joke. I own this game - got it 'free' with buyin a gtx 970. From the 5 hours I played, graphics are last gen, gameplay can be great if servers beef up, and not worthNot to minimize the rediculous "0" ratings, teh fact that this game is getting 10's is just as much of a joke. The game is not currently playable online, consistent disconnects. 10's must be coming from ubisoft, what a joke. I own this game - got it 'free' with buyin a gtx 970. From the 5 hours I played, graphics are last gen, gameplay can be great if servers beef up, and not worth $60 price for online only. If a game is online only - no campaign, it has to show why it justifies the price for limited options.… Expand
  34. Tenchu13
    Dec 2, 2015
    6
    It does what it says it will, but only that. The game while excellent, doesn't deserve a full price tagit is only a single multiplayer mode, which would be one of many in other full price games. at 2/3 to 1/2 of its asking price it would be an instant buy. There is also no single player.
  35. youlouz
    Jan 2, 2016
    7
    The game is pretty good
    PROS
    -Great graphics
    -Nice controls
    - Fun gameplay

    CONS
    -Extremely frustrating campaign
    -Multiplayer can be challenging .
  36. Meshuggener
    Jan 1, 2016
    6
    Descent game but NO SQUAD in single player!!! i paid full price for this game.This game is not bad
    but because of that it's not worth more than 30 bucks in my opinion.I prefer COD, Battlefield etc for Multiplayer.
  37. xKindred
    Feb 19, 2016
    7
    An entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to theAn entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to the console version. Given its triple-A release price and prestigious series history, Siege has a lot to live up to, but its inevitable repetition leaves more to be desired. Nevertheless, Siege is a laugh to play with friends & unlocking the many operators & accessories feels progressive as well as rewarding.… Expand
  38. ULTRA_MARIO_10
    Aug 7, 2016
    7
    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story- There's no campaign in the game Presentation- 6/10 Ok but nothing mind blowing. Graphics-5.4/10 The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre Sound/Music-7/10 The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game. Options-7.1/10 There is    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story-
    There's no campaign in the game

    Presentation- 6/10
    Ok but nothing mind blowing.

    Graphics-5.4/10
    The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre

    Sound/Music-7/10
    The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game.

    Options-7.1/10
    There is a good amount of options in this game you could change up like the graphics and the monitor you want the game to run in.

    Online functionality-7.9/10
    It's actually pretty good, you can make your own game or join a casual game or a ranked game when you reach level 20.

    Gameplay- 8/10
    It's a pretty fun game with explosions and rappels but I don't like how there's not team deathmatch or capture the flag
    and no campaign but it is pretty fun if you're good at online FPS games.

    Lasting appeal-6/10
    Meh... It's not a game I would play most of the time

    Verdict- Adding up everything that this game has, I think i'm pretty fair at giving it a...

    7/10.(Good)    … Expand
  39. Tcore999
    Dec 9, 2015
    5
    Great game in theory. Hit markers should not be in Rainbow Six. Made it really arcade feeling. PC movement is great. Got it on XBOX one as a gift. Really clunky and snappy on controller. Disappointed because of the many error codes, connection issues, and lack of customer support by UbiSoft. No campaign and really not worth $60 for the 8 maps you get. Very limited in game play. ThoughGreat game in theory. Hit markers should not be in Rainbow Six. Made it really arcade feeling. PC movement is great. Got it on XBOX one as a gift. Really clunky and snappy on controller. Disappointed because of the many error codes, connection issues, and lack of customer support by UbiSoft. No campaign and really not worth $60 for the 8 maps you get. Very limited in game play. Though there are 100's of ways to defeat your opponents. Buy at your own risk.… Expand
  40. objectivelytrue
    Dec 10, 2015
    6
    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game experience. Loading -> The matches are short and every match has a loading period before and after, as well as a one minute setup phase that gets old very quickly. Latency is extremely high, I frequently cannot edge around corners and shoot someone reliably because I don't receive a server packet until i've already been shot.

    A short lived multiplayer game, priced way beyond it's worth, with your typical competitive douchebag community. I wouldn't recommend it.    … Expand
  41. Star_Wolf
    Jul 11, 2016
    6
    I had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destructionI had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destruction (pfft, even indi game DUE PROCESS did better in ALPHA). I'm upset. Played it for 10 hours and forgot about even buying it… Expand
  42. LordZ_
    May 30, 2016
    5
    Good looking game, but multiplayer is not that fun because net code is in beta ... and take an hour to have a game
    There's no real solo campain and no coop (only bot).
    Well if u like Rainbow SIX stuff don't buy it.
  43. User28190895
    Apr 24, 2018
    6
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six® Siege isn't without its fair share of problems, infact it has alot of problems as far as I can tell. It mixes the two in a somewhat great brew that, with enough polish, can only become better and better if they keep getting their cards right.
  44. hspreg
    Jan 9, 2020
    6
    The game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... IThe game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... I maximized my personal skills in thousands of hours, like map knowledge, accuracy, response time, but the game mechanics don't let me develop further. So confusing...… Expand
  45. Membean1
    Jun 4, 2020
    5
    Rainbow six has been a long time favorite, but the bugs have gotten the best of me.
  46. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    6
    not bad game, but not good either. The multiplayer is really miss & match, visual is decent, and the voice is also decent
  47. Sesshomurai
    Aug 29, 2017
    7
    As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation?As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation? styling? What was once great about R6 was it put YOU in the role of R6 spec ops. YOU were calling the shots. YOU were leading your team. YOU were making the story. Not this minimap mayhem shootfest. And what is with these shields? The whole beauty of R6 is they are stealth. Not stand your ground behind a blast shield in a force-on-force shoot-em-up......what is this?… Expand
  48. BestNoob
    Feb 18, 2020
    5
    Es macht Spaß, aber es zerstört auch Leben...

    Das Matchmaking (Competitive Ranked) kann man komplett vergessen, Spieler mit 500H Spielzeit werden gegen Spieler mit unter 100 Stunden ins Ranglistenspiel geworfen. Es spielt keine Rolle wie gut du bist Up/Down Ranks gibt es nur für Win/Lose. Skill zählt kaum, da das Spiel extrem Lag/Latenz anfällig ist, es kommt öfters vor, dass Kugeln    Es macht Spaß, aber es zerstört auch Leben...

    Das Matchmaking (Competitive Ranked) kann man komplett vergessen, Spieler mit 500H Spielzeit werden gegen Spieler mit unter 100 Stunden ins Ranglistenspiel geworfen. Es spielt keine Rolle wie gut du bist Up/Down Ranks gibt es nur für Win/Lose.

    Skill zählt kaum, da das Spiel extrem Lag/Latenz anfällig ist, es kommt öfters vor, dass Kugeln nicht treffen oder ein Gegner einen vorher sieht, aus dem Grund sind auch immer die mit den High Pings, die die am meisten Kills haben.

    Dann gibt es noch einen Haufen Trolle, Saboteure, Team Killer, Cheater,
    High Pings, schlechte Performance, die das Spielgeschehen trüben, gerade zu Free Weekends und Sales ist es unmöglich ordentlich zu spielen.

    Das Game .. ist Geld & Zeitverschwendung.
    Nur als Full 5er Team macht es Sinn und Spaß dieses Spiel zu spielen.    … Expand
  49. DemKin
    Aug 25, 2021
    7
    The game has strong points but I find myself not able to play for more than 20 hrs periods. The destructive environments and numerous characters with their own gimmicks make for a fresh competitive FPS experience, where there are many ways to defend a site.
    However my experience is tarnished mainly by the technical shortcomings, among other things. The lag is very high for a game of this    The game has strong points but I find myself not able to play for more than 20 hrs periods. The destructive environments and numerous characters with their own gimmicks make for a fresh competitive FPS experience, where there are many ways to defend a site.
    However my experience is tarnished mainly by the technical shortcomings, among other things. The lag is very high for a game of this genre, oftentimes you get shot from someone who isn't even appearing in your screen or just very briefly appearing, while on his he had turned the corner for a good half a second to a full second.
    So much visual confusion, little details everywhere, and 90 different angles from which the ennemy can defend or approach a room (breakable ceilings/floors/walls, furniture, corners, windows...), make for a very, very steep learning curve, aswell as the sprawling maps that even 50 hours of play won't allow you to know well a single one. Oftentimes the character models are barely visible against the background too.
    Learning curve made steeper by the fact the game is quick to catapult you with players who actually know it well. While you start playing with noobs like you, which is quite enjoyable, after you start getting a few frags, you'll rapidly end up matching up with seasonned players, after that it's mainly getting spawnkilled and killed from angles you didn't know existed.
    Last but not least, the community's toxicity is ever present. Very rarely a single game without insults, flaming, trolling, griefing, TKs. The game I hear has a cheating problem aswell, but I only saw one very obvious one who didn't care to hide it, accompanied by his pal who kept insulting everyone who was accusing him. Considering my level, I can't really tell someone who's cheating from a good player.

    So a game you should be playing with friends really. Should make the experience so much more enjoyable than mine, who couldn't get my friends to hop on it.    … Expand
  50. mevsthevoices
    Feb 29, 2016
    5
    Improves on nothing over previous installments, fails as a shooter. The idea that this has anything to do with tactics is pretty laughable. Give me back Rainbow Six Vegas 1/2 anyday, much more solid games
  51. jgr94
    Mar 26, 2016
    7
    Don't let the reviews fool you (This is just the classic AAA title bashing).
    The gameplay is so f**king addicting. Best fun I have had in a FPS in a long time!
  52. Statutory
    Sep 27, 2021
    6
    Finally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games likeFinally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games like this.

    2021 Edit: Yeah, I gave a 10 to this game back in 2015. But after a lot of DLCs that has nothing to do with the original core of the game, which was something more realistic and serious, it just got meh. Looks like the new operators came from a Disney's agent movie or something (I love Disney) and it looks more like a Fortnite for young adults game nowadays.    … Expand
  53. The_BlueRose
    Feb 6, 2017
    7
    Good strategic-shooter game.

    Graphically can be improved.

    The operators are original but some of them have useless gadgets.

    The game requieres lot of hours to know every spot and camera locations, wich makes it a noob-unfriendly game and frustrating new players.
  54. JazzTheMan
    Feb 5, 2016
    7
    The game has a good concept, a medium delivery, and a good core, but it doesn't meet most expectations. The game was better during the E3 Demo, hence when you buy the game, everything is more limited than shown in the gameplay demo. Long story short: Good Concept, and Medium Standard, but could've been a lot better than it's given potential. Medium wedge on the 60$ Value.
  55. Robinjhoe
    Feb 6, 2016
    5
    It is a shooter. And it is not the typical Rainbow Six. But for a Game it is quite good.

    The Problem is, that it has the Ambition to be a skillful tactic shooter, what actually happens the most time however is pure luck. In your typical 5 vs 5 Game everything is important. Your position, the position of Gadgets, the Gadgets itself ( so which Operator you chose). But ultimately its just    It is a shooter. And it is not the typical Rainbow Six. But for a Game it is quite good.

    The Problem is, that it has the Ambition to be a skillful tactic shooter, what actually happens the most time however is pure luck. In your typical 5 vs 5 Game everything is important. Your position, the position of Gadgets, the Gadgets itself ( so which Operator you chose). But ultimately its just pure luck. I have seen people randomly shooting through walls and giving you a headshot. People who throw grenades or c4 randomly somewhere and killing you. But that is not a Problem of the Game.

    Because the Game itself has been improved a bit. But still. Loading Bugs. One Person is on the Desktop while loading and everyone is stuck in the loading screen. Matchmaking is awful. Either you are alone or in a full squad or you can wait forever to get into a Game. Very much glitching through walls while lying on the ground and getting shot through an indestructible Wall. Holes that arent holes and you thow a grenade against an invisible Wall.

    And finally. It is kind of true. It is not as casual as CoD or Battlefield. Which doesnt mean that People are prevented from that Gameplay. It happens a lot, that Defenders just screw at everything run out and either shoot you at your spawn or run towards you outside and shoot everyone because no one saw that coming. And then claim they got an Ace and we are noobs. And what is their penalty? Being constantly spotted. Thats all. Instead of giving them 10 seconds and the will be killed, no they are spotted and thats it.

    Or even better. My Squad is playing a lot of this game. We are playing it every Day and still have fun even if it is kind of repetitive. But the most unbelievable thing that happens, is that there are still Trolls that shoot their own teammates at spawn. Or better the whole team is fighting and insult each other leading to even more teamkills. ( was a funny Game though)

    All in all, the game sure has its moments. But the fact that it is a casual version of Rainbow Six, the lack of Game modes and the kind of irritating Gameplay decisions are often annoying. And of course dont forget Uplay. A fun but average Shooter.    … Expand
  56. crypticturtle
    Mar 8, 2016
    7
    A fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it isA fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it is worth the 20-30 US dollar range.… Expand
  57. REEDDLES
    Nov 30, 2020
    6
    В siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тотВ siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тот заходит потестить новыи патч. Бесит, что удалают дальние прицелы, лутше бы разброс немного увиличивали имбовым стволам. Звук в игре просто отвратительный, у меня звукавуха creative ae-9 и наушники hyperx alpha s и временами не слышу врага за углом в 2-3 метрах когда он бежит ко мне и много ещо других пробем со звуком.… Expand
  58. ihateubisoft
    Dec 21, 2016
    5
    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like: It is really, really bugged as hell laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40) it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed. It kinda sucks for beginners. Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that. Even    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like:

    It is really, really bugged as hell
    laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40)
    it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed.

    It kinda sucks for beginners.
    Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that.
    Even with Singeplayer Tut.
    This game could be so much, but Ubisoft just ruined it by hosting ****ty servers.    … Expand
  59. Flipmails
    Apr 10, 2017
    6
    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes. The level design is pretty damn good,    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes.

    The level design is pretty damn good, with blind spots usually containing breakeable walls/windows that disencourage enemies from camping. At the same time, because deaths come so fast, rushing through the map in an attempt to achieve the highest possible body count is also a terrible idea.

    Another interasting feature present in the game are the cameras and drones. The cameras allow the defending team to spot enemies and mark their location on the map, which helps to alleviate the lack of minimap, something that wouldn't fit what this game is trying to do anyway. Meanwhile, the drones give the attackers a safe way to see if there are any enemies ahead without exposing themselves to danger.

    Teamworking is also an important part of the game but that also has its fair share of problems. For starters, at least in the casual mode, there is no punishment for quiting in the middle of a match, usually resulting in numeric disadvantage that can end up in a round loss that could otherwise be reasonable avoided. A 20 minute ban for quiting would have been a simple and efficient solution since players that had something urgent to do would not be overly punished for leaving the game, while the ones who exited just because they felt like it would be forced to sit in the corner doing nothing for almost half an hour. Balancing is also another issue as it is not uncommon to have a level 20 player in the same team as a guy that has played the game for 200 hours.

    Had the the balancing and quiting being the only problems present in this product I would not have given it such a mediocre score, so let's get to the bigger factors preventing this from being a great video game.

    Now, I wouldn't mind microtransactions if they were only applied to cosmetics but that is obviously not the case. There are 28 unlockable operators in this game and their price varies from 12500 to 25000 points, which means that if you are not willing to put extra money into the game you will have to play for at least 700 hours in the best case scenario. And keep in mind that the only operator that can be selected by more than 1 player is the recruit, who also happens to be the most useless class in the game. So if you want to have a good time with your buddies who just bought the game you may as well just go play something else. Even for a $15 dollar game I find this absolutely outrageous.

    However, what kills the game for me are technical issues that I don't seem to have any control over. For some god forsaken reason I will suddenly go backwards 5 meters while I am reading to the objective, or maybe the game will freeze for about 3 seconds even though my ping is at 80. Speaking of ping, what is up with the random connection spikes? I swear to god the game sometimes jumps from 60 to 3000 for no apparent reason.

    All in all Rainbow Six SIege is refreshing FPS that rewards thought, planning and strategy more than quick reflexes and good aim. Unfortunately said game is hindered by technical issues and an abusive microtransaction system. Oh, I almost forgot, it also requires the installation of Uplay.    … Expand
  60. WoW1
    May 27, 2020
    5
    Rainbow Six Siege - это Overwatch, для тех, кто предпочитает "туц-туц", вместо "пиу-пиу".
    Дома, по всей видимости, строят, либо из пенопласта, либо из бетона. Даже те, что из дерева. А детские кровати из пуленепробиваемых пластин. Снаряжение намертво прибито к оперативнику. Ты не можешь испытать закрытого оперативника.Ты не можешь переместить, защищаемого заложника. Даже, если у тебя    Rainbow Six Siege - это Overwatch, для тех, кто предпочитает "туц-туц", вместо "пиу-пиу".
    Дома, по всей видимости, строят, либо из пенопласта, либо из бетона. Даже те, что из дерева. А детские кровати из пуленепробиваемых пластин. Снаряжение намертво прибито к оперативнику. Ты не можешь испытать закрытого оперативника.Ты не можешь переместить, защищаемого заложника. Даже, если у тебя кончились патроны, ты не сможешь подобрать оружие.
    К этой игре можно было бы относиться серьёзно, если бы карты были процедурно-генерируемые. В таком случае геймплей не сводился бы к заучиванию карт.
    Глушитель не делает выстрел бесшумным, совсем. Откуда басовые частоты в звуке выстрела?
    Логика, реализм, ИИ (в описании игры указана "сингл-плеер") - никогда не слышал об этом.
    Микротранзакции...

    ПС:Если хотите реализма лучше обратите внимание на Insurgency: Sandstorm.
    -----------------------------------
    Rainbow Six Siege is an Overwatch for those who prefer the tuts-tuts instead of pi-piu.
    Apparently, houses are being built either from polystyrene foam or from concrete. Even those made of wood. And children's beds are made of bulletproof plates. Equipment tightly nailed to the operators. You cannot experience a closed operator. You cannot relocate a protected hostage. Even if you run out of ammo, you won’t be able to pick up a weapon.
    This game could be taken seriously if the cards were procedurally generated. In this case, the gameplay would not come down to memorizing cards.
    The silencer does not make the shot silent, at all. Where did the bass frequencies come from in the sound of the shot?
    Logic, realism, AI ("single player" is indicated in the description of the game) - I never heard of this.
    Microtransactions...

    PS: If you want realism, better pay attention to Insurgency: Sandstorm.    … Expand
  61. Kvantaliani03
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  62. RazorSamurai
    Jan 11, 2019
    5
    Казуальное дерьмицо, лгбт параша, псевдохардкорная игра для 12 летних девочек, донатная хуйня, гриндилка ебучая, скучная поебота, хуевый геймплей и комьюнити токсиков дауничей. (В КСГО они есть но они не могут тебе никак помешать игре, в радуге можно легко помешать челику нормально играть и не быть забаненным, а написав слово негр можно отлететь нахуй)
    Платина 3.    Казуальное дерьмицо, лгбт параша, псевдохардкорная игра для 12 летних девочек, донатная хуйня, гриндилка ебучая, скучная поебота, хуевый геймплей и комьюнити токсиков дауничей. (В КСГО они есть но они не могут тебе никак помешать игре, в радуге можно легко помешать челику нормально играть и не быть забаненным, а написав слово негр можно отлететь нахуй)
    Платина 3.
  63. Macbaine
    Mar 3, 2019
    5
    realy good game when you play but
    im a coop player... realy hard to find a group,
    is possible to play alone but is realy ... realy ... realy hard ... not possible for every one

    microtransaction a lot and realy expensif
    exp and money in game too slow when you play coop and you dont progress if you play alone
  64. Ammonium
    Feb 9, 2021
    6
    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game. Not even in 20 years of playing CS. You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed. Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game.
    Not even in 20 years of playing CS.

    You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed.
    Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and listen to all sorts of ****
    People that just grief the entire match.
    Good example join a match there is a 4stack then be prepared to get reported and team killed and that they throw the match.

    Like i said the game itself is not bad but the community destroys the fun of it completely.    … Expand
  65. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    7
    누군가에게는 레인보우식스 프랜차이즈의 몰락일 수도 있지만 누군가에게는 산소호흡기 역활일 수도 있다는 점. 대테러 컨셉을 가진 하드코어FPS중에 손꼽히게 흥하고 있다는건 분명히 좋은 게임이라는 의미.
  66. effectcre
    Nov 13, 2020
    7
    Fantastic system, charming character, funny map design, but too many hacks and glitching.
  67. Shtern
    Jul 3, 2020
    5
    Игра существует уже очень долго, но проблемы игры не рашаются и по сей день.
    Хорошая сорвеновательная игра, я бы даже сказал лучшая, но как для меня, это просто очередной шутер, потому что, удовольствие можно получать играя тока с друзьями/командой иначе никак вообще. Мне не повезло иметь группу людей, которая бы со мной играла в эту замечательную игру,.
    Проблем у игры очень много, от    Игра существует уже очень долго, но проблемы игры не рашаются и по сей день.
    Хорошая сорвеновательная игра, я бы даже сказал лучшая, но как для меня, это просто очередной шутер, потому что, удовольствие можно получать играя тока с друзьями/командой иначе никак вообще. Мне не повезло иметь группу людей, которая бы со мной играла в эту замечательную игру,.
    Проблем у игры очень много, от вечно лагающих дисикнкающих серверов, до банального читерства и смехотворной цены за игру, что позволяет этим читерам существовать.
    Мачмейкинг который в бетте наверное до самого конца существования игры будет, потому что я не могу по другому написать, ибо когда ты ищешь игру сам, почему то игра считает своей обязаностью кинуть против тебя команду из 5 человек, в то время как в твоей команде все играют соло/два человека.
    Вообщем бессмысленная трата денег и времени, если у вас заведома нет Команды/Друзей с которыми вы в 45 сможете играть и железных нервов от вечно тупящих серверов.    … Expand
  68. ZubriQ
    Mar 15, 2020
    7
    It's a solid 7. This game could have been better if not those latencies in the game... If you has ping 70 then guys literally dwell in the future and you get killed by a void from dark world of oblivion. Or the situation that happened to me. I was not visible and the enemy just aimed at this point where I was supposed to be. And before going to another spot, he merely, blithely,It's a solid 7. This game could have been better if not those latencies in the game... If you has ping 70 then guys literally dwell in the future and you get killed by a void from dark world of oblivion. Or the situation that happened to me. I was not visible and the enemy just aimed at this point where I was supposed to be. And before going to another spot, he merely, blithely, half-heartedly shot only once to where my body wasn't visible. Thus, my skull was torn to shreds, and I died with sardonic emotions. Fortunately, the price does not bite too much.… Expand
  69. Sanghelic
    May 23, 2020
    6
    personalmente se me hizo aburrido, es muy tactico lo cual lo hace bastante divertio, sobre todo para jugar con amigos, pero no es mi tipo de juego, sobre todo porque no me gustan los juegos que tienen un meta muy muy establecido y tiene ya 20000 personajes que desbloquear (o comprar) cuando tu apenas tienes 1
  70. Hellanger
    Dec 29, 2021
    5
    From a serious game that everyone loved so much, nothing remained, the game more and more resembles Fortnite, again Ubisoft is doing everything to make normal players leave and stupid children come.
  71. pur__0_0__
    Mar 22, 2021
    6
    After having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in TeamAfter having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch since they are class-based characters but there's no reason here). There are a lot of smurf accounts that abuse us for not playing on their level (even though we are in the Newcomers level), and there is no way to report such players.

    In terms of visual appeal this game is great. There are also a large number of maps to choose from, which makes this game look like it had a lot more potential. There are also plenty of characters to choose from. Though it lacks a campaign mode, it makes up for it with Challenges (which are also very difficult for new players). So overall I'd say it's a gorgeous looking game ruined by its bad controls and community.    … Expand
  72. 2I2l1a
    May 1, 2022
    5
    Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators and engage in tangible sieges, a new style of assault in which enemies have the means to transformTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators and engage in tangible sieges, a new style of assault in which enemies have the means to transform their environments into modern strongholds while Rainbow Six teams lead the assault to breach the enemy’s position.… Expand
  73. tommydlbass
    Aug 16, 2020
    6
    Good game that turned into **** by the community and the p2w characters that are much better and useful than the "free" ones. I love the strategy that this game offers but I don't understand why the kill a team mate is activated and why the community is so toxic. Don't buy this game.
  74. GlocktorSeuss
    Jul 13, 2020
    5
    The main problem with R6 is that it's extremely difficult to get into now that other players have become so good at it. While games like CSGO and Rainbow Six Siege competitive at heart, Rainbow Six Siege is on another level. CSGO's main skill is aiming, while R6 has so many elements and new things to master. It's an well-crafted but extremely frustrating game.
  75. pan1ni
    Jul 20, 2020
    6
    I have a love relationship with this game even though i love its core gameplay the balencing is often broken and hit reg and glitches are comon, hackers have been a recent big problem and balancing maps and operators usaly takes way too long if i where you i would rather put your time in competive shooters that are functioning to be fair
  76. gorillareviews
    Sep 13, 2020
    7
    Oooh Ah ah game good, nice for smart ape like me OOohhh ahh. 7 because no ape and no banaan
  77. Killiomadness
    Aug 7, 2020
    7
    I honestly have mix emotions with this game it’s fun but also not fun it’s unbalanced and some of the event is garbage good ideas just garbage to be fair I love this game but also hate this game
  78. xFlyaway02
    Nov 15, 2020
    7
    All in all it's a good Game BUT, all the Head glitching makes me wanna kill Ubisoft
  79. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  80. Virr
    Dec 15, 2020
    6
    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или посмеяться в компании.

    6/10 от меня

    The game is good, BUT ... The sound is terrible. for a shooter, sound positioning is extremely important. here - it's some kind of random. very bad optimization. Of course, you can make a discount on the old engine, but the game was updated (and the last patch was completely full client re-download) ... animation bugs, cheaters, random ... everything is here.
    can be a good option for a group of 5 people - to get burned or laugh in the company.

    6/10 from me    … Expand
  81. f0v3r
    Dec 29, 2020
    7
    I'm writing this review in December of 2020 and it's honestly sad that the game is getting worse and worse every update. After 4 years of playing this game pretty much every day, I just have no interest in playing this game anymore. It's obviously not what was promised on the trailers but who cares at this point? The game was a success because of the esports scene and unique gameplay butI'm writing this review in December of 2020 and it's honestly sad that the game is getting worse and worse every update. After 4 years of playing this game pretty much every day, I just have no interest in playing this game anymore. It's obviously not what was promised on the trailers but who cares at this point? The game was a success because of the esports scene and unique gameplay but now everything has gone to sh*t.… Expand
  82. GreenPufferFish
    Aug 20, 2021
    7
    Fun game like csgo buy kinda needs a team deathmatch mode.More weapons and slightly pay to win but over all fun
  83. Asandberg
    Feb 28, 2021
    6
    It's a first person shooter, like csgo but its actually innovative and requires some brain usage to play. But the lack of content and repetitiveness makes it a boring game.
  84. Hot_Smurf
    Apr 25, 2021
    7
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a staple of esports FPS titles. Nerve-rackingly complex because of how much the map can change every round. I sunk more than 900 hours into R6 and it is still enjoyable. However, Ubisoft has a long history of making the game unplayable for long periods of time, for example when the add Ela. If you don't play with friends, then the game gets boringTom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a staple of esports FPS titles. Nerve-rackingly complex because of how much the map can change every round. I sunk more than 900 hours into R6 and it is still enjoyable. However, Ubisoft has a long history of making the game unplayable for long periods of time, for example when the add Ela. If you don't play with friends, then the game gets boring extremely quickly. A welcome change of pace from games like Call of Duty.

    7/10    … Expand
  85. 1pengu
    May 3, 2021
    7
    4k hours with this games. I hate it, server issues, toxic players, stupid newbie buy account and go play ranked.
  86. TheSikvel
    Sep 28, 2021
    7
    Perhaps the best tactical shooter of our time ... at least it was. Updates, although they introduce important tactical diversity, are often accompanied by bugs (such as DDOS attacks on consoles and the inability to log into the game on PC). There are not many cheaters, even if they meet, they are quickly banned and the rating returns. In general, a great game, which is spoiled by stupidPerhaps the best tactical shooter of our time ... at least it was. Updates, although they introduce important tactical diversity, are often accompanied by bugs (such as DDOS attacks on consoles and the inability to log into the game on PC). There are not many cheaters, even if they meet, they are quickly banned and the rating returns. In general, a great game, which is spoiled by stupid decisions of the developers and the curve of the implementation of good ideas.… Expand
  87. Bottie
    Apr 10, 2022
    5
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is my most played game on Steam with 528.8 hours, but anyway I'll talk a bit about this game today.
    The main point of criticism is that in year 4 season 1-4 and in year 5 season 1 there were still 2 operators per season and that's still the good thing, because from year 5 season 2 up to the current year 7 season 1 there is only one operator per season and    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is my most played game on Steam with 528.8 hours, but anyway I'll talk a bit about this game today.
    The main point of criticism is that in year 4 season 1-4 and in year 5 season 1 there were still 2 operators per season and that's still the good thing, because from year 5 season 2 up to the current year 7 season 1 there is only one operator per season and that gave the game half a broken neck.
    The last new map was in year 4 season 1 in Operation Outback (March 2019) in the last 11 seasons there were only reworks of old maps so even less content and we can only hope that there will be 2 operators again in the future and a new map will occasionally have a map rework per season.
    The community is almost more toxic than the League of Legends community and that must mean something, I've had rounds in which even beginners who just bought the game have already been yelled at by gold or platinum players.
    Graphically it looks very good, but you never judge a book by its cover, the content counts more.
    It was a fun experience with friends, but I could also play it alone and have fun (if I didn't have toxic high ranked dorks on my team).
    In the end I have to say if you want to get this game wait until it's on sale because today it's not worth paying 20€ for it anymore since the price in 2018- early 2020 was much more demanding than today.
    It's a shame what happened to this game today, shame on you Ubisoft    … Expand
  88. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    6
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    Used to be a great game
    My final rate is: 6
  89. Nick7000
    Mar 9, 2023
    5
    Симпатичный онлайн-шутер. Минус два балла за повесточку, минус балл за батлпасс, в остальном позалипать можно.
  90. Edik191
    Dec 3, 2021
    5
    Я купил игру в 2021 и что я скажу, мне игра в принципе понравилась геймплейно но
    В шутере ты видиш всяких розовых солдат с пони на голове и клоунских масок..
    И продвижение повестки полным ходом. Нерф персонажей и большим порогом вхождения, ведь тут за 1 секунду тебя выносят из-за угла, двери, стула с чего угодно.. Короче рекомендую Радугу только за свой уникальный геймплей а за все    Я купил игру в 2021 и что я скажу, мне игра в принципе понравилась геймплейно но
    В шутере ты видиш всяких розовых солдат с пони на голове и клоунских масок..
    И продвижение повестки полным ходом.
    Нерф персонажей и большим порогом вхождения, ведь тут за 1 секунду тебя выносят из-за угла, двери, стула с чего угодно.. Короче рекомендую Радугу только за свой уникальный геймплей а за все другое нет. И игра как по мне постепенно умирает.    … Expand
  91. trinovatic
    Nov 27, 2022
    7
    Me gusto mucho, muy buenas tardeadas y noches con los reales, es un shooter que me encanta aunque sea una basura jugándolo xdddd.
  92. ANTISHINEe_
    Dec 3, 2022
    7
    Graphics - 8/10
    Gameplay - 9/10
    Control - 6/10
    Detail control - 6/10
    Optimization - 10/10
    Interesity - 9/10
    Personal taste - 7/10
    Sound - 8/10
    Physics - 6/10
    Mechanics - 5/10
    Balance - 7/10
    Community - 6/10
    Players - 7/10
    Servers - 7/10

    Cons:
    How quickly it gets boring - -3/-10
    Bugs - -1/-10

    Score: 6.7/10
  93. N4C3R
    Oct 28, 2022
    7
    One of the best FPS shooting games have multiple rage attacks every match....

    But Overall a good FPS Game.
  94. Rocambole
    Jan 12, 2023
    5
    Au fur et à mesure que le jeu est mis à jour, de plus en plus de problèmes apparaissent, mais il est clair que les responsables n'ont tout simplement pas la détermination ou l'efficacité nécessaires pour corriger les bugs.
  95. azor_4e
    Mar 5, 2023
    6
    Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a thrilling tactical shooter that pits two teams of five against each other in various modes and maps. The game offers a lot of variety and customization, with dozens of operators to choose from, each with their own unique gadgets and abilities. The game also boasts realistic graphics and sound effects, creating an immersive experience that keeps you onTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a thrilling tactical shooter that pits two teams of five against each other in various modes and maps. The game offers a lot of variety and customization, with dozens of operators to choose from, each with their own unique gadgets and abilities. The game also boasts realistic graphics and sound effects, creating an immersive experience that keeps you on the edge of your seat. However, the game is not without its flaws. The game suffers from frequent bugs and glitches, some of which can ruin the match or even crash the game. The game also has a steep learning curve and a toxic community that can make it hard for new or casual players to enjoy. The developers do not seem to listen to the feedback or suggestions from the players, often ignoring the most pressing issues or making unpopular changes. Overall, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a fun and challenging game for fans of the genre, but it could use some more polish and communication from the developers. I would give it a 6/10 rating.… Expand

Awards & Rankings

79
#79 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »