Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege Image
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews What's this?

User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1768 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators andTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators and engage in tangible sieges, a new style of assault in which enemies have the means to transform their environments into modern strongholds while Rainbow Six teams lead the assault to breach the enemy’s position. Expand
Buy Now
Buy on

Trailer

Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege - New Operator Preview: Jackal (Operation Velvet Shell) Teaser Trailer
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Dec 3, 2015
    90
    Rainbow Six Siege is an accessible and deeply satisfying shooter that rewards planning and teamwork over a quick trigger finger.
  2. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  3. Dec 8, 2015
    83
    Multiplayer is the key word for this game, because you will gain nothing from Siege if you are looking for a single player experience.
  4. Dec 2, 2015
    80
    Although the single-player side of the game is weak, Rainbow Six: Siege's multiplayer modes are a huge amount of fun. Tense, thoughtful, and tactical, they play very differently to most run-and-gun shooters. While the game's content does feel a little slim at launch, there's no denying it's highly enjoyable to play - especially when you have a team of players working together.
  5. Dec 4, 2015
    79
    My time with Siege leaves me feeling like this Rainbow Six revival is a skeleton with not a lot of meat on its bones.
  6. Dec 8, 2015
    75
    Rainbow Six Siege delivers on its promise of tension, tactics and teamwork, but it might not be worth AU$70; there are bugs both big and small that need squashing, there's no server browser, and connection errors are too common. There's something else to consider, too: PC players have been abandoning multiplayer-only titles in record time this year.
  7. Dec 5, 2015
    50
    Rainbow Six Siege‘s core concept, namely its destructible world and reliance on communication-based strategy, is strong, but everything surrounding it seems to falter.

See all 39 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Dec 1, 2015
    10
    Finally FPS which requires usage of brain unlike some retarded CoD or one of the million CoD clones.
    Awesome maps, destructible environment,
    Finally FPS which requires usage of brain unlike some retarded CoD or one of the million CoD clones.
    Awesome maps, destructible environment, great weapons, unlocks etc. GOTY material.
    Expand
  2. May 4, 2019
    10
    a unique game, the most intiresnaya of its kind
    competitors it will not be the next twenty years
  3. Sep 4, 2019
    9
    The game is very good, but the reason why I don’t give them a 10 is that at the beginning is very difficult, because you have to learn a lot
  4. May 26, 2022
    7
    Как же хороша некогда была великая сига так же плоха она сейчас и будет становиться ещё хуже и хуже это точноКак же хороша некогда была великая сига так же плоха она сейчас и будет становиться ещё хуже и хуже это точно
  5. Aug 24, 2017
    5
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.

    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive, but the developers, even during this "operation health" project that they've claimed will improve the game, are never fixing the critical issues that make the game have no incentive for you to even try and play.

    A few examples:
    It takes 10 games to get a rank assigned in Ranked mode. The game rigs the 10 games so you are almost always with randoms and usually other unranked players, but rarely against other unranked players and usually organized teams.
    Upon being ranked, you will be given a poor rank thanks to this even if you perform well (Because the rank system is extremely volatile and even if you get 30 kills, losing is still that punishing), and you will begin waiting 10-15 minutes for a game because it now refuses to put you with anyone other than those at said horrendous ranks, but the game will continue to tell you that you will only wait 1 -2 minutes, and will continue blatantly lying at all times.
    There's no requirements for people to have before playing Ranked, so people jump straight into Ranked and ruin it for everyone else after just learning the keybinds in on game of casual. This is a problem with the community, but it's one that is critical and fixable by the devs.

    The only reason this game hasn't become as horrendous as Counter Strike Global Offensive is because, unlike Valve, they haven't started banning people for complaining on the forums. Yet.
    Expand
  6. Jan 10, 2016
    2
    Unworthy of all the appraisal it has gotten in the community. The only reason this is seen as tactical is because of the destructibleUnworthy of all the appraisal it has gotten in the community. The only reason this is seen as tactical is because of the destructible environment. Take away that, and it's just a buggy, laggy counter-strike source with gimmicky abilities. No single player campaign, one single PVP playlist, and a crappy terrorist hunt playlist. The AI in this game is absolutely pathetic. I think super mario 64 had more impressive AI than this. normal/hard are way too easy, and Realistic turns every enemy into an aimbot machine. 0/10.

    Don't get me wrong, it's a fun game and there is some level of thought that needs to be put into the game. But for god's sake, don't go into matchmaking without at least 2 friends. You will get your ass kicked all day long.

    Another thing is how people say this game has the best community known to man. That's completely not true. I've seen my fair share of trolls who will instantly kill you when the round stars, and blast music through their mic just to annoy you. That's in 11 hours of play time.(not counting the beta, which had the same amount of content as the full version, LOL.)
    Expand
  7. Jun 14, 2020
    0
    The idea and the game are amazing. BUT.
    There are f.cking tons of bugs. U are not able to play, because 3/10 games you play, game throws you
    The idea and the game are amazing. BUT.
    There are f.cking tons of bugs. U are not able to play, because 3/10 games you play, game throws you away from the server, all the server can get 1000 ping (not overstating), finaly, u can simply get stucked outside of the map.
    Ubisoft are the most swinish company i've ever seen. Even Valve fix their buggs. Ubi-don't.
    Never play this game if you don't want to lose mmr just because the game thinks you have to.
    Expand

See all 497 User Reviews

Trailers