User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 81 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 50 out of 81
-
Mixed: 22 out of 81
-
Negative: 9 out of 81
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
May 5, 2014
-
Jan 1, 2017
-
Jun 24, 2020Compared to the "Philosophers's Stone" for PS2, this one has definitely improved gameplay. Harry Potter fans will most probably enjoy it but both "Philosopher's Stone" and "Chamber of Sercrets" have a mess of a story line. Developers shortened it and skipped the parts that makes this game very difficult to follow if you haven't read the books.
-
SherylRMay 3, 2003I give this game a 6 becuase it is a bit disappointing. It is waaay to easy and even the first one on PS is harder! But there are the hard moments liek the libarry reading room at night, and Griffins and class challenges otherwise the loading is rubbish and the graphics are okay.
-
-
Jan 1, 2013Well, this is the worst console version of the game. The Xbox/Gamecube version has better controls, better targeting system, better graphics, and better voice acting. This one is okay, but I definitely recommend that you play the Xbox/Gamecube version instead.
-
Jul 7, 2017
-
Jul 5, 2012A disappointment compared to the PC version of the game. Still somewhat worthwhile, but there's really no point in getting it when the PC game is also available.
-
Mar 29, 2015
Awards & Rankings
26
|
#26 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2002
|
47
|
#47 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2002
|
-
For Potter fans of all ages, Chamber of Secrets is a must-have.
-
There is a glaring misbalance in the game progression, and additionally, the load times are almost grotesquely long, a fact that can lead to some unnecessary frustration.
-
PSM MagazineAnother strange weakness is the storytelling, which glosses over key events and explains itself so poorly that if you don't know the story already, you might not figure it out. [Jan 2003, p.36]