- Publisher: Agetec Inc.
- Release Date: Mar 25, 2002
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 23 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 20 out of 23
-
Mixed: 0 out of 23
-
Negative: 3 out of 23
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Aug 8, 2011
-
Mar 11, 2018
-
Dec 26, 2016
-
Nov 24, 2017This is an incredibly good, yet overlooked, series. They have this incredible atmosphere, and feeling of discovery. I would wholeheartedly recommend this game. That is, if you can stomach dying fairly often.
-
HeadacheBearcubJun 16, 2002
-
-
JonathanR.Jun 2, 2002This game is VERY good. I hope the bad reviews this game receive won't stop the making of another King's Field title.
-
-
MarkB.May 31, 2002
-
-
Jul 12, 2019
-
Sep 24, 2019
-
Dec 25, 2019This is my favourite game ever. Great atmosphere and gameplay, the graphics actually hold up really well (played on an actual PS2), losing none of the immersion over the years. The soundtrack is simply phenomenal and merits a playthrough just to experience it in action.
If you like atmospheric games, as well as any FromSoftware RPG, do yourself a favour and play this game.
Awards & Rankings
84
|
#84 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2002
|
21
|
#21 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2002
|
-
Game InformerEven with these intriguing traits in place, King's Field: The Ancient City will bore approximately 99.9% of the gamers out there. Primarily because the game is so slow and burdensome. [Apr 2002, p.77]
-
PSM MagazineThe action is so slow and the world so depressingly medieval. [Apr 2002]
-
With a better laid-out world, more cleverly hidden treasures, and a great sense of nonlinearity, The Ancient City is a nice bit of evolution for the series.