Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
X
Call of Duty 3 Image

Call of Duty 3 (PS3)

80
Metascore
43 reviews
6.9
User Score
110 ratings

Buy Now

Buy on
Rate Game
Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
Game Details: Call of Duty 3 delivers the intensity of being closer than ever to the fury of combat during the
Call of Duty 3 delivers the intensity of being closer than ever to the fury of combat during the battle for the Liberation of Paris, the most harrowing campaign of WWII, known as The Normandy Breakout. Through a seamless narrative, Call of Duty 3 delivers the rush of unrelenting battle and breathtaking action of the Allied offensive that changed the fate of the world. [Activision]
Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
Genre(s): Action Shooter Shooter First-Person Historic Historic Arcade
Number of players: Up to 16
Cheats: On GameFAQs
Rating: T
Now Playing:
Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Rate Game

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Add your rating

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Spoiler Alert!
0/5000
(43)
Metascore Generally favorable reviews
39 Positive Ratings 90%
4 Mixed Ratings 9%
0 Negative Ratings 0%
95
"The PS3 version of the game is just as impressive as the Xbox 360 version and while it doesn’t have split-screen multiplayer, it makes up for this with the Sixaxis functionality." ... Read full review
88
"If you own both an Xbox 360 and a PS3, choosing which version of this accomplished WWII shooter to buy comes down to how much you like or dislike the motion-sensing elements." ... Read full review
85
"Engrossing, frantic and exciting." ... Read full review
80
"The 360 version flat out stomps the PS3 this time." ... Read full review
80
"The PS3 version suffers, however. The outstanding visuals shine, but the frame rate has a tendency to jump around." ... Read full review
80
Pelit (Finland)
"Terrific multiplayer fun. [Feb 2007]"
60
"While it lacks the polish we’ve come to expect from original developer Infinity Ward, it’s still a fun, if dangerously familiar campaign through 1940’s Europe. It’s just doesn’t offer anything unique or new to the genre." ... Read full review
(23)
User Score Mixed or average reviews
50 Positive Ratings 45%
43 Mixed Ratings 39%
17 Negative Ratings 15%
10
JamesP.
May 26, 2007
This has to be one of the best games i have ever played in my life. i think combined with the graphics the ps3 can withstand it is the BEST.
10
ChrisF.
Apr 21, 2007
This game is superb, buy it
8
T0x1cc3r34l
Jun 20, 2018
good game,good graphics but the story could have been better and that's kinda it
7
thepatient613
Feb 16, 2016
Solid gameplay. Before COD was rehashed twice a year. There was nothing groundbreaking about this installment and it definitely should'ntSolid gameplay. Before COD was rehashed twice a year. There was nothing groundbreaking about this installment and it definitely should'nt have been console only. Still, if you feel like playing a more classic FPS and just want to do a quick playthrough, I'd say it's worth a shot for 10$. Expand
7
MichiganerE
Feb 24, 2014
The game is decent at best, and is one of my least favorite CoD games. The campaign isn't anything special or too memorable. It also has someThe game is decent at best, and is one of my least favorite CoD games. The campaign isn't anything special or too memorable. It also has some heavily scripted events that takes away from the non-linear action of the the previous two games. But unlike the first two, it features driving sections, and four playable factions instead of three. The campaign overall is okay, the multiplayer on the other hand is a step backwards and a step forward, and here is why. Instead of the 8 player limit of the first two games, it supports up to 24 players. It also introduces a new game mode called War. It also introduces vechicles, sprinting, and classes. But it's a step backwards because it gets rid of the radar and it runs at 30 FPS instead of 60 FPS. Overall, decent game, 7/10. Expand
7
eva3si0n
Feb 22, 2021
Call of Duty 3 many missed, firstly because it is a console exclusive, and secondly in 2007 the COD4 came out, after which no one needed 3Call of Duty 3 many missed, firstly because it is a console exclusive, and secondly in 2007 the COD4 came out, after which no one needed 3 part at all. But in fact, this is one of the best parts of the series about WW2. Yes, the setting of the western front of 1944 is very tired, but here you can play for the Poles and French partisans. And most importantly, at least some plot appeared in the 3 part. In general, this is a great game, for 2006, showing the potential of Treyarch. On PS3 the game looks average, QTE elements are generally terrible. The game noticeably slows down, giving an average of 20-24 frames. Expand
0
AAAA
Nov 18, 2006
I was a huge fan of RRT 3 who had solid "true 3D" graphics, good sound and the best economy/RR sim model ever made to day. You still find me I was a huge fan of RRT 3 who had solid "true 3D" graphics, good sound and the best economy/RR sim model ever made to day. You still find me under "Champion_Tycoon" in the multiplayer once in a while (I have not lost a multiplayer game in more than a year so strong players are highly welcome). I am also a long time fan of Sid Meier's games, some of which brought me many hours of relaxation over the past 15 years. That being said I expected 'Railroads' to come at least close to what RT3 was: a budget game. Oh boy was I wrong... Sid Meier's game is pure crap; I spent about 6 days playing the single and multiplayer maps and I was disappointed with every aspect of the game: graphics, sound, controls, design, game logic, economic model, RR model, historic accuracy, replayabilty and last, but not least, overall entertainment value. It is one of the worst games I have ever played... and I have played more of them than I should have. This game is an absolute ***ZERO*** Like some1 said b4: "Shame on you Sid." Expand