Wolfenstein

1. pre_-cision-_

   Jul 23, 2011

   10

   The original was the pioneer of all first person shooters and the latest addition is a worthy sequel and stands its own against any other fpsThe original was the pioneer of all first person shooters and the latest addition is a worthy sequel and stands its own against any other fps out on the market today. Fighting the naziâ… Expand

   • 1 of 2 users found this helpful
2. DarylS

   Sep 3, 2009

   9

   Considering the onslaught of shooters in the last while, I do find this one intriguing because of the occult aspect. The graphics are very Considering the onslaught of shooters in the last while, I do find this one intriguing because of the occult aspect. The graphics are very good.the storyline keeps me going for more and I really like all the weapon choices. Have only had it freeze up on me one time.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
4. TJDoc

   Aug 22, 2009

   8

   In many ways, this feels like the long-awaited conclusion to the "Old-school and Proud of it" trilogy, that began with Doom 3 and Quake 4. In many ways, this feels like the long-awaited conclusion to the "Old-school and Proud of it" trilogy, that began with Doom 3 and Quake 4. It's a simplistic, gore drenched, undeniably fun FPS experience; filled with grotesque and varied enemies, as well as a satisfying selection of weapons to shoot, burn,zap, and desintegrate the Nazis with. The very definition of an 8/10 game.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
5. Parazitu91

   May 30, 2017

   8

   Raven Software created a true successor for RTCW , it have the same recipe a WWII fps with paranormal activity and supranational the recipeRaven Software created a true successor for RTCW , it have the same recipe a WWII fps with paranormal activity and supranational the recipe includes : Normal Nazzi ; Zombie Nazzi ; Nazzi chicks ; Mechanical mech nazzi ; and a semi open world ( more hub zone ) game.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
6. WarTornRuston

   Jul 9, 2012

   6

   First of all this is a decent game but I feel like the FPS has evolved. Gone are the days of simple shooting mechanics in a decent enoughFirst of all this is a decent game but I feel like the FPS has evolved. Gone are the days of simple shooting mechanics in a decent enough story. Crysis, Bioshock, Snydicate, Deus Ex, The Darkness, and Halo have all shown that you need more than guns, grenades, and something to shoot to stand out.
   Even the Call of Duty and Battlefields of the world offer more variety and a large and deep multiplayer campaign. Wolfenstein feels ancient, almost like it belongs on the original XBOX. As for this version of Wolfenstein as a game?
   Well, It isn't the brilliant Return to Castle Wolfenstein on the original XBOX but it is a solid single player game. First of all shame on Activision. Raven Software is a great development team but Activision refuses to advertise their games. Quake 4, Soldier of Fortune, and Singularity had no advertisement and were set up to fail. Activision did the same thing to Bizarre Creations. It's a shame. As for Wolfenstein you again play B.J who is the last thing Nazi's wanna see. It is pretty obvious that Singularity was developed at the same time as Wolfenstein because both games involve going in and out of time. Even the green sheen from the veil looks just like Singularity. Basically you have to stop the Nazi's by going into the veil which is a parallel universe to stop the Nazi's from creating a weapon of mass destruction. And as always there is the Nazi backdrop where they are messing around with the super natural and doing more harm than good. But it gives Raven unlimited resources into creating a wide variety of enemies with several different powers. The game is set up in a small section of a town which is basically a hub. The problem is the hub is where you spend a third of the game and it is not really anything special. You are constantly going back and forth to find missions and fighting Nazi's. It all looks the same but at least the map is easy to navigate. Luckily once the mission starts there is a lot of variety and the game opens up a bit. The graphics which are based on the old ID engine hold up barely. There is nothing really special about the games look but it remains solid through out the game if a little bland. The environmental objects are surprisingly destructible and the lighting and textures are solid. It is a good looking game. One thing the game excels at in sound. The guns sound loud and powerful. Of course being a WWII setting all of the guns are familiar. Luckily the Nazi's have created a few gems to toy with later in the game. Most people know by now that shooters these days are around 5 to 8 hours long. However it took me about 10 hours on the normal settings. I guess it depends on the player. One thing you will not spend time with is the multiplayer. This was a disappointment. The great graphics from the single player are gone, the frame rate is suspect, the upgrade system takes way to long, and finding players on the PS3 is a choir. In fact the PS3 version suffers from glitches that have never been fixed. It is a waste of time. Here is the sad fact. Raven has made way to many games this gen with the Marvel and Wolverine games and three shooters. Singularity was in my opinion the game they really wanted to make. Even in Game Informer a while back a few of the guys even said Singularity was there most important title for them. Ironically Wolfenstein is the better single player campaign. Singularity ended up being delayed and I wonder if Activision cut them off and they had to go ahead and release it when they were not ready. So both Wolfenstein and Singularity suffered. Now Raven has basically vanished from the gaming scene and have been helping Infinity Ward with multiplayer maps. If they made one game at a time I positive both would of been better games. As it stands now Wolfenstein is a great bargain bin pick up because the single players story and missions are great. The multiplayer as disappointing as it is will not have anyone playing it anyways. Hopefully Raven will concentrate on one game at a time in the future. I good game that should of been great. Worth the $12 I spent for it but I am not sure I would spend any more… Expand

   • 4 of 4 users found this helpful
7. dimamachine

   Feb 17, 2021

   5

   A game with such a story could get more development in this part, playing a shooter with simple mechanics and banal missions in 2021, ofA game with such a story could get more development in this part, playing a shooter with simple mechanics and banal missions in 2021, of course, is already very unpleasant, but for the year of its release, I think the game was quite tolerable. While playing on PS3 with such poor auto-aiming, I got terrible stress, so only fans can play this game to the end on PS3. For PCs, this problem is not scaled down.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
8. dannyhl2

   Dec 13, 2012

   0

   This game is a big big big FAILURE---A major DISAPPOINTMENT...in other words---it a piece of TRASH !!!
   
   The AI SUX BALLS, the enemy justThis game is a big big big FAILURE---A major DISAPPOINTMENT...in other words---it a piece of TRASH !!!
   
   The AI SUX BALLS, the enemy just keep respawning ---endless respawning !!!, the gameplay is **** and the camera just keep shaking so intensely---this is a piece of **** that you will regret buying it---or you just like puking at your screen playing with this **** !!!… Expand

   • 0 of 6 users found this helpful

See all 25 User Reviews