Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2031 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 708 out of 2031
  2. Mixed: 467 out of 2031
  3. Negative: 856 out of 2031
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Talbis
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the best quality I have ever seen in CoD. I can see myself playing it again and again alongside the first games. Props on this one. And man, I wish I could buy a singleplayer only for a third of a price because the rest of this game...

    Zombies have zombies. Enough said. I vomit with zombies. Movies, TV, games, zombies are everywhere. They are boring. They were boring years ago. Just stop making zombie games and movies already! They've been done to death... Pun intended.

    Multiplayer is weird. You have that new hub section where a bunch of people run around, open boxes with random **** and do nothing but look for a menu to see the multiplayer modes. It's confusing at first but it is a good idea... but seeing loot boxes being open, seeing other people getting some random junk made me realize that the point of this hub is to gloat about your loot. Nothing social or interesting takes place here, just consumerism at its finest! The gameplay itself is like CoD of old. No recoil, no strategy, no thinking. Maps are built with sniper nests and choke points from grounds up, so... every game looks exactly the same. It gets boring after a while and because of how weapons handle you feel like the game was programmed as your first shooter - when you're done go play something better (most games are better).

    To sum this up. Singleplayer campaign is an easy 9/10, multiplayer is for me 3/10 (7/10 for CoD players) and zombies is about -1000/10. It's a shame you can't buy just the singleplayer, I'd pay for that.    … Expand
  2. Daikenkini
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as toA game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as to get ALL players to spend money on loot boxes - yeah it's not only that. You will also be left completely disappointed with the game overall, which offers absolutely nothing new, and is not enjoyable whatsoever.… Expand
  3. pina
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because of the old engine from the beginning of the franchise. They just 'modified' it but the basics remain the same. The download package is 70GB (!!!!), all of which is bloatware. We're not talking about ultra HD graphics are heavy renedering for next gen consoles.

    The gameplay in multiplayer is very arcade, very fast and it's like I'm playing against and with bots. They all move so jerky. Shooting mechanics are poorly done, it doesn't feel right, it's all too fast. After a MP round, it takes ages and ages before a new game starts and you have to stare five minutes at the scoreboard without any possiblity to go to another screen.

    What's great? The unlockables, the perks and kill cams are still great and something to play for. But the gaming experience is so so so poor and it's painful to see how the gaming press keep giving it high scores. Perhaps it's because of the Campaign Mode, which I'm not interested in.

    But the whole game experience and above all, the game mechanics are retarded and outdated. This is a game for PS3, not for current gen consoles. Once again, you should be ashamed Activision to support publishing a cheap rip off of this franchise. IW or Sledgehammer MUST create a new engine for this game.

    This is like like playing FIFA 07 on a PS4 in 2017.    … Expand
  4. timefish576
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Single player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me itSingle player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me it is purely twitch gameplay which means you can't play smart. For most of the COD multiplayers I'm a 2.0 KD player. I like to outsmart people, not just out reflex them. Sniping is a joke, no point when a AR can pick you off across map. Shotguns are way to powerful (probably will be nerfed). Overall the movement and aiming feel floaty, like AW. I'll keep playing for now but I'll probably be going back to MW remastered soon. Please Please make a Modern Warfare 2 remaster!

    FWIW my top COD multiplayers:

    MW2
    Ghost (all the hate ruined the series IMO)
    MW3
    MW Remastered
    BO2    … Expand
  5. Quijote
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  6. Seifer706
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    This game is horrible. Literally the only redeeming quality is parts of the campaign but even then it is one of the shortest campaigns in CoD history and still does nothing compared to CoD4/MW2/WaW/BO1/BO2.

    The MP... good lord is it horrible... guns lack any authenticity and are completely reskins (Tommy gun is literally the ASM-1 of AW). Returning the moment I leave work.
  7. MysticDingo
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Same old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing ofSame old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing of Activision, but this game is absolute garbage. Money better spent elsewhere. Maybe COD should take a cue from Ubisoft and take a year or two break from COD and really take the time to craft a sick shooter, with an actually good campaign, and awesome multiplayer. Most likely though, we will be seeing a trailer for the next COD in 4-5 months. 0/10 trash.… Expand
  8. whatever523
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Yay, lootboxes!

    You are paying for those extra profits with user ratings. I think you will find that in the long run, it's not worth it. Just ask Ubisoft.
  9. lakings78
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst.First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst. Even the remake of Modern Warfare has left little to be desired. Twitch shooters are not fun, just mindless running around. I really wanted to give this game a chance, as they promised going back to the roots. Well, they went back to the roots of Call of Duty on the surface only, that being a themed game in World War Two. That's the only thing. It is still a stupid, mindless twitch shooter. My first hour in, I was four matches into playing just regular Team Death Match and my soldier score was 16/45 with a KDR of .36. I don't seem to have that trouble on games like Battlefront or Battlefield. I do like the layout of the maps, lots of choke points, but the fact remains that this is a twitch shooter. The gameplay gets very tiresome very quickly. The last Call of Duty game I "bought' brand new was with my Xbox One and that was Ghosts. Ghosts was a better attempt to fix the last couple of releases prior to it, but still fell short. I vowed never to buy a COD game again. Yet the promises and hope that Activision finally drilled into the developers heads that the players wanted a solid COD game again, has fallen very short. It's the same rinse and repeat re-skinned twitch shooter. So now that I have wasted my money, I can say that I am officially DONE with this franchise. I will never purchase another COD game new. I didn't even buy the remastered Modern Warfare new because I had a feeling it was going to be trash, I bought it cheap on ebay and I recommend anyone wanting to give this game a chance to wait a while and do the same, get the game cheap on ebay as a re-sell and the company doesn't get the profit. OH, and if you thought the microtransactions of the last game were bad...wait until you see COD WW2's. Micro transactions everywhere. This is a trash game, save your money and continue to have faith in DICE and the Battlefield series...they for the most part listen to their customers and deliver a mostly solid game.… Expand
  10. Phoenix123
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    This game is just...bad. It represents everything about greed. How can you have BOTH season pass AND micro-transactions??? Not to mention the Season Pass is the price of a FULL GAME. The campaign is mediocre, the multiplayer is copy and paste from every year. It just isn't worth it. Cod is a dying franchise.

    Oh yeah, and they're adding JETPACKS IN WW2. That makes sense doesn't it???
  11. kinlopunim
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badlyinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly copied game mechanics.… Expand
  12. metasebii
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other forI'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other for a long time, and I was severely disappointed. After playing the game both in campaign and online for a couple of hours, I am going to return it today.

    More than disappointing — this is just a bad game.    … Expand
  13. EvanGeistfeld
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayerThe only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayer aspects and zombie mode. The multiplayer seems to be different for those who are used to jetpacks yatta yatta. We are heading back to WW2 and it feels nice for a change. I topped the leadboard on my first match with flame shotgun bullets. It was satisfying for sure. Although there is something that I do not like about this game, and it is the fact that they tried so hard to make this a game that would be played for hours on end, with amazing detail and what not. Unfortunately this game is not amazing and lacks a lot of graphical improvements and the optimization is just crap. I played on a 144hz monitor 2460 or 2K screen, with a 1080 graphics card and it didn't look all that great. The multiplayer is ok at best, but moving over to zombies, is just downright cringe worthy. The zombies look amazing art wise and their voices uncomfortable feeling which is great, but it just isn't as scary as we had hoped for the series. It has jump scares, but that is it. This Call of Duty, is by far an improvement for sure in some areas, but overall just isn't a game that I am interested diving more into. It was unfortunate because this was one of my anticipated game of this year, and it did not deliver to the hopes I thought it would bring.… Expand
  14. SoakerCity
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter. If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter.

    If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but ATTACHED TO THE GODDAMN SECOND WORLD WAR...

    It makes no sense. It isn't fun. Its packed with super-honed COD players that treat WW2 like Quake. Its just gross. And the extra money-grabs are just the icing. Avoid this game, its a waste of time. you could be playing something fun. This is a serious setback for Activision. Worst game I've played in years. Its like forcing long-time fans to fight like dogs. Unelegant. Crass. Tampered-with. Admit it, you played this game and it WASN'T fun. I'd rather play Counterstrike, Battlefront, checkers, with myself, ANYTHING is more fun than this. 2/10, because nice single player...sorta. Crashed 4 times on me on PS4 before I got to "play". TWITCH SHOOTERS CANT BE WW2 SHOOTERS!    … Expand
  15. javironcho
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    The campaign is like 5 hours, it has no replayability at all, and the multiplayer fells like a very bad battlefield 1 team deathmatch clone, it is exactly the same game we got 10 years algo with a wwii reskin
  16. damman
    Nov 20, 2017
    10
    I am changing my review for this wonderful game. It has it flaws but the war mode is really fun. I really like this game so go out and buy it. Been gaming for 30 years and I am back.
  17. mrjackthereaper
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over. No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes. the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp. The AI is super    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over.

    No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes.

    the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp.

    The AI is super stupid and dull some time even play in regular mode.

    The developer still focus too much on Multiplayer more than Singleplayer. Campaign is short and no replay valuable.

    Multiplayer mode is fine but feel like copy battlefield 1 concept in some point.

    NAZI Zombie mode is simply copy treyach-style, boring and no reason to enjoy this.

    Server are still not working sometime.

    My Score: 4/10.

    ANOTHER DISSAPOINTMENT FROM ACTIVITION.    … Expand
  18. UhMing
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    I'm only interested in campaign which was disappointing

    + Visually stunning.
    - Shortest CoD campaign ever.
    - Plot is scattered, unfinished, and feels truncated.
  19. kqnqrdS
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    + Perfect sound design.
    + Good campaign.
    + Very good Zombies Nazis mod.
    + Classic CoD in multiplayer with new game modes like War or HQ.
    + I play at 1440p 21:9 Ultra the game is beautiful with a good optimisation for me.

    -Some textures are blurred.
    -Certain accessories are not totally in adequacy with the theme of the game.
    -Some minor bugs that can be fix in an update.
  20. PAYAMFURY
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    بازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویک بخش زامبی عالی آورده.میریم سراغ بخش چندنفره که با داشتن چند حالت جدید پیشرفت زیادی داشته و به دوران اوج خود رسیده.بازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویک بخش زامبی عالی آورده.میریم سراغ بخش چندنفره که با داشتن چند حالت جدید پیشرفت زیادی داشته و به دوران اوج خود رسیده.
  21. BlueKetsueki
    Dec 8, 2017
    4
    Would only recommend to people who haven't played cod for a while, i can honestly say i have seen Fifa change more than cod the last few years which shows how stale it is wait for the modern warfare 2 remaster or buy an older cheaper better cod.
  22. danelectroman
    Dec 28, 2017
    1
    godawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to agodawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to a lame female you don't have the nerve to ask out because you're spineless. A 1 for the graphics but who cares, I'd rather play a nineties war game where you can actually play instead of this cut scene crap!… Expand
  23. UltraVIbe
    Dec 26, 2017
    2
    COD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of thisCOD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of this means of marketing that always cycles and repeats. Everytime you ask for a loot box it gives you the same thing such as grips that you cant even look at ingame to Emotes that look all the same with different titles and rarity. COD WWll Zombies Stripped out some features that it was known for as well. Like the music that you get from the box and is now replaced with... well nothing (there is no recognizable sound). It hardly takes any sort of means to actually come up with a strategy anymore because all you have to do is run and gun then hopefully you get that OP gun that the Zombie mode gives you FOR FREE!!! The one thing I actually feel is sorta well done is the campian. It might have a couple of flaw from there to there but the campian does offer a variety of missions with different playstyles (unlike multiplayer)… Expand
  24. LightPoth
    Jan 23, 2018
    3
    Call Of Duty: WW|| is quite lacking when you start to get into the game and play more. The Multiplayer has little to no maps for the general player, Zombies is a rip off from Treyarch's and has no replay-ability after a weeks worth of playing.
  25. monkey77
    Feb 11, 2018
    4
    now i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall innow i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall in black ops 2 that i could jump on what ever i wanted tanks cars ect, and if there were barriers they weren't that obvious or annoying, the game play is same old call of duty but more of a meat grinder where you die and the kill streaks are useless, in conclusion call of duty world war 2 is at best temporarily mediocre and will inevitably get repetitive. also microtransactions… Expand
  26. joker41187
    Feb 13, 2018
    2
    Wow this is a bad game, online is fun enough... But the campaign mode is the cheesiest most unrealistic waste of cinematics. The gameplay is fun enough. I am done with the call of Duty franchise...
  27. Voorhees91
    Mar 12, 2018
    1
    I fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer isI fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer is like taking a bunch of autistic children, giving them guns and crack, and throwing them into a tiny map. Hit detection is nothing short of horrific. Time after time I'd fire a shotgun point-blank into an enemy's chest only to have it not register at all and be killed. Most gunfights are based on some perverse sense of luck rather than any skill. The weapon damage has no basis in reality. HQ is a waste of time, and the micro-transactions are simply another insult to an already poor game. If you want mindless run and gun with campers, horrible hit detection, no skill required, etc. then this game is for you. If you want a half decent FPS then look somewhere else.… Expand
  28. i6mi6
    Apr 14, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Firstly, the campaign doesn't even touch on the idea of Russians, Japanese and/or the German point of view. Same old "americans were the only one with souls and feelings, germans were robots" clichè. They included a black person with another "you underestimated the blacks" clichè and totally dumped historical correctness for the sake of political. Same goes for the women characters which had no purpose to be women and could have easily be replaced by more appropriately for the historical time men.
    The game conveys no feeling, similar to how WAW conveyed feeling of horror just by the looks of the menu, the soundtrack and so on. I can associate any COD with some feeling, but I can't associate WWII to anything. In addition, I didn't notice any impressive soundtrack.

    Let's touch on the Mutiplayer. The moment I open the menu I see how terrible the UI is. In fact, I wonder if it could be worse than that. It's confusing, cluttered with stuff, backgrounds change, blur and have no relation to one another when you navigate. Navigation is horrible. It feels more challenging to open weapon customization than reach lvl 20 in zombies. I can't see scoreboard during a multiplayer match. I have to go through a few tabs, then one option down, then a popup for confirmation in order to leave the match. I can go on for hours about what's wrong with the UI.
    Maps are mostly terrible. 3-lane, boring, no diversity, nothing fun or special about them. Such a rushed design. I will leave it here regarding multiplayer.

    Zombies are lacking the horrific Treyarch feeling. There is unnecessary customization. Playing zombies is extremely easy. No soundtrack, no cool sound effects when you pick up a drop, it just doesn't make me want to replay it.

    Overall, the game is horrible, rent it, play the campaign and get rid of it.    … Expand
  29. TheQuietGamer
    Nov 24, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign: Sledgehammer Games    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign:
    Sledgehammer Games shows once again that they're almost as good at telling stories as the team at Treyarch. With the exception of the protagonist (whose voice actor has some trouble maintaining his southern accent), I actually cared about the characters. I wasn't a big fan of the gameplay changes though. The removal of recharging health for a limited bar that you need to keep an eye on is at odds with the chaotic nature of the action where bullets come at you from every direction. The new squad system where your AI teammates can resupply you with ammo and first aid kits is interesting, but not fleshed out enough to have any real impact. While I was invested in the story actually playing through it wasn't something I enjoyed all that much.

    Zombies:
    I think WWII actually has one of the best iterations of the fan favorite cooperative mode. The new tone and setting are really creepy giving it a distinct vibe. All of the abilities, power-ups, and single use skills will be easier for newcomers to wrap their heads around than they were in Black Ops 3. While this change may not sit well with some, I love the addition of regularly updated goals for the sense of direction they give. Of course playing with randoms isn't ideal. Especially if you or they don't have a mic. This is still a mode that is at its strongest with friends.

    Multiplayer:
    The biggest portion of the package and the thing that's kept this franchise alive. It's where you'll feel the effects of the return to boots-on-the-ground style gameplay the most. With the removal of all the movement systems introduced over the years as the series pushed further and further into the future this really does feel like playing old school CoD. The new War mode can be quite a bit of fun with each map offering different objectives for teams to complete in order to win the match. It adds some nice variety, but can be a little unbalanced at times with certain objectives giving one side a clear advantage over the other. The Hub is kind of an odd addition. Giving you a place to interact with other players. It has its amusements, but for the most part I never used it.

    The loot box system is understandably controversial as it has led to the inclusion of microtransactions. They are totally frivolous though as all they offer are cosmetic options. They're given out at random and you can earn them by completing "contracts" that require you to complete certain challenges. You can even get specific things you want with the easy to amass in-game currency by going to the Hub. So you'll never feel pressured to spend any money on them. Personally, I kind of like them as they mean I don't have to hit some crazy goal just to get a stupid charm or skin for my guns.

    Newcomers and longtime fans alike are going to face a bit of a learning curve when it comes to navigating WWII's confusing mess of menus. I don't know why Sledgehammer decided to ditch the sleak, easy to figure out layout of previous CoD titles, but it wasn't a smart move. Its the kind of thing that helped put Medal of Honor: Warfighter in a very early grave and has kept me from ever sticking with a Battlefield game for too long. I also encountered a startling amount of disconnects from matches. The stability is quite questionable given the meaty update sizes.

    Technical:
    Patch sizes are something Sledgehammer really needs to work on. I've been able to get every update put out for all of both Treyarch's and Infinity Ward's entries in the series over the years without ever having to worry about whether or not I had enough space for them. Here though I had to clear out a nice chunk of memory to make room. This was in issue for Advanced Warfare as well and I abandoned that game because of it.

    Conclusion:
    If you've wanted to see the series return to a more grounded style of play that's free of laser beams and robots then this is the CoD for you. Sledgehammer has tried to add some defining changes to the mix with varying degrees of success. Overall though this is another solid addition to the franchise and a sign that perhaps we haven't seen everything this conflict has to offer.

    7.9/10    … Expand
  30. BaconHD
    Apr 12, 2018
    0
    Es una basura mas de lo mismo sin originaldad y abusa de las microtransaciones (en AAA) y solo lo juegan niños pequeños sin criterio propio y youtuber que quieren sacar videos de mierda
  31. ShadowForce
    Apr 23, 2018
    8
    I personally enjoyed the game quite a lot. With this being said I also had a lot of issues with this game. Some of these were the maps aren’t the best, aren’t enough guns, killstreaks aren’t great, and the loot boxes are my biggest complaint. I overall enjoy the multiplayer and campaign even with all the criticisms.
  32. ifeelit
    Jul 2, 2018
    2
    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined

    - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never get used and the kill streaks are actually boring. Along with that, it takes too long to unlock what you want with the skin you favor being locked behind a loot crate. I quit the game only after playing it off and on for 4 months and i only collected maybe 15% of the stuff that I actually wanted.

    - the game, installed and played from disc with all the updates, was taking up 60gb on the my harddrive (for such a contentless game)

    - No soul in this game whatsoever.    … Expand
  33. RubenPrinsloo
    Aug 8, 2018
    6
    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows: My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows:
    My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole game and start from the beginning. Then I also want to ask to bring in more powerful weapons. For example, it takes 4 shots to kill someone, and by that time someone already killed me. My game also takes very long to connect online or in multiplayer.

    The Pros of the game:
    I really like the maps in the game. It has really nice hideouts for sniping. I also like to follow the story of how the game takes place. The best for me is the great graphics. It really looks realistic.

    I would recommend this game to people who likes war games.    … Expand
  34. mikect92
    Aug 15, 2018
    6
    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common problem with COD games. Huge explosions, great falls and unrealistic odds make the game unrealistic and goofy.

    The online multiplayer (which for most is the highlight of the game) is the polar opposite of the campaign. The visuals take a hit and are noticeably worse than the story. The maps are boring and not very re playable and it is a forgettable and boring experience. The maps are small and linear, the invisible walls are unforgivable and 2 of the very limited maps are obvious copies of Modern Warfare maps. Unlike the campaign which was over the top, the multiplayer is so under whelming. On top of this, the multiplayer suffers from pay to win mechanics and poor servers. Most guns are locked behind loot boxes which you can either pay real money for or grind like hell, only to end up with customised weapon grips. A FPS has customised weapon grips which are barely visible! As for servers, i played the game about 7-8 months after release and i keep being kicked from games and being locked out of matches. After 8 months, this should have been fixed.

    The final game mode is Zombies. Zombies is fun and interesting. There is a story and multiple different objectives and the map is huge. It is difficult however and is best played with friends in co-op.

    Over all, this game is a mixed bag, excelling in some game modes but horrifically failing in others. The campaign is great, as is Zombies, however the Online seriously holds the game back from greatness.    … Expand
  35. madmorningstar
    Sep 18, 2018
    8
    HONEST REVIEW

    I don't understand how has it got a 4.2 rating in the user score...I played the game in summer of this year and it is safe to say that the game was mind blowing.. it really gave me the experience of being in ww2. the medical kit function I did not like 2 much but it was essential to the game so that the players could have the ww2 experience. there is no denying that the    HONEST REVIEW

    I don't understand how has it got a 4.2 rating in the user score...I played the game in summer of this year and it is safe to say that the game was mind blowing.. it really gave me the experience of being in ww2. the medical kit function I did not like 2 much but it was essential to the game so that the players could have the ww2 experience. there is no denying that the graphics and visuals have never better then this one in the whole call of duty series.    … Expand
  36. Sanel00
    May 18, 2019
    8
    This game has a pretty good story mixed with a lot of action, good characters and the return to the origins with the health is something magic but, you know, crazy and too
  37. Coop123
    Jan 22, 2019
    4
    This was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well isThis was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well is great. The base game-play at its core is very well polished. The shooting feels perfect and movement is smooth. The campaign has some likable characters but the story is so generic and short making investment useless. Its well acted and sometimes actually well written but its so predictable and the everything feels so forced in so it can be condensed into a few hours. The game-play is standard corridor shooting and can get very old but the squad dynamic and having teammates supply you with health and ammo adds much needed depth. The vehicle sections feel under utilized and out of place. The game does switch it up sometimes and has some very cool moments but overall very average. The multiplayer however is a disaster. The maps are super small and force you into the same approach every time. They all feel very similar and generic. The weapons are good however and pretty diverse and feel good to use. Customization is lacking with certain divisions locking off certain things. Score streaks feel very unrewarding and useless and make the multiplayer feel very empty. The hub area has some cool things like playing old Activision games and one versus one duels. Mostly its a glorified loot box show room though. The cosmetic loot system is so lazy and broken that items are literally reused with different names. The cosmetics do not fit with the WWII setting and break any possible immersion. Zombies has some cool horror aspects and a cool atmosphere but the positives end there. The map is convoluted and annoying to navigate. Enemy variation is lacking and many things are made to complicated like the horrible perk system and power ups. Overall a very underwhelming experience.… Expand
  38. Blood8282
    Feb 23, 2019
    9
    After having spend way too long in modern and sci-fi warfare, it's great seeing Call Of Duty go back to it's roots, World War 2 ! Even health packs make a return ! This episode includes the Normandy landing and American advance into nazi Europe and including the 'Battle Of The Bulge'. The first major WW2 FPS on the PS4 and one of the best games ever in the series, it’s neverthelessAfter having spend way too long in modern and sci-fi warfare, it's great seeing Call Of Duty go back to it's roots, World War 2 ! Even health packs make a return ! This episode includes the Normandy landing and American advance into nazi Europe and including the 'Battle Of The Bulge'. The first major WW2 FPS on the PS4 and one of the best games ever in the series, it’s nevertheless hampered by it's shortness, weak AI and it features only 11 missions..… Expand
  39. fer5500
    May 26, 2019
    9
    Best WWII game ever! Activision has the budget to make great games, despite the hardcore fans of the franchise not liking it much, this game returns to its roots and it does it right.
  40. Garfield2010
    Sep 6, 2019
    7
    I got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off withI got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off with too much happening all the time. Every mission has an element where you need to rescue someone, clear certain areas, hold certain areas for a time period, some allies dying violently and a little bit of quick time melee. Very very linear.

    Good entertainment for a teenager I would say. Its basically a gaming version of Saving Private Ryan 15 years later    … Expand
  41. Ba-Ouai-Logic
    Jun 29, 2020
    4
    By the americans, for the americans. If I had to describe the game in one word, I would say "America". America lost around 350k soldiers during this war, but it's strange and I wonder why this game didn't tell me a single word about the URSS army that won this war, entered Berlin firstly and lost about 23.5 millions of people...
  42. Datojet
    Jul 1, 2020
    7
    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as simple as that. Yes, the dialogues in this game are dull and full of washed out cliches, but it`s not a first FPS to abuse that and definitely not the last. COD WW2 also has a number of gameplay shortcomings that get quite annoying after several hours of playing, like indistructible tables or other seemingly fragile objects that absorb RPG shots and leave enemies untouched, or crazy damage the nazis do on high level of difficulty resulting in frequent one-shots. Also, the friendly NPC`s are often annoying as they constantly run in front of you making it more difficult to aim at the enemies.
    But generally, I liked the dynamics of the game, I loved the missions where you operate a tank or a plane, the shooting itself feels pretty good, and the whole COD WW2 just feels like a solid game to spend a few eves with.    … Expand
  43. AntonL1kesPotat
    Jul 14, 2021
    8
    I bought this game from a second hand store like every other game for like 15€-10€ and it was worth it in my opinion: decent storyline (not that good but still), nice mechanics and other things though this game can get very annoying at times.
  44. ChibiDaFox
    Dec 13, 2017
    0
    Not even worth the score it got. The game is as accurate to the books as Mario was to physics. I'm no Nintendo fanboy, don't worry. But honestly, this is a real shame. And also, pay to win gameplay and **** servers.
  45. TechMarine
    Nov 26, 2017
    2
    What a huge waste of money. Should be called Connection Off Duty. Multiplayer is entirely dependent on who has the minutely better connection. Maps are TINY and 6v6 boring roflstomps. Does nothing great for the franchise except Zombies. Hope I can get 30 bucks for this **** on aftermarket.
  46. Riddler68
    Dec 13, 2017
    0
    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check Terrible hit-detection: Check Garbage maps: Check Whole 9 maps (woow): Check **** up perk system: Check Useless    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check
    Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check
    Terrible hit-detection: Check
    Garbage maps: Check
    Whole 9 maps (woow): Check
    **** up perk system: Check
    Useless killstreaks: Double Check
    Ruined Nazi Zombies: Triple Check

    Ok well... just like every call of duty since mw 3 they **** up and no one was expecting this... right. Guys, what were you expecting? it's still Call of Duty, the series that **** on the customers opinion to sell as many copies as possible.

    They will never change no matter what they say. This series dumbed them self down to be as appealing to every **** dumbass from every **** corner in this world.

    Save your money and wait for proper games that will be released in 2018.    … Expand
  47. MrRedMarsmallow
    Dec 11, 2017
    1
    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding - War mode is terrible - Campaign is far too short and very boring - PPSH-1 is far too powerful - MP maps are poorly designed - Quick-scoping - Zombies is nothing to write home about - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game - "Daily Orders" and    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding
    - War mode is terrible
    - Campaign is far too short and very boring
    - PPSH-1 is far too powerful
    - MP maps are poorly designed
    - Quick-scoping
    - Zombies is nothing to write home about
    - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game
    - "Daily Orders" and "Contracts" systems feel unrewarding
    - "Headquarters" makes the frame rate plummet (and you can't choose to be alone in HQ)
    - Menu system is horrendous
    - Game still has server errors and connectivity issues

    + Graphics are okay    … Expand
  48. Uglytruck
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    I've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with anI've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with an emotional/mental high to keep coming back when they have a match go 17-5 in their favor. Not unlike a drug dealer. Where does it leave the casually good to exceptional player? They don't care and now I don't care. Every game since the original black ops has had this with some varying degree. How many times have you played on a team with one of these games and wonder how the majority of everyone went negative? It's there. Group this up with an anemic number of maps and some of the series worst score streaks, you've got a really boring game. I don't feel compelled to play it - I often forget that I have it. I'm sure not "buying" anything on it. The sad thing is, they'll promote a redux of MW2 when they realize no one is playing or buying it, but they'll do it with the same awful netcode like they did with MWR. This is why the series is dead. Your skill or desire to build a skill-set doesn't mean anything to them.… Expand
  49. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember when video games were creative, interesting, and fun? Well, if you play this dud longer than an hour, you probably don't. I think I fell asleep holding the controller. Yawn.
  50. REAPER007
    Nov 22, 2017
    2
    F***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile ofF***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile of ten year old excrement with a scent of WW2 piss. And then they demand 50$ for this. Amen CoD, you are dead to me!… Expand
  51. Lukestrn
    Nov 26, 2017
    3
    This was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takesThis was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takes 5 minutes when it should be closer to 15. No penalizations for kids leaving every time their team starts losing. I guess it doesn't matter what the community thinks anyways because the kids are going to keep buying this garbage and feeding developers money for being lazy. Load times for logging in, interface, and maps are laughable. I'm not even going to bring up the loot boxes.. This is a problem that will continue until gamers come together and boycott the developers (especially EA) who employ these microtransactions.… Expand
  52. HENCHMAN
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    Absolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, justAbsolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, just smoke and mirrors masquerading as something new, again at a premium of $60. None of us would buy a new car and trade it in for the newer version every year, yet most of the community does it with this game. I really wish the player base who share my sentiments would just stop buying the game and force them to change their model. The current model is to maximize profits, and give the impression of improvement or added value without actually doing it. The marketing and press are essentially lobbyists artificially inflate what is truly a inferior game. I could go on but I'll stop now. This franchise is forever ruined as long as Activision is involved, as is Destiny. Good day!… Expand
  53. Tscolaro1
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well becauseI was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well because the words Call of Duty are in the title.

    Overall, I liked the single player a lot, that is this game's saving grace. I actually feel as if this was one of the better campaigns of the past few years. The multiplayer feels as if they threw $20 into a usb drive and are now trying to run the entire multiplayer servers through that. It is appalling how poorly the servers have been since the launch nearly a month ago and I have seen no signs of it getting better. The zombies was alright, I think that the new zombies games need to tone it down a little, but that's just personal preference.

    Overall, definitely a waste of $60.    … Expand
  54. andrewcarey7
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    Maps are garbage - they have no structure and the gameplay quickly falls into a mess of no strategy especially on objective game modes. The hit detection is extremely poor; 1v1 gunfights are horribly inconsistent. This game was pretty much my last chance for COD. Will be selling this game
  55. whambulance
    Dec 10, 2017
    0
    CoD continues it's downward spiral. Definitely the last one I buy. Terrible maps, terrible balances, worse patches, object clipping galore. Welcome to World War Quick Scope. If you want actual combat you're better off with anything else.
  56. BBQ
    Dec 18, 2017
    0
    Failure again. They may have gotten rid of the Marvel Superheroes versions of the games and got back to where it should be, but many of the key were never fixed. This includes the quick-scoping sniper shots and the perk stuff that is often constant when you are on a team that is doing nothing but getting killed.

    With the quick-scoping, you can miss by 3 meters and still get an    Failure again. They may have gotten rid of the Marvel Superheroes versions of the games and got back to where it should be, but many of the key were never fixed. This includes the quick-scoping sniper shots and the perk stuff that is often constant when you are on a team that is doing nothing but getting killed.

    With the quick-scoping, you can miss by 3 meters and still get an instant kill (if you aim and don't hit the head, you may not get a kill). This takes so much away from the multiplayer that just this issue requires me to award the multiplayer a complete failure. I know there are people that love this, but it is ridiculous.

    My other annoyance is all complete stupid little things you get for kills and how fast they come. I have had games that I quit because we were owning the other team so bad that it you couldn't play the shooter. I have joined games where the team I was on was getting so wasted that I couldn't even leave spawn - kept getting hit by all the perk crap, before I even took one step.

    After the last three games, I have decided I will no longer buy a copy of COD. Too bad you had to keep going downhill starting with MW3... (for those of you that thought the nuke was cool, really!?!?)    … Expand
  57. w1919
    Jan 20, 2018
    0
    I have played COD for 10 years, WW2 is definitely the worst COD i ever played! i don't even know were to start with all that is wrong with this game! Everything! if you like lag, camping, head-glitch, grenade spam, OP-snipers, and overall a glitch game that sometimes don't even work when you want to play, this is the game for you! Im going back to play older CODs.
  58. gmello00
    Dec 27, 2017
    0
    Oh man, I have no idea how they messed this game up, but they did. Here are my biggest issues

    Campaign: Remember when Call of Duty actually had good campaigns that could be considered a selling point? I'm talking about the Modern Warfare trilogy, World at War, Black Ops 1 and 2, etc. This campaign does not fall into this category. Daniels is a bad main character. The game spends a lot    Oh man, I have no idea how they messed this game up, but they did. Here are my biggest issues

    Campaign: Remember when Call of Duty actually had good campaigns that could be considered a selling point? I'm talking about the Modern Warfare trilogy, World at War, Black Ops 1 and 2, etc. This campaign does not fall into this category. Daniels is a bad main character. The game spends a lot of time trying to make the player feel bad for him, but I simply don't know enough about him to feel any emotion towards him. There are some interesting new mechanics in the campaign, such as health that can only be replenished using medkits, and squad members being able to resupply, but the resupply mechanic needs work. The only reason I took stuff from them is because they would not shut up until I took it from them. I had to toss grenades randomly on purpose just so my squad member would stop screaming every five seconds that he had grenades ready. The opening level is very good, you get a good sense of the danger soldiers faced and how grim the battlefield is. Every level after this is nothing like level 1 and they just get boring after a while. I think this game could have benefited from a branching stories campaign like World at War, because fighting Germans exclusively gets old, especially knowing that WWII wasn't only fought between the U.S and Germany. Overall, the campaign is a waste of time.

    Multiplayer: Awful. The game only came with 9 maps, which should be considered unacceptable. Headquarters is a waste of space. Call of Duty doesn't need a social hub and it only caused the game to crash or simply not work for about a month after release. The weapons are unbalanced. There is auto aim on the snipers and SMGs and shotguns are definitely overpowered compared to the assault rifles and LMGs. War mode is a joke. Given the run and gun style of COD multiplayer and the fast death times, how did they think an objective heavy mode like this would work? But the worst part is I'm writing this review more than a month after release and the game is still broken. Crashing is still a big issue, the supply drops you supposedly earn during games never appear in your inventory, and hit detection is still awful, and Sledgehammer has the nerve to push their first DLC pack while the game is still broken and they do nothing about it. A very bad experience.

    Zombies: I don't have much to say about this, but it's not very good. I'm a big fan of Treyarch zombies, so I had high hopes, but it didn't deliver. The characters are boring and the map is one big boring circle. It's also too easy. The game's equivalent to Juggernog on steroids is available right from the start for a measly 500 jolts, This mode is nothing special.

    This game alone has made me skeptical about buying future COD titles, but it has ensured that I'll never buy another product with Sledgehammer's name attached to it ever again.    … Expand
  59. Kramerllama
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    Let's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what theLet's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what the series was initially about.

    When WWII was announced I was a little excited that they were going back to boots on the ground, going back to WWII, and going back to the series roots. Though I was skeptical, and became a little disappointed in some of the features they were implementing, or blatantly ripping off from other games, I still decided to pick the game up on launch day to play it, and hopefully get that same feeling I had when I played CoD 2, 3 and WaW. Sadly, this game is probably one of the worst, if not the worst Call of Duty game I have played.

    To break it down:

    Weapons -
    Dont even bother using any of the other guns unless its the STG 44 or BAR, as silent SMGs dominate in this game. They are great in CQC, and can outgun nearly any sniper rifle, LMG, or typical
    semi auto rifles at medium and long range. STG and BAR have nearly 0 recoil, and again can out shoot any of the other weapons at medium to long range. Don't bother with the shotguns unless you run with the incendiary rounds loaded as even nearly point blank, shotguns are a 2 hit kill.

    Maps -
    These are probably the worst maps in Call of Duty history. Every map is a chokepoint meat grinder. It's you're typical 3 lane map, but there's no tactics involved. They become a meat grinder as they are poorly designed. Maps are filled with clutter, no flanking routes, terrible spawns, and they are easy to spawn camp on. Unless you like to die over and over and over due to campers camping your spawn, you'll probably not enjoy these maps.

    Matchmaking-
    The matchmaking in the game is equally as terrible as anything else. You'll constantly be put on teams filled with the worst players in the game, as the enemy team is stacked with above average and good players, which just results in a steam roll for the enemy team.

    Gameplay-
    This game is filled with players hopping around like Master Chief, and dropping down onto their bellies to drop shot you. Due to all the clutter on the maps, you'll get everyone headglitching behind an object.

    Zombies-
    Zombies in WaW was fun. It was addicting. Zombies in WWII is utterly boring. Played 1 online round of Zombies, got to level 30+ and everytime I died or go downed, I was praying the game would be over. I was that bored of it. I was bored of the game by level 15. It was just too easy to advance. I never felt threatened by the zombies at all. It was just boring.

    This game is just utter crap. It is probably the worst Call of Duty that I have played. I was hoping that when they said they were going back to boots on the ground, they were going back to Call of Duty 2, one of, if not the best game in the franchise, but with modern tech. Nope. This game feels like it was made in 2006. Unbalanced weapons, matches, poorly designed maps, which look like one of the developers toddlers designed them, horrible lag, and matchmaking, and ultimately just a poorly developed game. The fact that this game took 3 years to make is astonishing as it looks like they did everything in 6 months. Wait, Call of Duty 3 was developed in 8 months, and was a better developed game than WWII. There was no sense of accomplishment when you do well, no satisfaction when you kill an enemy who was besting you the whole match, no sense of pride as you rank up yourself, your division or your weapon. I was extremely disappointed with the game, and I didn't have a lot of expectations coming into it. If you want to play a good WWII game, play any of the older Call of Duty games. Play Medal of Honor Frontlines/Rising Sun/Airbourne/Allied Assault, they will all give you a better experience in a WWII setting, and online, and be a whole lot more fun than this game.

    The only thing that is redeemable in WWII is the new War mode. That is the only redeeming factor in the game. Even then, there's only 3 maps, which get old fast. If you want to waste $60 on this game, I won't stop you, but I will warn you I wouldn't spend $20 on it.    … Expand
  60. Gurdur
    Dec 11, 2017
    3
    Back to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflexBack to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflex shooting.

    I really don't understand why the developers have gone in this direction. Maybe it is to differentiate themselves from BF. Either way, the COD series has become a joke to serious gamers. I will not buy the next title.

    So if you like a fast paced fps where the only real skill needed is quick reactions, then this game is for you. If not, stay away.    … Expand
  61. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  62. llostsoll
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    The campaign mode is extremely disappointing. There is nothing good I can say about this game other than that the graphics look good and quite polished.

    It’s more of the same. (big wallet = big fun)
  63. BlackAndWhite
    Nov 24, 2017
    2
    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros: ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either. ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player. ▪Footsteps are easily    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros:

    ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either.
    ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player.
    ▪Footsteps are easily heard unlike MW Remastered.
    ▪ I personally like the new HQ instead of just sitting looking at a lobby screen. Pretty cool how you can look around and interact with different things.

    Cons:
    ▪Team balancing is horrendously poor. I played around 100 games and was on the team full of clueless morons about 75% of the time. A lot of games were not close at all, too one-sided.
    ▪The game lags quite often and has caused me multiple deaths (Not my connection as every other multi-player game is fine).
    ▪There is something massively wrong in multi-player. In many 1 v 1 gunfights where on my screen we (Me and an opponent) see eachother at the same time and I shoot first, get about 10 bullets into my opponent and he picks his **** gun up whilst being shot and drops me in 2 bullets. I watch the killcam and somehow he was already shooting me before I even lifted my gun up?? He had taken no damage either WTF??! Absolute joke.
    ▪Loot crates should not be in any game ever unless the game was free maybe. People already paid £50+ for the game and these greedy developers aren't satisfied and want more money for doing nothing basically.
    ▪Perk system/Division is just stupid in my opinion as it restricts you. If you don't want to show up on the enemy UAV then you have to use the Mountain division. You may also want to resupply from dead enemies.. Nope! Sorry, you can't have both as resupplying is in another division. So dumb. Should have just had normal perks as usual.
    ▪The maps are absolute garbage except 3. The other 6 are just painful to play. The inept developers had very little imagination when designing them. Only 9 **** maps in the base game is absolutely pathetic as well. The war game mode has its own 2-3 unique maps but that gamemode is pretty poor anyway.
    ▪They are copying off Battlefield with the Bayonet charge, War mode etc.
    ▪Gameplay is too fast paced.. everyone runs around like they are **** Olympic athletes on steroids. Why can't the game just be a bit slower paced??
    ▪Guns have basically no recoil making it very easy for terrible scrubs to shoot you from 40 yards with an SMG, laughable.
    ▪No-scoping and quick-scoping is too easy. Something else that caters to the 10 year olds who think they are pros, Jesus Christ.
    ▪You die a bit too quickly. Well.. I do at least. On my screen I am killed instantly but when I shoot enemies it sometimes takes 15 bullets and that's without missing.
    ▪The community is absolutely cancerous. Sitting in windows or behind objects head-glitching, sitting in corners, drop-shotting etc etc. This is not the developers fault obviously but it is another reason not to buy this trash.

    I could be on all day with the cons so I will just end it there. I give it a 2/10. Just absolutely terrible. The amount of **** which happens in multi-player is just mind-boggling. I almost smashed my controller on 10 seperate occasions. It's depressing thinking how great CoD used to be. WaW, BO1 were just brilliant. This **** doesn't come close to either. This is 100% the last CoD I ever, ever purchase. Deleted the game. Good **** riddance.    … Expand
  64. deanlynch2
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    Nice to be back to boots on the ground but, This game has alot of issues, worst cod i have ever played, right now do not waste your money on this game.
  65. metooo
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    I wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcassI wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcass of a downed helicopter, but instead they got rid of all that realistic hc Tdm stuff to appease the trigger fingers of people who complain about camping. The result is that it feels more streamlined than ever, in a very backward way. No you can't climb that tower it's decoration. No you can't hide in that grass, it's decoration too. BF1 really ruined COD for me, that was truly next gen and I got this hoping Cod was really gonna go back to the roots and then innovate from there. Loved advanced warfare btw, sledgehammer makes good games, but the slow boots on the ground doesn't work IMHO if you're using a map style still suited for fast play in the vein of advanced or infinite warfare. Slow play should have a tense stealth element to it which is what made the old games so fun for me,… Expand
  66. davidas101
    Nov 25, 2017
    1
    Boring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of AdvancedBoring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of Advanced Warfare or something along those lines. DO NOT BUY… Expand
  67. Arkas
    Dec 10, 2017
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thought this was going to be a great game, I was wrong! REALLY WRONG.
    The campaign was ok, not great but just ok. The ending was disappointing and the story itself actually sucked.
    Multiplayer: WORST multiplayer ever! Nothing worst than having opposing players shooting through walls to kill you. Wooden walls sure, but when you run around a corner of a brick wall and you die, come on COD, I'm sure your developers can do a better job than this.
    If you're looking for a WW1 or 2 style of game just go and buy Battlefield 1, I am not a fan of the Battlefield series but it blows this COD away.
    Bought this game less than a week ago and will be trading it in for something else today.
    COD WW2 is nothing but an attempt to copy other games but instead of making a step forward they took two steps back!!! Not sure if they hired new developers but this game is awful. Poor gameplay, poor graphics, crappy maps and whats with the headquarters? HQ is stupid.
    DO NOT waste your money on this game, not sure why some people think its a great game, they all must be high on drugs?!?!?!
    COD needs to get back to basics and come out with a game that reflects today's world struggles such as Afghanistan, Iraq, ISIS, etc.....Modern warfare was a great game.
    Sorry for the bad review but this game is a waste of money!    … Expand
  68. JPBGamer
    Feb 3, 2018
    0
    Just reached master prestige yesterday and I have to say this was my worst cod experience to date. I have played almost all cods since black ops and although I did get pissed off I still had fun. This game gave me none of that. It was just a torture fest of playing war cos i couldnt stand playing any of the base gamemodes. Even the new dlc maps are garbage. What where SHG thinking whenJust reached master prestige yesterday and I have to say this was my worst cod experience to date. I have played almost all cods since black ops and although I did get pissed off I still had fun. This game gave me none of that. It was just a torture fest of playing war cos i couldnt stand playing any of the base gamemodes. Even the new dlc maps are garbage. What where SHG thinking when they made this game is beyond me. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME PLS.… Expand
  69. wapakalypse
    Nov 4, 2017
    5
    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all day. The error codes present a link to www.callofduty.com/wwii/status where you can check updates on the server status however this page is clearly not updated because no one on my friends list can access any online function of this game yet the website indicates that all systems are green...

    The worst part, is that they have censored WWII and made it politically correct.

    Next Gen video games are ruining the gaming experience because video game developers seem to be simply riding the hype of next gen gaming while putting minimal effort into the actual performance of the games. Micro transactions have turned gaming into a profit first industry, have removed the artistic integrity of games, and have completely disregarded the consumer.

    My advice is to buy this game used on Kijiji and prevent these developers from making m.ore money than they deserve    … Expand
  70. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that do fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  71. kingz261
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Okay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those twoOkay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those two are classics and this game definitely tries to recapture what made those so good. Its a pretty good campaign but very short (5 or 6 hours on hardened). The switch back to healthpacks instead of the regenerating bulls*** is a amazing choice here. So the campaign is great, whats wrong? Well the zombies is meh, not bad nor good. And the multiplayer.... Its still the same garbage tripe that the series has been pushing out the past few years. Advanced Warfare had one of the better multiplayer components in recent years and it still wasnt very good. This multiplayer is just bad, they took a lot of inspiration from the originals for the campaign but didnt do anything for the multiplayer. I do not understand how people still enjoy this after all these years and improvements from other series. Its the same garbage circular map design where its basically a matter of who sees who first with a focus on grinding so you can unlock the cheap a** weapons so you can mow down the lower level players who use pea shooters. Its the same unbalanced garbage that really requires very little skill and lots of bulls***. Its a shame because the campaign is one of the best in the series.

    Campaign = 7.8/10 (still very short which sucks and some bad on-rails sequences and QTEs)
    Multiplayer = 3/10 (very little good to be said about this)
    Zombies = 5/10 (nothing new really, just a horror atmosphere and its just boring.)
    Graphics = 9.2 (pretty damn good)
    Sound = 9.5 (COD always has fantastic sound design)

    Id say buy this used and beat the campaign then return it or get it on sale. The multiplayer is what really kills this game since its the main focus and its abysmal. But even though most of my review is negative, the campaign still deserves a lot of praise as a call of duty campaign since the past 5 have had absolute garbage campaigns.    … Expand
  72. mrsalty101
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Why is everyone so pissed about the 85 rating from the critics. I don't feel bad for the kids that fall for it and play this like it's the best thing ever. I feel bad for the parents that didn't block their kid's accounts from spending, because you know those idiots are buying loot boxes galore.
  73. Lyvins
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2. Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now. This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2.
    Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now.

    This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just overreacting.    … Expand
  74. BoTToX_CH
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Useless game of 2017 !!! That's all folks !
    Servers Crash, boring and very short campaign, ridiculous sounds effects.
    Multi player in very little maps without soul and all in same type of environment !
    Just a little bad game
  75. Crockpot19
    Nov 12, 2017
    1
    Another money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby andAnother money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby and regroup or reset your game.

    They also added a "public" area for interactions with other players. The game servers run so poorly though that you can't even connect to random online players. If the game did run correctly, the game would make you go into these public area to open your loot boxes in front of everyone. They do this in hopes of sparking other players to buy loot boxes if yours contains a good weapon skin or other useless items.

    The 6 hour long campaign and one zombie map doesn't justify the full $60 price tag. I hope you don't repeat my mistake of buying this game.    … Expand
  76. Ungodly_Phantom
    Jan 26, 2018
    3
    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки,    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки, нулевой баланс оружия и баллистика, ужасный геймдизайн карт. Тошнотворный сетевой режим. Ужасно долгий поиск матча без возможности выбора нескольких режимов под поиск. У бравого американского десантника с сверхжёсткой подготовкой выносливости хватает на 3(!!!!!) секунды бега!!!!Один из худших сетевых шутеров на моей памяти 0 из 10
    Зомби-режим. Оставалась надежда на зомби-режим, и он, на фоне остального более менее играбелен. 5 из 10
    Вывод: Очень посредсвенный тир, с ужасным сетевым режимом, 30 часов жизни выкинул в пустую. Настоятельно рекомендую обходить данную игру стороной.
    БФ1 просто на 10 голов выше этого, имхо    … Expand
  77. Quitrightnow
    Nov 22, 2017
    1
    Get the boys back together said the commercial and so we did. But i did not become the happy reunion we were hoping for. This game killed Call of Duty for me. So sad but true. There is just something wrong with the game. I cant put my finger on it but its just not good.
  78. scruffy_77
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Sadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, asSadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, as an old school CoD fan who spent so much time on the likes of Modern Warfare 1 & 2, and black ops 1 I was excited for this back to the roots Call of Duty, but unfortunately my experience couldn’t be further from my nostalgic memories. To begin it didn’t work for a few days, just stuck at a loading screen, then when it did work my ping was so bad, I had no chance – this is despite being on a 250mbps connection. The maps are too small, and it just loads the same ones over and over again. The whole lobby thing I don’t get either – Just need a menu, and find match… Such a shame, I was overly looking forward to this game, and personally for me, they missed the target. But credit where credit is due, at least they have changed direction from the awful double jumping futuristic rubbish that the last few instalments followed.… Expand
  79. xpyrosh
    Dec 31, 2017
    1
    You spend 130 dollars of your hard earned cash towards a game just to be given "unable to connect to host" every single time you try to play with the people you bought the game to play with. This is disgusting and there should be compensation or full refunds available to people due to this. Completely unacceptable for 2017 standards.
  80. BenRiley83
    Nov 14, 2017
    8
    Very good game. The campaign is awesome and the multiplayer as fun and addicting as ever. The only issue I have so far are all the server issues the launch has had. They are quite bad, but besides that the game is super fun! I recommend it.
  81. Blinkdgb182
    Mar 12, 2018
    0
    reflex sights were rarely used on small weapons in WWII. Why does COD think its okay to use it on small weapons? Why cant they make an actual somewhat realistic game for once?????
  82. Hourless
    Jan 1, 2018
    2
    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess Cons: -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts. -Generic WW2 single    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting
    -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess

    Cons:

    -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting
    -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts.
    -Generic WW2 single player campaign, it's been covered so many times by different games it's hard to get excited
    -Outdated graphics, graphics look pretty much the same as COD: Ghosts were
    -Expensive DLCs to come, you would think the game is expensive enough as it is but wait there's more!
    -Just a twitch shooter, honestly most guns lack any kind of real feel behind them.    … Expand
  83. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  84. raefon
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound. There is not one single redeeming feature.    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound.

    There is not one single redeeming feature. Activision and sledge hammer should hold their heads in shame as this shambles and desecration of COD.

    R.I P. old friend its a shame you died with out the grace and respect you deserved.    … Expand
  85. BrutallyHnstGmr
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbolI created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbol there is. Everybody knows what it is and what it represents but it's still a part of history and if you are going to make a WWII game, regardless, you should probably leave it in.

    This game feels like a mistake. My bet is that Sledgehammer was going to make Advanced Warfare 2, and after Battlefield One's success and the fans hatred for COD in space, decided to scrap the work they had done on AW2 and rushed through this mess of a game. That's the best I can sum this up, as a rushed mess. I will disclose that I am a very big fan of Advanced Warfare, to date it's my favorite COD, I'm also a huge fan of Battlefield One, so grounded action is perfectly fine. This game cannot hold a candle to BF1, it's like comparing a Chevy to a Ferrari. HINT: Call of Duty is the Chevy.

    Graphically, this game is definitely a step back, both myself and my wife commented on how much worse it looks, almost like a PS3 game. From the character models to the boring and generic maps, oh and small maps. But as any seasoned gamer knows, graphics aren't everything, so let's move on.

    Sound: I typically give games of today a pass given the quality that exists with audio. gunfire is gunfire, bomb blast is bomb blast, nothing special, nothing spectacular. The sounds of burning humans is pretty comical though. The issue though is if you actually compare this game to Battlefield One, you can see the significant difference between the two companies and games, if you've never played BF1, then the audio is fine.

    Game play: Well, it's not terrible, it's back to basics, but it's still just mindless run and gun. I read one "professional" review that stated it brought strategy back to the series, what?? No there is no strategy, it's just mindless run and gun, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Everything so far feels responsive, and though server matchmaking is an issue, when in game, it seems everything works fine. My biggest problem with COD, which has just gotten worse with WWII, is the quick scope sniping bull****. How do I know it's worse, let me tell you how, and you don't even need to watch the kill cams to see people completely missing people and getting kills. My wife, is terrible at video games, but she loves them, and tries to play them. One thing she could not do on any game, either COD or BF1, is snipe. Well, guess what, the sniper rifle is her favorite gun in WWII because of the lack of needing to be accurate. I've watched her, and I've watched the kill cam, it seems there is a hit box around the player, so that as long as your bullet lands within the box, it registers a hit. This is total garbage, and when the really good players figure this out, which they have, it makes some matches completely unplayable, the cannon map. There's no skill, you don't need to time shots, you just scope and pull trigger at the same time, dead. The game modes themselves look like all the same stuff, with the exception of War, but I can't comment on that because I haven't played that yet. There's not that many weapons and getting exotic weapons seems pointless because unless I'm missing something, they do not do anything to increase the stats of the actual weapon, just add like 10x exp or some Zombie kill perk thing. The class system is fine, no complaint there, just be careful when changing weapons, do not change weapon classes under a class, change the entire class. For example, if you have the shot gun class but want to use a machine gun, don't change the shotgun to a machine gun, you lose your incendiary rounds per, instead make a infantry load out.

    Overall: I like it better than Black Ops III, which was returned to the store the next day, at least this one hasn't been returned. It's not nearly as fun as Advanced Warfare. If you want a really good shooter, pass this one up and get Battlefield 1. EA has to be laughing all the way to the bank, every time Activision releases a new COD game, it just makes their game look all the much better.

    UPDATE: It's been returned to the store.    … Expand
  86. adamf13
    Nov 11, 2017
    0
    - Terrible linear campaign
    - Historical inaccuracies
    - Only 8 MP maps
    - Feels like recent COD game with different skin.
    - Total let down wish I hadn't bought it.

    Really was the last chance with COD for me and it has been really poor, never buying COD again.
  87. Vebshtar
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it. Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far. Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun. Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see. Call of    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it.
    Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far.
    Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun.
    Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see.

    Call of Duty is like an Adam Sandler movie. I know I'm not getting the best, and parts of it may suck, but it's still fun.    … Expand
  88. albodoin
    Nov 5, 2017
    5
    First time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition ofFirst time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition of clear objectives. But the main drawback (which is a huge one) is the multiplayer...thank god they added the War mode and the headquarter as a lobby to join friend! Finally Activition is trying to improve, but that is pretty much it. The rest is still the same as always, corridor maps, run and gun, corner camping, people that plays for their kill ratio instead of the objectives. It's basically a Modern Warfare or Black Ops with a WW2 skin!; nothing new. Maybe I'm getting old but I'm tired of reflex shooters and would like something more immersive because right now I really don't feel like I'm fighting against hordes of nazis but more like farming kill for xp to unlock the next **** weapon skin for my pistol.… Expand
  89. EmirKhorasani
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    The multiplayer is wildly inconsistent. Under the exact same circumstances one game it will take 3 bullets to kill a full health player and 6 the next game. The hit boxes for sniper rifles extend in a 3 foot radius around player making sniper rifles win every single time in close quarters with the auto aim snapping. It's broken and it's annoying as hell.
  90. thunt
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    my dogs left something out in the backyard. another piece of crap game trying to suck out every penny of gamers as possible. rip off, boycott c.o.d. games do not support this rip off company any further! abandon this series!
  91. P_D1LLY
    Nov 4, 2017
    5
    The campaign and zombie mode seems fine, but I am here for the Multiplayer...for your reference, my favorite games in the series were Modern Warfare 1 & 2 and Black Ops II, in no particular order.

    This is one of the bigger disappointments in my gaming life, my friends and I were going to get the gang back together, after one day of this mess we will probably all be returning the game.    The campaign and zombie mode seems fine, but I am here for the Multiplayer...for your reference, my favorite games in the series were Modern Warfare 1 & 2 and Black Ops II, in no particular order.

    This is one of the bigger disappointments in my gaming life, my friends and I were going to get the gang back together, after one day of this mess we will probably all be returning the game. This game might look like boots on the ground WW2, however it doesn't feel like it at all. You're zooming around the map like it's nothing, it's a twitch shooter, I can't remember a COD game that felt so, for a lack of a better word, wrong. Advanced and Infinite warfare weren't my cup of tea, to say the least, but the way they controlled was in line with the setting and equipment.
    My biggest complaint might actually be the maps. Not only are they tiny, they are weirdly streamlined, don't feel like authentic environments, just corridors with a coat of paint (ugly coat of paint too, the graphics in mp are very underwhelming). The interface in my opinion is a mess, the hub world completely unnecessary. Bottom line, I have no intention of going back to the game. Which is kind of sad, we were all really looking forward to this. Even World at War was a superior WW2 shooter. I won't give this game a 0, because it obviously just doesn't deserve that, but I do believe a 5 is a fair score, I am shocked by the positive reception by some gaming sites (apart from the single player). I'd say stay away from this one...    … Expand
  92. WeatherfordJac
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes? Oh boy! I can't wait to feel like I'm playing on a crap phone game! Plus, the gameplay is lackluster and the story, as usual, is short and boring.
  93. mrseannathan
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago. 2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been. 3.    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago.
    2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been.
    3. LOADING TIMES.. HOEEEE LEEEEEEEEE (Holy!)... Even when leaving a match, i'm waiting ages until I can leave.

    I give this a 5/10 only because I am a long fan of Call of Duty and I will always love the series. Despite the poor execution, it still offers that appeal in a WW2 game... Especially now that they have added 'WAR', a mode perfected by Battlefield and one I have always wish to see in COD. There are some things that need to get fixed and I'm sure they will over the next couple days but in my eyes, it's failed on launch unlike the past releases.

    I'm a huge sucker for WW2 games but I have to say.. I miss the jumping, fast-paced gameplay COD evolved into.. and at this current moment, I can say I enjoyed IW way more that WWII.    … Expand
  94. Boscovelli
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks in at around 6.5 hours. So don't even consider it if you're strictly a single player fan. The multiplayer is more of the same with a fresh (kind of) coat of paint. Same old bullet sponge casual mechanics, Same old glitches throughout that likely won't ever get addressed, but perhaps worst of all - completely unbalanced maps. I was a little surprised at this because map design for the most part has been fairly consistent in Call of Duty, but alas, never count the franchise out for brand new disappointments.

    Some of the maps are just glaringly uneven. Objective based maps where one team is constantly fighting uphill in the open puts that team at a considerable disadvantage and makes for a 100% consistent rate of losses on those maps in my experience. Even with a party of 6 good players we found ourselves losing on those specific maps in those specific game modes.

    The game is a joke. The franchise has been a joke for nearly a decade. Do not buy this game.    … Expand
  95. leonardo2360
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    este videojuego es el claro ejemplo de como esta la industria en estos momentos cajitas aleatorias cayendo del cielo, season pass, campaña cortisima, penoso de verdad no compren este juego no apoyen a estas compañias que quieren dividir la comunidad del videojuego por politicas de mierda.
  96. Blindsyde
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    As I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m lookingAs I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m looking forward to getting back to it tonight.
    The zombies are darker, realer, creepier. Much better than the corny ones of the past.
    Multiplayer/pvp..... hmmm. I wanted to like it , but it’s definitely just another year of twitch shooting reskinned for the time frame. There are a few new things added, which are welcome additions. The new social hub , headquarters, is just like destinys “tower”,...which is a welcome addition to me. I like that they added the shooting range. War is an attempt at adding something new and fresh, but honestly I’d rather go play some Battlefield 1 for that fix. Battlefields pvp is in a league of its own, compared to this. I had a match last night where I was watching a replay of a final kill cam that showed some nonsensical quick scoping for kills that weren’t even CLOSE to being a hit. I tried to upload the capture to YouTube from my PS4 , but it keeps giving me errors and not letting me upload it. Good for Activision that I can’t get this footage out. They’d be embarrassed , lol.
    All in all, I really enjoy the campaign and zombies , but for my pvp fix there are newer , fresher things to play right now.    … Expand
  97. fr003ank
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    They put the maps that are supposed to be in the base game in the first dlc which only leaves the base game with 10 MP maps including the bonus map, this is unacceptable for a COD game
  98. northernlad
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    where to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable thewhere to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable the gaming industry at the minute has me worried microtransactions poor poor game releases i may need to start a new hobby… Expand
  99. PrimalBanana
    Nov 3, 2017
    7
    Another year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand timesAnother year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand times before. Im struggling to really connect with the chatacters too. Mainly because squad mates are bloody useless in a fire fight leaving it up to me to do everything. The AI is as dim as ever and the dialogue is just a clichè fest. Like i said its not terrible but its certainly not worthy of anything over a 6 or 7 out of 10. The MP is as you'd expect. Solid and tight and raining loot crates. Activision go to extreme legths to try to convince you to part with your cash, its kind of embarassing to be honest. There's even a daily mission to watch 3 people open loot crates in the social space. Gunplay is good, sounds are good and the level design is overall pretty decent. Graphically Call of Duty continues to show its age and as i've said in the past its desperate for a new engine. Certainly a better Call of Duty than we've had in the last few years but its nothing special so dont expect too much except your normal Call of Duty experience.… Expand
  100. Fabulous_Filou
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    So... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). ThatSo... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). That was the first Mission. Okay, it was okay, I didn't expect much but it got worse. The driving parts are so fast, its like playing Need For Speed. And then the tankdriving... Horrible, especialy when my little Sherman with his short 75mm gun takes out multiple Panzer 4s and a freaking Kingtiger... What a laugh! Over alll it was a really nice showcase of how freaking great the americans where and that they won the war ALONE. Well, no... for me it's just bitter how they try to tell this story. I am german and yes, my great grandfathers fought in this terrible war. I know a lot about it. The Story forgot the Brits and Canadians, even on the overview Map there where no signs of them, STUPID. The resistance part of the game was a bit new and gave a new perspective but here was also nearly everything wrong. First i thought the Voiceacting was cool, all Germans speak perfekt german and the conversations made sense but then there was this one offizier that name i forgot... He spokes very bad german with a stupid acsent... and the game lost me once again. So the unrealistic story went on and I played through.... but then there was the part i was most disappointed: The scene at the end with the KZ... Just some random buildings, two hanging copses, some corpses on the ground... nothing really shocking nd tht is the problem. If yo visit a real memorial site of a KZ and you read all the history and look at the pictures you can't sleep for days, thats how horrific it really is and this game needet to tell this story better, more shocking. But no, it looks like a random prison with some people who might have died. Seriously? The developers didn't take the time for research, everything is wrong about it. The Bunkers, the Tanks, the Soldiers, the Weapons... I've been even to france, I know how it should look like.
    But CoD isn't really about the campaign, right? So what about the Multiplayer. Well... It's standart, the Wa Mode is fun but nothing really new. I wish i could wright more about it, but the last three days where just a pain in the you know where. Server problems, buggy HQ, Lootboxes disappering. Nothing really works and thats all AFTER closed and open Beta. so no... nothing to be proud of right now.
    But there's a Zombiemode. And yes, it's fun, but not for so long. pretty standart, too.
    Overall this game is screwed and no recomandation at all!
    Battlefield 1 did so much right last year. The campaign was great, Told many storyyys and you cared about the characters. The multiplayeer WORKED and was fun, too.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »