Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle

Name: Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
Genre: Action, Adventure, Comedy, Crime
Released: June 27, 2003
Duration: 106 min
Rating: 48
Cast: Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu

2003

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 39 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 108 Ratings

See All

5.4

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5.4	Your Score
5.4	User Score Mixed or average reviews based on 108 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Charlie's Angels Full Throttle: Scene 3

Now Playing: Charlie's Angels Full Throttle: Scene 3

Movie Details & Credits

Columbia Pictures | Release Date: June 27, 2003 | Unrated

Starring: Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu

Summary: In the Angels' new adventure, the captivating trio once again demonstrates their expertise as masters of espionage, martial arts, and disguise. [Sony]

Director: McG

Genre(s): Action, Adventure, Comedy, Crime

Rating: Unrated

Runtime: 106 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Amy Dawes

Bigger, sleeker and better than the first, sequel Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle is a joyride of a movie that takes the winning elements of the year 2000 hit to the next level. Read full review

Wesley Morris

The movie's glee is contagious. Read full review

J.R. Jones

The main reason I enjoyed this high-powered action flick and its 2001 predecessor is their willingness to poke fun at the premise of crime-fighting dolls, even though it now has more currency than ever. Read full review

A.O. Scott

A sequel whose sugar-rush absurdity almost defeats the forces of logic, taste and conventional narrative. It is a defect that might undermine a lesser movie but that in this case proves to be as cheerfully, enjoyably humid as the first blast of summer light and heat. Read full review

Stephanie Zacharek

Should have been either a whole lot worse or a whole lot better than it is: If it were worse, we could simply toss aside the things that are fun and entertaining about it and not even think twice. And if it were better -- well, we'd have fewer complaints all around. Read full review

Keith Phipps

The film is smart enough to know that verbal humor isn't its strong point, but it doesn't offer much in the way of compensation. Read full review

Premiere Glenn Kenny

As for me, watching this overripe, ignorant parading of Hollywood privilege an hubris put me in mind of a different song--Neil Young's "Revolution Blues." Specifically the bit about Laurel Canyon being filled with famous stars . . . Read full review

SEE ALL 39 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

Lucas565

Nov 10, 2020

Assim como o primeiro filme, o segundo também é ótimo e marcou uma geração.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

FredR

Nov 16, 2005

I love giving this movie a 10 because of how I saw it. I was studying at dinner table while my nephew started to watch it in the living room. I turned my head to see what all the commotion was about and I didn't turn back to my books until it was over. It's visually captivating. I love giving this movie a 10 because of how I saw it. I was studying at dinner table while my nephew started to watch it in the living room. I turned my head to see what all the commotion was about and I didn't turn back to my books until it was over. It's visually captivating. I'm not sure if it's good, does it have to be? Some of the special effects flat-out sucked, and there were at least a few painfully corny scenes, but it was delicious for the eyes. I will definitely see it a 3rd time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

Sosmooth1982

Dec 14, 2022

Not as good as the 1st. It was still pretty funny. The sexy trio's fight scenes were a little better in this one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

diego9901

Feb 3, 2013

una secuela tan agradable y absurda que logra encantar a cualquiera esta película no se debe ver como una película de acción sino una nueva forma de ciencia ficcion

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

geewah

Mar 30, 2021

Bigger, sleeker and dumber than the original.
A few decent gags saves this lame and poorly written movie from being a complete disaster.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

matta.

Sep 20, 2005

The only decent part of this movie is Crispin Glover's character (although he was criminally underused in this one) and the Irish bad guy. The script was a joke (and they can't use the excuse it was supposed to be that way because that is just a cop-out for shitty writing) and all The only decent part of this movie is Crispin Glover's character (although he was criminally underused in this one) and the Irish bad guy. The script was a joke (and they can't use the excuse it was supposed to be that way because that is just a cop-out for shitty writing) and all three Charlie's Angels are extremely annoying, even more-so than they were in the first one (although Lucy Liu is tolerable because she is hot). Anyone who likes intelligent films, or even entertaining ones but with decent acting a good script, then stay away from this crap.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

TJOlson

Nov 30, 2005

Forgetable, inane, and supercillious to the max - this ain't no movie - it's a live-action cartoonl. Give me South Park or give me death! At least the Comedy Channel gives the brain something to chew on. With CA: Full Throttle, I simply chewed on my leg and left half-way through Forgetable, inane, and supercillious to the max - this ain't no movie - it's a live-action cartoonl. Give me South Park or give me death! At least the Comedy Channel gives the brain something to chew on. With CA: Full Throttle, I simply chewed on my leg and left half-way through forgetting everything I heard or saw.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

SEE ALL 17 REVIEWS

75	#75 Most Discussed Movie of 2003
27	#27 Most Shared Movie of 2003