Chloe

Name: Chloe
Genre: Drama, Thriller
Released: March 26, 2010
Duration: 96 min
Rating: 48
Cast: Amanda Seyfried, Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson

2010

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 33 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 88 Ratings

See All

5.7

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5.7	Your Score
5.7	User Score Mixed or average reviews based on 88 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Chloe

Now Playing: Chloe

Movie Details & Credits

Sony Pictures Classics | Release Date: March 26, 2010 | R

Starring: Amanda Seyfried, Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson

Summary: Chloe is a suspenseful story of love and betrayal. When Catherine, a successful doctor, begins to question her husband David's fidelity, she sets out to resolve her suspicions with the help of an alluring young woman, Chloe. Soon caught in a web of sexual desire, Catherine finds herself on a journey that places her family in great danger.Chloe is a suspenseful story of love and betrayal. When Catherine, a successful doctor, begins to question her husband David's fidelity, she sets out to resolve her suspicions with the help of an alluring young woman, Chloe. Soon caught in a web of sexual desire, Catherine finds herself on a journey that places her family in great danger. (Sony Classics)… Expand

Director: Atom Egoyan

Genre(s): Drama, Thriller

Rating: R

Runtime: 96 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Roger Ebert

It's not the kind of movie that depends on the certainty of an ending. It's more about how things continue. Read full review

Michael Rechtshaffen

Moore and Neeson beautifully underplay their roles, lending screenwriter Erin Cressida Wilson's ("Secretary") dialogue an unexpected, palpable poignancy. Read full review

Carrie Rickey

There are two questions to ask about a film such as Chloe: Is it erotic? Yes. Is it good? Yes, until it devolves into third-act pretentiousness and preposterousness. Read full review

Mike Scott

It's neither a good movie nor a bad movie. It's just a movie. Read full review

Owen Gleiberman

The film is Moore's story, and she acts the hell out of one sexy scene, but most of Chloe is plodding and drab. Read full review

J.R. Jones

As the aching spouse, Moore delivers what is for her an unusually sympathetic performance. Read full review

Elizabeth Weitzman

A tacky 'Fatal Attraction' for the lesbian set. Read full review

SEE ALL 33 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

jeffh

Mar 28, 2010

A very good erotic thriller with a great cast,Amanda Seyfried is an up-and-coming star and Julianne Moore is still gorgeous.Hearing Seyfried talk dirty will excite any red blooded heterosexual man.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Lopez17

Aug 11, 2010

I've seen many films just like or similar to Atom Egoyan's "CHLOE" I can name a few right off the top of my head: "Fatal Attraction"(1987), "9 1/2 Weeks"(1986), "Indecent Proposal"(1993), "Lolita(1997), "Disclosure"(1994). In addition, one of the most infamous of the erotic thrillerI've seen many films just like or similar to Atom Egoyan's "CHLOE" I can name a few right off the top of my head: "Fatal Attraction"(1987), "9 1/2 Weeks"(1986), "Indecent Proposal"(1993), "Lolita(1997), "Disclosure"(1994). In addition, one of the most infamous of the erotic thriller genre "Basic Instinct"(1992), now I ask you what all these films have in common. Simple they all have alluring femme fatale characters that try to seduce and kill and assert there power over men how theses beautiful and dangerous women and easily manipulate and control the men that are either after them or desire them. Theses type of films can go one of two ways 1. down the road of complete and utter absurdity and rampant sexuality(Basic Instinct, Lolita) that don't have a shred of intelligence and only serve the purpose of giving audiences some good sex scenes and nothing much else. On the other hand, the film can balance brains and sex to coherently tell an intelligent story of love, desire and family social angst (Fatal Attraction, Unfaithful, Eyes wide Shut) to make the film more than about sex. Itâ… Expand